Does the method of sternocleidomastoid muscle activation affect the vestibular evoked myogenic potential response?

2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 187-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon Isaacson ◽  
Emily Murphy ◽  
Helen Cohen
Keyword(s):  
Muscle Activation ◽  
Body Position ◽  
Sternocleidomastoid Muscle ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Potential Response ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential ◽  
Amplitude Response ◽  
Myogenic Potential ◽  
Significant Difference

The objective of this study was to assess the effects of different methods of sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) activation on vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP). Forty normal volunteers were tested using three different methods of SCM activation: sitting with the head turned away from the test ear (SIT), supine with the head held straight up (SHU), and supine with the head held up and turned away from the test ear (SHT). Dependent measures were latency, and amplitude. Head and body position significantly affected the amplitude of the VEMP, but had no significant effect on latency. Testing subjects in the supine position with the head up and turned toward the non-test ear yielded the most robust amplitude response and sternocleidomastoid EMG activity. When amplitude measures where corrected according to tonic electromyographic (EMG) activity no significant difference was noted between the three different test positions. The increased amplitude in the supine with head turned position can be directly attributed to increased tonic SCM EMG activity.

scholarly journals Influence of Body Position on Shoulder and Trunk Muscle Activation During Resisted Isometric Shoulder External Rotation

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 355-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Krause ◽  
Lucas G. Dueffert ◽  
Jaclyn L. Postma ◽  
Eric T. Vogler ◽  
Amy J. Walsh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Muscle Activation ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Body Position ◽  
Trunk Muscle ◽  
Trunk Muscles ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Overhead Athletes ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: External rotation (ER) strengthening of the shoulder is an integral component of rehabilitative and preventative programs for overhead athletes. A variety of shoulder ER strengthening exercises are reported, including those intended to integrate the core musculature. The purpose of this study was to examine ER torque and electromyographic (EMG) activation of shoulder and trunk muscles while performing resisted isometric shoulder ER in 3 positions (standing, side lying, and side plank). Hypothesis: Significantly greater force and shoulder muscle activation would be generated while side lying given the inherent stability of the position, and greater trunk muscle activation would be generated in the less stable plank position. Study Design: Quasi-experimental repeated-measures study. Level of Evidence: Level 5. Methods: A convenience sample of 25 healthy overhead recreational athletes (9 men, 16 women) participated in this study. EMG electrodes were placed on the infraspinatus, posterior deltoid, middle trapezius, multifidi, internal obliques, and external obliques. EMG signals were normalized to a maximal isometric contraction. Participants performed resisted isometric ER in standing, side-lying, and side plank positions. Results were analyzed using a repeated-measures analysis of variance with post hoc Bonferroni corrections (α = 0.05). Results: There was no significant difference in ER torque between positions (α = 0.05). A significant difference in EMG activity of shoulder and trunk musculature between positions was found in 7 of the 8 muscles monitored. Significantly greater EMG activity in the infraspinatus, middle trapezius, and the nondominant external and internal obliques was found in the side plank position as compared with standing and side lying. Conclusion: While there was no difference in ER torque between the 3 exercise positions, EMG activity of the shoulder and trunk muscles was dependent on body position. Clinical Relevance: If a clinician is seeking to integrate trunk muscle activation while performing shoulder ER strengthening, the side plank position is preferred as compared with standing or side lying.

Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome

2010 ◽  
Vol 124 (6) ◽  
pp. 610-615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y A Bayazit ◽  
F Celenk ◽  
A G Gunduz ◽  
B Gunduz ◽  
N Ondag ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fibromyalgia Syndrome ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential ◽  
Objective Indicator ◽  
Statistical Comparison ◽  
Myogenic Potential ◽  
Control Subjects ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Interpeak Latency

AbstractObjective:To assess vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome.Methods:Twenty-four patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (two men and 22 women) and 21 female controls were included in the study. All patients underwent vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing.Results:Statistical comparison of fibromyalgia patients with control subjects showed a significant difference with respect to n23 latencies and interpeak latencies (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in p13 latencies, nor in p13 amplitudes, n23 amplitudes or interpeak amplitudes (p > 0.05).Conclusions:Although patients with fibromyalgia syndrome generally have subjective neurotological symptoms, clinical and laboratory assessments usually fail to detect any objective abnormality. However, it is possible to detect abnormalities on vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing in such patients, indicating dysfunction in the vestibulospinal pathway, possibly in the saccule. Elongation of the n23 latency and of the interpeak latency of waves p13–n23, during vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing, may be a useful, objective indicator demonstrating neurotological involvement in fibromyalgia syndrome patients. Future research investigating the mechanisms of this latency elongation may help increase understanding of the pathogenesis of fibromyalgia syndrome.

scholarly journals Toward Optimizing Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials: Normalization Reduces the Need for Strong Neck Muscle Contraction

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 282-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberley S. Noij ◽  
Barbara S. Herrmann ◽  
Steven D. Rauch ◽  
John J. Guinan Jr.
Keyword(s):  
Muscle Contraction ◽  
Acoustic Stimulus ◽  
Acoustic Stimulation ◽  
Sound Level ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Neck Muscle ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential ◽  
Contraction Amplitude ◽  
Myogenic Potential

Background: The cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) represents an inhibitory reflex of the saccule measured in the ipsilateral sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) in response to acoustic or vibrational stimulation. Since the cVEMP is a modulation of SCM electromyographic (EMG) activity, cVEMP amplitude is proportional to muscle EMG amplitude. We sought to evaluate muscle contraction influences on cVEMP peak-to-peak amplitudes (VEMPpp), normalized cVEMP amplitudes (VEMPn), and inhibition depth (VEMPid). Methods: cVEMPs at 500 Hz were measured in 25 healthy subjects for 3 SCM EMG contraction ranges: 45-65, 65-105, and 105-500 μV root mean square (r.m.s.). For each range, we measured cVEMP sound level functions (93-123 dB peSPL) and sound off, meaning that muscle contraction was measured without acoustic stimulation. The effect of muscle contraction amplitude on VEMPpp, VEMPn, and VEMPid and the ability to distinguish cVEMP presence/absence were evaluated. Results: VEMPpp amplitudes were significantly greater at higher muscle contractions. In contrast, VEMPn and VEMPid showed no significant effect of muscle contraction. Cohen's d indicated that for all 3 cVEMP metrics contraction amplitude variations produced little change in the ability to distinguish cVEMP presence/absence. VEMPid more clearly indicated saccular output because when no acoustic stimulus was presented the saccular inhibition estimated by VEMPid was zero, unlike those by VEMPpp and VEMPn. Conclusion: Muscle contraction amplitude strongly affects VEMPpp amplitude, but contractions 45-300 μV r.m.s. produce stable VEMPn and VEMPid values. Clinically, there may be no need for subjects to exert high contraction effort. This is especially beneficial in patients for whom maintaining high SCM contraction amplitudes is challenging.

The N3 potential and the efferent cochlear pathway in profound sensorineural hearing loss

2017 ◽  
Vol 131 (4) ◽  
pp. 334-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
M H Abou-Elew ◽  
N A Hosni ◽  
E A Obaid ◽  
A H Ewida
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Response ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Potential Response ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential ◽  
Myogenic Potential ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Brainstem Response

AbstractObjective:This study aimed to evaluate the presence of the N3 potential (acoustically evoked short latency negative response) in profound sensorineural hearing loss, its association with the cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential and the relationship between both potentials and loss of auditory function.Methods:Otological examinations of 66 ears from 50 patients aged from 4 to 36 years were performed, and the vestibular evoked myogenic potential and auditory brainstem response were measured.Results:The N3 potential was recorded in 36 out of 66 ears (55 per cent) and a vestibular evoked myogenic potential was recorded in 34 (52 per cent). The N3 potential was recorded in 23 out of 34 ears (68 per cent) with a vestibular evoked myogenic potential response and absent in 19 out of 32 ears (59 per cent) without a vestibular evoked myogenic potential response. The presence of an N3 potential was significantly associated with a vestibular evoked myogenic potential response (p = 0.028), but there was no significant difference in the latency or amplitude of the N3 potential in either the presence or absence of a vestibular evoked myogenic potential.Conclusion:The presence of an N3 potential in profound sensorineural hearing loss with good or poor vestibular function can be explained by the contribution of the efferent cochlear pathway through olivocochlear fibres that join the inferior vestibular nerve. This theory is supported by its early latency and reversed polarity, which is masked in normal hearing by auditory brainstem response waves.

scholarly journals Cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in epileptic patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abd El Mageed Hassan Kabel ◽  
Khaled Hatem Afifi ◽  
Samar Mohammed ElFakhrany ◽  
Asmaa Salah Moaty
Keyword(s):  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Sex Distribution ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential ◽  
Myogenic Potential ◽  
Normal Individuals ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Epileptic Patients ◽  
And Control

Abstract Background Vertigo and dizziness are very common complaints that may be related to epilepsy. The purpose of this study was to assess vestibulo-spinal and linear vestibulo-ocular function in epileptic patients in the inter ictal period. The current observational study was carried out in audio-vestibular unit Menoufia University. Subjects in the current study were divided into two groups: The control group included 30 normal individuals not complaining from any dizzy symptoms and the epileptic cases group included 30 epileptic patients. All subjects in the study were submitted to cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential. Results There was no significant difference between the control and epileptic group regarding the age and sex distribution. Sixty-seven percent of epileptic cases had dizzy symptoms. There was statistically significant difference in the latency and amplitude of c and o VEMP between the control and the epileptic group, 39/60 ears (65%) in the study group had cVEMP abnormalities, 32/60 ears (53%) had oVEMP abnormalities. Abnormal c and o VEMP were reported in 28/60 ears (46.7%). There was statistically significant relationship between VEMP abnormalities and duration of seizures, frequency of epileptic attacks, and type of therapy. Conclusion Vestibular abnormalities were frequently reported in epileptic patients in the current study which may be related to the severity and control of epilepsy.

Comparison of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials elicited by click and short duration tone burst stimuli

2010 ◽  
Vol 125 (4) ◽  
pp. 343-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Kumar ◽  
S Kumar Sinha ◽  
A Kumar Bharti ◽  
A Barman
Keyword(s):  
Short Duration ◽  
Clinical Assessment ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Tone Burst ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential ◽  
Acoustic Stimuli ◽  
Myogenic Potential ◽  
Electrical Impulses

AbstractIntroduction:Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials are short latency electrical impulses that are produced in response to higher level acoustic stimuli. They are used clinically to diagnose sacculocollic pathway dysfunction.Aim:This study aimed to compare the vestibular evoked myogenic potential responses elicited by click stimuli and short duration tone burst stimuli, in normal hearing individuals.Method:Seventeen subjects participated. In all subjects, we assessed vestibular evoked myogenic potentials elicited by click and short duration tone burst stimuli.Results and conclusion:The latency of the vestibular evoked myogenic potential responses (i.e. the p13 and n23 peaks) was longer for tone burst stimuli compared with click stimuli. The amplitude of the p13–n23 waveform was greater for tone burst stimuli than click stimuli. Thus, the click stimulus may be preferable for clinical assessment and identification of abnormalities as this stimulus has less variability, while a low frequency tone burst stimulus may be preferable when assessing the presence or absence of vestibular evoked myogenic potential responses.

Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: review

2010 ◽  
Vol 124 (10) ◽  
pp. 1043-1050 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Mudduwa ◽  
N Kara ◽  
D Whelan ◽  
Anirvan Banerjee
Keyword(s):  
Vestibular Function ◽  
Extensive Study ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential ◽  
Clinical Role ◽  
Myogenic Potential ◽  
Future Developments ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Clinical Conditions ◽  
Based Medicine

AbstractBackground:Disorders of balance often pose a diagnostic conundrum for clinicians, and a multitude of investigations have emerged over the years. Vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing is a diagnostic tool which can be used to assess vestibular function. Over recent years, extensive study has begun to establish a broader clinical role for vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing.Objectives:To provide an overview of vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing, and to present the evidence for its clinical application.Review type:Structured literature search according to evidence-based medicine guidelines, performed between November 2008 and April 2009. No restrictions were applied to the dates searched.Conclusion:The benefits of vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing have already been established as regards the diagnosis and monitoring of several clinical conditions. Researchers continue to delve deeper into potential new clinical applications, with early results suggesting promising future developments.

scholarly journals Vestibular evoked myogenic potential

2014 ◽  
Vol 67 (suppl. 1) ◽  
pp. 38-45
Author(s):  
Slobodanka Lemajic-Komazec ◽  
Zoran Komazec ◽  
Ljiljana Vlaski ◽  
Slobodan Savovic ◽  
Maja Buljcik-Cupic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tone Burst ◽  
Acoustic Stimulation ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Myogenic Potential ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Interaural Differences ◽  
The Right ◽  
A Prospective Study

Introduction. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials are neurophysiological method for examining of saccular function, the bottom of the vestibular nerve that in nervates the sacculus and central vestibular pathways. Those are inhibitory potentials of the sternocleido mastoid musclein response to ipsilateral acoustic stimulation of the sacculus. Parameters of vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing include threshold, latencies of p1 and n1 wave and interamplitude p13-n23, interaural difference of p13 and n23 latency and interaural amplitude difference ratio. The aim of this study was to compire parameters standardization of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials responses, latency p13 and n23 of waves, the amplitude of responses and interaural differences in the amplitude andto determinewhether there is a difference in values between the sexes. Material and methods. This research was meant to be a prospective study which included 30 normal audiovestibular volunteers of both sexes. The group consisted of 53.3% women and 46.7% men. The saccular function testing by vestibular evoked myogenic potentials was performed monoaurally using air-conductive 500 Hz tone burst auditory stimulation. Results. The average value of the p13 wave latency in healthy subjects of this study was 15.18 ms (?1.24) while the mean latency of n23 waves in the same subjects was 25.00 ms (?2.23). The average value of the amplitude of the p13-n23 waves was 80.28 (34. ?04) microvolts. Conclusion. The difference in the values of the basic parameters of vestibular evoked myogenic potential responses between men and women does not exist. No differences between the right and the left ear in the values of latency and amplitude were observed.

Ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in response to bone-conducted vibration in patients with probable inferior vestibular neuritis

2012 ◽  
Vol 126 (7) ◽  
pp. 683-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Manzari ◽  
A M Burgess ◽  
I S Curthoys
Keyword(s):  
Sense Organ ◽  
Vestibular Neuritis ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials ◽  
Detectable Effect ◽  
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential ◽  
Previous Evidence ◽  
Surface Electrodes ◽  
Myogenic Potential ◽  
Function Testing ◽  
Utricular Function

AbstractBackground and aims:Previous evidence shows that the n10 component of the ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential indicates utricular function, while the p13 component of the cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential indicates saccular function. This study aimed to assess the possibility of differential utricular and saccular function testing in the clinic, and whether loss of saccular function affects utricular response.Methods:Following vibration conduction from the mid-forehead at the hairline, the ocular n10 component was recorded by surface electromyograph electrodes beneath both eyes, while the cervical p13–n23 component was recorded by surface electrodes over the tensed sternocleidomastoid muscles.Results:Fifty-nine patients were diagnosed with probable inferior vestibular neuritis, as their cervical p13–n23 component was asymmetrical (i.e. reduced or absent on the ipsilesional side), while their ocular n10 component was symmetrical (i.e. normal beneath the contralesional eye).Conclusion:The sense organ responsible for the cervical and the ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials cannot be the same, as one response was normal while the other was not. Reduced or absent saccular function has no detectable effect on the ocular n10 component. On vibration stimulation, the ocular n10 component indicates utricular function and the cervical p13–n23 component indicates saccular function.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document