scholarly journals Identifying Students' Learning Styles on Reading Comprehension Achievement

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Handayani Setiowati
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Comprehension Test ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Comprehension Tests ◽  
Percentage Correct

This study aims to identify the effect of type of students’learning styles in reading comprehension achievement. The design of the research was a descriptive quantitative research that used a case study design. A total of 20 students of reading class on the second semester of IAIN Metro was sample of this research. In collecting the data, the researcher used questionnaire of learning style and reading comprehension test. In the analysis of data, the writer classified the categorization of learning style from the questionnaire and the scores of reading comprehension tests. Then, the result was analyzed by comparing the mean score in test manually using by percentage correct. The finding of the research the students have three types of learning style, they are visual (45%), auditory (30%), and kinesthetic (25%), in which visual is the most dominant. whereas the result of reading comprehension test, the mean score of visual is 79.2, auditory is 70.8, and kinesthetic is 65. In conclusion, It showed that the students of reading class on second semester of IAIN Metro used three types of learning style, but visual learning style is the most dominant learning style the students have.

scholarly journals PENGARUH CARA MENGAJAR GURU TERHADAP HASIL PRESTASI SISWA

JENTRE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-23
Author(s):  
Niar Yuniarti
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Teacher Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Teaching Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Research Subject ◽  
Learning Achievement

The research departs from the belief that in addition to the teacher style in teaching the students, the teacher's learning style also affects the learning achievement students have gained. This research uses quantitative research. The research subject is 30 teachers of Madrasa in the Ministry of Religious Affairs who have followed a training. To support the research, questionnaire, interview, and observation were used as primary and secondary data. The results conclude that the teacher's learning style is much more visually compared to other styles of learning, the visual learning style focuses on vision. It shows that teacher learning styles have no correlation with the teacher's teaching style. In verificative analysis also gained the teacher's teaching style is lower to the student's learning outcomes.

scholarly journals Learning Styles and the Hybrid Learning: An Empirical Study about the Impact of Learning Styles on the Perception of the Hybrid Learning

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-148
Author(s):  
Ariel Ora ◽  
Roland Sahatcija ◽  
Anxhela Ferhataj
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Teaching Method ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Hybrid Learning ◽  
Statistical Correlation ◽  
The Impact

AbstractLearning style is a crucial element in the academic life of students. It plays a fundamental role in the selection of a suitable teaching method of instruction. The aim of this research paper is the study of the perception of the hybrid learning and students’ learning style. In addition, another objective of the study is to analyze the perception of the hybrid learning in accordance with the learning style. This paper employs quantitative research and the descriptive and comparative methods. The study sample consists of 89 Albanian university students. Data analysis was conducted through SPSS 20 and JASP-0.8.1.2. The statistical analyses utilized in this paper are distribution tables, crossed tabulation, student test, Pearson correlation coefficient, Bayesian Independent Samples T-Test, and One - Way ANOVA. The conclusion of the data analysis shows that most students used the visual learning style in order to study. Students have a positive perception of the hybrid learning. There exists an insignificant statistical correlation between learning styles and the perception of the hybrid learning. The area of study has an impact on the components of the hybrid learning.

scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF TEACHING STRATEGIES AND LEARNING STYLE ON STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN READING COMPREHENSION

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-77
Author(s):  
Fitri, Ayu
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Teaching Strategies ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Advance Organizer ◽  
Visual Style ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Group 1

The objectives of this experimental research were to investigate whether: 1) students’ achievement in reading comprehension taught by using advance organizer strategy was higher than taught by using reciprocal strategy. 2) students’ achievement in reading comprehension with visual style was higher than that students with verbal style, and 3) there was interaction between teaching strategies and learning styles on students’ achievement in reading comprehension. The population of this research was the students in grade X of private senior high school named SMA Kartika I-1 Medan in 2012/2013 school year. The total number of population was five classes containing 200 students. There were two classes containing 83 students chosen as sample of this research by applying cluster random sampling technique. In further, there was cluster random assignment done in both two classes in order to know the position of the class whether as experimental group 1 or experimental group 2.The experimental group 1 was treated by using advance organizer strategy and the experimental group 2 was treated by using reciprocal strategy. Then,the research design was experimentby using factorial design 2x2 because there is two independent variables (teaching strategies) and two attributives (learning styles). The questionnaire was conducted for classifying the students’ learning style upon the visual and verbal. Next, students’ achievement in reading comprehension text was measured by using reading comprehension test. The data were analyzed by applying two- way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at the level of significance ?= 0,05. The result reveals that (1) students’ achievement in reading comprehension taught by using advance organizer was higher than that taught by using reciprocal strategy, with Fobs= 9,1Ftab= 3,96, (2) students’ achievement in reading comprehension with visual learning style was higher that that with verbal learning style, with Fobs=11,7 Ftab= 3,96,(3) there is  interaction between teaching strategies and learning styles on students’ achievement in reading comprehension with Fobs= 47,4Ftab= 3,96. Moreover, Tuckey-Test result also showed that visual style students got higher achievement if they were taught by using advance organizer strategy while verbal style students got higher achievement if they were taught by using reciprocal strategy.

STUDENT’S LEARNING STYLES IN LEARNING READING COMPREHENSION

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sinta sasmita And Siti Aisah Ginting
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Tenth Grade ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Auditory Learners

This study is about student’s learning styles in learning reading comprehension. The design of this research was descriptive research. The data were collected by using questionnaires and observation sheet. The subject of the study are the XI AP 2 of SMK Swasta Harapan Stabat and the object of the study are the students learning styles in learning reading comprehension. The data were analyzed by using Fleming theory. The purpose of conducting this research was find out whether the most dominant learning style in reading comprehension and to find out what are the types of student’s learning styles which has higher achievement in reading comprehension of XI grade in SMK Swasta Harapan Stabat in academic 2016/2017. There were 32 students as the subject of this research. In this case, the researcher collected the data by using learning style questionnaire and observation. The result showed that auditory learning style is the most dominant learning style at the tenth grade students at SMK Swasta Harapan Stabat, the percentage was 71,87%, it means 23 from 32 students prefer to hear than read and move. The second was kinesthetic learning style, the score, 21,88%, means that only 7 students prefer to move. Then, visual learning style, score 6,25%, means that 2 from 32 students prefer to read. For the fastest student’s in reading comprehension came from auditory students or auditory learners. They get score 69,56% followed kinesthetic 21,74%, and visual 8,70%.

scholarly journals The Intervention of Using Reciprocal Teaching Technique and Learning Styles on Students’ Reading Comprehension

AL-TA LIM ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-223
Author(s):  
Siti Habibah Egiyantinah ◽  
Alek Alek ◽  
Fahriany Fahriany ◽  
Ismail Suardi Wekke
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Teaching Method ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
School Level ◽  
Reciprocal Teaching ◽  
High School Level ◽  
Teaching Technique

Reading is one of language skills that should be acquired by the students who learn English course in junior high school level. In learning a foreign language, students face many problems, especially in comprehending reading text. In reading process, the students have to understand the meaning of the text through their learning styles and combining their background knowledge, experiences, and situation with the information which is stated on the text. This article was to investigate the empirical evidence on the effect of Reciprocal Teaching Technique (RTT) Technique and learning styles on Students’ Reading Comprehension. The research was quantitative method and applied quasi-experimental design.  Sample of the research were chosen though simple random sampling technique. Data collecting technique of this research were pre-test and post-test. The data were analyzed by two-ways ANOVA. The findings of the recent study are: (1) there was an effect between teaching method and students’ learning styles on students’ reading comprehension, and (2) there were differences effect of students’ reading comprehension between students who own visual learning style in RTT group and those who own auditory learning style in class. It can be summed up that teaching through applying RRT technique which being supported by learning styles (visual and auditory) are to develop the students’ reading comprehension.

scholarly journals STUDENTS’ READING AND LISTENING COMPREHENSION BASED ON THEIR LEARNING STYLES

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Titing Magfirah
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Listening Comprehension ◽  
P Value ◽  
Comprehension Test ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
8Th Grade ◽  
Comprehension Score ◽  
Academic Year

This research aims to know whether there is significant difference of students’ reading and listening comprehension score based on their learning style; visual and auditory at 8th grade students of SMPN 4 Pallangga Gowa in academic year 2016-2017. This study used quantitative method and causal comparative as the design of the study. The instruments of this study were learning style questionnaire, reading comprehension test and listening comprehension test. Further, it used Independent Sample T-Test to analyze the data from learning styles questionnaire, reading and listening comprehension score. Findings of the result reveal that there is no significant difference of students’ reading and listening comprehension score based on two groups learning styles; visual and auditory. The result showed sig. value is 0.592 and 0.594 for the reading comprehension based on two learning styles; visual and auditory, are greater than p-value (0.05), (0.592 and 0.594 >0.05). Similarly, the sig. value of two learning style groups in listening comprehension performance are the same, it is 0.954. Meaning that both sig. values are greater than p-value (0.954> 0.05). Hence, it can be concluded that H0 is accepted and Ha is rejected. Clearly, from the result, it can be said that learning style was not the only one factor affecting students’ reading and listening comprehension score

The Effect of Students’ Learning Models and Style on Students’ Achievement in Reading

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa P.N. Nainggolan ◽  
Busmin Gurning ◽  
Sumarsih Sumarsih
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Visual Style ◽  
Level Of Significance ◽  
Test Result ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

The objectives of the research were to find out whether a) students’ achievement in reading comprehension taught by using Jigsaw model was higher than taught by using Task-Based Learning (TBL) b) students’ achievement in reading comprehension with visual style was higher than that students with auditory style. The population was the students of SMA Budi Murni 2 Medan with 104 students. The samples were 3 parallel classes and two classes by applying cluster random sampling. The questionnaire was administered for classifying the students upon the visual and auditory learning style. The data were analyzed by applying two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at the level of significance α= 0.05. The result proved that students’ achievement in reading comprehension taught by using Jigsaw was higher than that taught by using TBL,  students’ achievement in reading comprehension with visual learning style was higher than those with auditory learning style and there was interaction between models of learning and learning styles on students’ achievement in reading comprehension. Moreover, Tuckey-test result also showed that visual style students got higher achievement if they were taught by using Jigsaw model while auditory style students got higher achievement if they were taught by using TBL model. Keywords: Effect; Models of Learning; Reading Comprehension; Students’ Learning Style; Students’ Achievement

The effect of Teaching Methods and Learning Styles on Students’ Achievement in Reading Comprehension

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Parwati Parwati ◽  
Busmin Gurning ◽  
Berlin Sibarani
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Experimental Research ◽  
Teaching Methods ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Visual Style ◽  
Jigsaw Method ◽  
Experimental Group

The objectives of this experimental research were to investigate whether: 1) students’ achievement in reading comprehension taught by using CIRC method was higher than taught by using Jigsaw method. 2) students’ achievement in reading comprehension with visual style was higher than those with kinesthetic style, 3) there was interaction between teaching methods and learning styles on students’ achievement in reading comprehension. One hundred of 2011/2012 grade X students of SMAN 1 Delitua were selected as sample by applying cluster random sample technique. The research design was experimental research by using factorial design 2x2. Experimental group 1 was treated by using CIRC method and experimental group 2 was treated by using Jigsaw method. The questionnaire was conducted for classifying the students upon the visual and kinesthetic learning style. Students’ achievement in reading comprehension text was measured by using reading comprehension test. The data were analyzed by applying two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at the level of significance α= 0.05. The result reveals that (1) students’ achievement in reading comprehension taught by using CIRC was higher than that taught by using Jigsaw method, with Fobs= 3.36>Ftab=2.70, (2) students’ achievement in reading comprehension with visual learning style was higher than that with kinesthetic learning style with Fobs= 8.64>Ftable=2.70, (3) there is interaction between teaching method and learning styles on students’ achievement in reading comprehension with Fobs=7.74>Ftable=2.70. The result of Scheffe-Test showed that visual style students got higher achievement if they were taught by using CIRC method while kinesthetic style students got higher achievement if they were taught by using Jigsaw method.

scholarly journals THE CORRELATION STUDY OF STUDENTS’ LEARNING STYLES AND ENGLISH ACHIEVEMENT

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-150
Author(s):  
Dzul Rachman ◽  
Aniq Hudiyah Bil Haq ◽  
Rio Arif Pratama ◽  
Bayu Prasetyo
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Correlation Study ◽  
Language Learner ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
The Mean ◽  
English Achievement ◽  
Correlation Design

This research aimed to find out the students learning styles, the English achievement, and the correlation between students’ learning styles and English achievement of the second-semester students of University of Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur. The design of this study was quantitative research with a correlation design. The sample of the study was 56 students. The instruments of the study were the questionnaire of students’ learning styles and English achievement test. In order to make data become linear one, the researcher converted those data into Z-score and then correlated the converted data using correlate bivariate. The result of the study showed that the mean score of students’ learning styles was 50, that means fair. There were 21 students (38%) preferred visual learning styles, 15 (27%) of students preferred reading learning styles, 13 (23%) students preferred kinesthetic learning styles, 4 (7%) students preferred auditory learning styles and 3 (5%) preferred used two learning styles. Thus, the mean score of students’ English achievement was 50, that means fair. On the other word, there was a significant correlation between students’ learning styles and English achievement. Based on the finding above, it is suggested to language learner to be familiar with their learning styles so that they can benefit the strength of styles and manipulate the weakness of styles. For language teacher, they may take learners style into account for the sake of different learning strategies and ways in carrying out the lesson in the classroom so that they can promote learner’s need.

scholarly journals Examining the Relationship between E-Learning Styles and Achievement in English among Moroccan University Students

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arab World English Journal ◽  
Azize EL Ghouati
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
University Students ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Language Tests ◽  
E Learning ◽  
English Achievement ◽  
Learning Style Preference

The aim of the study is fourfold: to examine the nature of relationship between visual learning syle (VLS), auditory learning style (ALS), kinesthetic learning style (KLS), and read/write learning style (R/WLS) and students’ English achievement (EA) in technology-based learning environment among Moroccan university students. The present study adopts a quantitative research design. Therefore, the main instruments are questionnaires, and English achievement tests. Both the questionnaires and language tests are analyzed and interpreted quantitatively. The reliability of the questionnaire sections and scales as well as tests constructs matches the criterion for acceptable internal consistencies (α=70). The statistical tools used in order to help analyze and interpret data include descriptive and inferential statistics which make use of frequencies, percentage, and Correlation tests. Following what has been hypothesized; the test results do not support the four research hypotheses claiming there is no statistically significant relationship between the VLS, ALS, KLS, and R/WLS and students’ level of EA. The findings of the present study highlight some implications to improve students’ achievement in English with the help of e-learning style preference.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document