reciprocal teaching
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

466
(FIVE YEARS 209)

H-INDEX

18
(FIVE YEARS 1)

PRISMA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 182
Author(s):  
Elsa Widya Asri ◽  
Achi Rinaldi ◽  
Rizki Wahyu Yunian Putra ◽  
Nurhasanah Leni ◽  
Ahmad Sodiq

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui efektivitas penggunaan model pembelajaran reciprocal teaching dengan strategi heuristik krulik rudnick terhadap kemampuan representasi matematika dan self confidence. Jenis eksperimen yang digunakan adalah Quasi Eksperimental. Penelitian ini dilakukan di SMP Negeri 7 Krui. Populasinya adalah peserta didik kelas VIII dan sampel penelitian adalah kelas VIII B dengan jumlah 28 peserta didik sebagai kelas eksperimen dengan menerapkan model pembelajaran reciprocal teaching dengan strategi heuristik krulik rudnick dan kelas VIII A yang jumlah 28 peserta didik sebagai kelas kontrol dengan menerapkan model pembelajaran direct instruction. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan tes kemampuan representasi matematika dan angket self confidence. Analisis data menggunkan uji Manova. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh kemampuan representasi matematika dan self confidence menggunakan model reciprocal teaching dengan strategi heuristik krulik rudnick. Efektivias penggunaan model pembelajaran reciprocal teaching dengan strategi heuristik krulik rudnick lebih efektif terhadap kemampuan representasi matematika dan self confidence, ditunjukkan dari effect size yang diperoleh termasuk dalam kategori tinggi.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-126
Author(s):  
Yunita Aryani ◽  
Ida Bagus Kade Gunayasa ◽  
Heri Hadi Saputra

This study aims to determine the effect of the reciprocal teaching learning model on the speaking skills of fifth graders at SDN 1 Barejulat.  The results of this study are expected to be useful theoretically and practically.  The type of experimental research used is Quasi Experimental Design in the category of Noneequivalent Control Group Design.  Data collection techniques using observation and performance appraisal.  The data analysis technique is the prerequisite test 1).  Normality test 2).  Homogeneity test 3).  Hypothesis testing using the Anacova test.  The results showed that the highest pretest score for the control class (Vb) was 70, while the lowest score was 45. Then the highest pretest result for the experimental class (Va) was 75, the lowest was 43. The highest posttest score for the control class (Vb) was 73, while the  the lowest was 50. Then the highest posttest result in experimental class (Va) was 83, the lowest score was 65. This indicates that there is an effect of the reciprocal teaching learning model on the speaking skills of fifth grade students at SDN 1 Barejulat.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 122
Author(s):  
Andi Kusumayanti ◽  
Hendra Hendra
Keyword(s):  

Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu untuk mengetahui proses pengembangan Modul Matematika Berbasis Model Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching Materi Bangun datar Siswa Kelas VII SMPN 3 Sungguminasa. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan yaitu penelitian dan pengembangan (Research & Development) dengan model 4D. Penelitian ini dibatasi hanya sampai pada tahap valid dan praktis yang hanya mengukur tingkat kevalidan modul dengan hasil validasi dari validator, mengukur tingkat kepraktisan modul berdasarkan angket respons guru. Tahapannya hanya sampai tahap validasi dan praktis karena selanjutnya akan dilakukan perbaikan desain, uji coba produk, revisi produk, uji coba pemakaian, revisi produk lanjut, dan yang terakhir pembuatan produk secara massal. Namun, tahap selanjutnya tidak dapat dilaksanakan dikarenakan keadaan sekarang adanya Pandemi Covid-19. Instrumen yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah lembar validasi dan angket respons guru. Berdasarkan hasil Validasi, diperoleh bahwa (1) hasil kevalidan terkait modul dan RPP yaitu 3,4 di mana 3,4 yang berada pada interval 2.5 ≤ M ≤ 3.5 sehingga dikategorikan valid. (2)  kriteria kepraktisan hanya berdasarkan angket respons guru untuk keseluruhan aspeknya berada pada kategori sangat positif dengan persentase 85%. Sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa modul matematika berbasis model pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching Materi Bangun datar Siswa Kelas VII SMPN 3 Sungguminasa memenuhi kriteria kevalidan dan kepraktisan.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-111
Author(s):  
Maria J Jaiman ◽  
Indira Krisanti Lengkong ◽  
Samuel Igo Leton
Keyword(s):  

Penelitian ini merupakan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK) yang bertujuan untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar matematika siswa pada materi operasi vektor melaui pendekatan reciprocal teaching.  Subyek dalam penelitian ini yaitu peserta didik Kelas X IPA SMA Santa Angela Atambua yang berjumlah 12 orang.  Dalam mengumpulkan data, peniliti menggunakan beberapa instrumen, antara lain: lembar observasi kemampuan guru mengelola pembelajaran; lembar penilaian respons peserta didik, dan tes. Penelitian ini dilakukan dalam dua siklus. Hasil analisis data pada siklus 1, menunjukkan bahwa secara umum terdapat peningkatan hasil belajar siswa walaupun peningkatan tersebut dalam kategori rendah (nilai N-gain = 0,283); Kemampuan guru mengelola pembelajaran dalam kategori  cukup baik; dan respon peserta didik dalam kategori kurang baik. Hasil analisis data pada siklus 2, menunjukkan adannya peningkatan penguasaan akan konsep matematik dan peningkatan tersebut dalam ketegori sedang (nilai N-gain: 0,584); Kemampuan guru dalam mengelola pembelajaran dalam kategori baik dan respon peserta didik dalam kategori baik. Dengan demikian, kami menyimpulkan bahwa pendekatan reciprocal teaching dapat meningkatkan hasil belajar matematik siswa khususnya pada materi operasi vektor, meningkatkan kemampuan guru dalam mengelola pembelajaran dan juga dapat meningkatkan keaktifan siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika khususnya pada materi operasi vektor.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jurnal Julak

The purpose of this study is to answer the problems, First, how to apply the Reciprocal Teaching Model in Improving Activities and Learning Outcomes of State Ideology in Citizenship Education Lessons for Class VIII SMP Negeri 4 Marabahan in the 2017/2018 Academic Year. Second, whether the application of the Reciprocal Teaching Model can Improve the Learning Activities of State Ideology in Citizenship Education Lessons for Class VIII SMP Negeri 4 Marabahan in the 2017/2018 Academic Year. Third, whether the application of the Reciprocal Teaching Model can Improve the Learning Outcomes of State Ideology in Citizenship Education Lessons for Class VIII SMP Negeri 4 Marabahan in the 2017/2018 Academic Year.The results of observations of student work abilities in group discussions on the average value of the suitability of the material with the task in the first cycle the average is 30.75 while in the second cycle the average is 32.75, which means there is an increase of 2.00 points. In the discussion commentary session on learning materials in the first cycle the average was 29.75 while in the second cycle the average was 33.20, meaning there was an increase of 3.45 points. In terms of neatness or appearance, the average value in Cycle I was 16.75, while in Cycle II the average was 18.75, which means there was an increase of 2.00. The average score of student test results for Cycle I was 71.50 while in Cycle II it was 72.75, meaning there was an increase of 1.25. Meanwhile, the percentage of completeness in the first cycle was 75.00%. However, in the second cycle, the percentage of completeness reached 85.00%, there was an increase in completeness of 10.00%.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Anita Titter

<p>A mixed-methods quasi-experimental design was used to identify relationships between adolescent students’ attributions for their reading performance and their reading achievement by gathering baseline data from year 9 and 10 students (n = 175) and then investigating the effects of two stages of intervention on a treatment group (n = 22) and a comparison group (n = 16). The first stage of intervention used the instructional activity of reciprocal teaching to teach students cognitive strategies to improve reading comprehension. The second stage of the intervention combined on-going reciprocal teaching with attributional-retraining, aimed at to developing internal attributions for reading performance; specifically effort-related attributions rather than attributions focussing on ability. A baseline sample (which included the treatment and comparison samples as well as students from the wider year 9 and 10 cohort) completed a questionnaire about their attributions for their reading performance. There was no evidence of the hypothesised correlation between a measure of students’ incremental mindset (internal, unstable and controllable attribution) and standardised measures of reading comprehension. Analysis of the attribution data for the baseline sample showed evidence that internal and external attributions are not, as theorised, two ends of the same continuum, rather they are separate constructs, albeit negatively correlated. The treatment and comparison groups completed a standardised reading comprehension test and the attribution questionnaire at four time points: pre-intervention; between the two stages of intervention; post-intervention; and delayed post-intervention. A sub-sample of six students, representing a spectrum of reading achievement was interviewed to develop a better understanding of the responses provided in the questionnaire. The combined interventions had no significant effect on students’ attributions for their reading performance or on their reading comprehension achievement. Conversely, the first stage of the intervention, reciprocal teaching, did have a significant effect on the treatment group’s reading comprehension achievement immediately following the intervention and the group were observed eagerly participating in the activity with significantly increased engagement. The combined qualitative and quantitative data from the interventions provided evidence about the complexity of adolescents’ attributional beliefs. Students responded with a wide variety of beliefs that did not conform to the theorised pattern of attributional beliefs. The findings raise questions about how students form attributions for their successes and failures, in particular the direction of the causal relationship between achievement and attributional beliefs.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Anita Titter

<p>A mixed-methods quasi-experimental design was used to identify relationships between adolescent students’ attributions for their reading performance and their reading achievement by gathering baseline data from year 9 and 10 students (n = 175) and then investigating the effects of two stages of intervention on a treatment group (n = 22) and a comparison group (n = 16). The first stage of intervention used the instructional activity of reciprocal teaching to teach students cognitive strategies to improve reading comprehension. The second stage of the intervention combined on-going reciprocal teaching with attributional-retraining, aimed at to developing internal attributions for reading performance; specifically effort-related attributions rather than attributions focussing on ability. A baseline sample (which included the treatment and comparison samples as well as students from the wider year 9 and 10 cohort) completed a questionnaire about their attributions for their reading performance. There was no evidence of the hypothesised correlation between a measure of students’ incremental mindset (internal, unstable and controllable attribution) and standardised measures of reading comprehension. Analysis of the attribution data for the baseline sample showed evidence that internal and external attributions are not, as theorised, two ends of the same continuum, rather they are separate constructs, albeit negatively correlated. The treatment and comparison groups completed a standardised reading comprehension test and the attribution questionnaire at four time points: pre-intervention; between the two stages of intervention; post-intervention; and delayed post-intervention. A sub-sample of six students, representing a spectrum of reading achievement was interviewed to develop a better understanding of the responses provided in the questionnaire. The combined interventions had no significant effect on students’ attributions for their reading performance or on their reading comprehension achievement. Conversely, the first stage of the intervention, reciprocal teaching, did have a significant effect on the treatment group’s reading comprehension achievement immediately following the intervention and the group were observed eagerly participating in the activity with significantly increased engagement. The combined qualitative and quantitative data from the interventions provided evidence about the complexity of adolescents’ attributional beliefs. Students responded with a wide variety of beliefs that did not conform to the theorised pattern of attributional beliefs. The findings raise questions about how students form attributions for their successes and failures, in particular the direction of the causal relationship between achievement and attributional beliefs.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document