scholarly journals STUDI KOMPARASI HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION (STAD)

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-55
Author(s):  
Sri Fatoyah ◽  
Akhmad Nayazik ◽  
Arie Wahyuni

Abstract This study aims to find out which is better between mathematics learning outcomes in Cokroaminoto Batang Junior High School students who are taught using the Cooperative learning model Numbered Head Together (NHT) or those who are taught using the Cooperative learning model type Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) in the material mathematics field rectangular. The sample of this study consisted of 2 classes, namely experimental class 1 and experimental class 2 using the NHT and STAD methods. This study used qualitative research methods. Data collection methods used are documentation and test methods. Research instruments in the form of learning tools and mathematics test results. Data analysis performed was a prerequisite test using the average similarity test and hypothesis testing by calculating the average. The results showed that the average learning outcomes of experimental class 1 students amounted to 76,875 and experimental class 2 amounted to 72,56667 which means that classroom learning outcomes taught by NHT type cooperative learning models were better than classroom learning outcomes taught by the STAD type cooperative learning models. From the results of the study, it can be concluded that the NHT type of cooperative learning model is more effective when compared to the STAD type cooperative learning model on the subject of quadrilateral in class VII students of Cokroaminoto Batang Middle School Academic Year 2018/2019 Keywords: STAD type cooperative learning model, NHT type cooperative learning model, learning outcomes .

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-55
Author(s):  
Sri Fatoyah ◽  
Akhmad Nayazik ◽  
Arie Wahyuni

Abstract This study aims to find out which is better between mathematics learning outcomes in Cokroaminoto Batang Junior High School students who are taught using the Cooperative learning model Numbered Head Together (NHT) or those who are taught using the Cooperative learning model type Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) in the material mathematics field rectangular. The sample of this study consisted of 2 classes, namely experimental class 1 and experimental class 2 using the NHT and STAD methods. This study used qualitative research methods. Data collection methods used are documentation and test methods. Research instruments in the form of learning tools and mathematics test results. Data analysis performed was a prerequisite test using the average similarity test and hypothesis testing by calculating the average. The results showed that the average learning outcomes of experimental class 1 students amounted to 76,875 and experimental class 2 amounted to 72,56667 which means that classroom learning outcomes taught by NHT type cooperative learning models were better than classroom learning outcomes taught by the STAD type cooperative learning models. From the results of the study, it can be concluded that the NHT type of cooperative learning model is more effective when compared to the STAD type cooperative learning model on the subject of quadrilateral in class VII students of Cokroaminoto Batang Middle School Academic Year 2018/2019 Keywords: STAD type cooperative learning model, NHT type cooperative learning model, learning outcomes .


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 81
Author(s):  
Feby Julianti ◽  
Lisa Utami

AbstractThis research is based on the low outcomes of class XI students on their chemistry subject. Therefore, the experiment research by pretest and posttest to discover the effect of cooperative learning model of Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) by using Handout toward learning outcomes of State Senior High School 1 Kampar on salt hydrolysis is conducted. The subject of this research is the students of class XI Mia in 2015-2016 year by using 2 classroom samples: XI Mia 1 (exsperiment) dan XI Mia 4 (control). The data was collected by using observation, initial test (homogeneity), final test (pretest and postest), and documentation. To discover the effect of the model on learning outcomes, the formula of Kp is applied. The effect differences are analyzed by t-test sampel related. The analysis result of initial and final data is t-counting = 2.325 and t-table = 1,68 in the significant rate of 5%. The value of t-counting > t-table, therefore, Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. This shows that there is the effect of cooperative learning model of Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) by using handout toward learning outcomes of State Senior High School 1 Kampar on salt hydrolysis by the effect as much as 7.8%.  Key words:      Learning outcomes, model learning model of STAD, salt hydrolysis 


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Desi Anggraini

This article aims to determine the differences in the results of learning mathematics by using the appropriate learning model in the application of cooperative learning model Number Head Type Togeteher (NHT) and Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) on the subject of Circles at MTs Muhammadiyah Penyasawan, Kampar District. In this research the problem statement is "Are there differences in learning outcomes of mathematics using Cooperative learning models Number Head Together (NHT) and Student Achievement Division (STAD) types in class VIII MTs Muhammadiyah Penyasawan Kampar District on the subject of Circles?" This article uses comparative research which found a difference between the use of Cooperative learning models Number Head Together (NHT) and Student Achievement Division (STAD) types, in this study the researchers played a direct role as teachers in the learning process. In this study Cooperative Learning NHT type is X1 and STAD type is X2 variable and learning result is Y variable. The population of this study is all Muhammadiyah MTS students and the sample used is VIIIA class as a class using Cooperative Learning Type Number Head Together (NHT) and class VIIIB as a class that uses Student Team Achievement Divison (STAD) Type Learning Model. The research subjects were eighth grade eighth grade students and the object was learning outcomes using the cooperative learning type NHT model and learning outcomes using the STAD learning model. The data collection technique is in the form of observation, documentation and tests conducted at the sixth meeting after the learning meeting is complete. This data is processed using the test-t formula and obtained a t value of 4.115 with a significant value of 2.69 where the significant value obtained from the calculation is greater than the significance level α = 0.05, then Ha is accepted. Based on the results of the data analysis, it was concluded that there were differences in the mathematics learning outcomes of students using the Cooperative learning model Number Head Together (NHT) and Student Achievement Division (STAD) types on the subject of the Circle at MTs Muhammadiyah Penyasawan Kampar Distric


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Idham Kamil ◽  
Kashardi Kashardi

This study aims to find out the significant differences between students' mathematical understanding abilities that are taught using the Cooperative Learning Model type Auditory Intellectualy Receptition (AIR), Numbered Heads Together (NHT), and conventional learning models, and which learning model gives better results to improve students' mathematical understanding abilities. This type of research is quasi-experimental. The population in this study was class VIII 27 of Seluma State Junior High School consisting of 4 classes. The sample of this study was chosen 3 classes randomly, namely class VIII A as the experimental class I using the Cooperative learning model type Auditory Intellectualy Receptition (AIR), class VIII B as the experimental class II using the cooperative learning model type Numbered Heads Together (NHT), and Class VIII C as a control class using conventional learning models. Data collection on student mathematics learning outcomes in the form of tests consisting of pre-test and post-test. Data were analyzed using ANAVA and BNT. Based on ANAVA results, there are differences between students' mathematics learning outcomes in experimental class I, experimental class II, and control class. Based on the LSD test it was found that the treatment between the experimental class I with the experimental class II, the experimental class I with the control class, and the experimental class II with the control class there were differences. Auditory IntellectualyReceptition (AIR) cooperative learning model provides better results than the Numbered Heads Together (NHT) type of cooperative learning model and Conventional learning model.Keywords: mathematical understanding ability,  AIR,  NHT, learning model


Author(s):  
Silfi Ardillah

This research was motivated by a change of the curriculum from the curriculum KTSP is changed into the 2013 curriculum  which aims to make the 2013 curriculum students productive, innovative and effective. In order for a teacher-centered learning into an interactive learning. Therefore, the necessary learning model that can support the passage of the curriculum in 2013 that STAD cooperative learning model and cooperative learning model NHT.Formulation of the problem in this research is "Are there any differences in mathematics learning outcomes matrix material between students taught using cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) and cooperative learning model Numbered Heads Together (NHT) in class X AK of SMK Mahardika Surabaya ? ". The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a difference in the mathematics learning outcomes matrix material between students taught using cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) and cooperative learning model Numbered Heads Together (NHT) in class X AK SMK Mahardika Surabaya?.The population in this study were all students of class X AK SMK Mahardika Surabaya. While the sample is composed of two classes, namely class X AK AK AK-1 and X-2. Data was collected by providing a subjective test on the subject of the matrix given to both classes.From the data analysis calculated that t_hit > t_tabel of 4.2> 1.99125 and the average value of students who use cooperative learning model STAD is greater than the average value of students who use cooperative learning model NHT. So it can be concluded that there are differences in mathematics learning outcomes in the matrix material between students taught using cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) and cooperative learning model Numbered Heads Together (NHT) in class X AK SMK of Mahardika Surabaya. Keywords: Model STAD cooperative learning, cooperative learning model NHT, student learning outcomes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Iltavia Iltavia ◽  
Nurhasnah Nurhasnah

The problem formulation in this study is 1). How is the teacher's activity in the application of a scramble type cooperative learning model on Mathematics learning in class XI SMK Cendana Padangpanjang 2017/2018 Academic Year? 2). How is the activity of students in the application of scramble type cooperative learning models in mathematics learning in class XI SMK Cendana Padangpanjang class year 2017/2018, 3). Are students' mathematics learning outcomes using a scramble type cooperative model on effective mathematics learning to improve mathematics learning outcomes in the cognitive domain? To test the validity of the hypothesis the pretest and posttest values were analyzed using the t-test. Obtained then  rejected and  be accepted . This has the effect of increasing the percentage of good completeness as much as 75% of the mathematics learning outcomes. From the results of data analysis it can be concluded that by applying the Scramble Type Cooperative learning model has a good effect on students' mathematics learning outcomes in class XI TKJ SMK Cendana Padangpanjang


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 590-596
Author(s):  
Ika Kurniawati ◽  
Laila Hayati ◽  
Nurul Hikmah ◽  
Nyoman Sridana

This research is a quasi-experimental study that aims to determine the effect of the Group Investigation (GI) type of cooperative learning model on the mathematics learning outcomes of junior high school students. The population in this study were all VIII grade students of SMP Negeri 2 Kediri, which were divided into three classes. The research sample of two classes was taken by the purposive sampling technique. The data collection technique using tests and observation sheets. The experimental class uses a Group Investigation (GI) type of cooperative learning model and the control class uses a direct learning model. The sample in the study was class VIII-A as the experimental class and class VIIIB as the control class. The normality test and homogeneity test showed that the two samples were normally distributed and homogeneous. The data analysis using t test with  show  and  so  is rejected. So it can be concluded that there is an effect of the Group Investigation (GI) type of cooperative learning model on students mathematics learning outcomes. To find out how much the effect of the Group Investigation (GI) type of cooperative learning model has on the students mathematics learning outcomes, it can be done by using effect size calculations with Cohen’s formula and the calculation results are 1.18 including in the high category. This means that the application of the Group Investigation (GI) type of cooperative learning model has a high effect on the mathematics learning outcomes of VIII grade students of SMP Negeri 2 kediri academic year 2021/2022


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 177
Author(s):  
Mhd Ichsan Panggabean

Abstrak: tujuan penelitian ini adalah; (1) Untuk mengetahui besarnya perbedaan hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang diajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT dengan tipe TGT; (2) Untuk mengetahui besarnya perbedaan hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang memiliki aktivitas belajar tinggi dan siswa yang memiliki aktivitas belajar rendah; dan (3) Untuk mengetahui besarnya interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dan aktivitas belajar siswa terhadap hasil belajar Matematika. Metode penelitian ini adalah quasi eksperimen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, bahwa: (1)Hasil belajar matematika siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Numbered Head Together (NHT) lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar matematika siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe  Team Games Tournament (TGT). (2)Hasil belajar matematika siswa yang memiliki aktivitas belajar tinggi  lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar matematika siswa yang memiliki aktivitas belajar rendah; dan (3) Terdapat interaksi antara penggunaan model  pembelajaran kooperatif dan aktivitas belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar matematika siswa. Kata Kunci: model pembelajaran kooperatif,aktivitas belajar, matematika. Abstract: The purpose of this research is; (1) To know the difference of learning result of Mathematics of students taught by using cooperative learning model of type NHT with TGT type; (2) to know the difference of mathematics learning result of students who have high learning activity and students who have low learning activity; and (3) to know the magnitude of interaction between cooperative learning model and student learning activity toward mathematics learning result. This research method is quasi experiment. The result of the research shows that: (1) The result of learning mathematics of students who are taught by using cooperative learning model of NHT is higher than the students' mathematics learning outcomes learned by cooperative learning model of TGT type. (2) The result of mathematics learning of students who have higher learning activity is higher than the result of learning mathematics of students who have low learning activity; and (3) There is an interaction between the use of cooperative learning model and learning activity in influencing student's mathematics learning outcomes. Keywords: cooperative learning model, learning activity, math.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2104 (1) ◽  
pp. 012015
Author(s):  
N Muhammad ◽  
F Hamid ◽  
M Misbah ◽  
D Dewantara

Abstract This study aims to describe the validity of the electronic module on the elasticity of solids topic through the cooperative learning model to improve students’ learning outcomes and motivation. This research is a research and development with the ADDIE development model. This electronic module was assessed by using the electronic module’s validation sheet. The validators of this e-module consisted of two academics and one practitioner. Based on the validation results, it was obtained that the validity of the electronic module was 3.49 with a valid category. It shows that the electronic module on the elasticity of solids topic through cooperative learning models can be used in the classroom learning process to improve student’s learning outcomes and motivation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document