HASIL BELAJAR KOGNITIF SISWA MELALUI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE AIR DAN NHT

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Idham Kamil ◽  
Kashardi Kashardi

This study aims to find out the significant differences between students' mathematical understanding abilities that are taught using the Cooperative Learning Model type Auditory Intellectualy Receptition (AIR), Numbered Heads Together (NHT), and conventional learning models, and which learning model gives better results to improve students' mathematical understanding abilities. This type of research is quasi-experimental. The population in this study was class VIII 27 of Seluma State Junior High School consisting of 4 classes. The sample of this study was chosen 3 classes randomly, namely class VIII A as the experimental class I using the Cooperative learning model type Auditory Intellectualy Receptition (AIR), class VIII B as the experimental class II using the cooperative learning model type Numbered Heads Together (NHT), and Class VIII C as a control class using conventional learning models. Data collection on student mathematics learning outcomes in the form of tests consisting of pre-test and post-test. Data were analyzed using ANAVA and BNT. Based on ANAVA results, there are differences between students' mathematics learning outcomes in experimental class I, experimental class II, and control class. Based on the LSD test it was found that the treatment between the experimental class I with the experimental class II, the experimental class I with the control class, and the experimental class II with the control class there were differences. Auditory IntellectualyReceptition (AIR) cooperative learning model provides better results than the Numbered Heads Together (NHT) type of cooperative learning model and Conventional learning model.Keywords: mathematical understanding ability,  AIR,  NHT, learning model

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-60
Author(s):  
Yufitri Yanto ◽  
Ratna Juwita

This research aims to determine the completeness of the results of learning mathematics students VIII SMP Negeri B.Srikaton academic year 2017/2018 after applied model of cooperative learning type Student Facilitator and Explaining (SFaE). This type of research is experimental, with the design used is pre-test and post-test group design. The population in this study is all students of class VIII SMP Negeri B.Srikaton which amounted to 258 students. One class was taken randomly, that is class VIII.6 was 37 students as experiment class. The result of the research is the final score of the analysis using the t-test. The average score on mathematics learning outcomes is 81.57. Based on the results of data analysis with significant level α = 0.05 obtained tcount = 6.41 and ttable = 1.69 because tcount > ttable, then obtained the conclusion that the Application of Cooperative Learning Model Type Student Facilitator and Explaining (SFaE) on Student Learning Outcomes Mathematics Class VIII SMP Negeri B.Srikaton Lesson Year 2017/2018 completed significantly. Keywords: Cooperative Learning Model Type Student Facilitator and Explaining (SFaE), Learning Outcomes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhamad Ruslan Layn

This research is a Classroom Action Research (PTK), which aims to improve the learning outcomes of mathematics through NHT type cooperative learning model in students of class VIII A MTs. Muhammadiyah conducted collaboratively between researchers and teachers of mathematics studies. In the implementation of this research, it is done by giving group worksheet and observation sheet of student activity using NHT type cooperative learning model after giving an explanation about Pythagoras Theorem material as much as two cycles that cycle I and II. After being given group worksheets then conducted the assessment includes assessment of test results of a cycle I and cycles II and group worksheet to students that is by applying learning model of cooperative learning type NHT. The subjects of this study were students of class VIII A which amounted to 20 students consisting of 15 male students and 5 female students. Techniques of collecting data in research are this observation and test. The data obtained were then analyzed. The results of the study showed that the implementation using NHT type cooperative learning model on Pythagoras Theorem material. the ability of students in solving problems on the material above has increased. With the increase of the average value of students in the first cycle was 43.45 and increased in cycle II 83.90. Improvement of student learning outcomes to mathematics learning using NHT type cooperative learning is good. This is indicated by the average value of group learning outcomes in cycle I 60.00 or being in the medium category and the average score of the learning outcomes of the group in cycle I 82.50 or in the high category. This shows the result of increased mathematics learning after conducting cooperative learning model of NHT type


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hikmatul Fadhilah Sianipar ◽  
Asmin . .

ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar antara siswa kelas VII SMP Negeri 5 Binjai yang diajar  menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Make a Match dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran aktif tipe Index Card Match. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VII SMP Negeri 5 Binjai yang terdiri dari 7 kelas dan sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VII-2 dan kelas VII-4 sebanyak 52 siswa. Kelas VII-2 diajar menggunakan model kooperatif tipe Make a Match dan kelas VII-4 diajar menggunakan model aktif tipe Index Card Match. Jenis penelitian ini adalah eksperimen semu. Data yang digunakan adalah tes PAM yang diambil dari 15 butir soal UN Sekolah Dasar dan postest berbentuk uraian sebanyak 5 soal untuk melihat hasil belajar matematika siswa. Sebelum pengujian hipotesis terlebih dahulu diuji normalitas tes dengan menggunakan uji Chi Square dan homogenitas tes menggunakan uji F. Dari pengujian yang dilakukan diperoleh bahwa hasil tes PAM kedua sampel berasal dari populasi yang berdistribusi normal dan homogen, dengan demikian penulis bisa memberikan perlakuan kepada kedua sampel. Dari hasil analisis data diperoleh nilai rata-rata hasil belajar matematika siswa yang diberi model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Make a Match adalah 75,68 dengan simpangan baku 4,90 dan rata-rata hasil belajar matematika siswa yang diberi model pembelajaran aktif tipe Index Card Match adalah 70,53 dengan simpangan baku 5,85. Untuk uji hipotesis digunakan uji t, dari hasil perhitungan diperoleh thitung = 3,43875 dan ttabel = 2,01. Ternyata thitung > ttabel, sehingga Ho ditolak dan Ha diterima sehingga diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa terdapat perbedaan antara hasil belajar matematika siswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Make a Match dan model pembelajaran aktif tipe Index Card Match berbantuan Software Geogebra. Kata kunci: hasil belajar, make a match, index card match, geogebra ABSTRACT This study aims to determine whether there are differences in learning outcomes between students of class VII SMP Negeri 5 Binjai who was taught using cooperative learning model type Make a Match by using the model of active learning type Index Card Match. The population in this research is all students of class VII of SMP Negeri 5 Binjai which consists of 7 classes and the sample in this research are students of class VII-2 and class VII-4 as many as 52 students. Class VII-2 was taught using a Make a Match type of cooperative model and VII-4 classes were taught using an active model of Index Card Match type. This type of research is a pseudo experiment. The data used is the PAM test taken from 15 items of UN Primary School and postest in the form of a description of 5 questions to see the students' mathematics learning outcomes. Before testing the hypothesis first tested the normality of the test by using Chi Square test and the homogeneity of the test using the F test. From the test it was obtained that the results of the PAM test of both samples came from a population of normal and homogeneous distribution, thus the authors can give treatment to both samples. From the results of data analysis obtained the average value of mathematics learning outcomes of students who are given a model of cooperative learning type Make a Match is 75.68 with standard deviation 4.90 and the average of mathematics learning outcomes of students who are given an active model of learning type Index Card Match is 70.53 with standard deviation 5.85. To test the hypothesis used t test, from the calculation results obtained tcount = 3.43875 and ttabel = 2.01. Apparently thitung> ttabel, so Ho is rejected and Ha accepted so that obtained the conclusion that there is a difference between mathematics learning outcomes of students who are taught with cooperative learning model type Make a Match and active learning model type Index Card Match Software Geogebra.Keywords: study results, make a match, index card match, geogebra


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Desi Anggraini

This article aims to determine the differences in the results of learning mathematics by using the appropriate learning model in the application of cooperative learning model Number Head Type Togeteher (NHT) and Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) on the subject of Circles at MTs Muhammadiyah Penyasawan, Kampar District. In this research the problem statement is "Are there differences in learning outcomes of mathematics using Cooperative learning models Number Head Together (NHT) and Student Achievement Division (STAD) types in class VIII MTs Muhammadiyah Penyasawan Kampar District on the subject of Circles?" This article uses comparative research which found a difference between the use of Cooperative learning models Number Head Together (NHT) and Student Achievement Division (STAD) types, in this study the researchers played a direct role as teachers in the learning process. In this study Cooperative Learning NHT type is X1 and STAD type is X2 variable and learning result is Y variable. The population of this study is all Muhammadiyah MTS students and the sample used is VIIIA class as a class using Cooperative Learning Type Number Head Together (NHT) and class VIIIB as a class that uses Student Team Achievement Divison (STAD) Type Learning Model. The research subjects were eighth grade eighth grade students and the object was learning outcomes using the cooperative learning type NHT model and learning outcomes using the STAD learning model. The data collection technique is in the form of observation, documentation and tests conducted at the sixth meeting after the learning meeting is complete. This data is processed using the test-t formula and obtained a t value of 4.115 with a significant value of 2.69 where the significant value obtained from the calculation is greater than the significance level α = 0.05, then Ha is accepted. Based on the results of the data analysis, it was concluded that there were differences in the mathematics learning outcomes of students using the Cooperative learning model Number Head Together (NHT) and Student Achievement Division (STAD) types on the subject of the Circle at MTs Muhammadiyah Penyasawan Kampar Distric


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aris Doyan ◽  
Wayan Gunada ◽  
Susilawati ◽  
Ida AYu Desy Adriani

The research is aimed to finding difference of effect the implementation of cooperative learning model STAD and Jigsaw type on the result of physic learning, difference of effect the students whose achievement motivation on result of physic learning and interaction of effect between the learning model implementation and the achievement motivation on the result of physic learning. This type of research is quasi experimental with Factorial Design of 2x2. The population in this research is all Class VIII SMPN 12 Mataram with used technique cluster random sampling. There are two samples that are class VIII C as an experiment class I and class VIII D as experiment class II. The experiment class I used the treatment STAD cooperative learning model and the experiment class II used the treatment Jigsaw cooperative learning. Analysis technique using analysis of variance (ANOVA) two way different cells. Based on by calculation hypothesis testing obtained that, FA hint (6,37) > Ftable (4,02) then Ho1 rejected, FB hint (12,37) > Ftable (4,02) then Ho2 rejected,, FAB hint (0,96) < Ftable (4,02) then Ho3accepted. With significant level 0,05 obtained that there is a difference of effect the implementation of cooperative learning model STAD and Jigsaw type on the result of physic learning, there is a difference of effect the students whose achievement is high and low motivation on the result of physic learning and there is no interaction between of cooperative learning model STAD and Jigsaw type with achievement motivation towards of physics learning.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 103
Author(s):  
Tri Unggul Suwarsi ◽  
Pujianto Pujianto

<span lang="EN-US">This classroom action research</span><span lang="IN"> (CAR) </span><span lang="EN-US">aimed to: improve student’s</span><span lang="EN-US">activities and mathematics learning outcomes subject triangle and square for student at class VII B of SMP</span><span lang="EN-US">N</span><span lang="IN">egeri</span><span lang="EN-US"> 5<span>  </span>Surakarta through the implementation of </span><span lang="IN">the M</span><span lang="EN-US">ake a </span><span lang="IN">M</span><span lang="EN-US">atch cooperative learning model.</span><span lang="IN">This study used the method of CAR which was carried out during March until July 2018, it was in the 2017/2018 academic year.The receptive subject of the study was the 29 students of VII B while the agent subject was the mathematics teacher. The data were collected by observation, test, and documentation. The collected data were then analyzed using the technique of comparative descriptive sta­tistic and critical analysis. </span><span lang="EN-US">The result of </span><span lang="IN">CAR s</span><span lang="EN-US">hows that the imple</span><span lang="IN">­</span><span lang="EN-US">men</span><span lang="IN">­</span><span lang="EN-US">tation of cooperative learning model type make a match can improve the stu</span><span lang="IN">­</span><span lang="EN-US">dent’s activities and student’s mathematic learning outcome.</span>


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-35
Author(s):  
Rani Sugiarni ◽  
Ari Septian ◽  
Dadang Juandi ◽  
Siti Julaeha

Learning models that are not precise have an impact on low student understanding so that the student completeness score is still below 50%, so appropriate action is needed to improve the quality of learning so that students' understanding in learning mathematics increases. The purpose of this study was to determine the increase in mathematical understanding of students by using cooperative learning model type Snawbal throwing. This type of research is classroom action research through 3 cycles. The increase in learning outcomes is determined based on an increase in the average understanding of students, the attainment of absorption and learning completeness. Increment refers to the ratio between the value of cycle I, cycle II and cycle III. The results showed that the implementation of the snowball throwing type of cooperative learning model could improve students' mathematical understanding of set material. It can be seen from the students' average understanding of mathematics increased from 75 (cycle I) to 9 (cycle II), and 82 (cycle III). The increase also occurred in the attainment of absorption and learning completeness. The absorption capacity increased from 50% to 70% and 73%. The learning completeness has increased from 50% to 70% and 73%.


Author(s):  
Harahap Amin

This research is a Classroom Action Research. The subject of this research is class VII MTs N 2 Rantauprapat as many as 29 students. And the object of research is Through cooperative learning model type numbered heads together (NHT) in improving the Mathematics Learning Outcomes of Students of MTs N 2 Rantauprapat. Based on the results of the initial test of the Value of student learning outcomes in classical before the application of cooperative learning model type numbered heads together (NHT) is by 17.2% with the criteria is very low. The value of the Mathematics learning outcomes of students in the classical style after the application of cooperative learning model type numbered heads together (NHT) in the first cycle of 65,52%, mean value obtained by the students have not yet reached the classical completeness that is equal to > 85%. The value of the Mathematics learning outcomes of students in the classical style after the application of cooperative learning model type numbered heads together (NHT) in the second cycle of 86,21%, mean value obtained by the students have reached mastery in the classical that of 86,21%> 85%, This means that there is improvement of students ' Mathematics learning outcomes of prior actions to the cycle of 48,28 %, and from cycle I to cycle II amounted of 20.69%. Based on the results of the overall teacher had enough of the maximum in teach with the calculation of the average to each of the aspect in cycle I is 2,92 with good category and the average in cycle II is 4.00 is in very good category, this means there has been an increase in the activity of the teacher. From this study resulted in the conclusion that by using cooperative learning model type numbered heads together (NHT) can improve learning outcomes of students of class VII MTs N 2 Rantauprapat the school Year 2019/2020 on a Math lesson.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-137
Author(s):  
Sundari Sundari ◽  
Ningrum Ningrum ◽  
Tiara Anggia Dewi

As for the problem in the research conducted by researchers, “ there are still many students who have not experienced learning completeness in the learning outcomes of the XI SMA Negeri 1 Sekampung in the academic year 2018/2019”. Based on these problems, the problem statement is, Is there a positive influence on the use of cooperative learning model type example non example on learning outcomes in economic subjects in class XI SMA Negeri 1 Sekampung in the academic yaer 2018/2019 ?The purpose of this study was “ to find out the effect of using cooperative learning models  for example non example types on learning outcomes in economic subjects in class XI of SMA Negeri 1 Sekampung in the academic year 2018/2019. Based on the results of the research conducted, the hypothesis is accepted, because the value of tcount> t table can be seen in the appendix list G, at a significance level of 5%, namely 9,50> 1.70. Students who are declared complete with KKM are (72) after being given treatment with the inside outside circle model which is as many as 25 students or with a percentage of 83,33% and those that are not complete are 5 students with a percentage of 16,67%. Thus it shows that the Cooperative Learning Model Type Example Non Example has a positive influence on the economic learning outcomes of class XI students of State High School 1 Sekampung Academic Year 2018/2019.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document