scholarly journals The impact of economic value added (EVA) and return on assets on created shareholder value of Vietnamese firms

Author(s):  
Tran Thi Thuy Linh

The financial performance of an enterprise affects the valuation of assets to its shareholders. Maximizing the value of assets for shareholders is an important goal of corporate financial management, so shareholders always expect share value increases to achieve optimal investment efficiency. The objective of the study is to analyze the impact of Economic Value Added (EVA) and Return on Assets (ROA) on Created Shareholders Value (CSV) in Vietnamese listed companies during 2011-2016. Whether EVA measure better than the traditional performance measure like ROA on CSV? The CSV indicator is measured by two models: the Fernandez model (2001) and the Market Value Added (MVA) model. The regression methods were being used are the OLS regression model and the Robust regression model. The research results show that EVA has a positive impact on CSV in most years in the period of 2011-2016. In addition, EVA is more effective than ROA in explaining the changes in CSV in most years during the research period, showing the outstanding advantage of EVA in evaluating CSV over ROA. This study encourages companies to use a combination of different measurement methods to valuate shareholder assets and financial performance.

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 703-708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reeta Shah ◽  
Arunima Haldar ◽  
S.V.D. Nageswara Rao

With increased emphasis on shareholder value addition, there has been an ongoing debate on choosing the right measure of corporate financial performance. There is need for a single measure of financial performance that not only measures corporate financial performance but also works as a financial flexibility tool. The financial performance measure employed by the firm measures the value generated by the firm. This necessitates the firms to choose the right performance tool which can reflect the accurate value added by the firm. We study the role and implications of Economic Value Added as a financial performance measure and further discuss its applicability as a tool for introducing financial flexibility. Flexibility is assessed by measuring the impact of organization’s competitiveness and performance. The findings reveal that EVA as a tool enables the corporate to differentiate between value-creating and value-destructing activities and helps managers in taking right decisions which enhances shareholder value. Thus, finally the research makes a case for managers to use EVA as a tool to provide additional information to investors. Interestingly, EVA can also be adapted as a corporate philosophy for motivating and educating employees


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-119
Author(s):  
Trinik Susmonowati

The company's performance has always been measured based on financial ratios for a certain period. Measurement based on financial ratios is very dependent on the accounting treatment used in the preparation of corporate financial statements. The purpose of a company that is only oriented to the achievement of profits as big as when it is no longer relevant today. Therefore the responsibility of the company not only to the shareholders, but to all stakeholders. Performance appraisal of a company is very important that the assessment process must be in line with the effectiveness and efficiency in achieving competitive advantage in the business world. Since the last ten years has developed a new approach in assessing the financial performance of companies known as Economic Value Added (EVA). EVA model comes from the concept of capital cost (cost of capital), which is the risk faced by the company in making investments. The concept of Economic Value Added (EVA) as an alternative to performance measurement based on the value (EVA) is an approach in assessing the performance of the company by paying fair attention to the expectations of funders or investors. EVA is the profit left behind after deducting the capital cost (cost of capital) invested to generate the profit. Positive EVA values can be interpreted that the company's management has created value (creating value). Conversely, if the value of negative EVA means that there is no economic value added into the company. The goal to be achieved by the authors in this study is To determine the financial performance of Telecommunications Company in review of Economic Value Edded (EVA). And To know Which Telecommunication Company that provides better economic value.This research used qualitative analysis. The qualitative analysis method is used to interpret and analyze the result of EVA calculation, that is to measure the added value of the company by calculating all capital cost, either the capital contribution from the shareholder or from the loan, or the risk faced by the company in making the investment. To measure the company's performance required financial report data in the form of income statement and balance sheet, JCI, stock price and SBI rate data. Data Collection Procedure is the data of financial statements of companies from the telecommunications industry listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period 2005-2009, obtained from www.idx.co.id. Monthly monthly stock price index (IHSG) monthly from 2005-2009, interest rate of 12 month time deposit from 2005-2009 and stock price data used since 2005.The results show that only PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk alone can generate positive EVA, while PT Indosat Tbk and PT Bakrie Telecom Tbk generate negative EVA. Negative EVA values are caused by several factors, among others: because of the significant increase in fuel prices, followed by inflation and rising interest rates affecting people's purchasing power, rising capital costs and operational costs of both companies, the impact of the 2008 global financial crisis that affected on declining stock value and the impact of tariff war between telecommunication companies where telephone tariffs are lower and the decline in long distance call rates affects the telecommunication company's operating revenues.


Author(s):  
Ali Maghool

AbstractThis paper aims to study the effect of Financial performance indicators on the dividend policy among companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. The statistical sample includes 91 companies between 2008 and 2012. Dividend policy was considered a dependent variable, independent variables were economic value added, market value added, return on assets, and market to book value ratio, and control variables included company size and systematic risk. In the theoretical principles part, data were gathered through library method, and in the part of hypothesis tests, data were collected from financial statements and the Tehran Stock Exchange Website. Data were then examined in a multiple regression analysis and a correlation test. Results showed that Financial performance indicators indicators are direct and significant effects on dividend policy.Keywords: Dividend Policy, Financial performance indicators, Economic Value Added, Market Value Added, Return on Assets


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanan Ali Al-Awawdeh ◽  
Sa’ad Abdul Kareem Al-Sakini

The purpose of this is study is to test the impact of economic value added, market value added and traditional accounting measures on the shareholders’ value in the Jordanian commercial banks, based on a sample of 13 banks during the period 2010-2016. The study used the shareholders’ value as a dependent variable, while five independent variables were used, including Economic Value Added (EVA), Market value added (MVA), and three traditional accounting measures, namely; the rate of return on assets (ROA), rate of return on equity (ROE), and the Earning per share (EPS). The study found, by using the common regression analysis, that the rate of return on assets (ROA) and the economic value added (EVA) had a positive and statistically significant effect on maximizing the shareholders’ value, while the rest of the traditional accounting standards or the market added value had no any significant impact on shareholder’ value. The study concluded that traditional accounting standards are still constitute an important input for assessing shares, and maximizing the shareholders’ value along with modern performance assessment measures, especially economic value added. The study recommended that the performance assessment of banks should be based on two criteria: the rate of return on assets and the economic value added.


Author(s):  
Dwi Urip Wardoyo

This study aims to compare financial performance through profitability generated by two market participants in the witness transportation service industry in Jakarta, namely PT. BB compared to PT. ETU, this assessment is measured not limited to the profit generated but more than that by measuring financial added value through the concept of Eonomic Value Added produced by the two companies. The population in this study were all taxi transportation service companies in Jakarta. The sampling method selected two taxi companies that have the largest market share in DKI Jakarta, namely BB Taxi and ETU Taxi. The test analysis used in this study is ratio analysis through profit calculation and economic added value from the annual income statement. This study shows that there are (a) determination of the ratio of profit levels, (b) Determination of the comparison of economic value added of the two companies. Keywords :  Financial performance, Economic Value Added (EVA)


2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wikan Budi Utami

Tujuan dalam penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh EVA, ROA dan ROE terhadap return pemegang saham.Sampel yang diambil dalam penelitian ini adalah perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Jakarta (BEJ) yang tercantum dalam Indonesian Capital Market Directory dan internet dengan situs www.jsx.co.id sejak tahun 2006 sampai dengan 2008. Sampel penelitian ditentukan berdasarkan purposive sampling. Dalam penelitian ini uji asumsi klasik yang digunakan adalah: uji normalitas, uji Autokorelasi, uji Multikolinearitas, uji Heterokedastisitas, Uji Regresi (Uji f dan t).Pengujian hipotesis yang digunakan adalah uji f, uji t dan uji R2. Hasil uji F diperoleh nilai Fhitung sebesar 1,226 dengan tingkat signifikansi 0,317. Karena nilai signifikansi F lebih besar dari 0,05 maka disimpulkan tidak ada pengaruh simultan antara variabel Economic Value Added (EVA), Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE) terhadap Return Saham.Hasil uji t diperoleh variabel EVA memiliki tingkat signifikansi lebih dari 0,05 yaitu sebesar 0,100. Dengan tingkat signifikansi 0,100 yang lebih besar dari 0,05 disimpulkan bahwa secara parsial Economic Value Added (EVA) tidak berpengaruh terhadap Return Saham perusahaan. Variabel ROA memiliki tingkat signifikansi lebih besar dari 0,05 yaitu sebesar 0,789. Dengan tingkat signifikansi 0,789 lebih besar dari 0,05 disimpulkan bahwa secara parsial Return on Asset tidak berpengaruh terhadap Return Saham perusahaan. Variabel ROE memiliki tingkat signifikansi lebih dari 0,05 yaitu sebesar 0,689. Dengan tingkat signifikansi sebesar 0,689 yang lebih besar dari 0,05 disimpulkan bahwa secara parsial Return on Equity (ROE) tidak berpengaruh terhadap Return Saham perusahaanHasil uji koefisien determinasi diperoleh nilai R2 sebesar 0,109 atau 10,9%. Hal ini menunjukan bahwa 10,9% dari nilai variabel dependen yaitu Return Saham dapat dijelaskan oleh Economic Value Added (EVA), Return on Assets (ROA) dan Return on Equity (ROE) sedangkan sisa nilai variabel dependen yaitu  sebesar 89,1% tidak dapat dijelaskan oleh persamaan regresi atau dipengaruhi oleh faktor lain yang tidak termasuk dalam model analisis.Hasil penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberi masukan bagi investor dalam melakukan invetasi saham dengan tidak hanya melihat kondisi perusahaan melalui rasio keuangan, khususnya melalui rasio EVA, ROA dan ROE tapi dengan rasio lain sebagai penentu investasi.Kata kunci: Economic Value Added (EVA), Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE) dan Return Saham


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-45
Author(s):  
Ferry Irawan ◽  
Nico Yudha Manurung

PT Garuda Indonesia Tbk was one of the state-owned corporation that have go public on Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI). As a public company, PT Garuda Indonesia should create a good financial performance to attract financier (investor or creditor). The purpose of this study were to measure the financial performance by Economic Value Added (EVA) and Market Value Added (MVA). The result of this study is the company get a negative EVA in 2017 until 2019 which mean the company was not able to create value added for financier. In 2017 and 2018, MVA get a negative value which mean the company was not able to create value added for investor. In 2019, MVA get a positive value because the company’s stock price increased 73% from previous year.PT Garuda Indonesia Tbk merupakan salah satu Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) yang telah go public di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI). Sebagai perusahaan terbuka, PT Garuda Indonesia Tbk harus menciptakan kinerja keuangan yang baik untuk menarik pemodal (investor atau kreditur). Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengukur kinerja keuangan dengan Economic Value Added (EVA) dan Market Value Added (MVA). Hasil penelitian ini adalah perusahaan memperoleh nilai EVA yang negatif pada 2017-2019 yang berarti perusahaan tidak berhasil menciptakan nilai tambah bagi para pemodal. Pada 2017 dan 2018, MVA memperoleh nilai yang negatif yang berarti perusahaan gagal menciptakan nilai tambah pagi para investor. Pada 2019, MVA memperoleh nilai yang positif karena harga saham perusahaan yang meningkat sebesar 73% dari tahun sebelumnya.


2021 ◽  
Vol 129 ◽  
pp. 03014
Author(s):  
Dusan Karpac ◽  
Viera Bartosova

Research background: The modern goal of enterprises, value creation, is achieved through the concept of economic profit. Profit, as part of profit or loss, is one of the most important flows, pointing to how efficiently corporate capital is used in an entity (Coatney & Poliak, 2020). The article deals with the difference between accounting and economic profit, the selected form of economic profit - the EVA indicator. The economic value added (EVA) indicator is one of the best-known modern indicators of a company's performance (Siekelova et al., 2019). It shows whether the given entity increases its value or only earns for its economic survival. The benefit of this indicator is the valuation of equity and taking into account the risk. It is difficult to express the economic profit itself, therefore the article also addresses the issue of its calculation (Shah et al., 2016). The company needs to know its financial status and the direction it is heading, so we decided to calculate a selected form of economic profit. Purpose of the article: The company needs to know its financial status and the direction it is heading, so we decided to calculate a selected form of economic profit. When expressing the value of the economic value added indicator, it is also important to know the items and components of the calculation that have the strongest meaning and effect on the possible amount of the indicator. Given this, we decided to use a sensitivity analysis, which points to the effect of individual variables that participate in the construction of the EVA calculation. Methods: In this work, the methods of induction, deduction, and comparison were used to obtain a true picture of the subject issue. Methods of synthesis and analysis of the researched issues were also used. Findings & Value added: In the paper there is pointed out the intensity of the impact of individual variables that entered into the calculation of the economic value added indicator as a dominant indicator of concept of economic profit.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 47-55
Author(s):  
Olusegun Osho ◽  
Alexander Ehimare Omankhanlen ◽  
Mojisola Fasanmi ◽  
Victoria Akinjare

Considering the possibility of finding a gap and a room for improvement, so much have been written about liquidity and performance. Notwithstanding, the emphasis has been on profitability as a yardstick for performance and little has been done on other areas of performance measurement. The emphasis has also been more on various economic sectors with the exception of the manufacturing industry. This paper intends to look at the impact, if any, of liquidity provision and availability on Nigeria’s manufacturing firm’s performance from the perspective of Economic Value Added (EVA). Economic value-adding is beyond just profitability or liquidity. The firm's value to the stakeholders, its sustainability and long-term values are defined. The study would apply liquidity theories, profitability and the economic value-added theories as it applies to a manufacturing firm in a developing economy like Nigeria. On its methodology, the article data is obtained from the World Bank’s World Development Indicators-WDI and then a regression analysis will be run on the data using the SPSS software and then an analysis of the results of the regression. The last section of the article would conclude and make recommendations from the study outcome and the empirical analysis with respect to the theories.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document