A Novel IOT Based Smart Wheelchair Design for Cerebral Palsy Patients

Author(s):  
Shaolin Kataria ◽  
Aditya Sunil Menon ◽  
Prerna Sultania ◽  
Sunjol Singh Paul ◽  
Kakelli Anil Kumar

Several patients face Cerebral Palsy. Such debilitating diseases impede motor control and make it difficult for them to operate traditional electric wheelchairs. Existing models of smart wheelchairs accommodate these issues to a certain extent but fail to deliver a solution for patients to use the wheelchairs completely autonomously. This paper proposes a novel model for a cost-effective smart wheelchair that takes simple gestures as input for movement, along with several quality-of-life and assistive modules such as vitals monitoring and voice memo support for patients suffering from memory loss, along with obstacle detection to ensure complete safety of the patient regardless of the terrain. The paper discusses the various modules present in the wheelchair, elaborates upon the algorithm used for input detection and calculation, and finally, the implementation of each module. Lastly, the paper enlists comparisons between existing smart wheelchair models and the proposed model and lists out its strengths, weaknesses and states its findings from the proposed system's results.

BMC Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Arnaud ◽  
Carine Duffaut ◽  
Jérôme Fauconnier ◽  
Silke Schmidt ◽  
Kate Himmelmann ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Effective inclusion in society for young people with disabilities is increasingly seen as generating opportunities for self-development, and improving well-being. However, significant barriers remain in the vast majority of activities meaningful for young adults. Research argues that various personal (disabilities, health) and environmental (access to the resources needed, accessible environment, discrimination, lack of personal economic independence) factors contribute to limited participation. However, previous studies conducted in young people with cerebral palsy (CP) mainly investigated the transition period to adulthood, and did not fully consider the whole range of impairment severity profiles or environmental barriers. In this study, we will use the follow-up of the SPARCLE cohort and a comparison group from the general population (1) to investigate the impact of the environment on participation and quality of life of young adults with CP, (2) to determine predictors of a successful young adulthood in educational, professional, health and social fields, (3) to compare quality of life and frequency of participation in social, work and recreational activities with the general population, (4) to document on participation and quality of life in those with severe disabilities. Methods The SPARCLE3 study has a combined longitudinal and cross-sectional design. Young adults with CP aged 22 to 27 years in 6 European regions previously enrolled in the SPARCLE cohort or newly recruited will be invited to self-complete a comprehensive set of questionnaires exploring participation (daily life and discretionary activities), health-related quality of life, body function, personal factors (health, personal resources), and contextual factors (availability of needed environmental items, family environment, services provision) during home visits supervised by trained researchers. Proxy-reports or adapted questionnaires will be used for those with the most severe impairments. The recruitment of a large group from the general population (online survey) will enable to identify life areas where the discrepancies between young people with CP and their able-bodied peers are the most significant. Discussion This study will help identify to what extent disabilities and barriers in environment negatively affect participation and quality of life, and how previous valued experiences during childhood or adolescence might modulate these effects.


2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 298-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshitsugu Obi ◽  
Rieko Eriguchi ◽  
Shuo-Ming Ou ◽  
Connie M. Rhee ◽  
Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh

Background: The 2006 Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines suggest twice-weekly or incremental hemodialysis for patients with substantial residual kidney function (RKF). However, in most affluent nations de novo and abrupt transition to thrice-weekly hemodialysis is routinely prescribed for all dialysis-naïve patients regardless of their RKF. We review historical developments in hemodialysis therapy initiation and revisit twice-weekly hemodialysis as an individualized, incremental treatment especially upon first transitioning to hemodialysis therapy. Summary: In the 1960's, hemodialysis treatment was first offered as a life-sustaining treatment in the form of long sessions (≥10 hours) administered every 5 to 7 days. Twice- and then thrice-weekly treatment regimens were subsequently developed to prevent uremic symptoms on a long-term basis. The thrice-weekly regimen has since become the ‘standard of care' despite a lack of comparative studies. Some clinical studies have shown benefits of high hemodialysis dose by more frequent or longer treatment times mainly among patients with limited or no RKF. Conversely, in selected patients with higher levels of RKF and particularly higher urine volume, incremental or twice-weekly hemodialysis may preserve RKF and vascular access longer without compromising clinical outcomes. Proposed criteria for twice-weekly hemodialysis include urine output >500 ml/day, limited interdialytic weight gain, smaller body size relative to RKF, and favorable nutritional status, quality of life, and comorbidity profile. Key Messages: Incremental hemodialysis including twice-weekly regimens may be safe and cost-effective treatment regimens that provide better quality of life for incident dialysis patients who have substantial RKF. These proposed criteria may guide incremental hemodialysis frequency and warrant future randomized controlled trials.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alanoud Akram Aman ◽  
Bashaer Baharoon ◽  
Haifa Jamal Idrees ◽  
Ahad Mohammedyusuf Taj ◽  
Bassmah Ali Alzahrani ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Shelly ◽  
E Davis ◽  
E Waters ◽  
A Mackinnon ◽  
D Reddihough ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document