scholarly journals Dual frontiers data envelopment analysis: multiple ranking approaches from optimistic and pessimistic perspectives

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdullah Maraee Aldamak

The field of data envelopment analysis (DEA) has evolved rapidly since its introduction to decision-making science 40 years ago. DEA has since attracted the attention of many researchers because of its unique characteristic to measure the efficiency of multiple-input and multiple-output decision-making units (DMUs) without assigning prior weight to the input and output, unlike most available decision analysis tools. The body of research has resulted in a huge amount of literature and diverse DEA models with very many different approaches. DEA classifies all units under assessment into two groups: efficient with a 100% efficiency score and inefficient with a less than 100% efficiency score. This ability is considered both a strength and a weakness of the standard DEA model because, although it allows DEA to evaluate the efficiency of any dataset, it lacks the power to rank all DMUs, by giving full efficiency scores to many efficient units. This issue has attracted many researchers to investigate the weak discrimination power of classical DEA models, resulting in a subfield of research that focuses on DEA ranking. This thesis focuses on the development of the conventional DEA model, and an attempt has been made to study models that are considered as improved models, or approaches that bring a better ranking field, that may bring more accurate evaluation than the original DEA. After studying DEA ranking models, the thesis presents various models under the optimistic and pessimistic DEA ranking approaches. The first and fundamental contribution are the optimistic and pessimistic free disposal hull (FDH) models. In this study, authentic optimistic and pessimistic DEA models without convexity are developed from both input and output orientation. Further into the research investigation, extended models have been proposed, by combining the conventional and FDH ranking models with other different approaches in the literature. Chapter 4 of this thesis presents three extended FDH models: an FDH slack-based model, an FDH superefficiency model, and a dual frontier without infeasibility super-efficiency FDH model. Chapter 5 shows the development of extended models when virtual DMUs are considered. Improved virtual DMU models and improved FDH virtual DMU models are proposed in order to develop the DEA ranking ability from both optimistic and pessimistic approaches. The final model is an optimistic and pessimistic forecasting approach using regression analysis. The forecasting model can be used by decision makers to determine the resources needed for future planning to build an efficient new unit with reference to the current DMU set.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdullah Maraee Aldamak

The field of data envelopment analysis (DEA) has evolved rapidly since its introduction to decision-making science 40 years ago. DEA has since attracted the attention of many researchers because of its unique characteristic to measure the efficiency of multiple-input and multiple-output decision-making units (DMUs) without assigning prior weight to the input and output, unlike most available decision analysis tools. The body of research has resulted in a huge amount of literature and diverse DEA models with very many different approaches. DEA classifies all units under assessment into two groups: efficient with a 100% efficiency score and inefficient with a less than 100% efficiency score. This ability is considered both a strength and a weakness of the standard DEA model because, although it allows DEA to evaluate the efficiency of any dataset, it lacks the power to rank all DMUs, by giving full efficiency scores to many efficient units. This issue has attracted many researchers to investigate the weak discrimination power of classical DEA models, resulting in a subfield of research that focuses on DEA ranking. This thesis focuses on the development of the conventional DEA model, and an attempt has been made to study models that are considered as improved models, or approaches that bring a better ranking field, that may bring more accurate evaluation than the original DEA. After studying DEA ranking models, the thesis presents various models under the optimistic and pessimistic DEA ranking approaches. The first and fundamental contribution are the optimistic and pessimistic free disposal hull (FDH) models. In this study, authentic optimistic and pessimistic DEA models without convexity are developed from both input and output orientation. Further into the research investigation, extended models have been proposed, by combining the conventional and FDH ranking models with other different approaches in the literature. Chapter 4 of this thesis presents three extended FDH models: an FDH slack-based model, an FDH superefficiency model, and a dual frontier without infeasibility super-efficiency FDH model. Chapter 5 shows the development of extended models when virtual DMUs are considered. Improved virtual DMU models and improved FDH virtual DMU models are proposed in order to develop the DEA ranking ability from both optimistic and pessimistic approaches. The final model is an optimistic and pessimistic forecasting approach using regression analysis. The forecasting model can be used by decision makers to determine the resources needed for future planning to build an efficient new unit with reference to the current DMU set.


Author(s):  
somayeh khezri ◽  
Akram Dehnokhalaji ◽  
Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi

One of interesting subjects in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is estimation of congestion of Decision Making Units (DMUs). Congestion is evidenced when decreases (increases) in some inputs re- sult in increases (decreases) in some outputs without worsening (im- proving) any other input/output. Most of the existing methods for measuring the congestion of DMUs utilize the traditional de nition of congestion and assume that inputs and outputs change with the same proportion. Therefore, the important question that arises is whether congestion will occur or not if the decision maker (DM) increases or de- creases the inputs dis-proportionally. This means that, the traditional de nition of congestion in DEA may be unable to measure the con- gestion of units with multiple inputs and outputs. This paper focuses on the directional congestion and proposes methods for recognizing the directional congestion using DEA models. To do this, we consider two di erent scenarios: (i) just the input direction is available. (ii) none of the input and output directions are available. For each scenario, we propose a method consists in systems of inequalities or linear pro- gramming problems for estimation of the directional congestion. The validity of the proposed methods are demonstrated utilizing two nu- merical examples.


Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (21) ◽  
pp. 7028
Author(s):  
Qingyou Yan ◽  
Fei Zhao ◽  
Xu Wang ◽  
Tomas Balezentis

This paper suggests that the efficiency of a system (decision-making unit) and its subsystem cannot be properly measured using a two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) model either in cooperative or non-cooperative evaluation. Indeed, the existing methods subjectively determine the status of the subsystems in the whole system. The two-stage DEA models, either cooperative game or non-cooperative game, are used to analyze the environmental efficiency. However, when the actual relationship between the two subsystems is inconsistent with the subjective relationship assumptions, the overall efficiency of the system and the efficiency of each subsystem will be biased. The conventional two-stage DEA models require predetermining the relationship between the subsystems within the system based on the subjective judgment of the decision-maker. Based on this, this paper proposes a three-step method to solve the two-stage DEA. First, the position relation among subsystems is determined according to the optimal weights through the model. According to the status relationship among subsystems, the decision units are grouped, and the two-stage DEA model of cooperative game or non-cooperative game is used to analyze the efficiency in each group. This method reduces the subjectivity of decision making and analyzes the efficiency of each decision unit applying the most appropriate two-stage DEA model to find the source of inefficiency. Finally, this paper verifies the rationality and validity of the method by analyzing the water use efficiency of industrial systems in China. It is found that most regions in China value economic development more than environmental protection (as evidenced by the DEA weights). What is more, the method proposed by the paper can be generalized for any two-stage DEA problem.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jafar Pourmahmoud ◽  
Maedeh Gholam Azad

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to propose the data envelopment analysis (DEA) model that can be used as binary-valued data. Often the basic DEA models were developed by assuming that all of the data are non-negative. However, there are situations where all data are binary. As an example, the information on many diseases in health care is binary data. The existence of binary data in traditional DEA models may change the behavior of the production possibility set (PPS). This study defines a binary summation operator, expresses the modified principles and introduces the extracted PPS of axioms. Furthermore, this study proposes a binary integer programming of DEA (BIP-DEA) for assessing the efficiency scores to use as an alternate tool in prediction. Design/methodology/approach In this study, the extracted PPS of modified axioms and the BIP-DEA model for assessing the efficiency score is proposed. Findings The binary integer model was proposed to eliminate the challenges of the binary-value data in DEA. Originality/value The importance of the proposed model for many fields including the health-care industry is that it can predict the occurrence or non-occurrence of the events, using binary data. This model has been applied to evaluate the most important risk factors for stroke disease and mechanical disorders. The targets set by this model can help to diagnose earlier the disease and increase the patients’ chances of recovery.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 378-398
Author(s):  
Chunhua Chen ◽  
Haohua Liu ◽  
Lijun Tang ◽  
Jianwei Ren

Abstract DEA (data envelopment analysis) models can be divided into two groups: Radial DEA and non-radial DEA, and the latter has higher discriminatory power than the former. The range adjusted measure (RAM) is an effective and widely used non-radial DEA approach. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no literature on the integer-valued super-efficiency RAM-DEA model, especially when undesirable outputs are included. We first propose an integer-valued RAM-DEA model with undesirable outputs and then extend this model to an integer-valued super-efficiency RAM-DEA model with undesirable outputs. Compared with other DEA models, the two novel models have many advantages: 1) They are non-oriented and non-radial DEA models, which enable decision makers to simultaneously and non-proportionally improve inputs and outputs; 2) They can handle integer-valued variables and undesirable outputs, so the results obtained are more reliable; 3) The results can be easily obtained as it is based on linear programming; 4) The integer-valued super-efficiency RAM-DEA model with undesirable outputs can be used to accurately rank efficient DMUs. The proposed models are applied to evaluate the efficiency of China’s regional transportation systems (RTSs) considering the number of transport accidents (an undesirable output). The results help decision makers improve the performance of inefficient RTSs and analyze the strengths of efficient RTSs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-134
Author(s):  
Jelena Jardas Antonić ◽  
Kristina Kregar ◽  
Nenad Vretenar

Every sport organisation strives to evaluate its performance: its weaknesses and strengths. Measuring efficiency and sports are two interrelated concepts and it is not surprising that most of the research on sports is focused on analysing the efficiency of teams according to player techniques, attack and defence efficiency. However, there are very few studies based on the analysis of financial factors such as teams’ revenue and costs. In this paper two Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models were used to evaluate 16 young cadet volleyball teams in Primorsko-Goranska County based on two economic inputs. The paper aims to explain the importance of teams’ financial resources in achieving sports efficiency. To analyse the relative efficiency of teams, two frequently used models are employed, the Banker Charnes Cooper (BCC) and the Charnes Cooper Rhodes (CCR) model. In the end, a super efficiency analysis was conducted to make a distinction in efficiency scores between efficient units. Analyses showed that financial factors are not crucial factors for efficiency score and gave possibility to use obtained results and improve the performance of inefficient volleyball teams. The study was conducted on a sample of 16 teams through 4 inputs and 1 output collected during 2017/2018 season.


Kybernetes ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 536-551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Hossein Razavi Hajiagha ◽  
Shide Sadat Hashemi ◽  
Hannan Amoozad Mahdiraji

Purpose – Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a non-parametric model that is developed for evaluating the relative efficiency of a set of homogeneous decision-making units that each unit transforms multiple inputs into multiple outputs. However, usually the decision-making units are not completely similar. The purpose of this paper is to propose an algorithm for DEA applications when considered DMUs are non-homogeneous. Design/methodology/approach – To reach this aim, an algorithm is designed to mitigate the impact of heterogeneity on efficiency evaluation. Using fuzzy C-means algorithm, a fuzzy clustering is obtained for DMUs based on their inputs and outputs. Then, the fuzzy C-means based DEA approach is used for finding the efficiency of DMUs in different clusters. Finally, the different efficiencies of each DMU are aggregated based on the membership values of DMUs in clusters. Findings – Heterogeneity causes some positive impact on some DMUs while it has negative impact on other ones. The proposed method mitigates this undesirable impact and a different distribution of efficiency score is obtained that neglects this unintended impacts. Research limitations/implications – The proposed method can be applied in DEA applications with a large number of DMUs in different situations, where some of them enjoyed the good environmental conditions, while others suffered from bad conditions. Therefore, a better assessment of real performance can be obtained. Originality/value – The paper proposed a hybrid algorithm combination of fuzzy C-means clustering method with classic DEA models for the first time.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Hassanpour

Iranian Plastic Industries (IPI) created the main role in generating and producing a variety of plastic commodities and goods for inhabitant's demands. IPI comprised a cluster of 21 industries regarding the initial screening of Iranian evaluator team in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) plan. The present research empirically examined a way to find the efficiency score of IPI. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model was integrated with Additive Ratio ASsessment (ARAS) and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to estimate the efficiency score for IPI. The findings were classified IPI into 2 classes pertaining to both TOPSIS and ARAS models supported with both weighing systems of Friedman and Kendall tests. Moreover, the results proved an independent DEA value for the TOPSIS and ARAS models.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Nafiseh Javaherian ◽  
Ali Hamzehee ◽  
Hossein Sayyadi Tooranloo

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a powerful tool for evaluating the efficiency of decision-making units for ranking and comparison purposes and to differentiate efficient and inefficient units. Classic DEA models are ill-suited for the problems where decision-making units consist of multiple stages with intermediate products and those where inputs and outputs are imprecise or nondeterministic, which is not uncommon in the real world. This paper presents a new DEA model for evaluating the efficiency of decision-making units with two-stage structures and triangular intuitionistic fuzzy data. The paper first introduces two-stage DEA models, then explains how these models can be modified with intuitionistic fuzzy coefficients, and finally describes how arithmetic operators for intuitionistic fuzzy numbers can be used for a conversion into crisp two-stage structures. In the end, the proposed method is used to solve an illustrative numerical example.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (3b) ◽  
pp. 208-221
Author(s):  
IJ DIKE

This paper examines the use of data envelopment analysis (DEA) in the conduct of efficiency measurement involving fuzzy (interval) input-output values. Data envelopment analysis is a linear programming method for comparing the relative productivity (or efficiency) of multiple service units. Standard DEA models assume crisp data for both the input and output values. In practice however, input and output values may be uncertain, vague, imprecise or incomplete. A new pair of fuzzy DEA models is presented which differs from existing fuzzy DEA models handling uncertain data. In this approach, upper bound interval data are used exclusively to obtain the upper frontier values while lower bound interval data are used exclusively to obtain the lower frontier values. The outcome, when compared with the outcome of existing approach, based on the same set of data, shows a swap in the upper and lower frontier values with exactly the same number of efficient decision making units (DMUs). This new approach therefore clears the ambiguity occasioned by the mixture of upper and lower bound values in the determination of the upper and lower frontier efficiency scores respectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document