Analysis of EEG Amplitude Change during Thinking Process in Disaster Problem-solving Using Repeated Measures Multivariate Model

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 790-796
Author(s):  
Hae-Gyung Yoon ◽  
◽  
Taeyoung Kim ◽  
Kyung-Yae Hyun
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Multivariate Model ◽  
Amplitude Change ◽  
Thinking Process

Proses Berpikir Logis Siswa Sekolah Dasar Bertipe Kecerdasan Logis Matematis dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Liska Yanti Pane ◽  
Kamid Kamid ◽  
Asrial Asrial
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Qualitative Method ◽  
Logical Thinking ◽  
Think Aloud ◽  
Process Data ◽  
Thinking Process ◽  
Problem Solving Process ◽  
Problem Solving Strategy ◽  
Solving Strategy

This research aims to describe logical thinking process of a logical-mathematical intelligence student. We employ qualitative method to disclose the subject’s learning process. Data are collected by interview and modified think aloud methods. The results show that subject has capability to find and organize problems and data correctly. Subject describes conditions that are needed to do the steps of problem solving strategy. The steps are done systematically until the end of problem solving process.

Proses Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Tipe Linguistik dalamPemecahan Masalah Biologi

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Imelda Aisah Sarip ◽  
Kamid Kamid ◽  
Bambang Hariyadi
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Think Aloud ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Thinking Process ◽  
Problem Solving Process ◽  
The Given

The aim of this research is to describe creative thinking process of linguistic type student in biology problem solving. This research is conducted to linguistic intelligence type of subject at SMPN 6 Kota Jambi. SL the subject was selected based on the aim of the research. Data collection is conducted by interview and a modified think aloud method. Data is analyzed based on creative thinking process purposed by Polya.The result of this research shows that SL could find and arrange the given problems and collect data correctly and appropriately. The problem solving steps is done systematically to the end of problem solving process. The last steps problem solving, SL does checking while doing scratching to make sure that the written answers meet her need.

scholarly journals Thinking Process of Naive Problem Solvers to Solve Mathematical Problems

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jackson Pasini Mairing
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Procedural Knowledge ◽  
Mental Image ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Maximum Score ◽  
Mathematical Problems ◽  
Problem Solving Strategies ◽  
Thinking Process ◽  
Problem Solvers ◽  
Holistic Rubric

Solving problem is not only a goal of mathematical learning. Students acquire ways of thinking, habits of persistence and curiosity, and confidence in unfamiliar situations by learning to solve problems. In fact, there were students who had difficulty in solving problems. The students were naive problem solvers. This research aimed to describe the thinking process of naive problem solvers based on heuristic of Polya. The researcher gave two problems to students at grade XI from one of high schools in Palangka Raya, Indonesia. The research subjects were two students with problem solving scores of 0 or 1 for both problems (naive problem solvers). The score was determined by using a holistic rubric with maximum score of 4. Each subject was interviewed by the researcher separately based on the subject’s solution. The results showed that the naive problem solvers read the problems for several times in order to understand them. The naive problem solvers could determine the known and the unknown if they were written in the problems. However, they faced difficulties when the information in the problems should be processed in their mindsto construct a mental image. The naive problem solvers were also failed to make an appropriate plan because they did not have a problem solving schema. The schema was constructed by the understanding of the problems, conceptual and procedural knowledge of the relevant concepts, knowledge of problem solving strategies, and previous experiences in solving isomorphic problems.

scholarly journals The effectiveness of group counseling based on problem-solving on aggression and social adjustment in hearing-impaired students

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahdiyeh Azizi ◽  
Mohsen Saeidmanesh ◽  
Fateme Kazemi ◽  
Vahide Radaie
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Group Therapy ◽  
Social Adjustment ◽  
Group Counseling ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Yazd City ◽  
Hearing Impaired Students

Background and Aim: One of the common behavioral disorders of hearing-impaired child­ren is aggressive behavior, which can affect soc­ial adjustment in their adolescence. This study was designed to investigate the effectiveness of group counseling based on problem-solving on aggression and social adjustment of hearing-impaired students. Methods: This study is quasi-experimental with pretest posttest design and a control group. The study population was all adolescents with hear­ing impairment referred to Yazd Speech The­rapy Centers, Yazd City, Iran. A total of 30 stu­dents were selected from the referred hearing-impaired students with high aggression and low social adjustment. Then they were randomly assigned into control (n = 15) and experimental (n = 15) groups. The study instruments were the California social behavior and Buss and Perry aggression inventory. The group couns­eling based on problem-solving intervention consisted of 7 one-hour sessions, presented for the experimental group. We analyzed the obtai­ned data by repeated measures analysis of cova­riance. Results: Group therapy based on problem-solving can reduce aggression (p < 0.001) and increase social adjustment (p = 0.04). Conclusion: The professionals in this field are recommended to use group therapy based on problem-solving.

scholarly journals Profil Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa PGMI dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Dasar

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sintha Sih Dewanti
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Reciprocal Relationship ◽  
Applied Problem ◽  
Math Ability ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Mathematics Problems ◽  
Thinking Process ◽  
High Level ◽  
Complex Translation

Abstrak Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan profil berpikir kritis mahasiswa PGMI UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta dalam memecahkan masalah matematika dasar. Pemecahan masalah merupakan proses mental tingkat tinggi dan memerlukan proses berpikir yang lebih kompleks termasuk berpikir kritis. Pemecahan masalah juga mempunyai hubungan timbal balik dengan berpikir kritis. Berpikir kritis pada penelitian ini mengacu pada berpikir kritis dengan kriteria FRISCO. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Pada penelitian ini diambil 9 subjek penelitian, yaitu 3 subjek pada kemampuan matematika dasar tinggi, sedang, dan rendah. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan pemberian soal pemecahan masalah dan wawancara. Ada 5 tipe masalah yang digunakan dalam soal pemecahan masalah yaitu: simple translation problem, complex translation problem, process problem, applied problem, dan puzzle problem. Profil berpikir kritis mahasiswa dalam memecahkan masalah matematika dasar menurut kriteria FRISCO pada setiap langkah pemecahan Polya sebagai berikut: a) Mahasiswa dengan KPM tinggi mengetahui fokus, alasan, situasi dan kejelasan dalam setiap tahap pemecahan masalah juga menjelaskan inferensinya pada setiap tahap pemecahan masalah Polya pada simple translation problem, complex translation problem, dan applied problem, tetapi belum dapat untuk 2 masalah lainnya; b) Mahasiswa dengan KPM sedang, mengetahui fokus, alasan, situasi dan kejelasan dalam setiap tahap pemecahan masalah juga menjelaskan inferensinya pada setiap tahap pemecahan masalah Polya pada simple translation problem dan applied problem tetapi belum dapat untuk 3 masalah lainnya; dan c) Mahasiswa dengan KPM rendah, mengetahui fokus, alasan, inferensi, situasi, klarifikasi dan memeriksa kembali pada setiap langkah pemecahan masalah Polya pada masalah simple translation problem, dan belum dapat pada puzzle problem, sedangkan untuk 3 masalah lainnya mengetahui fokus dan alasan hanya sampai pada langkah melaksanakan strategi, tetapi belum dapat mengetahui inferensinya. Kata kunci: berpikir kritis, pemecahan masalah, kemampuan matematika dasar Abstract The purpose of this research is to describe the critical thinking profile of PGMI UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta students in solving basic mathematics problems. Problem solving is a high level mental process and requires a more complex thinking process including critical thinking. Problem solving also has a reciprocal relationship with critical thinking. Critical thinking in this study refers to critical thinking with the FRISCO criteria. The type of this research is descriptive research with qualitative approach. In this study, 9 subjects taken, that is 3 subject to the ability of high-basic mathematic, medium, and low. Data was collected by way of tests and interviews. There are 5 types of problems used in problem solving tests: simple translation problem, complex translation problem, problem process, applied problem, and puzzle problem. The profile of critical thinking of students in solving basic mathematics problems according to FRISCO criteria at each polya solving step as follows: a) Students with high problem solving abilitys know the focus, reason, situation and clarity in every problem solving step also explain the inferences at each stage of solving Polya problem on simple translation problem, complex translation problem, and applied problem, but not yet for 2 other problems; b) Students with medium problem solving abilitys know the focus, reason, situation and clarity in each stage of problem solving also explain the inferences at each stage of polya problem solving on simple translation problem and applied problem but not yet for the other 3 problems; and c) Students with low problem solving abilitys know the focus, reason, inference, situation, clarification and re-examine each step Polya problem solving on the problem of simple translation problem, and not yet in the puzzle problem, while for 3 other problems know the focus and reason only to the step of implementing the strategy, but not yet know the inferences. Keywords: critical thinking, problem solving, basic math ability

scholarly journals Proses Berpikir Mahasiswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Fungsi Pembangkit

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-39
Author(s):  
Ninik Mutianingsih ◽  
Lydia Lia Prayitno ◽  
Agus Prasetyo Kurniawan
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Generating Function ◽  
Procedural Knowledge ◽  
Think Aloud ◽  
Thinking Process ◽  
Low Ability

This study aims to describe students’ thinking process in solving the problems of generating function. This is a case study that classifies students into three categories: high, medium, and low. Subjects were asked to solve the problems then use think aloud to reveal their thinking process. The results show that in understanding the problem, using conceptual and procedural knowledge related to the problems, strategies, and experiences they have in solving similar problems between the three subjects is different. Subjects with high and medium capability are able to reveal the problem-solving component of Polya in detail, whereas low-ability subjects use only some of the problem-solving components of Polya.

Evaluation of a problem-solving (PS) techniques-based intervention for informal carers of patients with dementia receiving in-home care

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 937-948 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Chiu ◽  
Tim Pauley ◽  
Virginia Wesson ◽  
Dunstan Pushpakumar ◽  
Joel Sadavoy
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Perceived Stress ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Health Science ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Care Coordinator ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Problem Solving Therapy ◽  
Informal Carers

ABSTRACTBackground:The value of care provided by informal carers in Canada is estimated at $26 billion annually (Hollander et al., 2009). However, carers’ needs are often overlooked, limiting their capacity to provide care. Problem-solving therapy (PST), a structured approach to problem solving (PS) and a core principle of the Reitman Centre CARERS Program, has been shown to alleviate emotional distress and improve carers’ competence (Chiu et al., 2013). This study evaluated the effectiveness of problem-solving techniques-based intervention based on adapted PST methods, in enhancing carers’ physical and emotional capacity to care for relatives with dementia living in the community.Methods:56 carers were equally allocated to a problem-solving techniques-based intervention group or a control arm. Carers in the intervention group received three 1 hr visits by a care coordinator (CC) who had been given advanced training in PS techniques-based intervention. Coping, mastery, competence, burden, and perceived stress of the carers were evaluated at baseline and post-intervention using standardized assessment tools. An intention-to-treat analysis utilizing repeated measures ANOVA was performed on the data.Results:Post-intervention measures completion rate was 82% and 92% for the intervention and control groups, respectively. Carers in the intervention group showed significantly improved task-oriented coping, mastery, and competence and significantly reduced emotion-oriented coping, burden and stress (p < 0.01–0.001). Control carers showed no change.Conclusion:PS techniques, when learned and delivered by CCs as a tool to coach carers in their day-to-day caregiving, improves carers’ caregiving competence, coping, burden, and perceived stress. This may reduce dependence on primary, psychiatric, and institutional care. Results provide evidence that establishing effective partnerships between inter-professional clinicians in academic clinical health science centers, and community agencies can extend the reach of the expertise of specialized health care institutions.

scholarly journals STUDENTS’ CRITICAL THINKING PROFILES IN SOLVING MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS BADES ON ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ)

MATHEdunesa ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 211-220
Author(s):  
NILA NURCAHYANING KUSUMAWARDANI ◽  
RADEN SULAIMAN
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Mathematical Problem ◽  
Good Communication ◽  
Mathematics Problem Solving ◽  
Mathematical Problems ◽  
Processing Information ◽  
Thinking Process ◽  
Mathematics Problem

Critical thinking is a thinking process in processing information logically starti from understanding, analyzing, evaluating and making precise conclusions. Critical thinking indicators are clarification, assessment, inference, and strategy that referred to Jacob and Sam. Mathematics is designed to improve students' critical thinking in a solving problem. One of the factors that affect students' critical thinking in solving a problem is AQ. This research is descriptive study with qualitative approach. The aim is to describe critical thinking profile of climber, camper, and quitter students in solving mathematical problems. The subjects were three students of VIII grade junior high school who represented each AQ category and had good communication skills. The instrument used was the ARP questionnaire, mathematics problem solving tests, and interview guidelines. The results shows that students’ critical thinking profile in understanding the problem is climber and camper student do all indicators of critical thinking in the clarification phase. Quitter student is only able mentioning known and asked information. In devising a plan, climber student implements all indicators of assessment and strategy phase. Camper student implements all indicators in assessment phase, but do not discuss the possible steps in strategy phase. Quitter student does not do both assessment and strategy phase. In carrying out the plan, climber and camper students do all indicators of inference phase, while quitter student does not. In the step of looking back, only climber student who carries out evaluating steps that have been done. Keywords: Jacob and Sam’s critical thinking, mathematical problem solving, adversity quotient

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document