scholarly journals CLASSIFICATIONS OF LEGAL COMMUNICATION IN RUSSIAN CIVIL LAW

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 54-63
Author(s):  
Владимир Куранов
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Business Communication ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Essential Condition ◽  
Legal Implications ◽  
Legal Communication ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Communication Methods

Business communication is an essential condition for successful functioning of the civil turnover. In 2013, for assigning a legal effect to business communication, the legislator introduced a new norm - Article 165.1 of the Russian Federation Civil Code that covers legal communication. Despite the fact that this legislative innovation has been existing for almost seven years, despite the accumulated volume of judicial and arbitration practice of applying this rule, and despite the scientific research interest in this problem, the civil law science does not have a full-fledged theory of legal communication, including its concept, features, place in the system of legal facts, and other aspects. The purpose is to classify by various criteria the legal communication whose legal status is provisioned by the rule of Article 165.1 of the Russian Federation Civil Code, for solving a task meaningful for the Russian civil law development - i.e. the task of constructing the civil theory of legal communication. Methods: the basis of the research is the dialectical materialistic method of obtaining awareness of public phenomena and processes that conditions the study of legal communication in dynamics and in conjunction with other legal phenomena. Other universal methods including analysis, synthesis, induction and deduction, comparison, grouping are applied. Results: the author proposes innovative classifications of legal communication; with the classification criteria including the form, the conduct of the addressee of the message, the number of the addressees, the nature of legal implications, the source, and the sphere of application.

scholarly journals One Real Estate Complex: Concept and Prospects of Law

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 124-140
Author(s):  
ALEXANDR A. VEDENIN
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Real Estate ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Legal Concept ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Concepts ◽  
Property Complex

One of the most important and discussed topics of Russian civilization is the issue of objects of civil law. The topic under study is not adequately reflected in domestic civil law and judicial arbitration practice. According to legal scholars, the ongoing changes in domestic civil legislation have not eliminated problems that relate to objects of civil law. The constant complication of civil law turnover and the development of domestic science of civil law are forced to carry out targeted work in this direction. The domestic legislator initiates the necessary new norms of civil law. As a result, this entails, among other things, the emergence of new objects of civil law. The expediency of expanding the list of objects of civil law requires a rethinking of existing legal concepts and work on serious theoretical and practical justification of new ones. In legal science and practice, the need to include the legal concept of "single immovable complex" in the current civil legislation of the Russian Federation is proved Legal scholars have formed various opinions that characterize it. Domestic civilizations have identified and analyzed the theoretical and practical shortcomings of a single immovable complex. A comparative legal study of a single real estate complex, an enterprise as a property complex, a complex thing was carried out and it is confirmed that they are not identical. Obviously, a single immovable complex is a necessary and relevant legal concept of domestic scientific thought. In order to create a single real estate complex, some conditions are needed. The rights holder of movable and immovable property by his will decides to create it. The permitting authorities, through State registration, decide to establish. Disadvantages of a single immovable complex, both theoretical and practical, are indicated. Similarities and differences in the design of the enterprise as a property complex, a complex thing, and a single real estate complex made it possible to identify the features of the legal status of the latter and distinguish it as an independent object of civil rights. Despite the fact that in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation there are such legal concepts as "enterprise as a property complex" and "complex thing," the inclusion of a single real estate complex in the current civil legislation is necessary. The legal significance of this concept is unconditional. It justifies its own point of view on the problem and the place of a single immovable complex in the system of objects of civil law. Recognizing the need for the concept of "single immovable complex" in the current civil legislation of the Russian Federation, the domestic legislator should focus on its significant theoretical and practical shortcomings that impede the effective enforcement of the provisions of Art. 1331 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Domestic legislators need to give them an appropriate legal assessment, as well as suggest effective ways to solve them.

SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT IN THE SYSTEM OF PRIVATE LAW

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 7-107
Author(s):  
M.D. TYAZHBIN
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Law Reform ◽  
Private Law ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article is dedicated to the category of subordination agreements. Based on the concept of conflict of rights in personam, the author makes an attempt to integrate this category into the system of private law, to determine the legal nature of subordination, and from these positions to assess the effectiveness of Art. 309.1 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, implemented in the course of the civil law reform.

scholarly journals On the Issue of a Public Corporation as a Form of a Non-Profit Organization

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 3-5
Author(s):  
Natalia G. Kanunnikova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Legal Regime ◽  
Non Profit ◽  
Russian State ◽  
Public Corporation ◽  
State Corporation ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article offers the author’s vision of such a form of non-profit organization as a state corporation with a special legal status. As a result of the analysis, the author comes to the conclusion that it is permissible to recognize a state corporation as an independent subject of civil law relations, since state corporations combine the characteristics of both a legal entity, in particular, the autonomy of property, independent liability for obligations, etc., and the institution of the state, endowed with authority. The analysis of the federal legislation allowed the author to say that a special legal regime applies to modern Russian state-owned corporations, which provides for their exemption from certain duties and granting certain rights and powers. In this regard, the question is raised about the development of recommendations for improving legislation in the field under study by excluding Article 7.1 from the Federal Law, January, 12 № 7-FZ “On Non-Profit Organizations”, and introducing its content into the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, adding it to Article 124.1 “State Corporation”.

scholarly journals RUSSIAN LAW OF OBLIGATIONS REFORMED: THE CONSEQUENCES FOR THE INSTITUTE OF DAMAGES (LOSSES)

2021 ◽  
pp. 689-698
Author(s):  
Y. E. Monastyrsky ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Russian Law ◽  
Practice Methods

Introduction: of all the instruments of protection of subjective property rights, the fundamental role belongs to the institute of indemnification, whose regulatory framework needs to be clarified. The purpose of this paper is comparative description of the important legal aspects of the main type of property liability. In accordance with the purpose, the following objectives were set: to determine the extent to which legal provisions of general regulations on obligations laid down in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation should or can be applied to claims for damages; to formulate the proposals for improving the indemnification court practice. Methods: the methodological framework of the study consists of specific scholarly (special legal, comparative legal) and general scholarly (problem-theory, teleological, and system) methods of analysis. The main trends in the development of the institute of liability and the debatable aspects reflected in the Russian and foreign documents were studied with the use of the problem-theory and system analysis methods. Results: being a summary overview of the available knowledge and comparative regulatory material, this paper allowed us to articulate the ideas aimed at improving the fundamental principles of legal regulation of relations in the sphere of protection of subjective rights, in particular indemnification. Discussion: indemnification is a developing major institute of civil law, invariably attracting the attention of scholars around the world. Lately it has taken on special significance and some of its aspects have become a focus of a separate field of scholarly discussion. Many Russian scholars have written about indemnification in a comparative aspect: О. N. Sadikov, V. V. Baibak and others [2, 15]; this paper focuses on the reform of Russian law of obligations and the new provisions of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation of March 8, 2015 and reveals the consequences of the reform for the institute of damages, discussing this topic in detail as a separate standalone issue. Conclusion: we hope that this paper will contribute to further discussion in the civil law doctrine of the ideas and conclusions presented.

scholarly journals An Alternative View of the Legal Regulation of Civil Law Relations in the Digital Economy

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 52-62
Author(s):  
L. G. Efimova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Digital Economy ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Alternative View ◽  
Electronic Document ◽  
Digital Rights ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law

The paper substantiates the author’s proposal to amend the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, which is explained by the gradual creation of a digital economy in the Russian Federation. In particular, the author has examined and solved the following problems of the legal regulation of civil law relations in the context of digitalization: the problem of identifying the object of digital rights, the problem of legal qualification of the electronic form of the transaction, the problem of using a smart contract in civil transactions, the problem of using blockchain technology to create mixed payment systems. The paper proposes a non-standard solution to each of these problems—the author has prepared a draft federal law "On Amendments to Parts One and Two of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation in terms of legal relations arising in cyberspace." In particular, the author proposes to define digital rights as the absolute and relative rights to digital property named in this capacity, the content and conditions of implementation of which are determined by the law and the rules of the information system (protocol) that meets the characteristics established by the law. In the author’s opinion, an electronic document can exist in the form of a machine information file of any format or a computer program that meets the characteristics of an electronic document.

scholarly journals Challenges of Compulsory Seizure of Private Property by the State through Requisition, Confiscation and Nationalization under the Civil Legislation of Russia

Lex Russica ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 25-32
Author(s):  
E. V. Bogdanov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Private Property ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
State Ownership ◽  
The State ◽  
State Responsibility ◽  
Additional Equipment ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
To Come

The existence of extraordinary circumstances, which should be understood as circumstances unavoidable under these conditions, constitutes the condition for requisition. The Civil Code of the Russian Federation gives state bodies a certain freedom in carrying out requisitions, as it is hardly possible to list all exceptional circumstances when additional equipment or other property will be required both to prevent the development of emergencies and to deal with their consequences.Civil law confiscation involves the termination of private property and the emergence of state ownership of confiscated property. Therefore, it is impossible to treat as confiscation the seizure of tengible media according to Para. 4 of Art. 1252 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, because they were produced in violation of the law and, therefore, ownership has not arisen. The paper also substantiates the conclusion that nationalization requires relevant property to come not into the property of the State, but into the national property. In the author’s opinion, the currently existing State property does not contain any hints of national property, and it can be stated that the Russian people even more than previously are removed from the property of the State and are excluded from State responsibility. Nationwide property serves as a foundation of the civil society.

scholarly journals The Legal Status of Subjects of Corporate Relationships: Doctrinal and Law Enforcement Aspects

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 3-7
Author(s):  
Oksana V. Cherkasova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Law And Order ◽  
Generic Term ◽  
Foreign Law ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right

The article reviews the legal status of subjects of corporate relationships, analyzes doctrinal and law enforcement aspects. The author analyzes the scientists’ standpoints, various models of interaction between the subjects of corporate relationships existing in foreign law and order, case law, arrives at conclusions about the correlation between the categories of the “right of participation”, “right of membership”, “right of management”. It is noted that the membership concept evolves out of participation by performing the function of a generic term. It is suggested to determine the “right of management” of a corporation as just one of the member’s activity areas along with other rights. The author recommends to ensure consistency of the provision of Article 2 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and Articles 65.2, 65.3 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation where the concept of the “right of participation” would act as a basic one and the “right of management” would be its constituent part.

Application of civil law in the regulation of labour relations

2021 ◽  
pp. 748-755
Author(s):  
A.V. Mayfat ◽  
M.A. Zhiltsov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Labor Relations ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Labor Law ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Labor Disputes ◽  
Labour Relations ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Common Situation

The article presents an analysis of situations in which civil law is applied in the regulation of labor relations. The authors note that civil law is applied in the regulation of labor relations in several cases. The most common situation is the reference rules provided for by the Labor Code of the Russian Federation itself, which directly provides for situations in which the courts can apply civil law rules when regulating labor relations. In some cases, if there is a gap in law, the courts apply the norms of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation when considering labor disputes, filling the gaps in the regulation of labor relations. In a number of cases, the Labor Code of the Russian Federation adopted civil law structures, although in this case it is no longer possible to talk about the application of civil law norms, since in the case of transferring these structures to the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, they become labor law norms. Also, in practice, there are situations when, simultaneously with labor relations, other relations arise, including civil law relations. In these cases, the courts also apply civil law. The authors describe these situations, give examples from judicial practice, and also propose ways to solve the defects arising in the regulation of labor relations.

A.L. MAKOVSKY AND THE REVIVAL OF RUSSIAN PRIVATE LAW

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 8-17
Author(s):  
E.A. SUKHANOV
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Private Law ◽  
Public Interests ◽  
Private And Public ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article highlights the role of prof. A.L. Makovsky in the creation of the new Civil Code of the Russian Federation of 1994–2006, as well as in the organization of the practice of its application and the development of the Concept for the Development of Civil Legislation of the Russian Federation in 2009. Special attention is paid to the activities of A.L. Makovsky on the preparation of the Fourth Part of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and the concept of intellectual rights enshrined by it, opposing the traditional archaic concept of “intellectual property”. The importance of the need to increase the attention of civil law to the issue of protecting the rights and interests of citizens and other weakest participants in civil legal relations in their opposition to the interests of large companies striving to take a privileged position in property turnover is shown. From this point of view, the author substantiates the need for a significant adjustment in the understanding of the balance of private and public interests, which is the basis of civil law regulation.

The General Provisions on Purchase and Sale in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation

2005 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-160
Author(s):  
Stephen Smith
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Critical Examination ◽  
Market Economies ◽  
Western Market ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Russian Law ◽  
Broad Overview

AbstractThe author offers a critical examination of the provisions on purchase and sale in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Focusing narrowly on the text of the code, the paper starts with a broad overview of, and commentary on, the provisions and then provides a detailed article-by-article commentary on individual provisions. Potential difficulties are identified (especially with respect to transfer of ownership, remedies, and the code's attempt to blend common and civil law approaches to sale) and suggestions are offered for how the text might be clarified or, in certain cases, substantively changed. In view of the broad similarity between the provisions on sale in the Russian code and the rules on contracts of sale applicable in Western market economies generally, the paper proposes neither far-ranging criticisms nor radical reforms of the Russian law.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document