scholarly journals Presence of Residual Venous Thrombus at Warfarin Withdrawal: a Predictor for Recurrence after a First Episode of Symptomatic Provoked Proximal Deep Venous Thrombosis in Thai Population?

2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 486-490
Author(s):  
Kanin Pruekprasert ◽  
Chanean Ruangsetakit ◽  
Chumpol Wongwanit ◽  
Khamin Chinsakchai ◽  
Kiattisak Hongku ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Duplex Ultrasonography ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Thai Population ◽  
Venous Thrombus ◽  
Recurrent Vte ◽  
Compression Ultrasonography

Objective: To assess the risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence by presence of residual venous thrombus (RVT) at warfarin withdrawal following symptomatic first provoked proximal DVT.Methods: Medical records of 45 consecutive patients with symptomatic first provoked proximal DVTs who had undergone warfarin surveillance for ≥ 3 months were reviewed retrospectively. Altogether, 22 patients discontinued anticoagulation after ≥ 3 months regardless of duplex ultrasonography results of RVT diagnosed by compression ultrasonography. Another 23 patients discontinued anticoagulation after the RVT disappeared. Primary outcome was recurrent VTE.Results: Four of the 45 patients experienced recurrent VTE (8.89%), including 2 (9.00%) of 22 patients who had discontinued anticoagulant regardless of duplex ultrasonography results and 2 (8.70%) of 23 patients who discontinued anticoagulation after RVT disappearance (p = 0.963). All of the recurrent VTE were recurrent DVT.Conclusion: RVT at warfarin withdrawal was not a predictor for recurrence VTE following a first symptomatic provoked proximal DVT.

Long-term Clinical Follow-up in 265 Patients with Deep Venous Thrombosis Initially Treated with either Unfractionated Heparin or Dalteparin: A Retrospective Analysis

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (10) ◽  
pp. 1222-1226 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Åberg ◽  
D. Lockner ◽  
C. Paul ◽  
M. Holmström
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Unfractionated Heparin ◽  
Malignant Disease ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Post Thrombotic Syndrome ◽  
Recurrent Vte

SummaryThe primary objective of this retrospective study was to describe the frequency of a post-thrombotic syndrome in 265 patients previously treated for deep venous thrombosis (DVT). The secondary objectives were to document the frequency of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and mortality, especially from malignant disease. The patients were evaluated 5-14 years after inclusion in three randomized trials comparing continuous intravenous (i. v.) infusion of unfractionated heparin (UFH) (n = 85) with a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), dalteparin (n = 180). The median post-thrombotic score at follow-up was 2 (range 0-8). In a multiple step-wise regression analysis the post-thrombotic score was significantly higher among patients with initial proximal DVT (p = 0,0001) as compared with those who had distal DVT. A recurrent venous thromboembolic event was diagnosed in 29,4% of the patients treated with dalteparin and in 23,5% of the patients treated with UFH (ns). A secondary risk factor for venous thromboembolism and a longer duration of treatment with oral anticoagulants (OAC) were significantly associated with a lower risk for recurrent VTE, whereas malignant disease diagnosed during follow-up was associated with a higher risk. During follow-up a total of 40,7% of patients had died. No difference in total mortality or mortality from malignant disease was demonstrated between the two drugs. In conclusion, a severe post-thrombotic syndrome occured relatively infrequent. considering the long observation period. Proximal DVT was significantly associated with a more severe post-thrombotic syndrome. After 14 years follow-up, no significant differences were observed in overall mortality, mortality from malignant disease or recurrent VTE between UFH- and dalteparin-treated patients. Malignant disease was a risk factor for recurrent VTE, the presence of a secondary risk factor and a longer duration of treatment with OAC decreased the risk for recurrent VTE.

Monotherapy Anticoagulation to Expedite Home Treatment of Patients Diagnosed With Venous Thromboembolism in the Emergency Department: A Pragmatic Effectiveness Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey A. Kline ◽  
David H. Adler ◽  
Naomi Alanis ◽  
Joseph R. Bledsoe ◽  
Daniel M. Courtney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Home Treatment ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Severe Bleeding ◽  
Effectiveness Trial ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Recurrent Vte

BACKGROUND: The objective was to test if low-risk emergency department patients with vitamin K antagonist (venous thromboembolism [VTE]; including venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism [PE]) can be safely and effectively treated at home with direct acting oral (monotherapy) anticoagulation in a large-scale, real-world pragmatic effectiveness trial. METHODS: This was a single-arm trial, conducted from 2016 to 2019 in accordance with the Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies guideline in 33 emergency departments in the United States. Participants had newly diagnosed VTE with low risk of death based upon either the modified Hestia criteria, or physician judgment plus the simplified PE severity index score of zero, together with nonhigh bleeding risk were eligible. Patients had to be discharged within 24 hours of triage and treated with either apixaban or rivaroxaban. Effectiveness was defined by the primary efficacy and safety outcomes, image-proven recurrent VTE and bleeding requiring hospitalization >24 hours, respectively, with an upper limit of the 95% CI for the 30-day frequency of VTE recurrence below 2.0% for both outcomes. RESULTS: We enrolled 1421 patients with complete outcomes data, including 903 with venous thrombosis and 518 with PE. The recurrent VTE requiring hospitalization occurred in 14/1421 (1.0% [95% CI, 0.5%–1.7%]), and bleeding requiring hospitalization occurred in 12/1421 (0.8% [0.4%–1.5%). The rate of severe bleeding using International Society for Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria was 2/1421 (0.1% [0%–0.5%]). No patient died, and serious adverse events occurred in 2.5% of venous thrombosis patients and 2.3% of patients with PE. Medication nonadherence was reported by patients in 8.0% (6.6%–9.5%) and was associated with a risk ratio of 6.0 (2.3–15.2) for VTE recurrence. Among all patients diagnosed with VTE in the emergency department during the period of study, 18% of venous thrombosis patients and 10% of patients with PE were enrolled. CONCLUSIONS: Monotherapy treatment of low-risk patients with venous thrombosis or PE in the emergency department setting produced a low rate of bleeding and VTE recurrence, but may be underused. Patients with venous thrombosis and PE should undergo risk-stratification before home treatment. Improved patient adherence may reduce rate of recurrent VTE. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03404635

P3850Impact of sex and risk factors for venous thromboembolism on the clinical course of first acute venous thromboembolism. Insights from the PREFER in VTE

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Giustozzi ◽  
S Barco ◽  
L Valerio ◽  
F A Klok ◽  
M C Vedovati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Baseline Risk ◽  
Major Surgery ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Risk Of Recurrence ◽  
Recurrent Vte ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction The interaction between sex and specific provoking risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) may influence initial presentation and prognosis. Purpose We investigated the impact of sex on the risk of recurrence across subgroups of patients with first VTE classified according to baseline risk factors. Methods PREFER in VTE was an international, non-interventional registry (2013–2015) including patients with a first episode of acute symptomatic objectively diagnosed VTE. We studied the risk of recurrence in patients classified according to baseline provoking risk factors for VTE consisted of i) major transient (major surgery/trauma, >5 days in bed), ii) minor transient (pregnancy or puerperium, estroprogestinic therapy, prolonged immobilization, current infection or bone fracture/soft tissue trauma); iii) unprovoked events, iv) active cancer-associated VTE. Results A total of 3,455 patients diagnosed with first acute VTE were identified, of whom 1,623 (47%) were women. The percentage of patients with a major transient risk factor was 22.2% among women and 19.7% among men. Minor transient risk factors were present in 21.3% and 12.4%, unprovoked VTE in 51.6% and 61.6%, cancer-associated VTE in 4.9% of women and 6.3% of men, respectively. The proportions of cases treated with Vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were similar between sexes. Median length of treatment of VKAs was 181.5 and 182.0 days and of DOACs was 113.0 and 155.0 days in women and men, respectively. At 12-months of follow-up, VTE recurrence was reported in 74 (4.8%) women and 80 (4.5%) men. Table 1 shows the sex-specific proportion of recurrences by VTE risk factor categories. Table 1 Major Transient (n=722) Minor transient (n=573) Cancer-associated (n=195) Unprovoked (1965) Women (361) Men (361) OR (95% CI) Women (346) Men (227) OR (95% CI) Women (79) Men (116) OR (95% CI) Women (837) Men (1128) OR (95% CI) One-year follow-up, n (N%)   Recurrent VTE, 21 (6.2) 10 (2.9) 0.46 (0.2; 0.9) 9 (2.7) 12 (5.4) 2.09 (0.9; 5.0) 6 (8.0) 5 (4.5) 0.54 (0.2; 1.9) 38 (4.7) 53 (4.7) 1.03 (0.7; 1.6)   Major bleeding, 6 (1.8) 5 (1.5) 0.83 (0.3; 2.7) 5 (1.5) 1 (0.5) 0.30 (0.1; 2.6) 1 (1.3) 3 (2.7) 2.07 (0.2; 20) 10 (1.2) 15 (1.4) 1.11 (0.6; 2.4)   All-cause death, 37 (10.2) 31 (8.5) 0.82 (0.5; 1.4) 10 (2.9) 14 (6.2) 2.21 (0.9; 5.1) 26 (32.9) 49 (42.2) 1.49 (0.8; 2.7) 33 (3.9) 30 (2.7) 0.66 (0.4; 1.1) Conclusions The proportion of patients with recurrent VTE events after first acute symptomatic VTE provoked by transient risk factors was not negligible during the first year of follow-up during in both women and men. These results may have implications on the decision whether to consider extended anticoagulant therapy in selected patients with provoked events. Acknowledgement/Funding This study was funded by Daiichi Sankyo.

"ProC Global": A functional screening test that predicts recurrent venous thromboembolism

2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (03) ◽  
pp. 600-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon Bates ◽  
Marilyn Johnston ◽  
Simon McRae ◽  
Jeffrey Ginsberg ◽  
Anne Grand’Maison
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Protein C ◽  
Specific Inhibitor ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Functional Screening ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Global Result ◽  
Recurrent Vte

SummaryAbnormalities of the Protein C (PC) pathway are found in the majority of patients with thrombophilia. ProC Global is a coagulation assay that reflects the net effect of the PC pathway by measuring the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) of patient and control plasma, before and after activation of endogenous PC by Protac, a snake venom. Previous studies have suggested that abnormalities in this test are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). A retrospective analysis was performed using frozen plasma samples from 140 patients with confirmed VTE to determine whether an abnormal ProC Global result (in the presence and in the absence of known abnormalities in the PC pathway) is a predictor of initial and recurrent VTE. Patients were tested for the presence of activated protein C resistance, Factor V Leiden, PC and protein S (PS) deficiency, and non-specific inhibitor positivity. Mean ProC Global results were significantly lower in patients with recurrent VTE than in patients without recurrent VTE. The association between abnormal ProC Global result and recurrent VTE showed a strong trend, before (odds ratio, OR 3.6) and after (OR 3.1) exclusion of known thrombophilic abnormalities. Patients with a first episode of idiopathic VTE also expressed significant lower ProC Global results than those with secondary VTE. After exclusion of known PC pathway abnormalities, there was a statistically significant association between abnormal ProC Global and initial idiopathic VTE (p=0.04). These results suggest that ProC Global may serve as a predictor of recurrent VTE and potentially for first episode of idiopathic VTE. ProC Global may help identify patients at increased risk of initial and recurrent VTE.

Re-modelling of venous thrombosis

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 25-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
R D Malgor ◽  
N Labropoulos
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Thrombus Formation ◽  
Temporal Relation ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Basic Knowledge ◽  
Venous Thrombus ◽  
Prompt Treatment ◽  
Common Causes

Venous thromboembolism is one of the most common causes of morbidity and mortality in modern societies. The entirety of events involved in venous thrombus formation and resolution remains to be elucidated. Temporal relation between the initial cellular insult, thrombus formation and resolution is critical for instituting a prompt treatment. This paper analyses the current basic knowledge and the events involved in venous remodelling after an episode of venous thrombosis.

Aspirin and recurrent venous thromboembolism

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 99-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Prandoni ◽  
F Noventa ◽  
M Milan
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Recurrent Events ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Initial Period ◽  
Conclusive Evidence ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Vascular Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Recurrent Vte

While there is conclusive evidence that aspirin plays a role in reducing the risk of clinically relevant venous thromboembolism (VTE) arising in a number of surgical and non-surgical situations at risk, little is known of the potential of aspirin for the long/term prevention of recurrent VTE. In two recent multicentre, double-blind studies (WARFASA and ASPIRE), the efficacy and safety of a low dose of aspirin (100 mg per day) were assessed in patients with unprovoked VTE who had completed an initial period of conventional treatment with vitamin K antagonists. The two studies used identical aspirin regimens and had similar enrolment criteria and outcome measures. When data from these two trials were pooled, there was a 32% reduction in the rate of recurrence of VTE (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51–0.90) and a 34% reduction in the rate of major vascular events (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51–0.86). Moreover, these benefits were achieved with a low risk of bleeding. As patients with previous symptomatic atherosclerosis were not enrolled in these two studies, whether these results apply also to this category of patients is uncertain. We recently had the opportunity to review the clinical charts of 1919 consecutive patients presented with a first episode of VTE, which was either unprovoked or triggered by transient risk factors, and were followed up for an average period of four years after discontinuing anticoagulation. The rate of recurrent VTE in the 256 patients with a history of symptomatic atherosclerosis who had been given 80–160 mg of aspirin once daily (17.2%) did not differ from that (19.9%) observed in those without atherosclerosis who were left without any antithrombotic treatments. The implication of this observation is that whenever patients with symptomatic atherosclerosis are deemed to require long-term protection against recurrent VTE, they are unlikely to benefit from (resuming) aspirin. Conversely, aspirin in low doses offers an appealing, safe and highly cost-effective option for the long-term prevention of recurrent events in patients with unprovoked VTE who are free from symptomatic atherosclerotic lesions.

A Randomized Trial of Dabigatran Versus Warfarin in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism (RE-COVER II)

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 205-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sam Schulman ◽  
Ajay K Kakkar ◽  
Sebastian M Schellong ◽  
Samuel Z. Goldhaber ◽  
Eriksson Henry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Warfarin Dose ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Recurrent Vte ◽  
Acute Venous Thromboembolism

Abstract Abstract 205 Background: Dabigatran has been compared with warfarin for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in one previous trial (RE-COVER). Based on the low rate of the primary outcome as the RE-COVER study was running, we undertook this replica study to confirm the results of RE-COVER, and to allow for more rigorous sub-group analyses. Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial of 2568 patients with acute VTE, treated with low molecular weight or unfractionated heparin for 5 to 11 days, we compared dabigatran, 150 mg twice daily, with warfarin, dose-adjusted to an International Normalized Ratio of 2.0 and 3.0, each given for 6 months. Primary outcome was recurrent symptomatic, objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism and deaths related to venous thromboembolism during 6 months. Safety endpoints included bleeding events, acute coronary syndrome, elevated liver function tests, and adverse events. Results: Of 1279 patients randomized to dabigatran, 30 (2.4%) had recurrent VTE compared with 28 (2.2%) of 1289 patients randomized to warfarin; risk difference 0.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], −1.0 to 1.5); p<0.0001 for the pre-specified non-inferiority margin. The hazard ratio for dabigatran was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.64 to 1.80). Major bleeding occurred in 15 patients treated with dabigatran and 22 patients treated with warfarin (hazard ratio 0.69; 95% CI, 0.36 to 1.32) and any bleeding occurred in 200 versus 285 patients, respectively (hazard ratio 0.67, 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.81). The frequency of reported ACS events was less than 1% in the trial, with more cases in the dabigatran treatment group than those treated with warfarin. There were 25 deaths during each treatment, and serious adverse events were similar in the two groups. Analysis of outcomes based on demographic characteristics showed consistency of effects for both safety and efficacy. This included the analysis based on Asian race, which had been limited in RE-COVER. There were 537 Asian patients in RE-COVER II compared to only 65 in RE-COVER. The event rates of recurrent VTE and of any bleeding were similar in Asians and non-Asians. Conclusion: The study confirms that the efficacy of dabigatran is non-inferior to warfarin in the treatment of acute VTE and with a lower risk for bleeding. The safety of dabigatran is similar in the Asian population compared with non-Asians. Disclosures: Off Label Use: dabigatran for treatment of venous thromboembolism. Christiansen:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment. Schnee:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment.

Oral Anticoagulation after a First Episode of Venous Thromboembolism: How Long? How Strong?

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (S 01) ◽  
pp. 124-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. H. Watzke
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Short Duration ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Thrombotic Event ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Optimal Duration ◽  
Optimal Intensity ◽  
Shed Light

SummaryA number of studies have been published in the last years which shed light on the optimal intensity and the optimal duration of oral anticoagulation in patients with venous thrombosis.Based on these studies it is now generally recommended to treat patients with venous thromboembolism at an INR ranging from 2.0 to 3.0. The optimal duration of anticoagulation mainly depends on the nature of the thrombotic event. In patients with a temporary prothrombotic risk factor such as surgery, immobilization or trauma a relatively short duration of oral anticoagulation (3-6 months) is generally recommended. Patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism require a considerably longer duration of anticoagulation (6 months at least).

scholarly journals Clinical implications of incidental venous thromboembolism in cancer patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 1901697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frits I. Mulder ◽  
Marcello Di Nisio ◽  
Cihan Ay ◽  
Marc Carrier ◽  
Floris T.M. Bosch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Current Guideline ◽  
Similar Treatment ◽  
Recurrent Vte ◽  
Randomised Controlled

IntroductionIn cancer patients, current guidance suggests similar treatment for incidental and symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE), mainly based on retrospective data. We aimed to evaluate anticoagulant therapy in cancer patients with incidental and symptomatic VTE.MethodsThe Hokusai VTE Cancer Study was a randomised controlled trial comparing edoxaban with dalteparin for cancer-associated VTE. The primary outcome was the composite of first recurrent VTE or major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included major bleeding, recurrent VTE and mortality. Outcomes in patients with incidental and symptomatic VTE were evaluated during the 12-month study period.Results331 patients with incidental VTE and 679 patients with symptomatic VTE were enrolled, of whom the index event was confirmed by an independent radiologist. Median durations of anticoagulant treatment were 195 and 189 days, respectively. In patients with incidental VTE, the primary outcome occurred in 12.7% of patients, major bleeding in 6.6% of patients and recurrent VTE in 7.9% of patients. Out of the 26 VTE recurrences in patients with incidental VTE, five (31%) were incidental, seven (44%) were symptomatic and four (25%) were deaths for which pulmonary embolism could not be ruled out. In patients with symptomatic VTE, the primary outcome occurred in 13.8% of patients, major bleeding in 4.9% of patients and recurrent VTE in 10.9% of patients. All-cause mortality was similar in both groups.ConclusionClinical adverse outcomes are substantial in both cancer patients with incidental and symptomatic VTE, supporting current guideline recommendations that suggest treating incidental VTE in the same manner as symptomatic VTE.

High factor VIII and the risk of venous thromboembolism

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (01) ◽  
pp. 41-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Kyrle
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Factor Viii ◽  
Coagulation Factor ◽  
Convincing Evidence ◽  
Important Risk Factor ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Phase Reaction ◽  
Therapeutic Concept

SummaryThere is now convincing evidence that a high level of coagulation factor VIII is an important risk factor for venous thromboembolism. A factor VIII plasma concentration above 1500 IU/l is associated with an almost 5-fold risk for a first episode of venous thrombosis. In thrombosis patients high factor VIII has been shown to persist over time and is not related to an acute phase reaction. High factor VIII is also an important risk factor for recurrence of venous thrombosis. In a prospective cohort study factor VIII levels exceeding the 90th percentile of the patient population confered an almost 7-fold risk of recurrent venous thrombosis. The pathomechanisms leading to venous thrombosis in patients with high factor VIII are still unclear. In many patients, however, a biochemically detectable hypercoagulable state (as represented by elevated levels of the coagulation activation marker prothrombin thrombin fragment F1.2) was demonstrated. The optimal duration of secondary thromboprophylaxis for patients with high factor VIII levels is uncertain. We currently perform an interventional trial comparing conventional to extended anticoagulation. Reduction of factor VIII by administration of a non-selective ß-receptor blocker might be a promising therapeutic concept which is currently under investigation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document