scholarly journals Effect of Vitamin E on Serum Urea Level on Gentamicin Induced Nephrotoxicity in Long Evans Rats

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-15
Author(s):  
Md Shameem Ahmed ◽  
Mohammad Ashraf Ahmed ◽  
Md Rezwanur Rahman ◽  
Ashrafuzzaman ◽  
Mushtari Jahan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vitamin E ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Saline Control ◽  
Serum Urea ◽  
Urea Level ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Long Evans ◽  
Group B ◽  
Group D

Background: The kidneys have an important role in eliminating the final products of metabolic activities, excreting the drugs and chemicals. A variety of frequently used drugs have been demonstrated to produce nephrotoxic effects. Objective: This study was carried out to observe the effect of vitamin E on gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity by assessing serum urea level in Long Evans rats. Materials and method: The experimental study was carried out on 40 healthy Long Evans rats of both sex with the weight ranges from 172-255 gm and the age ranges from 7 to 10 weeks. The rats were divided into four groups - Group A (normal control) received normal saline, group B, C and D received gentamicin for 6 days, rats of group C received vitamin E capsule for total 9 days with gentamicin whereas group D received vitamin E capsule for total 10 days with gentamicin. Serum urea level was measured at the end of the experiment. Results: The (mean±SD) serum urea levels in group A, B, C and D were 4.79±0.32, 12.41±1.22, 7.56±1.11 and 7.15±1.09 mmol/L respectively. The differences between groups were highly significant (p<0.001) for group A & B, A & C, A & D, B & C, B & D whereas the difference between C & D (p>0.01) was not significant. Serum urea level of the normal saline control group (group A) was within the normal limit (4.79 mmol/L). Serum urea level in gentamicin treated rats (group B) was more in comparison to gentamicin and vitamin E treated rats (group C & D) and pretreatment with longer duration group (group D) showed lower serum urea value than shorter one (group C) though the groups showed no significant difference. Conclusion: Vitamin E treatment showed some protective effect against gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity. The results also indicated that effectiveness of vitamin E depends on duration of pretreatment that means the pretreatment duration must be increased to a suitable period for better protection against gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity. Delta Med Col J. Jan 2019 7(1): 11-15

scholarly journals Effect of Fish Oil on The Serum Urea Level in Gentamicin Induced Nephrotoxicity in Long Evans Rats

KYAMC Journal ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-86
Author(s):  
Md Shameem Ahmed ◽  
Ayesha Yasmin ◽  
Md Ashraf Ahmed ◽  
Ashrafuzzaman ◽  
Rashed Mustafa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fish Oil ◽  
Potential Effect ◽  
Saline Group ◽  
Protective Effects ◽  
Serum Urea ◽  
Urea Level ◽  
Group A ◽  
Long Evans ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group B

Background: Gentamicin is used worldwide as bactericidal agent against severe gram negative infections. Gentamicin induced nephrotoxicity can be minimized by administration dietary fish oil. Objectives: The present study was designed to observe the possible potential effect of Fish oil on gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity in Long Evans rats. Materials and Methods: The experimental study was carried out in the department of anatomy at Dhaka Medical College (DMC) among 40 Long Evans rats of both sex with the weight ranges from 172-255 gm and the age ranges from 7 to 10 weeks. The rats were divided into four groups-Group A (normal control) received normal saline, group B, C and D received gentamicin for 6 days. Rats of group C received fish oil capsule for 9 days with gentamicin and group D received fish oil capsule with gentamicin for total 10 days. Serum urea level was measured at the end of experiment. Results: The serum urea (mean±SD) levels in group A, B, C and D was 4.79±0.32, 12.41±1.22, 6.95±0.91 and 6.18±1.00, respectively. The gentamicin treated rats (group B) had shown increased serum urea levels in comparison to fish oil (group C&D) treated rats. The difference between groups were highly significant (P<0.001) for group A&B, A&C, B&C and B&D. The difference between groups A&D (P<0.01) were moderately significant. Whereas the difference between C&D (P>0.05) was not significant. Conclusion: Fish oil treatment showed some protective effects against gentamicin induced nephrotoxicity. The results also indicated that effectiveness of fish oil depends on a suitable duration of pretreatment. KYAMC Journal Vol. 11, No.-2, July 2020, Page 83-86

scholarly journals The Role of Obesity in Predicting the Clinical Outcomes of COVID-19

Obesity Facts ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Serdar Sahin ◽  
Havva Sezer ◽  
Ebru Cicek ◽  
Yeliz Yagız Ozogul ◽  
Murat Yildirim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Normal Weight ◽  
Overweight And Obesity ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Group D

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The aim of this was to describe the predictors of mortality related to COVID-19 infection and to evaluate the association between overweight, obesity, and clinical outcomes of COVID-19. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We included the patients &#x3e;18 years of age, with at least one positive SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Patients were grouped according to body mass index values as normal weight &#x3c;25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (Group A), overweight from 25 to &#x3c;30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (Group B), Class I obesity 30 to &#x3c;35 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (Group C), and ≥35 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (Group D). Mortality, clinical outcomes, laboratory parameters, and comorbidities were compared among 4 groups. <b><i>Results:</i></b> There was no significant difference among study groups in terms of mortality. Noninvasive mechanical ventilation requirement was higher in group B and D than group A, while it was higher in Group D than Group C (Group B vs. Group A [<i>p</i> = 0.017], Group D vs. Group A [<i>p</i> = 0.001], and Group D vs. Group C [<i>p</i> = 0.016]). Lung involvement was less common in Group A, and presence of hypoxia was more common in Group D (Group B vs. Group A [<i>p</i> = 0.025], Group D vs. Group A [<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001], Group D vs. Group B [<i>p</i> = 0.006], and Group D vs. Group C [<i>p</i> = 0.014]). The hospitalization rate was lower in Group A than in the other groups; in addition, patients in Group D have the highest rate of hospitalization (Group B vs. Group A [<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001], Group C vs. Group A [<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001], Group D vs. Group A [<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001], Group D vs. Group B [<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001], and Group D vs. Group C [<i>p</i> = 0.010]). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> COVID-19 patients with overweight and obesity presented with more severe clinical findings. Health-care providers should take into account that people living with overweight and obesity are at higher risk for COVID-19 and its complications.

scholarly journals Prophylactic temporary abdominal aortic balloon occlusion for patients with pernicious placenta previa: a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei Huo ◽  
Hansheng Liang ◽  
Yi Feng
Keyword(s):  
Placenta Previa ◽  
Balloon Occlusion ◽  
Artery Embolism ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Clinical Records ◽  
Group D ◽  
Central Placenta Previa

Abstract Background Pernicious placenta previa (PPP) can increase the risk of perioperative complications. During caesarean section in patients with adherent placenta, intraoperative blood loss, hysterectomy rate and transfusion could be reduced by interventional methods. Our study aimed to investigate the influence of maternal hemodynamics control and neonatal outcomes of prophylactic temporary abdominal aortic balloon (PTAAB) occlusion for patients with pernicious placenta previa. Methods This was a retrospective study using data from the Peking University People’s Hospital from January 2014 through January 2020. Clinical records of pregnant women undergoing cesarean section were collected. Patients were divided into two groups: treatment with PTAAB placement (group A) and no balloon placement (group B). Group A was further broken down into two groups: prophylactic placement (Group C) and balloon occlusion (group D). Results Clinical records of 33 cases from 5205 pregnant women underwent cesarean section were collected. The number of groups A, B, C, and D were 17, 16, 5 and 12.We found that a significant difference in the post-operative uterine artery embolism rates between group A and group B (0% vs.31.3%, p = 0.018). There was a significant difference in the Apgar scores at first minute between group A and group B (8.94 ± 1.43 vs 9.81 ± 0.75,p = 0.037),and the same significant difference between two groups in the pre-operative central placenta previa (29.4% vs. 0%,p = 0.044), complete placenta previa (58.8% vs 18.8%, p = 0.032),placenta implantation (76.5% vs 31.3%, p = 0.015). We could also observe the significant difference in the amount of blood cell (2.80 ± 2.68vs.10.66 ± 11.97, p = 0.038) and blood plasma transfusion (280.00 ± 268.32 vs. 1033.33 ± 1098.20, p = 0.044) between group C and group D. The significant differences in the preoperative vaginal bleeding conditions (0% vs 75%, p = 0.009), the intraoperative application rates of vasopressors (0% vs. 58.3%, p = 0.044) and the postoperative ICU (intensive care unit) admission rates (0% vs. 58.3%, p = 0.044) were also kept. Conclusions PTAAB occlusion could be useful in reducing the rate of post-operative uterine artery embolism and the amount of transfusion, and be useful in coping with patients with preoperative vaginal bleeding conditions, so as to reduce the rate of intraoperative applications of vasopressors and the postoperative ICU (intensive care unit) admission. In PPP patients with placenta implantation, central placenta previa and complete placenta previa, we advocate the utilization of prophylactic temporary abdominal aortic balloon placement.

scholarly journals Effect of Delayed Light-Curing Through a Zirconia Disc on Microhardness and Fracture Toughness of Two Types of Dual-Cure Cement

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pouran Samimi ◽  
Sara Kaveh ◽  
Maryam Khoroushi
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Delay Group ◽  
Fracture Toughness Test ◽  
Irradiation Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Light Curing ◽  
Group B ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Group D

Objectives: Photopolymerization immediately sets dual-cure cements and prevents the continuation of chemical polymerization. Delayed light-curing allows the chemical process to continue up to the point before starting irradiation; however, there is a controversy in this respect. The present study evaluates the effect of delayed light-curing through a zirconia disc on the microhardness and fracture toughness (KIC) of two types of dual-cure cement. Materials and Methods: Samples measuring 25×5×3 mm3 were prepared for fracture toughness test, and discs measuring 5 mm in diameter and 3 mm in thickness were prepared for microhardness test using Bifix and BisCem cements. Light-curing protocols were as follows: immediate light-curing (group A), a 2-minute delay (group B), a 5-minute delay (group C), direct irradiation (group D), and no irradiation (group E). In groups A to C, light-curing was carried out through a zirconia disc. Data were analyzed by two-way and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), post-hoc Tukey's test, and Kruskal-Wallis test at 95% confidence interval. Results: There was a significant difference in the microhardness of the cements (P=0.00). Delayed light-curing had no effect on microhardness (P=0.080). The microhardness of BisCem in group E was significantly lower than that in group D (P=0.015). The fracture toughness of Bifix in groups B and C was significantly different than that in group E and BisCem groups. Conclusions: Under the limitations of our study, delayed light-curing had different effects on microhardness and fracture toughness. Differences in light-curing protocols resulted in different effects based on the cement type. Light-curing is recommended to achieve optimal mechanical properties.

scholarly journals The Efficacy and Safety of Nabufen and Sufentanil in the Prevention of Visceral Pain After Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxia Gu ◽  
Jingjing Wang ◽  
Huihua Liao ◽  
Jian Mo ◽  
Weiming Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Visceral Pain ◽  
Sedation Score ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Group D ◽  
Ramsay Sedation Score

Abstract Background: To compare the efficacy and safety of different compatibility schemes in the prevention of visceral pain after gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Methods: from April 2019 to April 2020, patients undergoing elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery in our hospital were randomly divided into four groups: group A: sufentanil 3 μ g / kg; group B: low-dose nalbuphine group: 0.1 mg / kg of nabufen + 3 μ g / kg of sufentanil; group C: medium dose of nabufen group: 1 mg / kg of nabufen + 2 μ g / kg of sufentanil; group D: high-dose nabufen 2 There were 30 cases in each group. The degree of pain and the number of adverse reactions at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48 hours after operation were observed and recorded. The number and dosage of morphine used as a remedial analgesic were recorded. The pain degree was assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS). The total amount of analgesic pump used, the total number of times of pressing and the effective times of pressing were recorded. The adverse reactions included respiratory depression, nausea and vomiting, drowsiness, restlessness and skin The skin itches. Results: the analgesic effect of group B was similar to that of group A, and there was no significant difference in the number of invalid pressing, total pressing times and rescue analgesia rate (P > 0.05), while the invalid pressing times, total pressing times and remedial analgesia rate of group C and group D were significantly lower than those of group A (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between group C and group D in the number of invalid compressions, the total number of compressions and the rate of remedial analgesia (P > 0.05), suggesting that increasing the dose of nalbuphine could not significantly increase the analgesic effect. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, skin pruritus, lethargy and Ramsay Sedation score in group B and group C were significantly lower than those in group A (P < 0.05). Ramsay Sedation score and incidence of drowsiness were lower than those in group D, which indicated that the incidence of adverse reactions was higher in group D than group B and group C.Conclusion: the combination of 1 mg / kg nabufen and 2 μ g / kg sufentanil is a safe and effective combination scheme for the prevention of visceral pain after gynecological laparoscopic surgery with small adverse reactions.Trial registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=40635Registration number：ChiCTR1900025076 . Prospectively registered on 10 August 2019.

scholarly journals The Clinical Outcome in Patients with Peritoneal Metastasis

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Spiliotis J ◽  
◽  
Farmakis D ◽  
Raptis A ◽  
Kopanakis N ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Chemotherapy ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Peritoneal Metastases ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Chemotherapy Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Group D

Cytroreductive surgery (CRS) and HIPEC are controversial effective treatment options for selected patients with peritoneal metastases. We retrospectively examined 4.500 patients with peritoneal metastases from different tumors from 2005 to 2020. Patients were divided in 4 groups, surgery plus HIPEC and then systemic chemotherapy: Group A n=730, Group B n=700, R0 surgery plus systemic chemotherapy, Group C n=870, palliative surgery plus systemic chemotherapy and Group D n=2.200, palliative care and best support. The postoperative outcomes, morbidity, mortality were compared between the 4 groups. The mean survival rates Group A=24,4+10,2m, Group B= 18,4+6,3m, Group C=12,3+5,7m, Group D=5,8+2,3m (p<0.05 between Gr A vr Gr B). There was no statistically significant difference in the 30-day mortality and morbidity. In conclusion CRS + HIPEC are feasible in 16% of our patients with peritoneal metastases and are associated with pro-longed survival.

scholarly journals Assessment of Range of Movement, Pain and Disability Following a Whiplash Injury

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 541-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atif A. Malik ◽  
Simon Robinson ◽  
Wasim S. Khan ◽  
Bernice Dillon ◽  
Martyn E. Lovell
Keyword(s):  
Neck Pain ◽  
Whiplash Injury ◽  
Range Of Movement ◽  
Pain Group ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Group D

Background: Whiplash has been suggested to cause chronic symptoms and long term disability. This study was designed to assess long term function after whiplash injury. Material & Methods: A random sample of patients in the outpatient clinic was interviewed, questionnaire completed and clinical examination performed. Assessment was made of passive cervical range of movement and Visual Analogue Scale pain scores. One hundred and sixty-four patients were divided into four different groups including patients with no whiplash injury but long-standing neck pain (Group A), previous symptomatic whiplash injury and long-standing neck pain (Group B), previous symptomatic whiplash injury and no neck symptoms (Group C), and a control group of patients with no history of whiplash injury or neck symptoms (Group D). Results: Data was analyzed by performing an Independent samples t-test and ANOVA, with level of significance taken as p<0.05. Comparing the four groups using a one-way ANOVA showed a significant difference between the groups (p<0.001). There were significant differences when comparing mean ranges of movement between Group A and Group D, and between Group B and Group D. There was no significant difference between Group C and Group D. similar differences were also seen in the pain scores. Conclusion: We conclude that osteoarthritis in the cervical spine, and whiplash injury with chronic problems cause a significantly decreased cervical range of movement with a higher pain score. Patients with shorter duration of whiplash symptoms appear to do better in the long-term.

Treatment of Major Laparoscopic Bile Duct Injury: A Long-Term Follow-up Result

2011 ◽  
Vol 77 (12) ◽  
pp. 1584-1588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Dong Xu ◽  
You Cheng Zhang ◽  
Pen Gao ◽  
Farah Bahrani-Mougeot ◽  
Ling Yi Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Bile Duct Injury ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Secondary Operation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Group D

The goal of this study is to present the multiple institutions experience comparing the outcome of management between initial laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) surgeon and specialist as well as the outcome of different operative procedures to major bile duct injury (BDI) after LC. We have retrospectively collected data of 77 cases of perioperatively detected major BDI in LC at 15 general surgical institutions from 1997 to 2007. We classified 42 cases treated by an experienced biliary surgeon as Group A and 35 cases treated by the initial LC surgeon as Group B. Forty-eight cases were treated with duct-to-duct anastomosis as Group C and 29 cases were treated with Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy as Group D. The median duration of follow-up was 62 months. The outcome of groups was compared. In Group A, 7 of 42 (16.7%) patients developed a failure. Two of seven (28.6%) patients were treated by a secondary operation. In Group B, 24 of 35 (68.6%) patients developed a failure. Seventeen of 24 (70.8%) patients were treated by a secondary operation. One of 35 (2.85%) patients died. The significant differences were observed in failure and secondary operations (16.7 vs 68.6%, P < 0.01 and 28.6 vs 70.8%, P < 0.01). There is no significant difference Group C and Group D in failure rate (28.5 vs 11.7%, P > 0.05). A multiple institutional cooperative methodology between the local surgical institution and tertiary care centers provided a good way to limit further operations, failure. The reconstructive strategy is important and should be selected according to the type of injury and the diagnosed status of major BDI.

scholarly journals Influence of different auxiliary agents of biomechanical preparation in the filling of "artificially prepared" lateral canals

2005 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Ribeiro da Silva ◽  
Ivaldo Gomes de Moraes
Keyword(s):  
Penetration Rate ◽  
Hybrid Technique ◽  
Human Teeth ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Filling Materials ◽  
Rotary Instruments ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Group D

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the influence of some auxiliary agents of biomechanical preparation of the root canal on the filling of artificial lateral canals in extracted human teeth. A total of eighty single-rooted teeth were employed, which were submitted to preparation of three artificial lateral canals in one of the proximal aspects at the cervical, middle and apical thirds, besides one in the buccal aspect. The main canals were prepared by Profile 0.4 rotary instruments through the crown-down technique and irrigated with the irrigants investigated, as follows: Group A - 1% sodium hypochlorite and final irrigation with trisodium EDTA for 5 minutes; Group B - Endogel (2% chlorhexidine gel); Group C - Endo PTC and Dakin's solution and final irrigation with Tergentol- Furacin; and Group D - File Eze. The root canals were obturated by the Tagger's hybrid technique and then radiographed for assessment of the penetration rate of the filling materials in the lateral canals. Analysis of the results demonstrated no statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between the irrigants both to each other and as regards the location (thirds and aspects) of the artificial lateral canals.

scholarly journals Comparative Study of Efficiency between Povidone Iodine and Normal Saline Lavage in the Treatment of Acute Peritonitis

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-20
Author(s):  
Haridas Saha ◽  
Mohammad Ibrahim Khalil ◽  
Aminul Islam ◽  
Abdullah Al Mamun ◽  
Md Margub Hossain
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Povidone Iodine ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Acute Peritonitis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Saline Lavage

Background: Control of the primary site of sepsis is the main determinant of good surgical outcome. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to compare the efficiency between povidone iodine and normal saline lavage in the treatment of acute peritonitis. Methodology: This was a randomized clinical trial conducted in the Department of Surgery at Dhaka Medical College & Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Patients with acute peritonitis due to gastrointestinal causes who were admitted in the different units of Dhaka Medical College Hospital during the study period were selected as study population. Among them patients who were treated with povidone iodine were enrolled in the present study in group A and patients who were treated with conventional normal saline were in group B. Results: A total number of 1050 patients were recruited for this study. Among them 100 patients were enrolled in the present study of which group A (50 patients) for povidone iodine and group B (50 patients) for conventional normal saline. On 7th POD wound infection was found in Group A and Group B were 11(22.4%) and 21(44.7%) respectively. Statistically significant difference in post operative complication of wound infection was observed on 7th POD between the groups (p<0.05). Post operative hospital stay in Group A and Group B were 11.50 ± 4.48 and 13.46 ± 5.13 days respectively. There is statistically significant difference in post operative hospital stay between the groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: Statistically significant difference observed in post operative complication of wound infection and burst abdomen on 7th POD between the groups. The present study there is statistically significant difference in post operative hospital stay between the groups also observed. Bangladesh Journal of Infectious Diseases 2017;4(1):15-20

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document