scholarly journals PEMILIHAN TANAMAN BERDASARKAN KONDISI LAHAN DAN PERSYARATAN TUMBUH TANAMAN MENGGUNAKAN GABUNGAN METODE AHP DAN TOPSIS

JURTEKSI ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-208
Author(s):  
Mi`rajul Rifqi ◽  
Dona Dona
Keyword(s):  
Plant Growth ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Land Suitability ◽  
Cultivated Plants ◽  
Topsis Method ◽  
Growth Requirements ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Process Method ◽  
Lack Of Knowledge

Abstract: Most farmers are do’nt know what plants are suitable for planting on their land. This is due to the lack of knowledge of farmers regarding the suitability of land with the growing requirements of a crop. The lack of knowledge of farmers and the community about the evaluation of land suitability causes the cultivated plants do not produce optimally, because the conditions required by these plants are not in accordance with the conditions of the land that supports the growth of these plants. Seeing the importance of the process of selecting plants based on land suitability, while determining the selection of plants is still done only by looking at the experience of farmers who have not been tested. So the authors feel the need to make research to determine plants on land based on land suitability and plant growth requirements. The Analytical Hierarchy Process method is very suitable to be used to calculate the priority weight of each criterion because it is objective, which will later be used as a reference ranking by the TOPSIS method. With this research, it can determine the estate crops that will be planted on a land based on the level of land suitability and the requirements for growing plants that are alternative precisely, accurately and dynamically. Keywords: DSS, AHP, TOPSIS  Abstrak: Kebanyakan Petani masih banyak yang belum mengetahui tanaman apa yang cocok ditanaman di lahannya. Hal ini disebabkan karena kurangnya pengetahuan petani mengenai kesesuaian lahan dengan persyaratan tumbuh suatu tanaman. Lemahnya tingkat pengetahuan petani dan masyarakat tentang evaluasi kesesuaian lahan menyebabkan tanaman yang dibudidayakan tidak berproduksi optimal, karena syarat yang dibutuhkan tanaman tersebut belum sesuai dengan kondisi lahan yang mendukung pertumbuhan tanaman tersebut. Melihat pentingnya proses pemilihan tanaman berdasarkan kesesuain lahan, sedangkan penentuan pemilihan tanaman masih dilakukan hanya berdasarkan dengan melihat pengalaman petani yang belum teruji. Maka penulis merasa perlu membuat penelitian untuk menentukan tanaman pada lahan berdasarkan kesesuain lahan dan persyaratan tumbuh tanaman. Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process sangat cocok digunakan untuk menghitung bobot prioritas dari tiap kriteria karena bersifat obyektif, yang nantinya menjadi acuan perangkingan yang dilakukan dengan metode TOPSIS. Dengan adanya penelitian ini, maka dapat menentukan tanaman perkebunan yang akan ditanam pada suatu lahan berdasarkan tingkat kesesuaian lahan dan persyaratan tumbuh tanaman yang menjadi alternatif secara tepat, akurat dan dinamis.  Kata kunci: SPK, AHP, TOPSIS

scholarly journals Selection of the Best Lecturer in Management Forum Indonesia Chapter DKI Jakarta with Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method

Webology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (Special Issue 04) ◽  
pp. 619-625
Author(s):  
Faroman Syarief ◽  
Rustam Effendi ◽  
Amrillah Azrin ◽  
Imam Suroso ◽  
Dhian Tyas Untari
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Community Service ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Scientific Development ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Management Forum ◽  
Decision Making System ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Process Method

This study aims to be able to provide recommendations in the decision-making system related to the best lecturers at the Jakarta Chapter of the Indonesian Management Lecturer Forum. It is hoped that the research results can be used as input in the Best Lecturer decision making system with a more systematic system. This research was conducted through interviews, questionnaires and literature study related to the Lecturer profession. In the field, the assessment criteria are still rough, therefore this study must include all the criteria into the mechanism, rules, and codes. Analysis, each criterion is analyzed using the AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) method in weighting. The cumulative results of the recapitulation of scores show that teaching is still a top priority in the implementation of the Tridaharma of Lecturers, after that the second priority is research, then community service and finally support in the form of participation in supporting activities and scientific development.

scholarly journals Determination Of Lecturer Reception Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-141
Author(s):  
Hafizah Hanim ◽  
Jefril Rahmadoni
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Hierarchical Structure ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Structure Calculation ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Extra Time ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Process Method

During this time, the selection of non permanent lecturers, parts staffing difficulties in selecting lecturers. The obstacle faced is the large number of applicants who register to become prospective lecturers. So that the staffing or the campus must give extra time to choose prospective lecturers so that lecturers can be obtained that fit the desired criteria. The AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) method is a method in the decision-making process, this method performs a hierarchical structure calculation where the top level in the hierarchy is the goal to be achieved then the hierarchy below in the form of criteria in achieving goals and the lowest level is the alternatives in achieving goals.

scholarly journals The Selection of Best Employee by using Analytical Hierarchy Process Method in Go Wet Water Park

SinkrOn ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 191
Author(s):  
Supriyanti Supriyanti ◽  
Henny Destiana
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Human Resources ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Employee Selection ◽  
Expert Choice ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
A Company ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Process Method

In a company, human resource is something that must really be considered, the company must have good quality of human resources and be able to work well so that the company's sustainability can be maintained. To maintain the quality and existence of its employees, the company needs to give appreciation to its employees so that employees are motivated to work better. Employees are not motivated to work better because there is no model employee selection yet. Selecting and determining model employees requires a method or decision support system to support the selection of model employees. There are many methods that can be used to select model employees, one of which is the Analytical Hierarchy Process method. To support the selection of model employees, software that can make it easier to determine model employees is needed. The software used is Expert Choice 2000 software. The results obtained from research on the selection of model employees using the Analytical Hierarchy Process method in Go Wet Water Park are employees named Nugraha successfully selected as a model employee in the company with an overall inconsistency of 0.1.

scholarly journals Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process Method to Determine the Quality of Gemstones

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mochammad Sobandi Dwi Putra ◽  
Septi Andryana ◽  
Fauziah ◽  
Aris Gunaryati
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
Ahp Model ◽  
Decision Making System ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Process Method

The selection of quality gemstones requires a special ability to select and assess the quality of gemstones to be traded. The diversity of types of gemstones and consumers becomes an obstacle in itself when the knowledge and ability of individuals to analyze the quality of gemstones is minimal. The decision-making method used is Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (F-AHP) method which is widely used in various sectors. F-AHP is easy to adapt to many decision issues; the research proposes a decision-making system using the F-AHP algorithm to analyze the quality of gemstones. The results obtained with the use of F-AHP model in the selection of quality gemstones show the highest quality of gemstones of all stones compared, Rubi 1, with a weight value of 0.152942.

scholarly journals The selection of candidate of call center operator 112 using analytical hierarchy process method

2019 ◽  
Vol 1360 ◽  
pp. 012015
Author(s):  
D A Kurnia ◽  
D Sudrajat ◽  
N Rahaningsih ◽  
A R Rinaldi ◽  
F A Pratama
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Call Center ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Process Method

scholarly journals Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Bantuan Beras Miskin Menggunakan Metode AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) Pada Kecamatan Banawa

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 59
Author(s):  
Dewi Kusumawati ◽  
Mohammad Mohammad
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Black Box ◽  
Development Method ◽  
Poor Families ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Disadvantaged People ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Process Method

The rice program for poor families or commonly known as Raskin is one of the government's efforts to reduce the burden of expenditure on poor families. The Raskin program is to reduce poverty and maintain the food of economically disadvantaged people so that all parties are expected to participate in the success of this program so that it can be implemented properly and is beneficial to the community. In general, the problems that occur in the assistance of Poor Rice assistance are still not optimal, because at the time of selection of poor rice recipients there is no system that supports so that during the selection process still using estimates only and there is no calculation at the time of selection of poor rice recipients. So that few or many people sometimes protest because people are supposed to get help but they don't get the assistance, and vice versa. The purpose of this study is to help the committee to receive poor rice assistance in selecting people who are entitled to receive assistance, especially in the district of Banawa. The research method used is the software development method using the prototype method and decision-making method using the AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) method. Based on the results of testing conducted with the black box technique, the results show that the decision support system for receiving poor rice assistance can help the sub-district, especially the committee in selecting poor rice aid recipients, by comparing the criteria for each alternative and showing the value the highest of alternatives means that the alternative is the main choice for receiving poor rice assistance.

scholarly journals Penggunaan Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) pada Penentuan Prioritas Supplier Food Chemical di PT. Garuda Hidrotive Internasional

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-160
Author(s):  
Nehemia Hadiwijaya ◽  
Jenie Sundari
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Supply Chain ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Supplier Selection ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Supply Chain Performance ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Process Method

Abstract-Supplier selection is one of the important things in purchasing activities for companies. Supplier selection is a multi-criteria problem which includes quantitative and qualitative factors. One method that can be used for supplier selection is the AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) method. The problems that will be discussed in this study are: (1) how is the order of priority criteria and sub-criteria in the selection of suppliers at PT Garuda Hidrotive International? (2) which supplier / supplier should PT Garuda Hidrotive International choose based on the AHP method? The sampling technique uses judgment sampling because the AHP method requires dependence on a group of experts according to the types of specialists involved in decision making. Based on the results of the analysis, the advice that can be given is, if the company will develop a partnership with suppliers, the company is preferred to choose supplier X as a supplier food chemical for the company because supplier X is the best supplier that has the highest overall value. With this partnership, the supply chain performance between suppliers and companies will be better and can facilitate the overall production activities. 

scholarly journals PEMILIHAN PRIORITAS PROGRAM KERJA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS PADA PT. GARUDA INDONESIA CARGO

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Dimas Novrisal ◽  
Farah Almira ◽  
Eva Febrianty
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Quality Criteria ◽  
Limited Resources ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
Work Program ◽  
Weight Value ◽  
Final Weight ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Process Method

Company is required to compete and being innovated to carry out work program strategies in order to improve the service quality while deliver goods to consumers. Due to limited resources, companies need to prioritize work programs based on existing criteria. The purpose of this study is the selection of work program priorities using the analytical hierarchy process method at PT. Garuda Indonesia Cargo. This research begins with determining the criteria and alternatives that are carried out for making questionnaires, then distributing questionnaires to get priority criteria and alternatives using the AHP method. The results of data processing using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method obtained the sequence results from each of the highest to lowest criteria and the highest weighted results were the quality criteria with the final weight value 0.71 after that followed the profit criteria with the final weight 0.29. After obtained the heightened criteria, the optimal alternative selected is Equipment with a weight value of 0.46, and followed by HR with a weight value of 0.38, then Infrastructure with a final weight value of 0.16.

scholarly journals DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM IN DETERMINING THE BEST JUDO ATHLETE USING AHP METHOD

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-52
Author(s):  
Dinar Ajeng Kristiyanti ◽  
Garth Wishnuwardhana Pangemanan
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Statistical Data ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
Strong Basis ◽  
Judo Athlete ◽  
Judo Athletes ◽  
Training Team ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Process Method

To determine the best Judo athlete, Rajawali Judo Club of Battalion Arhanud 1 Divif 1 Kostrad has several obstacles such as making a decision in determining the best Judo athlete by the Coach and the Achievement Development which only based on experience which is estimated without the existence of any system. This results in subjectivity and the absence of a strong basis for competent objective decision making which then triggers gaps between athletes. The absence of specific criteria creates that result in not targeting the selection of the best Judo athletes. For this reason, a method, in this case, is needed to choose the AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) method and a number of criteria as indicators in determining the best Judo athlete. While the referenced criteria are Self-Dropping Technique (Ukemi), Slamming Technique (Nage-waza), Lockdown or Lying Technique (Katame-waza), Discipline and Achievement. The purpose of this study is expected to produce statistical data as an evaluation material for the training team to minimize or even eliminate the gap between fellow Judo athletes at the Rajawali Judo Club of Battalion Arhanud 1 Divif 1 Kostrad. The result of this study is based on Analytical Hierarchy Process calculations, obtained the most important priority criteria in determining the best Judo athlete in which the Achievement criteria with value  0.325 or equivalent to 32%, then followed by Disciplinary criteria with value 0.227 or equivalent to 23%, Slamming Technique criteria (Nage-waza) with value 0.211 or equivalent to 21%, Lockdown/Laying Technique criteria (Katame-waza) with value 0.125 or equivalent to 12% and in the last rank the Self-Dropping Technique criteria (Ukemi) with value 0.112 or equivalent to 11%.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document