scholarly journals Monoctonus leclanti sp. n. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Aphidiinae) from high-montane areas of southeastern Europe, and key to related species

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Željko Tomanović ◽  
Petr Starý ◽  
Olivera Petrović

Monoctonus leclanti sp. n., a parasitoid of Delphiniobium junackianum Karsch. (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on Aconitum toxicum bosniacum and Aconitum pentheri in the high mountains of the Balkans is described. The species is an additional member of the high-montane aphid parasitoid guild determined in the area. A key to related species is included.

2020 ◽  
Vol 77 ◽  
pp. 167-174
Author(s):  
Željko Tomanović ◽  
Andjeljko Petrović ◽  
Korana Kocić ◽  
Jelisaveta Čkrkić ◽  
Vladimir Žikić

Here we describe two new Ephedrus species from the Biologiezentrum Linz´s collection: Ephedrus antennalissp. nov., which possesses 12-segmented antennae, a unique character within the genus Ephedrus; and E. carinatussp. nov., which represents an additional member of the root aphid parasitoid group within the genus Ephedrus.


2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Mishkova

AbstractThis article takes a distance from the debate about 'symbolic geographies' and structural definitions of historical spaces as well as from surveying discrete disciplinary traditions or political agendas of regionalist scholarship in and on Southeastern Europe. Its purpose instead has been two-fold. On the one hand, to bring to light a preexistent but largely suppressed and un-reflected tradition of regionalist scholarship with the hope that this could help us fine tune the way we conceptualize, contemplate and evaluate regionalism as politics and transnationalism as a scholarly project. In epistemological terms, on the other hand, it proposes a theoretical perspective to regionalist scholarship involving rigorous engagement with the scales of observation, and scale shifts, in the interpretation of history. The hypothesis the article seeks to test maintains that the national and the (meso)regional perspectives to history chart differentiated 'spaces of experience' — i.e. the same occurrences are reported and judged in a different manner on the different scales — by way of displacing the valency of past processes, events, actors, and institutions and creating divergent temporalities — different national and regional historical times. Different objects (i.e. spaces) of enquiry are therefore coextensive with different temporal layers, each of which demands a different methodological approach. Drawing on texts of regional scholars, in which the historical reality of the Balkans/Southeastern Europe is articulated explicitly or implicitly, the article discusses also the relationship between different spaces and scales at the backdrop of the Braudelian and the microhistorical perspectives.


2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 1080-1083 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHRISTOPH SANDROCK ◽  
NATHALIE FRAUENFELDER ◽  
SIMONE VON BURG ◽  
CHRISTOPH VORBURGER

1997 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Panikhos Poutziouris ◽  
Katherine O'Sullivan ◽  
Lumenita Nicolescu

This paper explores the development of the family-business sector during the post-socialist era in the Balkans. It establishes the profile of family-business entrepreneurship in the emerging markets of southeastern Europe. By focusing on the Bulgarian and Romanian experience, we present and briefly contrast the transitional variant of family-business entrepreneurship with the contours of the Greek family business system. Next, we map out the growth patterns of Balkan family ventures, including businesses in the agro-industrial, manufacturing and other commercial sectors. We conclude with some tentative policy recommendations aimed at enhancing the further development of family-business entrepreneurship in the Balkans.


Author(s):  
Richard C. Hall

Revolts against Ottoman rule erupted in the Balkans in 1875 and in 1876. Wars in which Montenegro, Romania, Russia, and Serbia fought against the Ottoman Empire broke out soon thereafter. While the Montenegrins and Serbs soon suffered defeat, the Russians overcame Ottoman forces on Bulgarian battlefields. The Treaty of San Stefano of 3 March 1878, imposed by the Russians on the Ottomans, proved to be controversial. In an effort to resolve the national issue of southeastern Europe and to replace the contentious Treaty of San Stefano, the European great powers met at Berlin to forge a new settlement. The Treaty of Berlin of 13 July 1878 established a Bulgarian principality under Ottoman suzerainty. Although the Treaty of Berlin satisfied none of the Balkan countries, rivalries among the Balkan peoples over the disposition of Ottoman territories prevented the formation of a united effort against the Ottomans. After the turn of the 20th century, intra-Balkan rivalries intensified, especially over Macedonia. At the same time, Albanians, Muslim Slavs, and Turks sought to effect reforms within the Ottoman Empire. The seizure of power by the Committee for Union and Progress (Young Turks) in Constantinople and their stated intentions to reform the Ottoman Empire initiated a series of events that led to general conflict. In the immediate aftermath of the Young Turk coup, the Austro-Hungarian government announced the formal annexation of Bosnia-Herzegovina. Concurrently, Bulgaria made a formal declaration of independence. Concerns that Ottoman reform would thwart their nationalist aspirations led many Albanians to revolt in 1910. Two years later, similar apprehensions led the Bulgarians and the Serbs to put aside their rivalries over Macedonia and conclude an anti-Ottoman alliance. The Greeks and Montenegrins subsequently joined this Balkan League. In October 1912, the Balkan League went to war against the Ottoman Empire. The Balkan armies triumphed on all fronts. On 30 May 1913, the Balkan allies signed a preliminary peace with the Ottomans in London. Shortly thereafter, the Balkan alliance collapsed due to disputes over the disposition of Ottoman territory. On 30 June, the Bulgarians attacked their former Greek and Serbian allies in Macedonia. The Ottomans entered the fray against Bulgaria to regain lost Thracian territory, and the Romanians invaded Bulgaria to seize southern Dobrudja (Dobrudzha). Attacked on all sides, the Bulgarians were forced to sue for peace. These wars left Bulgaria with a sense of national frustration and the Balkan allies and Romania with a feeling of inflated national success. Within three years, all the participants in the Balkan Wars would again be at war.


Zootaxa ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
ZELJKO TOMANOVIC ◽  
PETR STARÝ

Examination of Aphidius matricariae Haliday specimens from Yugoslavia yielded the presence of a new species reared from Linosiphon sp. on Galium silvaticum. Aphidius linosiphonis sp. n. is described and is differentiated from its relatives based on differences in morphology. This species also was found in collections from the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-111
Author(s):  
Vladimir Kulić

This article introduces the special issue of Southeastern Europe dedicated to architecture in the Balkans produced in the networks of socialist internationalism. The built heritage of socialism has suffered several waves of erasure, most spectacularly exemplified by the current remake of Skopje, but it is also undergoing a surge in popular and scholarly interest. Focusing on Bucharest, Skopje, Sofia, and the activities of the Belgrade company Energoprojekt in Nigeria, the issue contributes to the growing scholarship on socialist and postsocialist space by analyzing architecture’s global entanglements during the Cold War. “Architecture” is understood here not only as the built environment in its various scales, but also as a regulated, organized profession, a field of cultural production, an art, and a technical discipline. It thus opens up a broad range of phenomena that cut across the fabric of society: from the representations of specific global imaginaries, to the transnational exchanges of expertise, services, and material goods.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document