scholarly journals A CONVENIÊNCIA, A OPORTUNIDADE E A SUSTENTABILIDADE COMO CRITÉRIOS JUDICIAIS NO REGISTRO DE TÍTULOS NO REGISTRO DE IMÓVEIS

2021 ◽  
pp. 170-188
Author(s):  
Carlos Cini Marchionatti ◽  
Francine Cansi ◽  
Paulo Márcio Cruz
Keyword(s):  
Legal Requirements ◽  
Property Registration

A Conveniência e a Oportunidade são critérios legais e judiciais de decidir em Jurisdição Voluntária. Quando o Oficial do Registro de Imóveis deixa de registrar título apresentado para registro no Registro de Imóveis por causa das exigências legais ou da Legalidade Estrita, esta objeção ao registro pode ser submetida ao Juiz de Direito competente, conhecimento e julgamento que ocorrem em Jurisdição Voluntária, onde incidem a Conveniência e a Oportunidade. A Sustentabilidade também pode aparecer como razão judicial de julgar, concomitante à Conveniência e à Oportunidade. Palavras-Chave: Sustentabilidade. Conveniência. Oportunidade. Jurisdição voluntária. Registro de Imóveis.   Abstract: The Convenience anda Opportunity are legal and judicial criteria for deciding on Voluntary Jurisdiction. When the Notary Officier of Property Registration refuses to book the propriety’s title due to the legal requirements or Strict Legality, this objection to registraty may be submitted to the competente Judge of Law, acknowledging and judging it in Voluntary, where the Convenience and Opportunity are applied. Sustainability miggt also be presente as a judicial reason of deciding concurrent with Convenient and Opportunity. Keywords: Sustentability. Convenience. Opportunity. Voluntary Jurisdiction. Property Registration.

Drinking water quality and protection of resources

2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 51-54
Author(s):  
J. Fettig
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Drinking Water ◽  
Water Resources ◽  
River Water ◽  
Spring Water ◽  
Public Water Supply ◽  
Legal Requirements ◽  
Reservoir Water ◽  
Water Lake ◽  
Treatment Step

Abstract The structure of public water supply in Germany and the water resources used are briefly described. An overview over the legal requirements for drinking water is given, and the sources for contaminants are outlined. Then the multiple-barrier approach is discussed with respect to the resources groundwater and spring water, lake and reservoir water, and river water. Examples for treatment schemes are given and the principle of subsurface transport of river water as a first treatment step is described.

Influence of Pumps on Salinity of a Coastal Aquifer with Legal Protection (A Zone in the North of Isla Cristina, Huelva, Spain)

1991 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 251-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. González ◽  
E. Romero
Keyword(s):  
Coastal Aquifer ◽  
Salt Water ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Hydraulic Gradient ◽  
Water Mixture ◽  
Residual Flow ◽  
Legal Requirements ◽  
The North ◽  
North Side ◽  
Rational Distribution

In this article we show that the legal measures for protection of aquifers are not enough to lessen the pumping if the users are not associated and determined to have a rational distribution of water. The expansive agriculture on the North side of Isla Cristina (Huelva, Spain), based on citrus and strawberry growing, uses high volumes of groundwater that comes from a tertiary age detritic coastal aquifer with a significant lack of resources. This causes a decrease of the residual flow to the sea, deep pumpcones, and an inversion of the hydraulic gradient, which initiates the progressive salinization of the aquifer northwards, in the sense that the fresh-salt water mixture zone is moving. The problem is worsening because the number of uncontrolled pump-works in the areais increasing. This problem could be alleviated if a Users Community for the whole aquifer were created, itself to watch over the fulfilment of the legal requirements and to regulate the water extractions.

scholarly journals Development, piloting, and evaluation of an evidence-based informed consent form for total knee arthroplasty (EvAb-Pilot): a protocol for a mixed methods study

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alina Weise ◽  
Julia Lühnen ◽  
Stefanie Bühn ◽  
Felicia Steffen ◽  
Sandro Zacher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Nocebo Effect ◽  
Legal Requirements ◽  
Consent Forms ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Total Knee

Abstract Background Practitioners frequently use informed consent forms to support the physician-patient communication and the informed consent process. Informed consent for surgery often focuses on risk centered information due to high liability risks for treatment errors. This may affect patients’ anxiety of adverse events and the nocebo effect. This study focuses on the optimization of pre-surgical information on risks and complications, and at the same time reconciles these information with legal requirements. Methods The development, piloting, and evaluation of evidence-based informed consent forms for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and related anesthesia procedures will follow the UK MRC Framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions. Conducting different sub-studies, we will (I) qualitatively explore the information acquisition and decision-making processes, (II) develop and pilot test evidence-based informed consent forms on the example of TKA and related anesthesia procedures, (III) conduct a monocentric interrupted time series (ITS) pilot study to evaluate the effects of evidence-based informed consent forms in comparison with standard consent forms, and (IV) perform a process evaluation to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the intervention and to analyze mechanisms of impact. Discussion The evidence-based and understandable presentation of risks in informed consent forms aims at avoiding distorted risk depiction and strengthening the patients’ competencies to correctly assess the risks of undergoing surgery. This might reduce negative expectations and anxiety of adverse events, which in turn might reduce the nocebo effect. At the same time, the practitioners’ acceptance of evidence-based informed consent forms meeting legal requirements could be increased. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04669483. Registered 15 December 2020. German Clinical Trials Registry, DRKS00022571. Registered 15 December 2020

scholarly journals The Forensic Entomology Case Report—A Global Perspective

Insects ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 283
Author(s):  
Zanthé Kotzé ◽  
Sylvain Aimar ◽  
Jens Amendt ◽  
Gail S. Anderson ◽  
Luc Bourguignon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Forensic Entomology ◽  
Professional Associations ◽  
Global Perspective ◽  
Legal Requirements ◽  
Standard Format ◽  
Complete Report ◽  
Colonization Time ◽  
First Time

Forensic practitioners analyzing entomological evidence are faced with numerous challenges when presenting their findings to law practitioners, particularly in terms of terminology used to describe insect age, what this means for colonization time of remains, and the limitations to estimates made. Due to varying legal requirements in different countries, there is no standard format for the entomological case report prepared, nor any guidelines as to the sections that are required, optional or unnecessary in a case report. The authors herein propose sections that should be considered when drafting an entomological case report. The criteria under which entomological evidence is analyzed are discussed, as well as the limitations for each criterion. The concept of a global, standardized entomological case report is impossible to achieve due to national legislative differences, but the authors here propose a basic template which can be adapted and changed according to the needs of the practitioner. Furthermore, while the discussion is fairly detailed, capturing all differences between nations could not be accomplished, and those initiating casework for the first time are encouraged to engage other practicing forensic entomologists or professional associations within their own nation or region, to ensure a complete report is generated that meets lab or national requirements, prior to generating a finalized report.

An application of Austrian legal requirements for CSO emissions

2011 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 1081-1088 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manfred Kleidorfer ◽  
Wolfgang Rauch
Keyword(s):  
Model Calibration ◽  
Model Building ◽  
Treatment Plant ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Combined Sewer Overflows ◽  
Sewer System ◽  
Legal Requirements ◽  
Innovative Methods ◽  
Combined Sewer

The Austrian standard for designing combined sewer overflow (CSO) detention basins introduces the efficiency of the combined sewer overflows as an indicator for CSO pollution. Additionally criteria for the ambient water quality are defined, which comprehend six kinds of impacts. In this paper, the Austrian legal requirements are described and discussed by means of hydrological modelling. This is exemplified with the case study Innsbruck (Austria) including a description for model building and model calibration. Furthermore an example is shown in order to demonstrate how – in this case – the overall system performance could be improved by implementing a cost-effective rearrangement of the storage tanks already available at the inflow of the wastewater treatment plant. However, this guideline also allows more innovative methods for reducing CSO emissions as measures for better usage of storage volume or de-centralised treatment of stormwater runoff because it is based on a sewer system simulation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document