Estudo de comparação institucional para solução de controvérsias para eleições de chefes regionais na Indonésia e no Brasil

This article is a legal research which conducts a comparative study of the dispute resolution institutions between the Indonesian and Brazilian elections. The purpose of writing this article is to map the similarities and differences in the practice of dispute resolution between regional head elections in Indonesia and Brazil to take good aspects that are suitable for implementation in Indonesia. In the discussion, it also covers the practice of organizing elections, election management organs and institutions, including the practice of dispute resolution for Election / Pilkada in both countries. The research method used is normative legal research using primary legal materials in the form of statutory regulations and court decisions, using a comparative approach, a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Conclusions from the discussion of the research results, the authors propose two institutional options for Pilkada dispute resolution in Indonesia: a) Establishing a special election / election court under the PTUN environment. This Special Judiciary is domiciled in each provincial capital to adjudicate and decide on election result disputes (Election / Pilkada Crime and also examine and adjudicate election / election / election process / administration disputes), or b) Define the authority of the Constitutional Court of Justice to adjudicate disputes over the results of the Pilkada (in addition to PHPU) without any differentiation of regime.

Download Full-text

The Position of Constitutional Complaint in the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Pancasila and Law Review ◽

10.25041/plr.v2i1.2308 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2 (1) ◽

pp. 61-78

Author(s):

Agsel Awanisa ◽

Yusdianto Yusdianto ◽

Siti Khoiriah

Keyword(s):

South Africa ◽

South Korea ◽

Judicial Review ◽

Research Method ◽

Comparative Approach ◽

Constitutional Court ◽

Legal Research ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

The Republic ◽

Case Number

The purpose of this research is to determine the constitutional complaint mechanism based on comparisons in other countries, practices, and adaptation of constitutional complaints under the authority of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Many cases with constitutional complaint substance have been submitted to the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia even though they don’t have this authority. This research uses a normative legal research method using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, a comparative approach, and a case approach. This research indicates that the constitutional complaint mechanism in Germany, South Korea, and South Africa has been well implemented. In practice, cases with constitutional complaint substance are filed to the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia by changing the form by using the legal means of a judicial review, such as case number 16/PUU-VI/ 2008, case number 140/PUU-XIII/2015 and case number 102/PUU-VII/2009. Due to the consideration of the structure, substance, and culture of law, adaptation of constitutional complaint within the authority of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia needs to be carried out by amending Law Number 24 of 2003 jo. Law Number 7 of 2020 concerning the Constitutional Court.

Download Full-text

Prinsip Proporsionalitas dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap UUD NRI 1945 (Studi Perbandingan di Indonesia dan Jerman)

Jurist-Diction ◽

10.20473/jd.v4i4.28482 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 4 (4) ◽

pp. 1479

Author(s):

Irene Angelita Rugian

Keyword(s):

General Principle ◽

Comparative Approach ◽

Constitutional Court ◽

Narrow Sense ◽

Legal Research ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Legal Policy ◽

Test Norms ◽

Federal Constitutional ◽

Principle Of Proportionality

AbstractIn several decisions that have been decided by the Mahkamah Konstitusi, some of the judges considerations only test norms with benchmarks contrary to the UUD NRI 1945 or not? However, MK has not tested the basis of the petition itself, there are limitation of rights, open legal policy, and the real harm felt by the petitioner. Therefore, it is necessary to have a principle of proportionality that can be used by judges to assist in deciding cases related to limiting rights and open legal policy. In order to know the concept of the principle of proportionality, it is necessary to conduct a comparative study between Indonesia and Germany by analyzing the concept and development of this principle. The method used is legal research with a statute approach, a case approach, a comparative approach and a conceptual approach. From the results of these studies, it was found that the principle of proportionality in Germany was well conceptualized and developed rapidly. In fact, this principle has become a general principle in the Germany Federal Constitutional Court. Meanwhile in Indonesia, this principle is still unknown and undeveloped like Germany.Keywords: The Principle of Proportionality; Legitimate Aim; Suitability; Neccesity; Balancing in Narrow Sense.AbstrakDalam beberapa putusan yang telah diputus oleh MK, beberapa pertimbangan hakim hanya menguji norma dengan tolak ukur bertentangan dengan UUD NRI 1945 atau tidak? Namun, MK belum menguji sampai kepada dasar dari permohonan itu sendiri, yaitu pembatasan hak, open legal policy, dan kerugian yang nyata dirasakan oleh pemohon. Maka dari itu, perlu adanya prinsip proporsionalitas yang dapat digunakan para hakim untuk membantu memutus perkara yang berkaitan dengan pembatasan hak dan open legal policy. Agar mengetahui konsep dari prinsip proporsionalitas, maka perlu melakukan studi perbandingan antara Indonesia dan Jerman dengan menganalisis konsep dan perkembangan prinsip tersebut. Metode yang digunakan adalah legal research dengan pendekatan statute approach, case approach, comparative approach dan conceptual appoach. Hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa prinsip proporsionalitas di Jerman telah terkonsep dengan baik dan berkembang dengan pesat. Bahkan prinsip tersebut telah menjadi prinsip umum dalam Germany Federal Constitutional Court. Sedangkan di Indonesia, prinsip tersebut masih belum dikenal oleh MK. Sehingga, proporsionalitas belum memiliki konsep yang jelas dan tidak berkembang seperti negara Jerman.Kata Kunci: Prinsip Proporsionalitas; Legitimate Aim; Suitability; Neccesity; Balancing in Narrow Sense.

Download Full-text

Hukum Internasional sebagai Alat Interpretasi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang

Jurnal Konstitusi ◽

10.31078/jk1514 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 15 (1) ◽

pp. 73

Author(s):

Umbu Rauta ◽

Ninon Melatyugra

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

International Law ◽

Judicial Review ◽

Review Process ◽

Constitutional Court ◽

Legal Research ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

The Republic ◽

Constitutional Tradition ◽

The Relationship

Tulisan ini ingin menjawab dua isu utama mengenai hubungan hukum internasional dan pengujian undang-undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi RI (MKRI). Isu pertama adalah legitimasi penggunaan hukum internasional sebagai alat interpretasi dalam pengujian undang-undang, sedangkan isu kedua adalah urgensi penguasaan hukum internasional oleh hakim MKRI. Tulisan ini merupakan penelitian hukum yang menggunakan pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan historis dalam menjelaskan perkembangan pengujian undang-undang di Indonesia sekaligus menemukan legitimasi penggunaan hukum internasional oleh MK RI. Kesimpulan dari tulisan ini menegaskan bahwa hukum internasional memiliki sumbangsih yang penting dalam perannya sebagai alat interpretasi dalam proses pengujian undang-undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi, khususnya terkait hak asasi manusia. Justifikasi keabsahan praktik penggunaan hukum internasional tersebut ditarik dari tradisi ketatanegaraan yang secara implisit dikehendaki UUD NRI Tahun 1945. Manfaat positif yang diberikan hukum internasional nyatanya harus disertai juga dengan penguasaan hukum internasional oleh hakim MK RI supaya hukum internasional dapat digunakan secara tepat. Pembahasan dalam tulisan ini dibagi ke dalam empat sub bahasan inti yakni, pengujian undang-undang, penggunaan hukum internasional sebagai the interpretative tool dalam pengujian undang-undang oleh MK, legitimasi penggunaan hukum internasional sebagai the interpretative tool dalam pengujian undang-undang, pentingnya penguasaan hukum internasional oleh hakim MK.This article intentionally answers two principal issues regarding the relationship between international law and judicial review by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. The first issue is the legitimacy of international use as an interpretative tool in judicial review. The second issue talks about the necessity of urgent international law mastery by the Constitutional Court’s judges. This legal research utilizes both a conceptual approach and a historical approach to explain the development of judicial review in Indonesia, and to find legitimacy of international law by the Constitutional Court. The analysis in this article affirms that international law positively contributes as an interpretative tool in judicial review by the Constitutional Court, particularly pertaining to human rights. A justification of a legitimate international law use is withdrawn from constitutional tradition which is implicitly desired by the Indonesian Constitution (UUD NRI 1945). Since international law has provided better insights into norms, a mastery of international law should be encouraged. There are four main discussions in this article: judicial review, application of international law in judicial review process, legitimacy of international law application in judicial review, and the importance of international law mastering by Constitutional Court judges.

Download Full-text

Penggunaan Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Negara (APBN) dalam Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Umum Ulang

Jurnal Preferensi Hukum ◽

10.22225/jph.2.1.2798.78-82 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2 (1) ◽

pp. 78-82

Author(s):

I Kadek Andika Setiawan ◽

I Gusti Bagus Suryawan ◽

I Wayan Arthanaya

Keyword(s):

The State ◽

General Election ◽

Constitutional Court ◽

Legal Research ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Presidential Candidates ◽

State Revenue ◽

General Elections ◽

Additional Costs ◽

Election Commission

A failed general election will result in a re-election and will certainly require additional budget. The purpose of this research is to find out the mechanism for the implementation of the re-election and to analyze the use of the State Revenue and Expenditure Budget in the implementation of the re-election. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that the mechanism for implementing the re-election is a dispute over the results of the disputed General Election, by presidential candidates and members of the legislative candidates through the Constitutional Court decision. The mechanism for the provision of funds from the State Revenue and Expenditure Budget in the implementation of the re-General Election is the submission of additional costs by the General Election Commission to the Budget Institution and the Budget Department to revise the budget for the implementation of General Elections that are undergoing re-election.

Download Full-text

INTERGARASI FILSAFAT PANCASILA DAN BINEKATUNGGAL IKA DALAM PENANGGULANGAN KEJAHATAN KRIMINALITAS PELAJAR DAN MAHASISWA

Al-Syakhsiyyah: Journal of Law & Family Studies ◽

10.21154/syakhsiyyah.v2i2.2596 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2 (2) ◽

pp. 268-287

Author(s):

Dewi Iriani ◽

Arif Budiono ◽

St. Hadijah Wahid

Keyword(s):

Comparative Approach ◽

Legal Research ◽

Conceptual Approach

ABSTRAK: Filsafat pancasila bersemboyan pada Bineka Tunggal Ika (berbeda-beda tetap satu), namun sangat disayangkan begitu indahnya makna dan arti dari Pancasila dan Bineka Tunggal Ika. Menlunturnya makna tersebut telah lah luntur maknanya, dikarenaka banyaknya kasus-kasus kekerasan oleh oknum pelajar sekolah dan mahasiswa yang melakukan kriminalitas klitih, bully, narkoba, terorisme, ausila. artikel ini akan mengangkat kajian Intergarasi Filsafat Pancasila dan Binekatunggal Ika Dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan Kriminalitas Pelajar Dan Mahasiswa. Maka permasalahan yang diangkat 1) Bagaimana intergrasi filsafat Pancasila dan Bineka Tunggal Ika dikalangan pelajar dan mahasiswa? 2) Bagaiman cara Penanggulangan Kriminalitas oleh Pelajar dan Mahasiswa? Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum (legal research) merupakan penelitian hukum dengan empat pendekatan yaitu pendekatan peraturan perundang – undangan (statutory approach) yakni Pendekatan kasus (case approach) pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach) dengan kasus bully, kasus terorisme, kasus narkoba, kasus asusila, kasus klitih.d dengan pendekatan perbandingan (comparative approach) dengan membandingkan anatara teori hukum, hukum pidana, sistem peradilan anak, filsafat pancasila dan Bineka Tunggal Ika sebagai pisau analisisnya Hasil yang diperoleh 1) Menerapkan nilai nilai pancasila Bineka Tunggal Ika berdasarkan Ketuhanan yang Maha Esa, Kemanusiaan yang adil dan beradab, persatuan Indonesia, kerakyatan yang dipimpin oleh hikmat kebijaksanaan dalam permusyawaratan / perwakilan, Persatuan Indonesia dalam prilaku kehidupan sehari-hari.Menghidupkan kembali dengan menganti mata kuliah atau mata pelajaran (PKN) Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan dengan mata pelajaran / mata kuliah (PMP) tingkat playgrup sampai perguruan tinggi. Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) terkait tindak penganiayaan. 2) Jika pelakunya adalah mahasiswa yang sudah dewasa maka akan dikenakan sesuai dengan KUHP dan undang-undnag yang berlaku, namun jika pelakuknya masih dibawah umur Perundang-undangan tersebut menjadi lex specialis (kekhususan) tindakan yang terjadi karena para pelaku masih di bawah umur. Perlunya kerjasama antara kampus dan sekolah dengan pemerintah, psikologi, kepolisan

Download Full-text

Cyber Espionage Sebagai Ancaman Terhadap Pertahanan Dan Keamanan Negara Indonesia

Law & Justice Review Journal ◽

10.11594/lrjj.01.01.03 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 1 (1) ◽

pp. 12-25

Author(s):

Evi Dwi Hastri

Keyword(s):

Cyber Security ◽

Research Method ◽

Comparative Approach ◽

National Defense ◽

Cyber Defense ◽

Legal Research ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Cyber Espionage ◽

The Stability

This research aims to analyze the norms that have a blur (Vague Norm) against Cyber Espionage related to Indonesia's legal ability to accommodate Cyber Espionage attacks. In addition, this study also aims to analyze Indonesia's efforts to overcome the Cyber Espionage attack that could threaten the stability of national defense and security. The type of research in the legal research method used is normative juridical with three problem approaches, namely the Statute Approach, Conceptual Approach, and Comparative Approach. Primary and secondary legal materials that have been collected will be processed through deductive methods and an analysis of legal materials is carried out, namely by systematic interpretation and extentive interpretation. So based on the results of the discussion, then there is a Vague Norm about Cyber Espionage that affects Indonesian law in accommodating. The efforts taken by Indonesia to deal with Cyber Espionage outside of juridical efforts began with the preventive efforts of Cyber Security and Cyber Defense, optimizing the role of the TNI, BIN, and POLRI as national resources in defending the country's defense.

Download Full-text

Indonesia Regional Representative Council Authority After Constitutional Court Decision No. 92 / PUU-X / 2012

Rechtsidee ◽

10.21070/jihr.v5i2.64 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 5 (2) ◽

Author(s):

Bukhori Bukhori ◽

Nizla Rohaya

Keyword(s):

State Institution ◽

Court Decision ◽

Comparative Approach ◽

Constitutional Court ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Before And After ◽

Strategic Role ◽

Constitutional System ◽

And Function ◽

Role And Function

The purpose of this study was to determine the position, role and function of the DPD-RI in the Indonesian constitutional system before and after the Constitutional Court Decision No. 92 / PUU-X / 2012. The research method used is juridical normative and type of research is statutory approach, comparative approach, and conceptual approach. The results showed that a number of laws and regulations governing the DPD-RI were still less than the initial purpose of the formation of the DPD-RI. Certain articles relating to the position, function and role of the DPD-RI actually limit the authority of the DPD-RI so that it cannot function as a state institution that should have the same position as the DPR-RI. The decision of the Constitutional Court No. 92 / PUU-X / 2012 brings a new chapter in the implementation of democracy in Indonesia. The ruling of the Constitutional Court firmly provides a strategic role for the Regional Representative Council in Indonesian constitution.

Download Full-text

STATUS HUKUM KONTRAKTOR PRIVATE MILITARY AND PRIVATE SECURITY COMPANIES DALAM HUKUM HUMANITER INTERNASIONAL

Yustisia Jurnal Hukum ◽

10.20961/yustisia.v5i1.8726 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 5 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Sefriani

Keyword(s):

Cold War ◽

Legal Status ◽

Descriptive Analysis ◽

Private Security ◽

Comparative Approach ◽

Legal Research ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Post Cold War ◽

Historical Approach ◽

Private Security Companies

AbstractPost- cold war the number ofmilitary privatization has been raising with many role in .This raises legal problemrelated to the legal status of PMSCs contractors. The method used is a normative legal research with statute approach, the historical approach, conceptual approach, as well as the comparative approach. Results of the study are presented in the form of descriptive analysis. The study concluded that generally the contractors are civilian unless and during they aredirectlyparticipatein thehostilities.Key world: PMSCs contractor; legal status; direct participationAbstrakPasca perang dingin terjadi peningkatan privatisasi militer dengan banyaknya penggunaan kontraktor Private Military and Securites Companies PMSCs untuk berbagai peran di wilayah-wilayah konflik. Hal ini menimbulkan masalah hukum terkait status hukum kontraktor tersebut mengingat belum jelasnya aturan yang ada.Metode penelitianyang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan statute approach, historical, conceptual dan comparative approach yang disajikan secara deskriptif analitis. Kesimpulan yang diperoleh adalah bahwa secara umum dikatakan kontraktor PMSc adalah civilian yang berhak atas perlindungan dari penyerangan langsung kecuali dan selama mereka ambil bagian langsung dalam permusuhan..Kata kunci: kontraktor PMSCs, status hukum, partisipasi langsung

Download Full-text

STATUS HUKUM KONTRAKTOR PRIVATE MILITARY AND PRIVATE SECURITY COMPANIES DALAM HUKUM HUMANITER INTERNASIONAL

Yustisia Jurnal Hukum ◽

10.20961/yustisia.v0i94.2794 ◽

2016 ◽

Author(s):

Sefriani ,

Keyword(s):

Cold War ◽

Legal Status ◽

Descriptive Analysis ◽

Private Security ◽

Comparative Approach ◽

Legal Research ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Post Cold War ◽

Historical Approach ◽

Private Security Companies

Abstract Post- cold war the number ofmilitary privatization has been raising with many role in .This raises legal problemrelated to the legal status of PMSCs contractors. The method used is a normative legal research with statute approach, the historical approach, conceptual approach, as well as the comparative approach. Results of the study are presented in the form of descriptive analysis. The study concluded that generally the contractors are civilian unless and during they aredirectlyparticipatein thehostilities. Key world: PMSCs contractor; legal status; direct participationAbstrak Pasca perang dingin terjadi peningkatan privatisasi militer dengan banyaknya penggunaan kontraktor Private Military and Securites Companies PMSCs untuk berbagai peran di wilayah-wilayah konflik. Hal ini menimbulkan masalah hukum terkait status hukum kontraktor tersebut mengingat belum jelasnya aturan yang ada.Metode penelitianyang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan statute approach, historical, conceptual dan comparative approach yang disajikan secara deskriptif analitis. Kesimpulan yang diperoleh adalah bahwa secara umum dikatakan kontraktor PMSc adalah civilian yang berhak atas perlindungan dari penyerangan langsung kecuali dan selama mereka ambil bagian langsung dalam permusuhan.. Kata kunci: kontraktor PMSCs, status hukum, partisipasi langsung

Download Full-text

An Analysis of The Offense of Unpleasant Action in Article 335 Paragraph (1) of The Indonesian Criminal Code

Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist ◽

10.35326/volkgeist.v5i2.678 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 5 (2) ◽

pp. 151-159

Author(s):

Xavier Nugraha ◽

Kusuma Wardani Raharjo ◽

Ahmad Ardhiansyah ◽

Alip Pamungkas Raharjo

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Criminal Code ◽

Court Decision ◽

Constitutional Court ◽

Legal Research ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

The Core ◽

Core Elements ◽

The Law ◽

The Guardian

The Constitutional Court as the guardian of the constitution and the guardian of human rights has the duty to ensure that the Law does not contradict the constitution and does not violate human rights. One of the manifestations of this can be seen in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 1 / PUU-X / 2013, where the Constitutional Court removed the element "Some other deeds or unpleasant treatment/act" in Article 335 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. With the removal of the core elements of Article 335 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, raises questions related to the existence of the offense whether it still exists or not. Based on this, this study will examine 1) Application of Article 335 of the Criminal Code Before the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 1 / PUU-X / 2013 and 2.) Application of Article 335 of the Criminal Code After the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 1 / PUU-X / 2013. This research is a normative legal research with a statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. Based on this research, it was found that after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 1 / PUU-X / 2013 that offenses of unpleasant acts had been reconstructed into forced offenses.

Download Full-text