scholarly journals PELAKSANAAN PUTUSAN NOMOR: 1719/PDT.G/2018/PA.BWI DALAM PEMBAGIAN HARTA PERKAWINAN DALAM PERKARA POLIGAMI

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
ABDUR ROHMAN

 Dapat dideskripsikan, bahwa pelaksanan pembagian harta gono-gini dalam perkawinan poligami adalah sama dengan pembagian harta gono-gini dalam perkawinan monogami, yaitu masing-masing pasangan mendapatkan bagian sama antara suami dan para istri, sebagaimana maksud Pasal 37 Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 dan Pasal 97 Kompilasi Hukum Islam.  Ditetapkan harta bersama dalam perkara ijin poligami, adalah demi kemaslahatan dan melindungi Harta bersama Pemohon dan Termohon, agar istri yang  baru tidak mengklaim harta bersama tersebut dengan menerapkan 3 pilar tujuan hukum yaitu keadilan, kemanfaatan dan kepastian hukumKata kunci: kepastian hukum, poligami, perkawianan It can be described, that the distribution of the gono-gini assets in the polygamy marriage is the same as the distribution of the gono-gini assets in a monogamous marriage, where each pair gets an equal share between husband and wife, as intended in Article 37 of Law Number 1 of 1974 and Article 97 Compilation of Islamic Law. Determined joint property in the case of a polygamy permit, is for the benefit and protection of Assets with the Petitioner and Respondent, so that the new wife does not claim the joint property by applying the 3 pillars of legal objectives namely justice, expediency and legal certainty Keywords: legal certainty, polygamy, marriage 

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 29
Author(s):  
Jumni Nelli

In Islam, a nafkah is the responsibility of a husband. As in Indonesia family lawappliesthat nafkahis the responsibility of a husband and also it imposes joint property. The obligation of a husband to feed raises an issue regarding the implementation of obligations of a husband that can lead to a legal loophole that could undermine the principle of legal certainty and justice community. It is important to be discussed about nafkah and the concept of joint property in Islamic law and KHI, as well as the obligations to provide nafkah for her husband. Based on this research, understandably ifjoint property was appliedthen it becomes the collective responsibility of husband and wife. It also brings the consequence that all the household duties can beduties in together. Thus Islam adheres to the principle of balance and fairness in the relationship of husband and wife.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-48
Author(s):  
Siah Khosyi’ah

The division of marital joint property after the breakup of marriage, whether dropping out of marriage due to divorce or due to death, is a new thing in Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh). This is because the concept of mutual treasure is not known in the books of classical Islamic jurisprudence of Muslim scholars of the schools at their times, in which their work are always made as referral in the legal cases up to the present days. In Indonesia, the distribution of common property is regulated in the Compilation of Islamic Laws Articles 96 and 97, which stipulate the rules of distribution of joint property for married couples whose married are off as a result of divorce or death. Article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law actually provides an overview of the flexibility of the distribution of common marital property, including in certain cases because the article is regulating (regelen) rather than forcing (dwigen), so that the division is not absolutely divided equally between husband and wife, and casuistically the provisions of that article may be disregarded.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-77
Author(s):  
Puspa Fitriyah

The problem of debt is included in the field of personal status, where marriages are carried out between spouses, which as a result of the law of debt become a burden to be borne together from marriage agreements between citizens, especially related to the distribution of joint assets. How is the legal liability of debtors to creditors in the final period of marriage? and How is the legal protection for the debtor's innate property? Regarding the marriage agreement, it is regulated in Article 29 of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. This is because of the agreement made between the husband and wife both regarding joint property after marriage and the child's guardianship rights as well as the citizenship status of the child and each party. The method used in this research is normative juridical and empirical juridical research which is analyzed using legal certainty theory and legal liability theory. From the results of the research. Events that often occur in the field of debt, debt repayments that must be paid by the debtor are often not as agreed. In the legal certainty of customer credit guarantees on objects of land and building mortgages, there is a decrease in the appraisal value by the bank, but the binding of credit guarantees with mortgages is carried out if a customer or debtor obtains credit facilities from the bank. Divorce is an abolition of marriage accompanied by a judge's decision. or at the will of one of the parties, both husband and wife, through the submission of a claim by one of the parties to the marriage. Keywords: Legal Liability, Debt, Creditors, Wife.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-92
Author(s):  
I Kadek Leo Byasama Wijaya ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
Ni Made Puspautari Ujianti

Disputes over joint property mixed with inheritance Dispute resolution specifically means that in a dispute that occurs between a husband and wife there is a difference of opinion between the two parties because property can also refer to a dispute So that for this there is an imbalance of ownership and a policy is needed to equalize the position of both parties Based on the background of the problems that have been described several problems can be formulated as follows 1) How is the Legal Power of mediation in the trial process at the Badung Religious Court? 2) What are the procedures for distributing inheritance and collective assets according to the compilation of Islamic law? This type of research used here is a type of empirical research where this research is carried out on the real situation in a community or the surrounding environment with the aim of finding facts or existing legal problems The results of this study indicate that the legal power of mediation in the trial process at the Badung Religious Court namely with the peace deed the results of the peace agreement get legal certainty


Al-Qadha ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-174
Author(s):  
Azmil Fauzi Fariska

This research was motivated by the decision of the Tembilahan Religious Court judges who decided the joint property case in which the judge decided the Plaintiff (husband) got 1/4 while the Defendant (wife) got 3/4 of the shared property. However, Article 97 in the Compilation of Islamic Law states that: "Widows or widowers are each entitled to half of the joint property as long as it is not stipulated otherwise in the marriage agreement." This research is in the form of library research using case No.0233/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Tbh, as the primary reference, while the secondary material in this paper consists of laws and regulations related to the object of the research decision No. 0233/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Tbh as well as books, journals, scientific works related to the object of research. The author's data collection technique uses interview techniques and study documents or library materials. The results of the verdict research are in accordance with the judge in deciding the case based on Legal Certainty (legal certainty) and Legal Justice (legal justice), legal certainty is what has been outlined by the laws and regulations, Compilation of Islamic Law, like this case according to legal certainty then the distribution it is the wife gets 1/2 and the husband also gets 1/2 then if only this which is applied rigidly in the case will reduce the values of justice itself, thus the judge in determining the joint property case uses Legal Justice.


2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mesraini Mesraini

Abstract: The Concept of  Joint Assets and its Implementation in the  Religious Court. Legislation in Indonesia stipulates that any property acquired during marriage becomes joint property of husband and wife, without distinguishing who works and who registered the property. If the marriage come to an ends, either through death or divorce, the property must be divided equally. In general, this study found that a panel of judges in the religious court division decided a case of the distribution of joint property is not outside of the statutory rules. Since no agreement or reconciliation had been made   by the husband and wife in dispute about the portion of the division of their property, the judge decided that the joint property be divided in the same amount. However, if there is an agreement between husband and wife, the division of the joint property will be based on that agreement.Keywords: community property, Compilation of Islamic Law, judgment, Court of Religion.Abstrak: Konsep Harta Bersama dan Implementasinya di Pengadilan Agama. Perundang-undangan di Indonesia mengatur bahwa setiap harta yang diperoleh selama perkawinan dijadikan sebagai harta bersama suami isteri, tanpa membedakan siapa yang bekerja dan harta itu terdaftar atas nama siapa. Apabila perkawinan itu berakhir, baik karena kematian maupun karena perceraian, maka harta tersebut harus dibagi dua sama banyak nilainya. Penelitian ini menemukan data bahwa secara umum majelis hakim Pengadilan Agama dalam memutuskan perkara pembagian harta bersama tidak keluar dari aturan perundang-undangan tersebut. Selama tidak ada kesepakatan atau perdamaian yang dibuat oleh suami dan isteri yang bersengketa tentang porsi pembagian harta bersama, majelis hakim memutuskan harta bersama tersebut dibagi sama banyak. Namun, apabila terdapat kesepakatan antara suami dan isteri, pembagian harta bersama didasarkan atas kesepakatan yang mereka buat.Kata Kunci: harta bersama, Kompilasi Hukum Islam, putusan hakim, Pengadilan AgamaDOI: 10.15408/ajis.v12i1.980


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-45
Author(s):  
Gina Yunita

A man who has more than one wife is called polygamy. A polygamy often creates legal uncertainty about joint property. The purpose of writing this thesis is to analyze the legal certainty of joint property in polygamous marriage. The research method which used in this paper is Juridical Research Methods with Sociological Approach (Empirical). Authority of the Cibinong Religious Court in examining the case of the joint treasure agreement in polygamous marriage, the Muslim husband who wishes to have more than one wife is required to apply for polygamy permission to the Religious Court under the conditions as set forth in Article 4 and Article 5 of Law Number 1 Year 1974 about Marriage. Regarding the petition for polygamy permit, it is combined with a joint property appointment request which filed by a spouse or husband who files a joint property agreement reconvention. A married husband of more than one person is governed in Article 94 of the Compilation of Islamic Law and the separation of joint property separated in the mediation room, this agreement is made or before or at the time of marriage takes place, which then authorized by religious affairs office (KUA) for Muslims and may be signed before the notary. The consideration of the Panel of Judges about the joint property agreement in polygamous marriage is seen only through evidence at that time which causing injustice to the first wife since there is no explicit law  that regulates t the distribution of joint property in polygamous marriage. Therefore, we need protection of law which is preventive and repressive


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 151
Author(s):  
Sugih Ayu Pratitis

<p>The emergence of the problem of joint property in a marriage is usually when there is a divorce between husband and wife, or when the divorce process is taking place in the Religious Court. The purpose of the study is to examine the position of joint property in marriage according to Islamic law and the provisions of the legislation and the legal consequences of divorce on marital property. The research method used is a type of normative research where research is carried out by first researching the materials that are in accordance with the problem to be studied. The result of this research is that the position of husband and wife property obtained in marriage is shared property except personal property which is under the marriage will be the personal rights of each husband or wife. While due to divorce between husband and wife, the assets obtained during marriage are divided in half for the husband and half for the wife. The method for resolving cases of sharing of shared assets at the Religious Court is if the divorce has been approved by a judge, then a husband and wife can submit a request for sharing of shared assets in accordance with applicable law. And if a divorced husband and wife do not want to carry out the distribution of shared assets, then one of the parties can submit a request for execution in the Religious Court to force those who do not want to carry out the decision in accordance with what was decided by the Religious Court.</p>


ADDIN ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 555
Author(s):  
Nur Khoirin

<p>One of the problems that often arise after the divorce is the ownership of assets acquired during marriage, whether it belongs to the husband, wife, or both of them. According to the Compilation of Islamic Law or the fiqh of the results of <em>ijtihad fuqaha</em> Nusantara, the assets obtained in marriage, except those obtained through inheritance or grants from parents/family, are joint property of husband and wife (gono gini). One party may not use it except getting agreement from the other parties. And if marriage breaks, either because of divorce or death, then it must be divided into two. In the books of Arabic Fiqh, there is no joint property because marriage does not cause a mixture of wealth. Nonetheless, in the books of fiqh provides the possession of wife's assets, such as dowry, livelihood, mut'ah, <em>iwadl</em> and <em>tirkah</em>. If the provision of fiqh is carried out consistently, then when a divorce occurs, the husband must leave the house, because all the property has become the property of his wife through a way of life. But this is certainly not fair. Therefore the determination of the existence of joint property in marriage is a moderate opinion and a benefit.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Eka Ristianawati

Joint property distribution has been regulated in the Islamic Law Compilation (KHI), namely, Article 97 which explains that a widow or widower is entitled to half of the joint property. The distribution is fair if the husband and wife make the same contribution in the marriage. However, in fact, today we often find that wives are being the backbone of the family while husbands do not earn a living or husbands earn a living for the family, but wives do not take care of the household. If such a situation is found, is the article 97 of KHI still relevant? This paper presents a concept of joint property distribution based on the contribution of husband and wife in marriage which is considered fairer for both of them than what has been stipulated in the KHI and the Civil Code Articles 128-129. The type of research used is descriptive research. This means that research is discussed in the form of an explanation described in words carefully and thoroughly. The approach method used in this research is a normative juridical approach. The results of this study explain that to obtain the justice, judges can act contra legem (against the law) where justice should give a share to everyone based on his services or contributions (Aristotle). The joint property distribution in marriage from a justice perspective is the distribution of joint property by assessing the amount of contribution of the parties. A fair share does not have to be 50% for widowers and 50% for widows. The husband can get a smaller share from the wife if the contribution is less during the marriage and does not carry out his obligation as the breadwinner and the wife can get a larger share from the husband if the wife plays a dual role, and vice versa.Pembagian harta bersama telah diatur dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam yakni pada pasal 97 dijelaskan bahwa janda atau duda berhak separuh dari harta bersama. Pembagian tersebut adil apabila suami dan istri memberikan kontribusi yang sama dalam perkawinan. Akan tetapi pada faktanya saat ini sering kita temui istri menjadi tulang punggung keluarga sedangkan suami tidak mencari nafkah atau suami mencari nafkah untuk keluarga akan tetapi istri tidak mengurus rumah tangga. Jika ditemukan keadaan seperti itu apakah masih relevan KHI pasal 97 tersebut. Tulisan ini menyajikan sebuah konsep pembagian harta bersama berdasarkan kontribusi suami istri dalam perkawinan yang dinilai lebih adil untuk keduanya daripada apa yang sudah diatur dalam KHI dan KUHPerdata Pasal 128-129. Hasil dari penelitian ini dijelaskan bahwa untuk mendapatkan sebuah keadilan hakim dapat bertindak contra legem (mengenyampingkan undang-undang) dimana keadilan itu seharusnya memberikan bagian kepada setiap orang didasarkan atas jasa-jasanya atau kontribusinya (aristoteles). Pembagian harta bersama dalam perkawinan jika dilihat dari perspektif keadilan adalah pembagian harta bersama dengan menilai besaran konstribusi para pihak. Dimana pembagian yang adil tidak harus 50 % untuk duda dan 50% untuk janda. suami bisa mendapatkan bagian yang lebih kecil dari istri apabila kontribusinya kurang selama perkawinan dan tidak menjalankan kewaibannya sebagai pencari nafkah dan istri bisa mendapatkan bagian yang lebih besar dari suami jika istri berperan ganda, begitu uga sebaliknya. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document