CONSIDERATION OF PANEL OF JUDGES IN THE CASE OF JOINT PROPERTY AGREEMENT TOWARDS POLYGAMOUS MARRIAGE INRELIGIOUS COURT OF CIBINONG CLASS 1B

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-45
Author(s):  
Gina Yunita
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Sociological Approach ◽  
Polygamous Marriage ◽  
Legal Uncertainty ◽  
Article 5 ◽  
Joint Property

A man who has more than one wife is called polygamy. A polygamy often creates legal uncertainty about joint property. The purpose of writing this thesis is to analyze the legal certainty of joint property in polygamous marriage. The research method which used in this paper is Juridical Research Methods with Sociological Approach (Empirical). Authority of the Cibinong Religious Court in examining the case of the joint treasure agreement in polygamous marriage, the Muslim husband who wishes to have more than one wife is required to apply for polygamy permission to the Religious Court under the conditions as set forth in Article 4 and Article 5 of Law Number 1 Year 1974 about Marriage. Regarding the petition for polygamy permit, it is combined with a joint property appointment request which filed by a spouse or husband who files a joint property agreement reconvention. A married husband of more than one person is governed in Article 94 of the Compilation of Islamic Law and the separation of joint property separated in the mediation room, this agreement is made or before or at the time of marriage takes place, which then authorized by religious affairs office (KUA) for Muslims and may be signed before the notary. The consideration of the Panel of Judges about the joint property agreement in polygamous marriage is seen only through evidence at that time which causing injustice to the first wife since there is no explicit law  that regulates t the distribution of joint property in polygamous marriage. Therefore, we need protection of law which is preventive and repressive

scholarly journals KEDUDUKAN HARTA BERSAMA PERKAWINAN POLIGAMI

Mahakim ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arif Zunaidi
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Status ◽  
Regulatory Approach ◽  
Legal Uncertainty

Islam allows the marriage of more than one partner, provided that the husband can be fair and get permission from the first wife. As a result of polygamous marriages, there is legal uncertainty about joint assets, both in the first, second, third and fourth wives. The purpose of this paper is to find out the legal certainty of shared assets in polygamous marriages. The method used is a normative legal research method, using a regulatory approach, both Islamic law, Law Number 1 of 1974 and KHI. As a result, there is legal uncertainty especially for the first wife based on the Compilation of Islamic Law, specifically legal protection for the property with the wife brought in by her husband’s second marriage. According to Law No. 1 of 1974, each wife gets a second share, whereas according to Islamic law the status of a woman’s property does not change with the marriage. Keywords: polygamy, shared assets

scholarly journals Kepastian Hukum Harta Bersama bagi Istri Pertama dalam Perkawinan Poligami

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 66
Author(s):  
Willy Budianto ◽  
Rachmi Sulistyarini
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Polygamous Marriage ◽  
The Future ◽  
Shared Property ◽  
The Creation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Joint Property

This study aimed to analyze the legal certainty of shared property as well as the urgency of marriage agreements on the shared property for first wives in polygamous marriages. The research used the statute approach. The provisions of the law on joint property in polygamous marriage based on Article 94 of the compilation of Islamic law did not provide legal certainty to the first wife, thus the creation of a marriage treaty deed on joint property under Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage became one of the efforts to obtain legal certainty. The urgency of the marriage agreement on the joint property for the first wife in a polygamous marriage was related to the legal protection of the first wife when the husband was influenced by the second wife in the future.

Metodologi Pengeluaran Fatwa di Jawatankuasa Fatwa Negeri Johor

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-88
Author(s):  
Mohd Faez Mohd Shah ◽  
Norhidayah Pauzi
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Research Methodology ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Field Research ◽  
The State ◽  
Original Source ◽  
Interview Methods ◽  
The Right

In the discipline of Islamic law research, strong proofing and clear Istinbat method are key pillars in the construction of Islamic law based on the application of the science of usul al-fiqh and maqasid al-shari'ah. However, what happens at the state of Johor’s fatwa institution is the opposite. The fatwa research methods applied by the Fatwa Committee of Johor in resolving current fatwa issues is not based on the right and true discipline of Islamic law research. In fact, current inputs related to fatwa issues are not explicitly stated in the method of determining the law either in the form of reality or scientifically verified. Therefore, this paper will discuss the fatwa procedures undertaken by the Fatwa Committee of Johor based on the methods applied in resolving current issues. The research methodology adopted is library and interview methods. This study shows that fatwa management and production in the state of Johor is placed under the jurisdiction of the Mufti of Johor’s Department. The methods adopted by the Fatwa Committee of Johor covers two methods, namely: internal research methods including literature review through the application of original source and proofs based on syarak. Second: field research method that includes an external review or going to the location of study such as conducting observation, questionnaires and interviews including referrals to specialists of different fields. Maslahah and mafsdah consideration are also implemented by the Fatwa Committee in every fatwa decision based on the standard that meets the interests of maqasid al-shari'ah. Keywords: Metode, fatwa, istinbat, usul al-fiqh, maqasid al-shari’ah ABSTRAK Dalam disiplin penyelidikan hukum Islam, kekuatan pendalilan dan kaedah istinbat yang jelas merupakan tunggak utama dalam pembinaan hukum Islam berasaskan kepada aplikasi ilmu usul al-fiqh dan maqasid al-shari’ah. Namun begitu, apa yang berlaku di institusi fatwa negeri Johor adalah sebaliknya. Kaedah penyelidikan fatwa yang diaplikasi oleh Jawatankuasa Fatwa Negeri Johor dalam menyelesaikan isu fatwa semasa tidak berasaskan kepada disiplin penyelidikan hukum Islam yang tepat dan sebenar. Malahan input-input semasa yang berkaitan dengan isu fatwa juga tidak dinyatakan secara jelas dalam kaedah penentuan hukum sama ada dalam bentuk realiti yang berlaku atau pembuktian secara saintifik. Justeru, kertas kerja ini akan membincangkan prosedur fatwa Jawatankuasa Fatwa Negeri Johor berdasarkan metode-metode yang diaplikasi dalam menyelesaikan isu-isu yang bersifat semasa. Metodologi kajian yang digunakan dalam kajian ini adalah melalui metode perpustakaan dan metode lapangan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahawa pengurusan dan pengeluaran fatwa di negeri Johor hanya terletak di bawah bidang kuasa Jabatan Mufti Johor. Metode fatwa yang diamalkan oleh Jawatankuasa Fatwa Negeri Johor merangkumi dua metode iaitu pertama, kaedah penyelidikan dalaman yang merangkumi kajian kepustakaan menerusi pengaplikasian dari sumber asas dan dalil-dalil syarak. Kedua, kaedah penyelidikan lapangan yang meliputi kajian luaran atau turun ke lokasi kajian seperti observasi, soal selidik dan temubual dan rujukan kepada pakar dalam bidang yang berlainan. Pertimbangan maslahah dan mafsdah juga dimplementasikan oleh Jawatankuasa Fatwa dalam setiap keputusan fatwanya berasaskan standard yang menepati kepentingan maqasid al-shari’ah. Kata kunci: Metode, fatwa, istinbat, usul al-fiqh, maqasid al-shari’ah

scholarly journals Penyelesaian Perkara Harta Warisan dan Harta Bersama dengan Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan Agama Badung (Nomor Perkara 0095/PDTG/2017/PABDG)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-92
Author(s):  
I Kadek Leo Byasama Wijaya ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
Ni Made Puspautari Ujianti
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Peace Agreement ◽  
Real Situation ◽  
Trial Process ◽  
Legal Power ◽  
Legal Problems ◽  
Surrounding Environment ◽  
Difference Of Opinion ◽  
Joint Property

Disputes over joint property mixed with inheritance Dispute resolution specifically means that in a dispute that occurs between a husband and wife there is a difference of opinion between the two parties because property can also refer to a dispute So that for this there is an imbalance of ownership and a policy is needed to equalize the position of both parties Based on the background of the problems that have been described several problems can be formulated as follows 1) How is the Legal Power of mediation in the trial process at the Badung Religious Court? 2) What are the procedures for distributing inheritance and collective assets according to the compilation of Islamic law? This type of research used here is a type of empirical research where this research is carried out on the real situation in a community or the surrounding environment with the aim of finding facts or existing legal problems The results of this study indicate that the legal power of mediation in the trial process at the Badung Religious Court namely with the peace deed the results of the peace agreement get legal certainty

scholarly journals Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim Perkara Harta Bersama di Pengadilan Agama Tembilahan

Al-Qadha ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-174
Author(s):  
Azmil Fauzi Fariska
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Secondary Material ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Primary Reference ◽  
Shared Property ◽  
Data Collection Technique ◽  
Research Decision ◽  
Joint Property ◽  
Laws And Regulations

This research was motivated by the decision of the Tembilahan Religious Court judges who decided the joint property case in which the judge decided the Plaintiff (husband) got 1/4 while the Defendant (wife) got 3/4 of the shared property. However, Article 97 in the Compilation of Islamic Law states that: "Widows or widowers are each entitled to half of the joint property as long as it is not stipulated otherwise in the marriage agreement." This research is in the form of library research using case No.0233/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Tbh, as the primary reference, while the secondary material in this paper consists of laws and regulations related to the object of the research decision No. 0233/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Tbh as well as books, journals, scientific works related to the object of research. The author's data collection technique uses interview techniques and study documents or library materials. The results of the verdict research are in accordance with the judge in deciding the case based on Legal Certainty (legal certainty) and Legal Justice (legal justice), legal certainty is what has been outlined by the laws and regulations, Compilation of Islamic Law, like this case according to legal certainty then the distribution it is the wife gets 1/2 and the husband also gets 1/2 then if only this which is applied rigidly in the case will reduce the values of justice itself, thus the judge in determining the joint property case uses Legal Justice.

scholarly journals PELAKSANAAN PUTUSAN NOMOR: 1719/PDT.G/2018/PA.BWI DALAM PEMBAGIAN HARTA PERKAWINAN DALAM PERKARA POLIGAMI

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
ABDUR ROHMAN
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Equal Share ◽  
Joint Property ◽  
Husband And Wife

 Dapat dideskripsikan, bahwa pelaksanan pembagian harta gono-gini dalam perkawinan poligami adalah sama dengan pembagian harta gono-gini dalam perkawinan monogami, yaitu masing-masing pasangan mendapatkan bagian sama antara suami dan para istri, sebagaimana maksud Pasal 37 Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 dan Pasal 97 Kompilasi Hukum Islam.  Ditetapkan harta bersama dalam perkara ijin poligami, adalah demi kemaslahatan dan melindungi Harta bersama Pemohon dan Termohon, agar istri yang  baru tidak mengklaim harta bersama tersebut dengan menerapkan 3 pilar tujuan hukum yaitu keadilan, kemanfaatan dan kepastian hukumKata kunci: kepastian hukum, poligami, perkawianan It can be described, that the distribution of the gono-gini assets in the polygamy marriage is the same as the distribution of the gono-gini assets in a monogamous marriage, where each pair gets an equal share between husband and wife, as intended in Article 37 of Law Number 1 of 1974 and Article 97 Compilation of Islamic Law. Determined joint property in the case of a polygamy permit, is for the benefit and protection of Assets with the Petitioner and Respondent, so that the new wife does not claim the joint property by applying the 3 pillars of legal objectives namely justice, expediency and legal certainty Keywords: legal certainty, polygamy, marriage 

scholarly journals Kepastian Hukum dalam Politik Hukum di Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 114-123
Author(s):  
Fadly Andrianto
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
The Political ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Current Development ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Second Amendment ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Article 50 ◽  
Article 5

This study aims to determine the development of legal certainty issues within the scope of law in Indonesia. This research uses normative juridical research methods. The results of the research are that in the discussion of the Second Amendment of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia NRI Article 28I (1) which contains legal certainty is basically proposed based on the political objectives of a particular group and does not answer the issue of legal certainty that actually occurs in Indonesia between positive law and customary law of the Indonesian people. The issue of legal certainty in Indonesia between positive law and customary law of the Indonesian people in its development was then resolved by Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power, namely in Article 5 paragraph (1) and Article 50 paragraph (1). Furthermore, with the enactment of Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages. Current development regarding the issue of legal certainty in Indonesia is in the RUU KUHP.Keywords: Legal Certainty; Positive Law; Customary Law  Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perkembangan isu kepastian hukum dalam ruang lingkup hukum di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian yaitu bahwa dalam pembahasan Amandemen Kedua UUD NRI 1945 Pasal 28I ayat (1) yang memuat tentang kepastian hukum pada dasarnya diajukan berdasarkan tujuan politis suatu golongan tertentu dan tidak menjawab mengenai isu kepastian hukum yang sebenarnya terjadi di Indonesia antara hukum positif dan hukum adat masyarakat Indonesia. Isu kepastian hukum di Indonesia antara hukum positif dan hukum adat masyarakat Indonesia dalam perkembangannya kemudian diselesaikan dengan UU Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman yaitu dalam Pasal 5 ayat (1) dan Pasal 50 ayat (1). Selanjutnya dengan diundangkannya Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa. Perkembangan saat ini mengenai isu kepastian hukum yang ada di Indonesia yaitu dalam RUU KUHP. Kata Kunci: Kepastian Hukum; Hukum Positif; Hukum Adat 

scholarly journals Position Replacement By Inheritee Who Refuses A Heritage According To Heir Civil Law Dan Islamic Heir Law

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-165
Author(s):  
Gibtha Wilda Permatasari ◽  
Yuliati Yuliati ◽  
Herman Suryokumoro
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Inheritance Law ◽  
Research Journal ◽  
The Law

This research journal discusses legal issues relating to the substitution of places made by the heirs who previously rejected the inheritance which falls to him by comparison of the perspectives of civil inheritance law and Islamic inheritance law. Pursuant to Article 848 and Article 1060 of the Civil Code on the replacement of the place by the heirs who reject the inheritance and the notary's role as a general official in providing legal certainty to prevent the issue of inheritance according to the law of civil inheritance and the Islamic inheritance law. The purpose of this research is to know and to analyze whether or not the heirs who have rejected inheritance replace other heirs as well as to know the role of notary in giving legal certainty to prevent problems in the civil inheritance law and Islamic inheritance law. The research method used by the writer is the statue approach and comparative approach. Heirs who reject inheritance under civil law of inheritance cannot change place (plaatsvervulling) because the requirement of replacement of place according to the law of civil inheritance is derived from families of blood in the same degree and not reject the inheritance. The replacement of places in Islamic inheritance law is known as mawali however, Islamic law does not recognize the denial of inheritance only known in the law of civil inheritance.

scholarly journals Implementasi PTSL Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Konflik Pertanahan Di Kecamatan Ingin Jaya Kabupaten Aceh Besar

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 217
Author(s):  
M. Syuib ◽  
Sarah Diana Aulia
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Large Area ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Land Dispute ◽  
Land Disputes ◽  
Legal Uncertainty ◽  
The Government ◽  
Ownership Of Land

In order to guarantee legal certainty for land rights holders, the Government is conducting land registration program throughout Indonesia territory. The program has put an obligation to the land rights holder to register their land. The purpose of land registration is, to provide evidence for the ownership of land. The implementation mechanism of the program in regulated in the Permen ATR/BPN Number 6 of 2018 concerning Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL). The presence of the Permen is, in order to prevent land disputes in the community by accelerating land registration. Sub-district of Ingin Jaya, which is located in the Aceh Besar district, is one of the areas where PTSL activities are carried out. Currently, there is a large area of land in the Aceh Besar district has not been certified yet, it may cause legal uncertainty for land owner and such condition can potentially lead to land dispute. One of the indicators to claim this, are by taking land dispute cases as put on trial in the Jantho Court which has reached 32 cases from 2014 until 2019. This study aims to find out how the implementation of PTSL and its barrier in the Sub-District of Ingin Jaya, Aceh Besar. The research method is an empirical juridical research; it works by conducting observations, interviews, and documentation. The result found that the implementation of PTSL in the Sub-District of Ingin Jaya, Aceh Besar, is in accordance with Permen ATR/BPN No. 6 of 2018. However, in the ground, it is found that there are a number of obstacles which affect the successful of the PTSL program both internally and externally. Therefore, synergy and cooperation with all parties are needed so that the PTSL program in the Sub-District of Ingin Jaya can be implemented successfully in order to provide legal certainty for land rights holders, so that the land dispute can be prevented as early as possible.

scholarly journals Akibat Hukum Perceraian Terhadap Harta Benda Perkawinan

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 151
Author(s):  
Sugih Ayu Pratitis
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Applicable Law ◽  
Personal Property ◽  
Personal Rights ◽  
Marital Property ◽  
Shared Property ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Joint Property ◽  
Husband And Wife

<p>The emergence of the problem of joint property in a marriage is usually when there is a divorce between husband and wife, or when the divorce process is taking place in the Religious Court. The purpose of the study is to examine the position of joint property in marriage according to Islamic law and the provisions of the legislation and the legal consequences of divorce on marital property. The research method used is a type of normative research where research is carried out by first researching the materials that are in accordance with the problem to be studied. The result of this research is that the position of husband and wife property obtained in marriage is shared property except personal property which is under the marriage will be the personal rights of each husband or wife. While due to divorce between husband and wife, the assets obtained during marriage are divided in half for the husband and half for the wife. The method for resolving cases of sharing of shared assets at the Religious Court is if the divorce has been approved by a judge, then a husband and wife can submit a request for sharing of shared assets in accordance with applicable law. And if a divorced husband and wife do not want to carry out the distribution of shared assets, then one of the parties can submit a request for execution in the Religious Court to force those who do not want to carry out the decision in accordance with what was decided by the Religious Court.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document