Clozapine Treatment in a Patient with a Persistently Low Neutrophil Count

2007 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 270-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Gugger ◽  
Charles Caley
Author(s):  
Gabriel Vallecillo ◽  
Josep Marti-Bonany ◽  
Maria José Robles ◽  
Joan Ramón Fortuny ◽  
Fernando Lana ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S30-S30
Author(s):  
Laurent Béchard ◽  
Olivier Corbeil ◽  
Maude Plante ◽  
Marc-André Thivierge ◽  
Charles-Émile Lafrenière ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Clozapine possesses unique efficacy profile in treatment-resistant schizophrenia but is associated with neutropenia and agranulocytosis, in respectively, 3% and 0.7% of exposed patients. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been used to allow clozapine continuation or rechallenge in such situation (1,2). Methods We aim to describe the use of G-CSF to maintain clozapine despite neutropenia or agranulocytosis in treatment resistant schizophrenia patients in Quebec province, Canada. A national clozapine hematological monitoring database was consulted to identify all patients who have had red event (neutrophil count < 1,5 threshold) since 2004 in Quebec and was cross-referenced with hospital pharmacy software to identify patients who have received at least one dose of G-CSF while been exposed to clozapine All patients with an active cancer diagnosis while taking clozapine and G-CSF were excluded. A group of pharmacists specialized in psychiatry in Quebec was also contacted to ensure selecting all cases in the province. In additional to demographic data and clozapine and G-CSF details, Clinical Global Impression severity scale (CGI-S) was used to evaluate psychopathology severity during four critical turning points: before and after clozapine introduction, after agranulocytosis episode and after clozapine rechallenge. All data were collected retrospectively, using patient’s medical files, from January to July 2019. Results Eight (8) patients (5 males, 3 females), Caucasian, mean age 48 years old, with clozapine median exposition of 4.8 years, were identified. In 7/8 of those, G-CSF was used according to an “as required strategy”, i.e., whenever the patient’s neutrophil count dropped below a pre-determined threshold, varying according to patient between 0,8 à 1,5. In the other patient, a 3-weekly doses were preventively administered. Despite this, a mean number of 4 red events (ranging from 1 to 10 events) were subsequently observed in those patients, leading to clozapine cessation in 4/8 patients. One other patient responded to G-CSF but the clinical team felt uncomfortable to maintain clozapine in such circumstances. No complication (infection for instance) due to low neutrophil counts was observed nor any significant side effect related to G-CSF. However, in all these cases, while clozapine treatment was associated with clinically significant improvement of psychopathology (mean CGI-S decreased from 5.5 to 3.4), clozapine cessation led to an important psychotic deterioration (mean CGI-S of 6.2) at follow up. Fortunately, in patients successfully rechallenged (3/8), a strong clinical improvement was observed, with return to previous response level observed. Discussion To our knowledge, this is the largest case series of clozapine rechallenge using G-CSF and adds to the 39 already described cases in which G-CSF was concomitantly used with clozapine (1,2). While an “as required” strategy was mainly used here, a different prophylactic G-CSF use may have led to higher rates of clozapine maintenance, despite red codes, which provides the impetus for further studies. Reference


CNS Spectrums ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 98-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Molly Britton ◽  
Palanikumar Gunasekar ◽  
Vithyalakshmi Selvaraj

AbstractClozapine is an atypical antipsychotic approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment-resistant schizophrenia and also indicated for the reduction in risk of recurrent suicidal behavior in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. The most serious side effect of clozapine treatment is agranulocytosis, which is defined as an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 0.50 × 109 per L. Benign ethnic neutropenia (BEN) is a condition found in members of African or Middle Eastern descent that is characterized by ANC < 1.50 × 109 per L in the absence of other causes. Filgrastim is a granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) that has shown efficacy in reducing the duration of agranulocytosis in some patients who develop clozapine-induced agranulocytosis. It is currently unknown whether filgrastim is beneficial in the treatment of neutropenia due to BEN. We here, for first the time report a case of a patient with BEN who developed agranulocytosis both during the first clozapine trial for schizophrenia and during the rechallenge, despite early stabilization with filgrastim treatment, which highlights the failure of filgrastim in treating BEN.Funding AcknowledgementsNo funding.


Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 86-LB
Author(s):  
TIANGE SUN ◽  
FANHUA MENG ◽  
RUI ZHANG ◽  
ZHIYAN YU ◽  
SHUFEI ZANG ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asma H. Almaghrebi

Background: The clozapine-derivative quetiapine has been shown in some cases to cause leukopenia and neutropenia. Case Presentation: We reported on a case of a young female diagnosed with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. After failed trials of three antipsychotic medications and despite a history of quetiapineinduced leukopenia, clozapine treatment was introduced due to the severity of the patient’s symptoms, the limited effective treatment options, and a lack of guidelines on this issue. Result: Over a ten-week period of clozapine treatment at 700 mg per day, the patient developed agranulocytosis. Her white blood cell count sharply dropped to 1.6 &#215; 10<sup>9</sup> L, and her neutrophils decreased to 0.1 &#215; 10<sup>9</sup> L. There had been no similar reaction to her previous medications (carbamazepine, risperidone, and haloperidol). Conclusion: The safety of clozapine in a patient who has previously experienced leukopenia and neutropenia with quetiapine requires further investigation. Increased attention should be paid to such cases. Careful monitoring and slow titration are advisable.


Blood ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 155-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence A. Harker ◽  
Ulla M. Marzec ◽  
Andrew B. Kelly ◽  
Ellen Cheung ◽  
Aaron Tomer ◽  
...  

Abstract This report examines the effects on hematopoietic regeneration of pegylated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor (PEG-rHuMGDF ) (2.5 μg/kg/d) alone and in combination with recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (rHu-GCSF ) (10 μg/kg/d) for 21 days in rhesus macaques receiving intense marrow suppression produced by single bolus injections of hepsulfam (1.5 g/m2). In six hepsulfam-only control animals thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100 × 109/L) was observed between days 12 and 25 (nadir 39 ± 20 × 109/L on day 17), and neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <1 × 109/L) occurred between days 8 and 30 (nadir 0.167 ± 0.120 × 109/L on day 15). PEG-rHuMGDF (2.5 μg/kg/d) injected subcutaneously into four animals from day 1 to day 22 following hepsulfam administration produced trough serum concentrations of 1.9 ± 0.2 ng/mL and increased the platelet count twofold over basal prechemotherapy levels (856 ± 594 × 109/L v baseline of 416 ± 88 × 109/L; P = .01). PEG-rHuMGDF alone also shortened the period of posthepsulfam neutropenia from 22 days to 12 days (P = .01), although the neutropenic nadir was not significantly altered (neutrophil count 0.224 ± 0.112 × 109/L v 0.167 ± 0.120 × 109/L; P < .3). rHu-GCSF (10 μg/kg/d) injected subcutaneously into four animals from day 1 to day 22 following hepsulfam administration produced trough serum concentrations of 1.4 ± 1.1 ng/mL, and reduced the time for the postchemotherapy neutrophil count to attain 1 × 109/L from 22 days to 4 days (P = .005). The postchemotherapy neutropenic nadir was 0.554 ± 0.490 × 109neutrophils/L (P = .3 v hepsulfam-only control of 0.167 ± 0.120 × 109/L). However, thrombocytopenia of <100 × 109 platelets/L was not shortened (persisted from day 12 to day 25), or less severe (nadir of 56 ± 32 × 109 platelets/L on day 14; P = .7 compared with untreated hepsulfam animals). The concurrent administration of rHu-GCSF (10 μg/kg/d) and PEG-rHuMGDF (2.5 μg/kg/d) in four animals resulted in postchemotherapy peripheral platelet counts of 127 ± 85 × 109/L (P = .03 compared with 39 ± 20 × 109/L for untreated hepsulfam alone, and P = .02 compared with 856 ± 594 × 109/L for PEG-rHuMGDF alone), and shortened the period of neutropenia <1 × 109/L from 22 days to 4 days (P = .8 compared with rHu-GCSF alone). Increasing PEG-rHuMGDF to 10 μg/kg/d and maintaining the 21-day schedule of coadministration with rHu-GCSF (10 μg/kg/d) in another four animals produced postchemotherapy platelet counts of 509 ± 459 × 109/L (P < 10−4compared with untreated hepsulfam alone, and P = .04 compared with 2.5 μg/kg/d PEG-rHuMGDF alone), and 4 days of neutropenia. Coadministration of rHu-GCSF and PEG-rHuMGDF did not significantly alter the pharmacokinetics of either agent. The administration of PEG-rHuMGDF (2.5 μg/kg/d) from day 1 through day 22 and rHu-GCSF (10 μg/kg/d) from day 8 through day 22 in six animals produced peak postchemotherapy platelet counts of 747 ± 317 × 109/L (P < 10−4 compared with untreated hepsulfam alone, and P = .7 compared with PEG-rHuMGDF alone), and maintained the neutrophil count < 3.5 × 109/L (P = .008 v rHu-GCSF therapy alone). Thus, both thrombocytopenia and neutropenia are eliminated by initiating daily PEG-rHuMGDF therapy on day 1 and subsequently adding daily rHu-GCSF after 1 week in the rhesus model of hepsulfam marrow suppression. This improvement in platelet and neutrophil responses by delaying the addition of rHu-GCSF to PEG-rHuMGDF therapy demonstrates the importance of optimizing the dose and schedule of cytokine combinations after severe myelosuppressive chemotherapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document