scholarly journals Коррупция и государство в Сахеле

2021 ◽  
pp. 97-120
Author(s):  
Джорджо Блундо
Keyword(s):  
Burkina Faso ◽  
Everyday Life ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Corruption Perception Index ◽  
Transparency International ◽  
Means Of Measurement ◽  
Corruption Perception ◽  
Systemic Corruption ◽  
Culturally Embedded

Начиная с 2000 гг. новые инструменты оценки борьбы с коррупцией создают нелестный образ госу-дарств Сахеля. Согласно наиболее известному из них – Списку стран по восприятию коррупции (Corruption Perception Index, CPI), составляемому международной неправительственной организацией Transparency International, в 2016 г. практически все страны региона попали в группу государств с эндемической коррупцией. Однако восприятие коррупции внутри группы варьирует: Сенегал и Буркина Фасо считаются менее коррумпированными, чем Мали и Нигер, которые, в свою очередь, вы-глядят лучше Мавритании и особенно Чада, входящего в список 20 наиболее коррумпированных стран мира – вместе с Бурунди, Гаити, Центральноафриканской Республикой и Демократической Республи-кой Конго. Однако эти чисто количественные и вырванные из контекста измерения проливают мало света на социальное и культурное обрамление повседневной коррупции. Настоящая статья опирается на качественные эмпирические полевые исследования, ведущиеся автором в Нигере, Сенегале и Мавритании. Starting in the early 2000s, new means of measurement produced by the international anticorruption indus-try cast a rather unflattering light on the Sahelian countries, stigmatizing them for their lack of public integ-rity. In 2016 the best known of these tools, Transparency International’s “Corruption Perception Index” ranked all Sahelian countries, excepting (barely) Senegal, as states with systemic corruption (a score lower than 43). Perceptions vary from country to country: Senegal and Burkina Faso are reputedly less corrupt than Mali and Niger; these two are, in turn, more virtuous than Mauritania, and even more so than Chad. These approaches, purely quantitative and decontextualized, shed little light on how corruption is socially and culturally embedded in everyday life. In contrast, this article is based on qualitative empirical studies and on the author’s own research in Niger, Senegal, and Mauritania.

Analysis Good Governance of Corruption Eradication toward Penta Helix Model in Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 14-28
Author(s):  
Aris Sarjito ◽  
Ghazalie
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Annual Report ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Positive Influence ◽  
Business Community ◽  
Upward Trend ◽  
Corruption Perception Index ◽  
Transparency International ◽  
Survey Results ◽  
Corruption Perception

Transparency International released an annual report on the corruption perception index in 2018. The survey results of 180 countries showed a bad score because more than two-thirds scored less than 50. The highest score is 100, which means very clean or free of corruption, and the lowest is zero which means it is very corrupt. Indonesia must learn from New Zealand and Australia who have succeeded in helping improve the corruption perception index in their country, even though Indonesia's corruption perception index experienced an upward trend in 2014-2018. In an effort to analyze Good Governance in eradicating corruption in Indonesia, the researchers applied the Penta Helix Model, better known as the ABCGM concept, namely Academicians, Business, Community, Government, and Media to reduce the level of corruption in Indonesia. This research method is qualitative to investigate, find, describe, and explain the quality or features of social influences that cannot be explained, measured or described through a quantitative approach. The Penta Helix model is considered to have a positive influence in eradicating corruption.

The corruption perception index and the political economy of governing at a distance

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 504-523
Author(s):  
Hannes Baumann
Keyword(s):  
Political Economy ◽  
Analytical Framework ◽  
The Political ◽  
Business Elites ◽  
Corruption Perception Index ◽  
Transparency International ◽  
Corporate Capital ◽  
Comprehensive Survey ◽  
Corruption Perception ◽  
Corporate Clients

The corruption perception index (CPI) compiled by Transparency International (TI) ranks countries by perceived levels of corruption. It is a reformist rather than a radical form of ‘statactivism’. First, I use Rose and Miller’s analytical framework to explain how corporate concerns come to dominate the CPI: How a neoliberal rationality is translated into a programme to govern corruption and then a technology – the CPI. A comprehensive survey of sources used to compile the CPI 2001–2016 shows that the vast majority were either produced for sale to corporate clients or were based on surveys of business elites. Second, I embed the index’s production into a wider political economy: TI workers are Gramscian intellectuals who put forward an interpretation of corruption that is non-threatening to corporate capital. This Gramscian framework holds wider relevance for analyses of the politics of global benchmarking.

Уровень коррупции в России на фоне зарубежных стран

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Дмитрий Юрьевич Федотов
Keyword(s):  
Corruption Perception Index ◽  
Transparency International ◽  
Corruption Perception

В статье проведено исследование уровня коррупции в России и в зарубежных странах мира. В качестве источника информации использован Индекс восприятия коррупции (Corruption Perception Index), ежегодно составляемый неправительственной международной организацией Transparency International, а также данные Всемирного банка. Рассмотрены мнения различных авторов о причинах и размерах коррупции в различных странах мира. Сделан вывод о том, что коррупция наблюдается в той или иной степени во всех странах мира, как в развитых, так и в развивающих. В ходе проведенного анализа было установлено, что коррупция в России находится на высоком уровне. По уровню коррупции Россия опережает большинство развивающихся стран. Высокая коррупция тормозит экономическое развитие страны. Коррупция сопровождается высокой степенью расслоения общества по уровню доходов и большими масштабами теневой экономики.

scholarly journals Corruption perceptions index and economic development of the country

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-122
Author(s):  
Liviu-Stelian Begu ◽  
Simona-Andreea Apostu ◽  
Andreea-Oana Enache
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Civil Society ◽  
Unemployment Rate ◽  
Global Civil Society ◽  
Economic Situation ◽  
Corruption Perception Index ◽  
Transparency International ◽  
The World ◽  
Corruption Perception ◽  
Educational Factors

Abstract The phenomenon of corruption is known all over the world, and its intensity varies according to economic, behavioral and educational factors. Transparency International is a global civil society that carries out regular opinion surveys and publishes the perceptions of corruption in countries around the world. This index identifies the level of corruption perceived in the world and contributes achieving a ranking of countries in this regard. The corruption perception index should be correlated with economic situation of a country. The economic situation of a country can be reflected by GDP and unemployment rate. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the index of corruption is influenced by the economic situation of a country, so the study analyses the corruption perception index, GDP and unemployment rate, establishing whether there is a link between them.

The Curbing of Corruption by Formal and Informal Accountability at the Indonesian Local Governments

2020 ◽  
pp. 1894-1914
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ichsan Kabullah ◽  
Syaiful Wahab
Keyword(s):  
Local Governments ◽  
Additional Insight ◽  
Corruption Perception Index ◽  
Transparency International ◽  
Theoretical Perspectives ◽  
Formal Mechanism ◽  
Corruption Perception ◽  
Low Levels ◽  
Informal Accountability ◽  
Yogyakarta City

According to the compilation of Corruption Perception Index (CPI) by Transparency International Indonesia on 2006, 2008 and 2010, 85 percent of the Indonesia local governments got a score less than 5 with meaning highly corrupt. However, there are exceptions such as Yogyakarta City. Yogyakarta is one of the areas with relatively low levels of corruption in its local governments in 2006 (5.59), 2008 (6.33), and 2010 (5.81). So, what does Yogyakarta do differently? One of the reasons for the differences in corruption level might be that, where it is widely supposed that corruption is negatively related to accountability, increased accountability is mostly implemented by formal mechanism. Special for Yogyakarta is that it, next to such formal ways of accountability, makes extensive use of informal ways to improve accountability. As such, the success of Yogyakarta as one of the Indonesian regions with the lowest levels of corruption is interesting to study in that it might provide additional insight in existing theoretical perspectives on accountability.

scholarly journals ESTABLISHING REGIONAL ANTI-FRAUD OFFICE TO TACKLE FINANCIAL CRIME IN ASEAN

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  
Reza Haidar Kamal
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
International Cooperation ◽  
Member Country ◽  
Regional Level ◽  
Financial Crime ◽  
Corruption Perception Index ◽  
Transparency International ◽  
Asean Member ◽  
The World ◽  
Corruption Perception

Corruption is still becoming hot issue around the world. Each country has its own way to combat corruption starting from the scope of national, regional to international cooperation to fight against this issue. Indonesia also has several strategies to eradicate corruption which are getting better from time to time. According to Transparency International (TI), as a member of regional organization, ASEAN, Indonesia is still ranked fourth,in Corruption Perception Index (CPI),out of tenmember countries. But the rank-range of ASEAN member countries is too far from one country to another, unlike European Union. Three member countries of European Union stand are on the top three of 168 countries. Besides having anti-corruption institution in each member country, European Union also has anti-fraud office, called OLAF, to tackle financial crime at regional level. Therefore, it is necessary for ASEAN to establish an institution that aims to combat corruption at regional level of ASEAN, just like the European Union’s OLAF, which has a mandate to detect, investigate and stop fraud related to EU’s funds.

The Curbing of Corruption by Formal and Informal Accountability at the Indonesian Local Governments

2016 ◽  
pp. 441-461
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ichsan Kabullah ◽  
Syaiful Wahab
Keyword(s):  
Local Governments ◽  
Additional Insight ◽  
Corruption Perception Index ◽  
Transparency International ◽  
Theoretical Perspectives ◽  
Formal Mechanism ◽  
Corruption Perception ◽  
Low Levels ◽  
Informal Accountability ◽  
Yogyakarta City

According to the compilation of Corruption Perception Index (CPI) by Transparency International Indonesia on 2006, 2008 and 2010, 85 percent of the Indonesia local governments got a score less than 5 with meaning highly corrupt. However, there are exceptions such as Yogyakarta City. Yogyakarta is one of the areas with relatively low levels of corruption in its local governments in 2006 (5.59), 2008 (6.33), and 2010 (5.81). So, what does Yogyakarta do differently? One of the reasons for the differences in corruption level might be that, where it is widely supposed that corruption is negatively related to accountability, increased accountability is mostly implemented by formal mechanism. Special for Yogyakarta is that it, next to such formal ways of accountability, makes extensive use of informal ways to improve accountability. As such, the success of Yogyakarta as one of the Indonesian regions with the lowest levels of corruption is interesting to study in that it might provide additional insight in existing theoretical perspectives on accountability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document