scholarly journals Left Bundle Branch Pacing: Current Knowledge and Future Prospects

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Liu ◽  
Qiaozhu Wang ◽  
Hongke Sun ◽  
Xinghua Qin ◽  
Qiangsun Zheng
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Biventricular Pacing ◽  
Sinus Node ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Conduction ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Implantation Technique ◽  
Increased Risk

Cardiac pacing is an effective therapy for treating patients with bradycardia due to sinus node dysfunction or atrioventricular block. However, traditional right ventricular apical pacing (RVAP) causes electric and mechanical dyssynchrony, which is associated with increased risk for atrial arrhythmias and heart failure. Therefore, there is a need to develop a physiological pacing approach that activates the normal cardiac conduction and provides synchronized contraction of ventricles. Although His bundle pacing (HBP) has been widely used as a physiological pacing modality, it is limited by challenging implantation technique, unsatisfactory success rate in patients with wide QRS wave, high pacing capture threshold, and early battery depletion. Recently, the left bundle branch pacing (LBBP), defined as the capture of left bundle branch (LBB) via transventricular septal approach, has emerged as a newly physiological pacing modality. Results from early clinical studies have demonstrated LBBP's feasibility and safety, with rare complications and high success rate. Overall, this approach has been found to provide physiological pacing that guarantees electrical synchrony of the left ventricle with low pacing threshold. This was previously specifically characterized by narrow paced QRS duration, large R waves, fast synchronized left ventricular activation, and correction of left bundle branch block. Therefore, LBBP may be a potential alternative pacing modality for both RVAP and cardiac resynchronization therapy with HBP or biventricular pacing (BVP). However, the technique's widespread adaptation needs further validation to ascertain its safety and efficacy in randomized clinical trials. In this review, we discuss the current knowledge of LBBP.

Inflammatory Arthritis and Heart Disease

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 262-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santos Castaneda ◽  
Carlos Gonzalez-Juanatey ◽  
Miguel A. Gonzalez-Gay
Keyword(s):  
Heart Disease ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Joint Disease ◽  
Cardiac Conduction ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Joint Involvement ◽  
Pubmed Database ◽  
Increased Risk

Background: The term inflammatory joint disease (IJD) includes a group of chronic conditions, particularly rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), with predominant joint involvement and increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) complications and premature mortality. Objective: The study aims to review of the most relevant CV manifestations from clinical point of view associated with IJD. Methods: To update the current knowledge on CV manifestations in patients with IJD, we review the most relevant literature studies published in English (PubMed database) from January 2007 to February 2017. Results: Ischemic heart disease and congestive heart failure are the most relevant complications and those causing higher mortality. Pericarditis and myocarditis may be seen in patients with RA, especially in flares of disease, although they are often asymptomatic. Left ventricular diastolic ventricular dysfunction is an increasing recognized problem. Arrhythmias and cardiac conduction disturbances may be observed in patients with IJD. Chronic inflammation and fibrosis of the cardiac conduction system may be responsible for these complications. Noninvasive diagnostic tools including cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography have improved considerably our understanding of the cardiovascular disease in IJD. Conclusion: Cardiac manifestations in IJD are frequent and they are the leading cause of an increased morbimortality in IJD. Clinicians would be aware of that, given that early diagnosis of these complications may reduce the frequency of CV events and improve survival of patients with IJD.

Biventricular pacing-induced acute response in baroreflex sensitivity has predictive value for midterm response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

2009 ◽  
Vol 297 (1) ◽  
pp. H233-H237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maaike G. J. Gademan ◽  
Rutger J. van Bommel ◽  
C. Jan Willem Borleffs ◽  
SumChe Man ◽  
Joris C. W. Haest ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Baroreflex Sensitivity ◽  
Biventricular Pacing ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Arterial Baroreflex ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Acute Response

In a previous study we demonstrated that the institution of biventricular pacing in chronic heart failure (CHF) acutely facilitates the arterial baroreflex. The arterial baroreflex has important prognostic value in CHF. We hypothesized that the acute response in baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) after the institution of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has predictive value for midterm response. One day after implantation of a CRT device in 33 CHF patients (27 male/6 female; age, 66.5 ± 9.5 yr; left ventricular ejection fraction, 28 ± 7%) we measured noninvasive BRS and heart rate variability (HRV) in two conditions: CRT device switched on and switched off (on/off order randomized). Echocardiography was performed before implantation (baseline) and 6 mo after implantation (follow-up). CRT responders were defined as patients in whom left ventricular end-systolic volume at follow-up had decreased by ≥15%. Responders (69.7%) and nonresponders (30.3%) had similar baseline characteristics. In responders, CRT increased BRS by 30% ( P = 0.03); this differed significantly ( P = 0.02) from the average BRS change (−2%) in the nonresponders. CRT also increased HRV by 30% in responders ( P = 0.02), but there was no significant difference found compared with the increase in HRV (8%) in the nonresponders. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that the percent BRS increase had predictive value for the discrimination of responders and nonresponders (area under the curve, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.51–0.87; maximal accuracy, 0.70). Our study demonstrates that a CRT-induced acute BRS increase has predictive value for the echocardiographic response to CRT. This finding suggests that the autonomic nervous system is actively involved in CRT-related reverse remodeling.

Pacing: a new look. Don’t be deceived

Heart ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 104 (18) ◽  
pp. 1491-1528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chee Loong Chow ◽  
Barveen Abu Baker ◽  
Uwais Mohamed
Keyword(s):  
Right Ventricular ◽  
Sinus Bradycardia ◽  
Biventricular Pacing ◽  
Sinus Node ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Supplementary File ◽  
Electrode Position ◽  
List Type ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Clinical introductionA 78-year-old man presents following a syncopal episode in the setting of intermittent sinus bradycardia and left bundle branch block (LBBB). With symptoms likely due to documented intermittent sinus node dysfunction, and finding of a diseased left bundle, a pacemaker was inserted (online supplementary figure 1 shows the electrode position in a PA fluroscopy view). His baseline ECG is shown in figure 1A, with a QRS width of 160 ms, and his echocardiogram revealed a left ventricular ejection fraction of 45%. His ECG day 1 postdevice insertion is shown in figure 1B. His device check confirmed excellent function. His QRS width on ECG postdevice insertion is now normalised to 80 ms.Supplementary file 1QuestionWhat type of device therapy has this patient received?Biventricular pacing.Right ventricular outflow septal pacing.His bundle pacing.Right ventricular apical pacing.Figure 1(A) Baseline ECG and (B) day 1 postpacemaker implantation.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy: optimization and follow-up

2015 ◽  
pp. 420-431
Author(s):  
Marta Sitges ◽  
Genevieve Derumeaux
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Biventricular Pacing ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Functional Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Cardiac Imaging Techniques ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy

Cardiac imaging techniques have an important role in the follow-up of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) as they provide objective evidence of changes in cardiac dimensions and function. The role of echocardiography is well established in the assessment of left ventricular reverse remodelling and the evaluation of secondary (functional) mitral regurgitation. Additionally, echocardiography might be used for optimizing the programming of atrio-ventricular (AV) and inter-ventricular (VV) delays of current CRT devices. Acute benefits from this optimization have been demonstrated, but longer follow-up studies have failed to show a clear benefit of optimized CRT on top of simultaneous biventricular pacing on the outcome of patients with CRT. This chapter reviews the role of imaging in assessing follow-up and outcome of patients undergoing CRT, as well as the rationale, the methods used, and the clinical impact of optimization of the programming of CRT devices.

45Improving the optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: Does multipoint left ventricular pacing shorten the paced-QRS duration compared to the fusion-optimized intervals method?

EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R San Antonio ◽  
M Pujol-Lopez ◽  
R Jimenez-Arjona ◽  
A Doltra ◽  
F Alarcon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Biventricular Pacing ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Reverse Remodeling ◽  
Prospective Clinical Study ◽  
Battery Life ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Qrs Duration ◽  
Phrenic Stimulation

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Cardiac Pacing Scholarship from the Spanish Society of Cardiology (SEC) Background Electrocardiogram-based optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using the fusion-optimized intervals (FOI) method has demonstrated to improve both acute hemodynamic response and left ventricle (LV) reverse remodeling compared to nominal programming of CRT. FOI optimizes the atrioventricular (AV) and ventriculo-ventricular (VV) intervals to achieve the shortest paced-QRS duration. The recent development of multipoint pacing (MPP) enables the activation of the LV from 2 locations, also shortening the QRS duration compared to conventional biventricular pacing. Purpose To determine if MPP reduces the paced-QRS duration compared to FOI optimization.  Methods This prospective clinical study included 25 consecutive patients who successfully received a CRT with MPP pacing capability. All patients were in sinus rhythm and had an PR interval below 250 ms. The QRS duration was measured with a 12-lead digital electrocardiography (screen speed of 200 mm/s) at baseline and using 3 different configurations: MPP, FOI and a combined FOI-MPP strategy. In MPP, the intervals were (based on previous studies): 1) AV 130 ms, 2) Right ventricular (RV)-LV2 (Δ1) 5 ms, and 3) LV1-LV2 (Δ2) 5 ms. In FOI, AV and VV intervals were optimized to achieve fusion between intrinsic conduction and biventricular pacing. In FOI-MPP, the Δ2 was set at 5 ms, while AV and Δ1 intervals were optimized using the FOI method. The CRT device was programmed with the configuration that achieved a greater paced-QRS shortening. After 45 days, battery life was estimated. Results   Mean age was 65 ± 10 years, 20 were men (80%) and baseline QRS duration was 177 ± 17 ms. The FOI method bested nominal MPP (QRS shortened by 58 ± 16 ms vs 43 ± 16 ms, respectively, p = 0.002). Adding MPP to the narrowest QRS by FOI did not result in further shortening (FOI: 58 ± 16 ms vs FOI-MPP: 59 ± 13 ms, p = 0.81). The final configuration was FOI method alone in most cases (n = 16, 64%) and FOI-MPP in all others (n = 9, 36%; figure). In total, 10 out of 25 patients (40%) were not candidates to MPP due to: 1) pacing thresholds exceeding 3.5 V/0.4 ms at the distal or proximal electrode (8, 32%), and 2) phrenic stimulation (2, 8%). Estimated battery longevity was longer in patients receiving FOI as compared to MPP (8.3 ± 2.1 years vs. 6.2 ± 2.2 years, p = 0.04). Conclusion In CRT, the FOI method is not improved by coupling with MPP.  Up to 40% of patients are not candidates for MPP due to high thresholds or phrenic stimulation. The use of MPP in unselected patients would result in a decrease of battery longevity, without any additional benefit over FOI. Abstract Figure.

scholarly journals Percutaneous left ventricular endocardial leads: adverse outcomes and a percutaneous extraction case series

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Jonathan M Behar ◽  
Malcolm C Finlay ◽  
Edward Rowland ◽  
Vivienne Ezzat ◽  
Simon Sporton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biventricular Pacing ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Venous Anatomy ◽  
Percutaneous Extraction ◽  
Alternative Approaches

Abstract Background Conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) involves the placement of an epicardial left ventricular (LV) lead through the coronary venous tree. However, alternative approaches of delivering CRT have been sought for patients who fail to respond to conventional methods or for those where coronary venous anatomy is unfavourable. Biventricular pacing through an endocardial LV lead has potential advantages; however, the long-term clinical and safety data are not known. Case summary This article details a case series of four patients with endocardial LV leads; three of these for previously failed conventional CRT and a fourth for an inadvertently placed defibrillator lead. Discussion We describe the clinical course and adverse events associated with left-sided leads and subsequently describe the safe and feasible method of percutaneous extraction.

scholarly journals Alternative sites of ventricular pacing: His bundle pacing

2020 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Vetta ◽  
Leonardo Marinaccio ◽  
Giampaolo Vetta
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Biventricular Pacing ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Cardiac Pacing ◽  
Cardiac Conduction ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Conduction Delay ◽  
Ventricular Pacing ◽  
His Bundle ◽  
His Bundle Pacing

Since its introduction right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing has been the mainstay in cardiac pacing. However, in recent years there has been an upsurge of interest in permanent His bundle pacing (HBP), given the scientific evidence of the harmful role of dyssynchronous ventricular activation, induced by RVA pacing, in promoting the onset of heart failure and atrial fibrillation. After an intermediate period in which attention was focused on algorithms aimed at minimizing ventricular pacing, with partially inadequate and harmful results, scientific attention shifted to HBP, which proved to ensure a physiological electro-mechanical activation of the ventricles. The encouraging results obtained have allowed the introduction of HBP in recent guidelines for cardiac pacing in patients with bradicardia and cardiac conduction delay. Recent studies have also demonstrated the potential of HBP in patients with left bundle branch block and heart failure. HBP is promising as an attractive way to achieve physiological stimulation in patients with an indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Comparative studies of HB-CRT and biventricular pacing have shown similar results in numerically modest cohorts, although HB-CRT has been shown to promote better ventricular electrical resynchronization as demonstrated by a greater QRS narrowing. A widespread use of this pacing tecnique also depends on improvements in technology, as well as further validation of effectiveness in large randomised clinical trials

scholarly journals Cardiac Emerinopathy

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Taisuke Ishikawa ◽  
Hiroyuki Mishima ◽  
Julien Barc ◽  
Masanori P. Takahashi ◽  
Keiichi Hirono ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Muscular Dystrophy ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Conduction ◽  
Conduction Disturbance ◽  
Ventricular Noncompaction ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Genes Encoding ◽  
History Of ◽  
Cardiac Conduction Defect ◽  
Female Carriers

Background: Mutations in the nuclear envelope genes encoding LMNA and EMD are responsible for Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. However, LMNA mutations often manifest dilated cardiomyopathy with conduction disturbance without obvious skeletal myopathic complications. On the contrary, the phenotypic spectrums of EMD mutations are less clear. Our aims were to determine the prevalence of nonsyndromic forms of emerinopathy, which may underlie genetically undefined isolated cardiac conduction disturbance, and the etiology of thromboembolic complications associated with EMD mutations. Methods: Targeted exon sequencing was performed in 87 probands with familial sick sinus syndrome (n=36) and a progressive cardiac conduction defect (n=51). Results: We identified 3 X-linked recessive EMD mutations (start-loss, splicing, missense) in families with cardiac conduction disease. All 3 probands shared a common clinical phenotype of progressive atrial arrhythmias that ultimately resulted in atrial standstill associated with left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC), but they lacked early contractures and progressive muscle wasting and weakness characteristic of Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. Because the association of LVNC with EMD has never been reported, we further genetically screened 102 LVNC patients and found a frameshift EMD mutation in a boy with progressive atrial standstill and LVNC without complications of muscular dystrophy. All 6 male EMD mutation carriers of 4 families underwent pacemaker or defibrillator implantation, whereas 2 female carriers were asymptomatic. Notably, a strong family history of stroke observed in these families was probably due to the increased risk of thromboembolism attributable to both atrial standstill and LVNC. Conclusions: Cardiac emerinopathy is a novel nonsyndromic X-linked progressive atrial standstill associated with LVNC and increased risk of thromboembolism.

scholarly journals Septal contraction predicts acute haemodynamic improvement and paced QRS width reduction in cardiac resynchronization therapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 845-852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stian Ross ◽  
Eirik Nestaas ◽  
Erik Kongsgaard ◽  
Hans H Odland ◽  
Trine F Haland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Diastolic Pressure ◽  
Electrical Response ◽  
Electrical Parameter ◽  
Biventricular Pacing ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Device Implantation ◽  
Crt Response

Abstract Aims  Three distinct septal contraction patterns typical for left bundle branch block may be assessed using echocardiography in heart failure patients scheduled for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The aim of this study was to explore the association between these septal contraction patterns and the acute haemodynamic and electrical response to biventricular pacing (BIVP) in patients undergoing CRT implantation. Methods and results  Thirty-eight CRT candidates underwent speckle tracking echocardiography prior to device implantation. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether their septal contraction pattern was indicative of dyssynchrony (premature septal contraction followed by various amount of stretch) or not (normally timed septal contraction with minimal stretch). CRT implantation was performed under invasive left ventricular (LV) pressure monitoring and we defined acute CRT response as ≥10% increase in LV dP/dtmax. End-diastolic pressure (EDP) and QRS width served as a diastolic and electrical parameter, respectively. LV dP/dtmax improved under BIVP (737 ± 177 mmHg/s vs. 838 ± 199 mmHg/s, P < 0.001) and 26 patients (68%) were defined as acute CRT responders. Patients with premature septal contraction (n = 27) experienced acute improvement in systolic (ΔdP/dtmax: 18.3 ± 8.9%, P < 0.001), diastolic (ΔEDP: −30.6 ± 29.9%, P < 0.001) and electrical (ΔQRS width: −23.3 ± 13.2%, P < 0.001) parameters. No improvement under BIVP was observed in patients (n = 11) with normally timed septal contraction (ΔdP/dtmax: 4.0 ± 7.8%, P = 0.12; ΔEDP: −8.8 ± 38.4%, P = 0.47 and ΔQRS width: −0.9 ± 11.4%, P = 0.79). Conclusion  Septal contraction patterns are an excellent predictor of acute CRT response. Only patients with premature septal contraction experienced acute systolic, diastolic, and electrical improvement under BIVP.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document