scholarly journals Variability in Global Prevalence of Interstitial Lung Disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhavika Kaul ◽  
Vincent Cottin ◽  
Harold R. Collard ◽  
Claudia Valenzuela
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
North America ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Relative Frequency ◽  
English Language ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Epidemiologic Studies ◽  
Disease Classification ◽  
Global Burden ◽  
Community Based

There are limited epidemiologic studies describing the global burden and geographic heterogeneity of interstitial lung disease (ILD) subtypes. We found that among seventeen methodologically heterogenous studies that examined the incidence, prevalence and relative frequencies of ILDs, the incidence of ILD ranged from 1 to 31.5 per 100,000 person-years and prevalence ranged from 6.3 to 71 per 100,000 people. In North America and Europe, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and sarcoidosis were the most prevalent ILDs while the relative frequency of hypersensitivity pneumonitis was higher in Asia, particularly in India (10.7–47.3%) and Pakistan (12.6%). The relative frequency of connective tissue disease ILD demonstrated the greatest geographic variability, ranging from 7.5% of cases in Belgium to 33.3% of cases in Canada and 34.8% of cases in Saudi Arabia. These differences may represent true differences based on underlying characteristics of the source populations or methodological differences in disease classification and patient recruitment (registry vs. population-based cohorts). There are three areas where we feel addition work is needed to better understand the global burden of ILD. First, a standard ontology with diagnostic confidence thresholds for comparative epidemiology studies of ILD is needed. Second, more globally representative data should be published in English language journals as current literature has largely focused on Europe and North America with little data from South America, Africa and Asia. Third, the inclusion of community-based cohorts that leverage the strength of large databases can help better estimate population burden of disease. These large, community-based longitudinal cohorts would also allow for tracking of global trends and be a valuable resource for collective study. We believe the ILD research community should organize to define a shared ontology for disease classification and commit to conducting global claims and electronic health record based epidemiologic studies in a standardized fashion. Aggregating and sharing this type of data would provide a unique opportunity for international collaboration as our understanding of ILD continues to grow and evolve. Better understanding the geographic and temporal patterns of disease prevalence and identifying clusters of ILD subtypes will facilitate improved understanding of emerging risk factors and help identify targets for future intervention.

scholarly journals POS0210 THE INCIDENCE AND RISK FACTORS OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS-ASSOCIATED INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 322-322
Author(s):  
B. Samhouri ◽  
R. Vassallo ◽  
S. Achenbach ◽  
V. Kronzer ◽  
J. M. Davis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Competing Risk ◽  
Olmsted County ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Risk Of Death

Background:Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic inflammatory disease of the joints and other organs, including the lungs.1 Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a lung injury pattern associated with significant symptom burden and poor outcomes in RA.2 Better understanding of its risk factors could help with disease prevention and treatment.Objectives:Using a population-based cohort, we sought to ascertain the incidence and risk factors of RA-associated ILD (RA-ILD) in recent years.Methods:The study included adult residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota with incident RA between 1999 and 2014 based on the 1987 ACR classification criteria.3 Study subjects were followed until death, migration, or 4/30/2019. ILD was defined by the presence of bilateral interstitial fibrotic changes (excluding biapical scarring) on chest computed tomography (CT). In the absence of chest CT imaging, a physician’s diagnosis of ILD in conjunction with chest X-ray findings suggestive of ILD and a restrictive pattern on pulmonary function testing (defined as a total lung capacity less than the lower limit of normal) was considered diagnostic of ILD. Evaluated risk factors included age, sex, calendar year, smoking status, body mass index (BMI) and presence/absence of rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA). Cumulative incidence of ILD was adjusted for the competing risk of death. Cox models were used to assess the association between potential risk factors and the development of RA-ILD.Results:In Olmsted County, 645 residents were diagnosed with RA between 1999 and 2014. Seventy percent of patients were females, and 30% were males; median age at RA diagnosis was 55.3 [IQR 44.1-66.6] years, and most patients (89%) were white. Fifty-three percent of patients were never-smokers, and 64% had seropositive RA. Forty percent were obese (i.e., BMI ≥30 kg/m2); median BMI was 28.3 [IQR 24.3-33.0] kg/m2.In the cohort, ILD was identified in 73 patients. The ILD diagnosis predated RA diagnosis in 22 patients (3.4%) who were excluded from subsequent analyses. Final analyses included the remaining 623 patients with no ILD preceding, or at the time of RA diagnosis. Over a median follow-up interval of 10.2 [IQR 6.5-14.3] years, 51 patients developed ILD. Cumulative incidence of ILD, adjusted for the competing risk of death, was 4.3% at 5 years; 7.8% at 10 years; 9.4% at 15 years; and 12.3% at 20 years after RA diagnosis (Figure 1).Age, and history of smoking at RA diagnosis correlated with the incidence of ILD; adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were 1.89 per 10-year increase in age (95% confidence interval 1.52-2.34) and 1.94 (95% confidence interval 1.10-3.42), respectively. On the other hand, sex (HR: 1.21; 95% CI: 0.68-2.17), BMI (HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.95-1.04), obesity (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.50-1.58), and seropositivity (HR: 1.15; 95% CI: 0.65-2.03) did not demonstrate significant associations with ILD.Conclusion:This study provides a contemporary estimate of the occurrence of ILD in a well-characterized population-based cohort of patients with RA. Our findings of a lack of association between sex, obesity and seropositivity with ILD may indicate a change in established risk factors for ILD and warrant further investigation.References:[1]Shaw M, Collins BF, Ho LA, Raghu G. Rheumatoid arthritis-associated lung disease. Eur Respir Rev. 2015;24(135):1-16. doi:10.1183/09059180.00008014[2]Bongartz T, Nannini C, Medina-Velasquez YF, et al. Incidence and mortality of interstitial lung disease in rheumatoid arthritis - A population-based study. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(6):1583-1591. doi:10.1002/art.27405[3]Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, et al. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(9):2569-2581. doi:10.1002/art.27584Figure 1.Cumulative incidence of ILD in patients diagnosed with RA between 1999 and 2014, adjusted for the competing risk of death. Abbreviations. ILD: interstitial lung disease; RA: rheumatoid arthritis.Disclosure of Interests:Bilal Samhouri: None declared, Robert Vassallo Grant/research support from: Research grants from Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceuticals and Bristol Myers Squibb, Sara Achenbach: None declared, Vanessa Kronzer: None declared, John M Davis III Grant/research support from: Research grant from Pfizer., Elena Myasoedova: None declared, Cynthia S. Crowson: None declared

Global and regional burden of interstitial lung disease and pulmonary sarcoidosis from 1990 to 2019: results from the Global Burden of Disease study 2019

Thorax ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. thoraxjnl-2020-216732
Author(s):  
Xiaoqian Ma ◽  
Lili Zhu ◽  
Jonathan S Kurche ◽  
Huijuan Xiao ◽  
Huaping Dai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Burden Of Disease ◽  
Temporal Trends ◽  
Pulmonary Sarcoidosis ◽  
Global Burden Of Disease ◽  
Global Burden ◽  
Heterogeneous Distribution ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Incidence And Mortality

BackgroundInterstitial lung disease (ILD) and pulmonary sarcoidosis are common respiratory diseases with a heterogeneous distribution worldwide. The global burden and temporal trends of ILD and sarcoidosis are rarely explored.MethodsUsing the classification ‘ILD and pulmonary sarcoidosis’ from the Global Burden of Disease 2019 dataset, we described the age-standardised rates of incidence, mortality, disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and their average annual percentage change from 1990 to 2019 by sex, Sociodemographic Index (SDI) and region.ResultsIn 2019, the global incidence and mortality of ILD and pulmonary sarcoidosis were 24.2 million and 169 833 cases, respectively. From 1990 to 2019, the global incidence, deaths and DALYs due to ILD and pulmonary sarcoidosis increased by 118.6%, 166.63% and 122.87% respectively. The global incidence of ILD and pulmonary sarcoidosis was higher in men and was mainly concentrated among persons aged 70‒79 of both sexes. Significant regional differences could be seen in the disease burden of ILD and pulmonary sarcoidosis: since 2006, high-SDI regions had higher age-standardised incidence rates but lower age-standardised death rates compared with the low-SDI regions.ConclusionsOur study suggests the incidence, mortality and DALYs from ILD and pulmonary sarcoidosis are increasing globally. To reduce the ongoing burden of this condition, early diagnosis and treatment are vital, and more targeted and specific strategies should be established in high-burden regions. Differences in incidence and mortality across regions may reflect the influence of genetic, environmental, diagnostic, pharmacotherapeutic, and health system factors.

scholarly journals Translation and cultural adaptation of the King’s Brief Interstitial Lung Disease health status questionnaire for use in Brazil

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karoline Silveira ◽  
Leila John Marques Steidle ◽  
Darlan Laurício Matte ◽  
Pedro Heliodoro Tavares ◽  
Mariangela Pimentel Pincelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Status ◽  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
English Language ◽  
Target Population ◽  
Cognitive Debriefing ◽  
Language Version ◽  
Back Translation ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Translation And Cultural Adaptation

ABSTRACT Objective: To translate the King’s Brief Interstitial Lung Disease (K-BILD) questionnaire to Portuguese and culturally adapt it for use in Brazil. The K-BILD quantifies the health status of patients with ILD. Methods: The process involved the following steps: authorization from the author of the original (English-language) questionnaire; translation of the questionnaire to Portuguese by three translators, working independently; merging of the translations by a committee of specialists; back-translation of the questionnaire to English; revision and readjustment of the back-translation by the committee of specialists; evaluation by the original author; revision of the back-translation; cognitive debriefing (verification of the clarity and acceptability of the Portuguese-language version in the target population-i.e., patients with ILD); and finalization of the Portuguese-language version. Results: In the cognitive debriefing step, 20 patients with ILD were interviewed. After the interviews, the clarity and acceptability index of each question was ≥ 0.8, which is considered acceptable. Conclusions: The Portuguese-language version of K-BILD appears to be easily administered to and understood by patients with ILD in Brazil. To our knowledge, this is the only instrument in Brazilian Portuguese that is designed to evaluate the impact that ILD has on the various aspects of the lives of those it affects.

scholarly journals Validation of an algorithm to identify incident interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

2022 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Meehan ◽  
A. Shah ◽  
J. Lobo ◽  
J. Oates ◽  
C. Clinton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Real World ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Case Finding ◽  
Administrative Claims ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Predictive Values

Abstract Background/purpose Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is an important problem for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, current approaches to ILD case finding in real-world data have been evaluated only in limited settings and identify only prevalent ILD and not new-onset disease. Our objective was to develop, refine, and validate a claims-based algorithm to identify both prevalent and incident ILD in RA patients compared to the gold standard of medical record review. Methods We used administrative claims data 2006–2015 from Medicare to derive a cohort of RA patients. We then identified suspected ILD using variations of ILD algorithms to classify both prevalent and incident ILD based on features of the data that included hospitalization vs. outpatient setting, physician specialty, pulmonary-related diagnosis codes, and exclusions for potentially mimicking pulmonary conditions. Positive predictive values (PPV) of several ILD algorithm variants for both prevalent and incident ILD were evaluated. Results We identified 234 linkable RA patients with sufficient data to evaluate for ILD. Overall, 108 (46.2%) of suspected cases were confirmed as ILD. Most cases (64%) were diagnosed in the outpatient setting. The best performing algorithm for prevalent ILD had a PPV of 77% (95% CI 67–84%) and for incident ILD was 96% (95% CI 85–100%). Conclusion Case finding in administrative data for both prevalent and incident interstitial lung disease in RA patients is feasible and has reasonable accuracy to support population-based research and real-world evidence generation.

scholarly journals The incidence of interstitial lung disease 1995–2005: a Danish nationwide population-based study

2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jette B Kornum ◽  
Steffen Christensen ◽  
Miriam Grijota ◽  
Lars Pedersen ◽  
Pia Wogelius ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Population Based Study

scholarly journals SAT0582 RISK OF INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE IN SYSTEMIC AUTOIMMUNE RHEUMATIC DISEASES: A NATIONWIDE, POPULATION-BASED COHORT STUDY

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1250.1-1250
Author(s):  
H. H. Chen ◽  
K. H. Ng ◽  
W. C. Chao ◽  
C. H. Lin
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Systemic Sclerosis ◽  
Interstitial Lung Disease ◽  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Connective Tissue Disease ◽  
Rheumatic Diseases ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases ◽  
Comparison Groups

Background:To date, very few studies had investigated the epidemiology of interstitial lung disease (ILD) among patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD).Objectives:To study the risk of interstitial lung disease (ILD) among patients with various systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), dermatomyositis (DMtis), polymyositis (PM), systemic sclerosis (SSc), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS).Methods:Using 1997–2013 claims data from the Taiwanese National Health Insurance Research Database, we identified 63,277 newly diagnosed patients with various SARDs after excluding those with overlapping SARD diagnoses from 2001-2013 and randomly selected 253,108 non-SARD subjects matching (1:4) SARD patients for SARD diagnosis, age, sex and the year of the index date. We calculated the incidence rates (IRs) of ILD (ICD-9 code 515) in various SARD groups and the corresponding non-SARD comparison groups and estimated the IR ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of ILD development. Using multivariable cox regression analyses, we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs of ILD in various SARD groups compared with their comparison groups after adjusting for age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, amiodarone use and methotrexate use. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by using a narrow definition of ILD.Results:As shown in Table 1, the IRs of ILD were greatest in SSc patients (2,523 per 105years), followed by patients with DMtis (2,463 per 105years), PM (1,956 per 105years), SS (601 per 105years), RA (279 per 105years), and SLE (276 per 105years). Multivariable analyses showed that the risks of ILD were significantly increased in patients with SSc (HR, 66.01; 95% CI, 32.73—133.13), DMtis (128.74, 95% CI, 40.19—412.47), PM (HR, 30.39; 95% CI, 11.24—82.15), pSS (HR, 8.76; 95% CI, 7.03—10.90), RA (HR, 4.22; 95% CI, 3.51—5.08), and SLE (HR, 13.98; 95% CI, 9.25—21.14).Conclusion:This nationwide, population-based, matched cohort study demonstrated that the risks of ILD were significantly increased in patients with SARDs.References:[1]Su R, Bennett M, Jacobs S, Hunter T, Bailey C, Krishnan E, et al. An analysis of connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease at a US Tertiary Care Center: better survival in patients with systemic sclerosis. The Journal of rheumatology. 2011;38(4):693-701.[2]Hu Y, Wang LS, Wei YR, Du SS, Du YK, He X, et al. Clinical Characteristics of Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease in 1,044 Chinese Patients. Chest. 2016;149(1):201-8.Araki T, Putman RK, Hatabu H, Gao W, Dupuis J, Latourelle JC, et al. Development and Progression of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities in the Framingham Heart Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016;194:1514-1522.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document