scholarly journals Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Prospective Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of the Assisi Anti-anxiety Device (Calmer Canine) for the Treatment of Canine Separation Anxiety

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Pankratz ◽  
Judy Korman ◽  
Carrie Emke ◽  
Brianna Johnson ◽  
Emily H. Griffith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Separation Anxiety ◽  
Video Data ◽  
Behavioral Changes ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Negative Behaviors ◽  
Full Study ◽  
Pulsed Electromagnetic

Introduction: Separation anxiety (SA) is among the most common canine behavior disorders and affects quality-of-life for dogs and their owners. Dogs with SA show signs of anxiety during absence or perceived absence of their owners. While psychoactive medications are often helpful for treating SA, dog and human factors may limit their utility. This study explored the efficacy of a pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) device for treatment of canine SA.Materials and Methods: In this double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study, a screening questionnaire and baseline video confirmed the diagnosis of SA. Owners treated their dog with the device twice daily for 6 weeks, completed weekly questionnaires, and noted adverse events. Videos were taken of the dog while alone at weeks 4 and 6. Behaviors were coded and categorized as negative and positive. Questionnaire and video data at weeks 4 and 6 were compared to baseline.Results: Forty client-owned dogs with moderate to severe SA completed the study. There were no differences between groups for age, weight, or sex. In owner questionnaires, no difference in behavior or overall score was found between the active and sham groups (p > 0.05). Videos of the active group compared to the sham group showed significant reduction in negative behaviors by week 6 (p = 0.036) and higher percentage of success at week 4 (Z = 2.83, p = 0.005), at week 6 (Z = 1.65, p = 0.098), and across the full study (Z = 1.99, p = 0.047). Adverse events were reported in eight dogs (6 active, 2 sham); all resolved and were unlikely to be related to treatment.Discussion: This study supports the efficacy and safety of this PEMF device for treatment of SA in dogs. Questionnaire results may not be sensitive enough to detect subtle negative behavioral states compared to video, and may not capture other owner observed behavioral changes. A caregiver placebo effect may account for some improvement seen in both groups. Video data appear better for diagnosis and monitoring dog's behavior when left alone. Future studies should assess PEMF's impact on other anxieties or combination of anxiety disorders in dogs.

Effect of multi-strain probiotic (UB0316) in weight management in overweight/obese adults: a 12-week double blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 855-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ratna Sudha ◽  
J.J. Ahire ◽  
N. Jayanthi ◽  
A. Tripathi ◽  
S. Nanal
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Body Weight ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Vital Signs ◽  
Bacillus Coagulans ◽  
Blood Lipid ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Obese Adults ◽  
Double Blind

This clinical trial was carried out to assess the effects of multi-strain probiotic capsule (UB0316: Lactobacillus salivarius UBLS-22, Lactobacillus casei UBLC-42, Lactobacillus plantarum, UBLP-40, Lactobacillus acidophilus UBLA-34, Bifidobacterium breve UBBr-01, Bacillus coagulans Unique IS2 5×109 cfu each and fructo-oligosaccharide, 100 mg) on overweight/obesity-related parameters. Ninety subjects (age, 30-65 years; body mass index (BMI), 25-32 kg/m2) were randomised into two groups, i.e. UB0316 (probiotic) and placebo (excipient maltodextrin). They were instructed to take 2 capsules (UB0316 or placebo) per day after meals for 12 weeks. Primary (BMI), and secondary (waist-to-hip ratio: WHR; body weight, body fat; sugar and lipid profile) endpoint measures were evaluated at scheduled visits. Vital signs, physical investigations, quality of life, physician/subjects global assessment and adverse events were also recorded. A total of 71 subjects completed the scheduled study visits and analysis thereof showed that a 12-week UB0316 supplementation significantly reduced BMI (95% CI: -0.64, -0.27; P=0.0001), body weight (95% CI: -1.16, -0.50; P<0.0001), and WHR (95% CI: -0.06, -0.01; P=0.007) from the baseline, compared to placebo. Fat, blood lipid and sugar profile changes were non-significant. UB0316 significantly improved quality of life of overweight/obese individuals. Furthermore, no severe adverse events or abnormal findings were noted during vital, blood and physical examinations. In conclusion, this 12-week trial demonstrates that UB0316 is effective in reducing BMI, body weight and WHR in overweight/obese adults.

Low-dose olanzapine, sedation and chemotherapy-induced nausea & vomiting: a prospective randomized controlled study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandip Mukhopadhyay ◽  
Premnath Dutta ◽  
Sanatan Banerjee ◽  
Biswamit Bhattacharya ◽  
Supreeti Biswas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Emetogenic Chemotherapy ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Chemotherapy Patients

Aims: Comparison of efficacy, safety and sedation between two doses of olanzapine in the control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Patients & methods: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study was conducted, enrolling 68 patients receiving a single-day cycle of high and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Patients received either of olanzapine 5 mg or 10 mg from day 1 through 3 in addition to ondansetron and dexamethasone. Control of CINV, nausea, sedation, quality of life (QoL) and adverse events were compared. Results: Nausea, emesis control and improvement of QoL were similar in both groups. Sedation severity was 133% higher with 10 mg olanzapine. Conclusions: Lower dose olanzapine is effective to control CINV with significantly reduced sedation.

ISA247: Quality of Life Results from a Phase II, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study

2008 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 268-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditya K. Gupta ◽  
Richard G. Langley ◽  
Charles Lynde ◽  
Kirk Barber ◽  
Wayne Gulliver ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Life Quality ◽  
Skin Condition ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Plaque Type ◽  
Psoriasis Disability Index ◽  
Stable Plaque

Background: Psoriasis is a chronic skin condition that can negatively affect a patient's quality of life (QoL), often hindering social functioning. ISA247, a novel psoriatic agent, has shown clinical efficacy in moderate to severe psoriasis sufferers, but its effect on QoL is currently not reported. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the effect of ISA247 on the QoL in patients with stable, plaque-type psoriasis. Methods: A phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study assessed the effects of ISA247 doses of 0.5 mg/kg/d ( n = 77) or 1.5 mg/kg/d ( n = 83) compared with placebo ( n = 41) for 12 weeks. QoL was assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Psoriasis Disability Index (PDI) scales. Results: ISA247 treatment (pooled groups) significantly improved QoL scores as assessed by both the DLQI and the PDI compared with those receiving placebo ( p < .05). Treatment with the higher dose of 1.5 mg/kg/d demonstrated a significantly greater response to many of the QoL scales compared with the 0.5 mg/kg/d group ( p < .05). Conclusions: ISA247 appears to improve the QoL while also providing effective treatment for chronic, moderate to severe, plaque-type psoriasis.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Lactobacillus paracasei HA-196 and Bifidobacterium longum R0175 in Alleviating Symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS): A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 1159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin D. Lewis ◽  
Joseph M. Antony ◽  
David C. Crowley ◽  
Amanda Piano ◽  
Renu Bhardwaj ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Irritable Bowel Syndrome ◽  
Bifidobacterium Longum ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Lactobacillus Paracasei ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Gi Symptoms ◽  
Irritable Bowel

Specific probiotic strains can alleviate the gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and psychiatric comorbidities of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, the efficacy of Lactobacillus paracasei HA-196 (L. paracasei) and Bifidobacterium longum R0175 (B. longum) in reducing the GI and psychological symptoms of IBS was evaluated in 251 adults with either constipation (IBS-C), diarrhea (IBS-D), or mixed-pattern (IBS-M). Following a 2-week run-in period, participants were randomized to one of three interventions: L. paracasei (n = 84), B. longum (n = 83) or placebo (n = 81). IBS symptoms, stool frequency and consistency and quality of life were assessed by questionnaires. The differences from baseline in the severity of IBS symptoms at 4 and 8 weeks were similar between groups. Participants in this study were classified, after randomization, into subtypes according to Rome III. Within the L. paracasei group, complete spontaneous and spontaneous bowel movement frequency increased in participants with IBS-C (n = 10) after 8 weeks of supplementation (both p < 0.05) and decreased in participants with IBS-D (n = 10, p = 0.013). Both L. paracasei and B. longum supplementation improved the quality of life in emotional well-being and social functioning compared with baseline (all p < 0.05). In conclusion, L. paracasei and B. longum may reduce GI symptom severity and improve the psychological well-being of individuals with certain IBS subtypes.

scholarly journals Evaluation of efficacy and safety of montelukast and levocetirizine FDC tablet compared to montelukast and levocetirizine tablet in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomized, double blind, multicentre, phase III trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 83
Author(s):  
Sagar Panchal ◽  
Saiprasad Patil ◽  
Hanmant Barkate
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Global Evaluation ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Nasal Symptoms

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> To evaluate efficacy, safety and tolerability of Montelukast 10 mg+levocetirizine 5 mg  FDC compared to either montelukast 10 mg or levocetirizine 5 mg given alone in seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) patients.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> Phase III, multicentre, randomized, double blind, parallel group, active controlled study was conducted in 279 SAR patients at 16 sites across India. Efficacy was assessed using daytime nasal symptoms score (Primary efficacy outcome), night-time symptoms score, daytime eye symptom score, patient's global evaluation, physician's global evaluation, rhino-conjunctivitis quality-of-life score.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> At end of treatment there was statistically significant evidence from the per protocol analysis that patients on FDC had a greater improvement in change from baseline in daytime nasal symptoms score than patients who received Montelukast (p=0.0266) or Levocetirizine (p=0.0409). These results were consistent with the Intent to treat analysis. Analysis of the secondary efficacy endpoints provided numerically greater improvement in the nighttime symptoms score, daytime eye symptoms score, and rhinoconjunctivitis quality-of-life scores in the FDC group as compared to the Montelukast group or Levocetirizine group. The FDC of Montelukast and Levocetirizine was found to be safe and generally well tolerated. The majority of adverse events were mild in severity, resolved without treatment and were unrelated to study medication.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Fixed dose combination of Montelukast and Levocetirizine was safe, generally well tolerated and superior on efficacy compared to Montelukast or Levocetirizine in patients of seasonal allergic rhinitis.</p>

Safety and Efficacy of a Topical Anesthetic for Neonatal Circumcision

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 92 (5) ◽  
pp. 710-714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen B. Weatherstone ◽  
Lynn B. Rasmussen ◽  
Allen Erenberg ◽  
Emily M. Jackson ◽  
Katherine S. Claflin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vital Signs ◽  
Behavioral Changes ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Topical Anesthetic ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Topical Lidocaine ◽  
Postoperative Serum

Objective. Circumcision is a common neonatal surgical procedure routinely performed without the use of anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of topical lidocaine cream as an anesthetic for circumcision. Methods. Thirty newborns were studied in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study; 15 received a topical 30% lidocaine cream and 15 received the cream base alone. Vital signs were recorded, and preoperative and postoperative serum β-endorphin and lidocaine concentrations were measured. A videotape of the newborn was used to score behavioral changes. Results. Comparisions of the vital signs precircumcision and postcircumcision showed no differences between the placebo and treatment groups, with the exception of mean systolic blood pressure, which significantly increased in the placebo-treated newborns (P &lt; .05). Serum β-endorphin concentrations increased postoperatively in 11 of 15 subjects receiving placebo, but decreased or remained unchanged in 10 of 15 subjects receiving lidocaine (P = .03, Fisher's exact test). When stress-related behaviors in the precircumcision and post-circumcision periods were compared, the mean increase in their occurrence was greater in the placebo than in the treatment group. There was no significant absorption of lidocaine as measured in the serum. Conclusion. Topical application of a 30% lidocaine cream as used in this study may be a safe and efficacious anesthetic for circumcision.

scholarly journals A Phase 1 Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Safety, Immunogenicity and Genetic Stability of a New Potential Pandemic H7N9 Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine in Healthy Adults

Vaccines ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 296
Author(s):  
Irina Kiseleva ◽  
Irina Isakova-Sivak ◽  
Marina Stukova ◽  
Marianna Erofeeva ◽  
Svetlana Donina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Influenza Vaccine ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Healthy Adults ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Human Influenza Virus ◽  
Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine

This study describes a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled phase I clinical trial in healthy adults of a new potential pandemic H7N9 live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) based on the human influenza virus of Yangtze River Delta hemagglutinin lineage (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03739229). Two doses of H7N9 LAIV or placebo were administered intranasally to 30 and 10 subjects, respectively. The vaccine was well-tolerated and not associated with increased rates of adverse events or with any serious adverse events. Vaccine virus was detected in nasal swabs during the 6 days after vaccination or revaccination. A lower frequency of shedding was observed after the second vaccination. Twenty-five clinical viral isolates obtained after the first and second doses of vaccine retained the temperature-sensitive and cold-adapted phenotypic characteristics of LAIV. There was no confirmed transmission of the vaccine strain from vaccinees to placebo recipients. After the two H7N9 LAIV doses, an immune response was observed in 96.6% of subjects in at least one of the assays conducted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document