Transcription recycling assays identify PAF1 as a driver for RNA Pol II recycling

RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) transcriptional recycling is a mechanism for which the required factors and contributions to overall gene expression levels are poorly understood. We describe an in vitro methodology facilitating unbiased identification of putative RNA Pol II transcriptional recycling factors and quantitative measurement of transcriptional output from recycled transcriptional components. Proof-of-principle experiments identified PAF1 complex components among recycling factors and detected defective transcriptional output from Pol II recycling following PAF1 depletion. Dynamic ChIP-seq confirmed PAF1 silencing triggered defective Pol II recycling in human cells. Prostate tumors exhibited enhanced transcriptional recycling, which was attenuated by antibody-based PAF1 depletion. These findings identify Pol II recycling as a potential target in cancer and demonstrate the applicability of in vitro and cellular transcription assays to characterize Pol II recycling in other disease states.

Polyamines and eIF5A hypusination facilitate SREBP2 translation and cholesterol synthesis to enhance enterovirus attachment and infection

Metabolism is key to cellular processes that ultimately underly the ability of a virus to productively infect a cell. Polyamines are small metabolites that are vital for many host cell processes including cellular proliferation, transcription, and translation, and these molecules are also key in virus infection. Depletion of polyamines inhibits viral infection via diverse mechanisms, including by inhibiting polymerase activity, cellular attachment, and translation of viral proteins. The precise mechanisms underlying many of these phenotypes remain to be understood. We have shown previously that Coxsackievirus B3 requires polyamines for attachment and protease function; however, the mechanism behind this is unknown. Here, we report that polyamines' involvement in translation, through a process called hypusination, globally affects expression of cholesterol synthesis genes by supporting SREBP2 translation, the master transcriptional regulator of cholesterol synthesis genes. By measuring bulk cellular transcription, we found that polyamines enhance the expression of a wide variety of cholesterol synthesis genes, ultimately regulated by SREBP2. The net effect of polyamine depletion on cells negatively impacts CVB3 attachment and replication in polyamine depleted cells by depleting cellular cholesterol. Exogenous cholesterol rescues CVB3 binding and replication, and mutant CVB3 resistant to polyamine depletion exhibits resistance to cholesterol perturbation. This study provides a novel link between polyamine synthesis and cholesterol homeostasis that explains data seen in animals and provides a mechanism through which polyamines impact CVB3 infection.

Structure of the human RNA polymerase I elongation complex

Eukaryotic RNA polymerase I (Pol I) transcribes ribosomal DNA and generates RNA for ribosome synthesis. Pol I accounts for the majority of cellular transcription activity and dysregulation of Pol I transcription leads to cancers and ribosomopathies. Despite extensive structural studies of yeast Pol I, structure of human Pol I remains unsolved. Here we determined the structures of the human Pol I in the pre-translocation, post-translocation, and backtracked states at near-atomic resolution. The single-subunit peripheral stalk lacks contacts with the DNA-binding clamp and is more flexible than the two-subunit stalk in yeast Pol I. Compared to yeast Pol I, human Pol I possesses a more closed clamp, which makes more contacts with DNA. The Pol I structure in the post-cleavage backtracked state shows that the C-terminal zinc ribbon of RPA12 inserts into an open funnel and facilitates “dinucleotide cleavage” on mismatched DNA–RNA hybrid. Critical disease-associated mutations are mapped on Pol I regions that are involved in catalysis and complex organization. In summary, the structures provide new sights into human Pol I complex organization and efficient proofreading.

Sequestration of RBM10 in Nuclear Bodies: Targeting Sequences and Biological Significance

RBM10 is an RNA-binding protein that regulates alternative splicing (AS). It localizes to the extra-nucleolar nucleoplasm and S1-1 nuclear bodies (NBs) in the nucleus. We investigated the biological significance of this localization in relation to its molecular function. Our analyses, employing deletion mutants, revealed that RBM10 possesses two S1-1 NB-targeting sequences (NBTSs), one in the KEKE motif region and another in the C2H2 Zn finger (ZnF). These NBTSs act synergistically to localize RBM10 to S1-1 NBs. The C2H2 ZnF not only acts as an NBTS, but is also essential for AS regulation by RBM10. Moreover, RBM10 does not participate in S1-1 NB formation, and without alterations of RBM10 protein levels, its NB-localization changes, increasing as cellular transcriptional activity declines, and vice versa. These results indicate that RBM10 is a transient component of S1-1 NBs and is sequestered in NBs via its NBTSs when cellular transcription decreases. We propose that the C2H2 ZnF exerts its NB-targeting activity when RBM10 is unbound by pre-mRNAs, and that NB-localization of RBM10 is a mechanism to control its AS activity in the nucleus.

ZBTB2 represses HIV-1 transcription and is regulated by HIV-1 Vpr and cellular DNA damage responses

Previously, we reported that cellular transcription factor ZASC1 facilitates DNA-dependent/RNA-independent recruitment of HIV-1 TAT and the cellular elongation factor P-TEFb to the HIV-1 promoter and is a critical factor in regulating HIV-1 transcriptional elongation (PLoS Path e1003712). Here we report that cellular transcription factor ZBTB2 is a novel repressor of HIV-1 gene expression. ZBTB2 strongly co-immunoprecipitated with ZASC1 and was dramatically relocalized by ZASC1 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. Mutations abolishing ZASC1/ZBTB2 interaction prevented ZBTB2 nuclear relocalization. We show that ZBTB2-induced repression depends on interaction of cellular histone deacetylases (HDACs) with the ZBTB2 POZ domain. Further, ZASC1 interaction specifically recruited ZBTB2 to the HIV-1 promoter, resulting in histone deacetylation and transcription repression. Depleting ZBTB2 by siRNA knockdown or CRISPR/CAS9 knockout in T cell lines enhanced transcription from HIV-1 vectors lacking Vpr, but not from these vectors expressing Vpr. Since HIV-1 Vpr activates the viral LTR by inducing the ATR kinase/DNA damage response pathway, we investigated ZBTB2 response to Vpr and DNA damaging agents. Expressing Vpr or stimulating the ATR pathway with DNA damaging agents impaired ZASC1’s ability to localize ZBTB2 to the nucleus. Moreover, the effects of DNA damaging agents and Vpr on ZBTB2 localization could be blocked by ATR kinase inhibitors. Critically, Vpr and DNA damaging agents decreased ZBTB2 binding to the HIV-1 promoter and increased promoter histone acetylation. Thus, ZBTB2 is recruited to the HIV-1 promoter by ZASC1 and represses transcription, but ATR pathway activation leads to ZBTB2 removal from the promoter, cytoplasmic sequestration and activation of viral transcription. Together, our data show that ZASC1/ZBTB2 integrate the functions of TAT and Vpr to maximize HIV-1 gene expression.

The XPB Subunit of the TFIIH Complex Plays a Critical Role in HIV-1 Transcription and XPB Inhibition by Spironolactone Prevents HIV-1 Reactivation from Latency

HIV transcription requires assembly of cellular transcription factors at the HIV-1promoter. The TFIIH general transcription factor facilitates transcription initiation by opening the DNA strands around the transcription start site and phosphorylating the C-terminal domain for RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) for activation. Spironolactone (SP), an FDA approved aldosterone antagonist, triggers the proteasomal degradation of the XPB subunit of TFIIH, and concurrently suppresses acute HIV infection in vitro. Here we investigated SP as a possible block-and-lock agent for a functional cure aimed at the transcriptional silencing of the viral reservoir. The long-term activity of SP was investigated in primary and cell line models of HIV-1 latency and reactivation. We show that SP rapidly inhibits HIV-1 transcription by reducing RNAPII recruitment to the HIV-1 genome. shRNA knockdown of XPB confirmed XPB degradation as the mechanism of action. Unfortunately, long-term pre-treatment with SP does not result in epigenetic suppression of HIV upon SP treatment interruption, since virus rapidly rebounds when XPB reemerges; however, SP alone without ART maintains the transcriptional suppression. Importantly, SP inhibits HIV reactivation from latency in both cell line models and resting CD4+T cells isolated from aviremic infected individuals upon cell stimulation with latency reversing agents. Furthermore, long-term treatment with concentrations of SP that potently degrade XPB does not lead to global dysregulation of cellular mRNA expression. Overall, these results suggest that XPB plays a key role in HIV transcriptional regulation and XPB degradation by SP strengthens the potential of HIV transcriptional inhibitors in block-and-lock HIV cure approaches. IMPORTANCE Antiretroviral therapy (ART) effectively reduces an individual’s HIV loads to below the detection limit, nevertheless rapid viral rebound immediately ensues upon treatment interruption. Furthermore, virally suppressed individuals experience chronic immune activation from ongoing low-level virus expression. Thus, the importance of identifying novel therapeutics to explore in block-and-lock HIV functional cure approaches, aimed at the transcriptional and epigenetic silencing of the viral reservoir to block reactivation from latency. We investigated the potential of repurposing the FDA-approved spironolactone (SP), as one such drug. SP treatment rapidly degrades a host transcription factor subunit, XPB, inhibiting HIV transcription and blocking reactivation from latency. Long-term SP treatment does not affect cellular viability, cell cycle progression or global cellular transcription. SP alone blocks HIV transcription in the absence of ART but does not delay rebound upon drug removal as XPB rapidly reemerges. This study highlights XPB as a novel drug target in block-and-lock therapeutic approaches.

Y44A Mutation in the Acidic Domain of HIV-2 Tat Impairs Viral Reverse Transcription and LTR-Transactivation

HIV transactivator protein (Tat) plays a pivotal role in viral replication through modulation of cellular transcription factors and transactivation of viral genomic transcription. The effect of HIV-1 Tat on reverse transcription has long been described in the literature, however, that of HIV-2 is understudied. Sequence homology between Tat proteins of HIV-1 and 2 is estimated to be less than 30%, and the main difference lies within their N-terminal region. Here, we describe Y44A-inactivating mutation of HIV-2 Tat, studying its effect on capsid production, reverse transcription, and the efficiency of proviral transcription. Investigation of the mutation was performed using sequence- and structure-based in silico analysis and in vitro experiments. Our results indicate that the Y44A mutant HIV-2 Tat inhibited the activity and expression of RT (reverse transcriptase), in addition to diminishing Tat-dependent LTR (long terminal repeat) transactivation. These findings highlight the functional importance of the acidic domain of HIV-2 Tat in the regulation of reverse transcription and transactivation of the integrated provirions.

Contribution of HDAC3 to transcriptional repression by the human papillomavirus 31 E8^E2 protein

Human papillomaviruses (HPV) such as HPV16 and HPV31 encode an E8^E2 protein that acts as a repressor of viral replication and transcription. E8^E2′s repression activities are mediated via the interaction with host-cell NCoR (nuclear receptor corepressor)/SMRT (silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid receptors) corepressor complexes, which consist of NCoR, its homologue SMRT, GPS2 (G-protein pathway suppressor 2), HDAC3 (histone deacetylase 3), TBL1 (transducin b-like protein 1) and its homologue TBLR1 (TBL1-related protein 1). We now provide evidence that transcriptional repression by HPV31 E8^E2 is NCoR/SMRT-dependent but surprisingly always HDAC3-independent when analysing different HPV promoters. This is in contrast to the majority of several cellular transcription factors using NCoR/SMRT complexes whose transcriptional repression activities are both NCoR/SMRT- and HDAC3-dependent. However, NCoR/SMRT-dependent but HDAC3-independent repression has been described for specific cellular genes, suggesting that this may not be specific for HPV promoters but could be a feature of a subset of NCoR/SMRT-HDAC3 regulated genes.

IFI16, a nuclear innate immune DNA sensor, mediates epigenetic silencing of herpesvirus genomes by its association with H3K9 methyltransferases SUV39H1 and GLP

IFI16, an innate immune DNA sensor, recognizes the nuclear episomal herpes viral genomes and induces the inflammasome and interferon-β responses. IFI16 also regulates cellular transcription and act as a DNA virus restriction factor. IFI16 knockdown disrupted the latency of Kaposi’s sarcoma associated herpesvirus (KSHV) and induced lytic transcripts. However, the mechanism of IFI16’s transcription regulation is unknown. Here, we show that IFI16 is in complex with the H3K9 methyltransferase SUV39H1 and GLP and recruits them to the KSHV genome during de novo infection and latency. The resulting depositions of H3K9me2/me3 serve as a docking site for the heterochromatin-inducing HP1α protein leading into the IFI16-dependent epigenetic modifications and silencing of KSHV lytic genes. These studies suggest that IFI16’s interaction with H3K9MTases is one of the potential mechanisms by which IFI16 regulates transcription and establish an important paradigm of an innate immune sensor’s involvement in epigenetic silencing of foreign DNA.

Regional Gene Repression by DNA Double-Strand Breaks in G1 Phase Cells

ABSTRACT DNA damage responses (DDR) to double-strand breaks (DSBs) alter cellular transcription programs at the genome-wide level. Through processes that are less well understood, DSBs also alter transcriptional responses locally, which may be important for efficient DSB repair. Here, we developed an approach to elucidate the cis-acting responses to DSBs in G1 phase cells. We found that DSBs within a gene body silence its expression, as well as the transcription of local undamaged genes at a distance defined by the spread of γ-H2AX from the DSB. Importantly, DSBs not only repress ongoing transcription but also block the inducible expression of regional genes. DSB-mediated transcriptional repression depends on DDR signaling but does not require the generation of inaccessible chromatin. Our findings demonstrate that in G1 phase cells, DDR signaling establishes a robust and extensive region of transcriptional repression spreading from DSB sites and introduce an approach to study the mechanistic impact of targeted DNA breaks in nearly any chromatin environment.