scholarly journals Cancer immunotherapy-associated hypophysitis

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (27) ◽  
pp. 3159-3169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franklin Castillero ◽  
Omar Castillo-Fernández ◽  
Geiner Jiménez-Jiménez ◽  
José Fallas-Ramírez ◽  
Marco P Peralta-Álvarez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Event ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Current Data ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

The advances in cancer therapy have included the development of drugs that inhibit immune checkpoint ligands. Two types of immune checkpoint inhibitors, both antibodies that target CTLA-4 and PD-1, have been approved for its use in NSCLC and melanoma as first-line or second-line therapy. Sadly, not desirable consequences of immunotherapy are immune-related adverse events. immune-related hypophysitis is the most common endocrine adverse event after thyroid disfunction. The particularity of endocrine immune-related adverse events is their non-reversibility, with incidence and prevalence destined to increase in the coming years, particularly if this form of therapy is used in the future for earlier stages of cancer. Therefore, hypophysitis represents a challenge for the physician, sometimes occurring without specific symptomatology and which should be considered for clinical management. In this review, we describe the current data regarding the pathophysiology and management for immune-related hypophysitis.

scholarly journals Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for the Treatment of Bladder Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 131
Author(s):  
Antonio Lopez-Beltran ◽  
Alessia Cimadamore ◽  
Ana Blanca ◽  
Francesco Massari ◽  
Nuno Vau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Durable Response ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

A number of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved as first-line therapy in case of cisplatin-ineligible patients or as second-line therapy for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) of the bladder. About 30% of patients with mUC will respond to ICIs immunotherapy. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression detected by immunohistochemistry seems to predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with mUC as supported by the objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS) associated with the response observed in most clinical trials. Pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, demonstrated better OS respective to chemotherapy in a randomized phase 3 study for second-line treatment of mUC. Nivolumab, a PD-1 antibody, also demonstrated an OS benefit when compared to controls. Atezolizumab, Durvalumab, and Avelumab antibodies targeting PD-L1 have also received approval as second-line treatments for mUC with durable response for more than 1 year in selected patients. Atezolizumab and Pembrolizumab also received approval for first-line treatment of patients that are ineligible for cisplatin. A focus on the utility of ICIs in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting, or as combination with chemotherapy, is the basis of some ongoing trials. The identification of a clinically useful biomarker, single or in association, to determine the optimal ICIs treatment for patients with mUC is very much needed as emphasized by the current literature. In this review, we examined relevant clinical trial results with ICIs in patients with mUC alone or as part of drug combinations; emphasis is also placed on the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting. The current landscape of selected biomarkers of response to ICIs including anti-PD-L1 immunohistochemistry is also briefly reviewed.

Combination of biomarker and clinicopathologic characters to circle out beneficiaries through second-line immunotherapy: A meta analyse.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14535-e14535
Author(s):  
C Zhang ◽  
Wenzhao Zhong ◽  
Zhong yi Dong ◽  
Yi-Long Wu
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

e14535 Background: Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression had been proposed as predictive biomarker to immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Yet treatment responses are not always consistent with this single agent in the second-line therapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Whether combination of PD-L1 and clinicopathologic characters could circle out optimal beneficiaries are still unknown. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of randomized control trials that compared immune-checkpoint inhibitors against chemotherapy in second-line therapy. Data including smoking status, EGFR status, KRAS status and histology were extracted as subgroup analyse to estimate the potential predictor of efficacy for anti PD-1/L1. Results: Five clinical trials that compared immune-checkpoint inhibitors against chemotherapy for second-line therapy were included. Both PD-L1 positive (HR = 0.64, 95%CI = 0.56-0.73, P < 0.00001) and PD-L1 negative (HR = 0.88, 95%CI = 0.78-1.00, P = 0.05) favored anti PD-1/L1. Subgroup analyse indicated that adenocarcinoma (ADC) as well as squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) preferred anti PD-1/L1. Never smokers may not benefit from anti PD-1/L1 but current/ever smokers did (HR = 0.70, 95%CI = 0.63-0.79, P < 0.00001). Patients with EGFR mutation could not gain benefit from anti PD-1/L1 while the EGFR wild type could (HR = 0.67, 95%CI = 0.60-0.76, P < 0.00001). Both KRAS mutation (HR = 0.60, 95%CI = 0.39-0.92, P = 0.02) and wild type/unknown (HR = 0.81, 95%CI = 0.67-0.97, P = 0.02) were apt to anti PD-1/L1. Conclusions: Regardless of PD-L1 status, immune-checkpoint inhibitors could achieve better efficacy than chemotherapy in second-line therapy. Current/ever smokers without EGFR mutations may benefit more from anti PD-1/L1. Combination of PD-L1 and strongly relevant clinicopathologic characters should be considered to tailor optimal patients for anti PD-1/L1.

Efficacy and Toxicity of Addition of Bevacizumab to Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 718-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Cong Ruan ◽  
Yue-Ping Che ◽  
Li Ding ◽  
Hai-Feng Li
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Event ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Clinical Prognosis ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Pre-treated patients with first-line treatment can be offered a second treatment with the aim of improving their poor clinical prognosis. The therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who did not respond to first-line therapy has limited treatment options. Recently, many studies have paid much attention to the efficacy of bevacizumab as an adjuvant treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy compared with bevacizumab-naive based chemotherapy as second-line treatment in people with metastatic CRC. Methods: Electronic databases were searched for eligible studies updated to March 2018. Randomized-controlled trials comparing addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy without bevacizumab in MCRC patients were included, of which, the main interesting results were the efficacy and safety profiles of the addition of bevacizumab in patients with MCRC as second-line therapy. Result: Five trials were eligible in the meta-analysis. Patients who received the combined bevacizumab and chemotherapy treatment in MCRC as second-line therapy showed a longer overall survival (OS) (OR=0.80,95%CI=0.72-0.89, P<0.0001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (OR=0.69,95%CI=0.61-0.77, P<0.00001). In addition, there was no significant difference in objective response rate (ORR) (RR=1.36,95%CI=0.82-2.24, P=0.23) or severe adverse event (SAE) (RR=1.02,95%CI=0.88-1.19, P=0.78) between bevacizumab-based chemotherapy and bevacizumabnaive based chemotherapy. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the addition of bevacizumab to the chemotherapy therapy could be an efficient and safe treatment option for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer as second-line therapy and without increasing the risk of an adverse event.

scholarly journals Treatments of Advanced Non‑Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) in an Italian Center: Drug Utilization and the Treatment Costs of Innovative Drugs

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francovito Piantedosi ◽  
Raffaela Cerisoli ◽  
Ciro Battiloro ◽  
Francesca Andreozzi ◽  
Fabiana Vitiello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Multivariate Analyses ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Target Therapy ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line

AIM: To provide an updated picture of the therapies most commonly used in the advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) setting, together with the relevant costs.METHODS: This study considered the clinical records of patients affected by stage IIIb and IV NSCLC treated in the AORN dei Colli - Plesso Monaldi in Naples during the period January 2016-July 2017 and diagnosed since 2014, as well as the pathology lab database. Multivariate analyses were performed in order to identify the main predictors of time to next treatment and the main cost drivers.RESULTS: Data were collected on 575 patients, who were mainly affected by adenocarcinoma (62%) and squamous cell carcinoma (34%). 64% of patients were reported having been tested for molecular biomarkers (among the patients tested, 13% were EGFR+, 4% Alk t, and 1% ROS1 t). In accordance with the international guidelines, chemotherapy – as single agent or platinum-based doublets – was the prevalent first-line treatment, except among EGFR+ and ROS1 t patients, for whom the target therapy was authorized as first-line therapy. As second-line treatment, the target therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab) were the most commonly used treatments. Drug expenditure per patient was remarkably higher in mutated patients (€ 29,053) versus wild-type patients, or patients with unknown mutational status (€ 11,854), who received just chemotherapy. The costs sustained in 2017 are proportionally higher than those sustained in 2016, mainlydue to the increasing eligibility to target therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors and the wider biomarker analysis performed. From multivariate analyses, among the predictors of a longer time to next treatment (TTNT) were a better performance status and target therapy both in first and second line. The therapy for squamous cell carcinoma and other nonadeno histotypes turned out to be less expensive in patients treated just in the first line than that for adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the second line results in increased costs compared to the use of chemotherapy. Also the target therapy in the first line results in an increase in the total costs with respect to chemotherapy in patients who received just a first-line therapy.CONCLUSIONS: Generally, in this study population, the treatments administered are in accordance with the international guidelines. The costs borne by the Health Systems are higher for the target therapy and the immune checkpoint inhibitors.

scholarly journals Pericardial Toxicities Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Pharmacovigilance Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhuo Ma ◽  
Jie Pei ◽  
Ximu Sun ◽  
Lihong Liu ◽  
Wenchao Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Event ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Reporting System ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Adverse Event Reporting System ◽  
Adverse Event Reporting ◽  
Interquartile Range ◽  
Event Reporting

Introdution: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly improved clinical outcomes for a wide range of cancers but can also lead to serious or fatal immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Although ICI-related pericardial toxicities have been reported, the clinical features are not well characterized in real-world studies.Objective: To characterize the main features of ICI-related pericardial toxicities and identify factors associated with death.Methods: Data from January 1, 2011 to March 31, 2020 in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database were retrieved for disproportionality analysis. We used the reporting odds ratio and the information component (IC) to evaluate the association between ICIs and pericardial adverse events. Clinical characteristics of patients with ICI-associated pericardial toxicities were collected and compared between fatal and non-fatal groups. The time to onset following different ICI regimens was further investigated.Results: We identified a total of 705 ICI-associated pericardial toxicities which appeared to influence more men (53.90%) than women (36.03%), with a median age of 63 (interquartile range [IQR] 54–69) years. Patients with lung cancer accounted for the largest proportion (55.6%). ICI therapies were detected with pharmacovigilance signals of pericardial toxicities, corresponding to IC025 = 2.11 and ROR 4.87 [4.51–5.25]. Nevertheless, there was a lack of association between anti-CTLA-4 and pericardial toxicities. There was no difference in onset time among all ICI regimens. However, TTO of fatal cases (25 days (interquartile range [IQR] 6–70)) occurred statistically earlier than non-fatal cases (42 days (IQR 12–114), p = 0.003).Conclusion: ICI monotherapy (PD-1/PD-L1 therapy) and combination therapy can lead to pericardial toxicities that can result in serious outcomes and tend to occur early. Early recognition and management of ICI-related pericardial disorders should attract clinical attention. The findings require further clinical surveillance for the quantification.

scholarly journals Cardiotoxicity Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Pharmacovigilance Study From 2014 to 2019 Based on FAERS

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chenxin Chen ◽  
Ting Chen ◽  
Jizhou Liang ◽  
Xiaojing Guo ◽  
Jinfang Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Event ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Adverse Event Reporting System ◽  
Adverse Event Reporting ◽  
Cardiac Complications ◽  
Cardiac Adverse Events

This study was to scientifically and systematically explore the association between cardiotoxicity and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and also to characterize the spectrum of ICI-related cardiac complications. From the first quarter of 2014 to the fourth quarter of 2019, data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database were selected to conduct the disproportionality analysis. Reporting odds ratios and information components were used to evaluate the signal after statistical shrinkage transformation. In total, 7,443,137 cases and 36,326,611 drug-adverse event pairs were collected, among which 9,271 cases were identified to be related to ICI-induced cardiotoxicities. The number of male patients was much higher than that of females (5,579 vs. 3,031) and males presented a slightly higher reporting frequency than females in general, which was statistically significant (ROR = 1.04, 95%CI: 0.99–1.09, p &lt; 0.001). Simultaneously, the proportion of serious or life-threatening outcomes in males was significantly higher than in females (ROR = 1.05, 95%CI: 0.96–1.15, p &lt; 0.001). Importantly, ICIs were associated with over-reporting frequencies of cardiotoxicities in general (ROR025 = 1.06, IC025 = 0.08). PD-1 and PD-L1 were found to be related to cardiac adverse events, corresponding to ROR025 = 1.06, IC025 = 0.08, and ROR025 = 1.06, IC025 = 0.08, respectively, while anti-CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4) was significantly associated with some specific adverse events rather than common adverse events. The spectrum of cardiotoxicities induced by ICIs mostly differed among individual agents, but also demonstrated some common features. Dyspnea (N = 2,527, 21.25%), myocarditis (N = 614, 5.16%), atrial fibrillation (N = 576, 4.84%), cardiac failure (N = 476, 4.00%), and pericardial effusion (N = 423, 3.56%) were the top five cardiac adverse events reported in the database. Among them, myocarditis was the only one caused by all ICIs with strong signal value and high risk, warranting further attention. Overall, this investigation mainly showed the profile of cardiotoxicities caused by ICIs, which varied between different ICI therapies, but also shared some similarities in specific symptoms such as myocarditis. Therefore, it is vital and urgent to recognize and manage ICI-related cardiotoxicities, known to frequently occur in clinical practice, at the earliest point.

scholarly journals Timing of immune checkpoint inhibitors for metastatic patients over 75 years of age: the earlier the better

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry Landre ◽  
Gaetan Des Guetz ◽  
Kader Chouahnia ◽  
Virginie Fossey-Diaz ◽  
Stéphane Culine
Keyword(s):  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Line Setting ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The impact of ageing on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) effectiveness remains controversial. However, data from clinical studies do not show any difference between patients over 65 years and those under 65 years. We focused our study on patients over 75 and looked at the potential impact of timing in the use of ICIs. Methods We performed a meta-analysis of published randomized control trials (RCTs) concerning ICIs versus standard therapy in patients with advanced solid tumors. Overall Survival (OS) among the older (≥75 years) was compared with that of younger patients (< 75 years). Hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% confidence interval (CI) were collected and pooled. Results Fifteen phase III studies evaluating anti-PD-1(nivolumab or pembrolizumab), anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab or avelumab) or anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab) were included. Patients were enrolled for Non-Small-Cell-Lung-Cancer, Renal-Cell-Carcinoma, Melanoma, Head-and-Neck-Squamous-Cell-Carcinoma or Gastric Cancer. Eight studies assessed treatment in first-line setting and seven in the second line. The median age was 64 years, with 906 patients over 75 years of age and 5233 youngers. In first-line setting, HRs for death were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.61-0.99) in patients ≥75 years versus 0.84 (95% CI: 0.71-1.00) in younger. In second line setting, HRs for death were 1.02 (95% CI: 0.77-1.36) in patients ≥75 years versus 0.68 (95% CI: 0.61-0.75) in younger with a statistically significant difference observed between subgroups (p interaction = 0.009). Conclusions ICIs appears to be effective in patients over 75 years of age. However, the survival benefit is mainly observed in first-line treatment.

Association between antibiotic exposure and survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with nivolumab.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16186-e16186
Author(s):  
Kanan Alshammari ◽  
Futoon Alsugheir ◽  
Mohammad Aldawoud ◽  
Ashwaq Alolayan ◽  
Mohammad Ahmad Algarni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Number Of Patients

e16186 Background: Nivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, has improved the outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It is approved for HCC patients previously treated with sorafenib. Outcomes have been reported in previous studies, in malignancies other than HCC, to be worse when patients have been exposed to antibiotics while receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. We aimed to evaluate the effects of antibiotics on survival in HCC patients treated with nivolumab. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 59 patients with advanced HCC that have been treated with nivolumab in two academic centers in Saudi Arabia. Patient characteristics, tumor data, antibiotic use (2 weeks prior, during, and 4 weeks after nivolumab therapy), survival data, and other factors were collected. Log-rank test analysis was performed to test the difference in overall survival (OS) time with and without antibiotics use. Results: The majority of patients were males (n=51, 85%), and 38 were Child-Pugh A (64%). A large number of patients had Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C tumors (n=42, 71%), and 20 patients (34%) used antibiotics. Most patients received nivolumab as second-line therapy after exposure to sorafenib (n=49, 83%). In patients who received nivolumab as first- or second-line therapy (n=57) and did not receive antibiotics, the median OS was double that of patients who received antibiotics (10 vs. 4.5 months, P=0.04). In child A patients who received nivolumab as second-line therapy (n=32), those who were exposed to antibiotics had a statistically significant shorter median OS compared to those who did not (5.5 vs. 20 months, P=0.04). More patients achieved partial response, or complete response (as per modified RECIST criteria) in the cohort that did not receive antibiotics compared to patients who received antibiotics (21% vs. 15%) but that was not statistically significant (P=0.6). Conclusions: This study shows that HCC patients receiving nivolumab have worse survival if they received antibiotics. Antibiotic mediated alteration of the gut microbiome may impact nivolumab response and shorten patient survival. Although this finding may warrant a prospective larger study but it is consistent with other previous studies. Antibiotics should be used very cautiously when treatment with checkpoint inhibitors is considered.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document