scholarly journals TremelImumab and Durvalumab Combination for the Non-OperatIve Management (NOM) of Microsatellite InstabiliTY (MSI)-High Resectable Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: The Multicentre, Single-Arm, Multi-Cohort, Phase II INFINITY Study

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2839
Author(s):  
Alessandra Raimondi ◽  
Federica Palermo ◽  
Michele Prisciandaro ◽  
Massimo Aglietta ◽  
Lorenzo Antonuzzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
High Rate ◽  
High Status ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy ◽  
Non Operative Management

In resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC), the powerful positive prognostic effect and the potential predictive value for a lack of benefit from the combination of adjuvant/peri-operative chemotherapy for the MSI-high status was demonstrated. Given the high sensitivity of MSI-high tumors for immunotherapy, exploratory trials showed that combination immunotherapy induces a high rate of complete pathological response (pCR), potentially achieving cancer cure without surgery. INFINITY is an ongoing phase II, multicentre, single-arm, multi-cohort trial investigating the activity and safety of tremelimumab and durvalumab as neoadjuvant (Cohort 1) or potentially definitive (Cohort 2) treatment for MSI-high/dMMR/EBV-negative, resectable GC/GEJC. About 310 patients will be pre-screened, to enroll a total of 31 patients, 18 and 13 in Cohort 1 and 2, at 25 Italian Centres. The primary endpoint of Cohort 1 is rate of pCR (ypT0N0) and negative ctDNA after neoadjuvant immunotherapy, of Cohort 2 is 2-year complete response rate, defined as absence of macroscopic or microscopic residual disease (locally/regionally/distantly) at radiological examinations, tissue and liquid biopsy, during non-operative management without salvage gastrectomy. The ongoing INFINITY proof-of-concept study may provide evidence on immunotherapy and the potential omission of surgery in localized/locally advanced GC/GEJC patients selected for dMMR/MSI-high status eligible for radical resection.

scholarly journals A Phase II Trial of Adjuvant Durvalumab Following Trimodality Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: A Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirva Mamdani ◽  
Bryan Schneider ◽  
Susan M. Perkins ◽  
Heather N. Burney ◽  
Pashtoon Murtaza Kasi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
M2 Macrophages ◽  
Activated T Cells ◽  
Trimodality Therapy ◽  
Surgical Specimen

BackgroundMost patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma (AC) receive concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) followed by esophagectomy. The majority of patients do not achieve pathologic complete response (pCR) with neoadjuvant CRT, and the relapse rate is high among these patients.MethodsWe conducted a phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02639065) evaluating the efficacy and safety of PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab in patients with locally advanced esophageal and GEJ AC who have undergone neoadjuvant CRT followed by R0 resection with evidence of persistent residual disease in the surgical specimen. Patients received durvalumab 1500 mg IV every 4 weeks for up to 1 year. The primary endpoint was 1-year relapse free survival (RFS). Secondary endpoint was safety and tolerability of durvalumab following trimodality therapy. Exploratory endpoints included correlation of RFS with PD-L1 expression, HER-2 expression, and tumor immune cell population.ResultsThirty-seven patients were enrolled. The majority (64.9%) had pathologically positive lymph nodes. The most common treatment related adverse events were fatigue (27%), diarrhea (18.9%), arthralgia (16.2%), nausea (16.2%), pruritus (16.2%), cough (10.8%), and increase in AST/ALT/bilirubin (10.8%). Three (8.1%) patients developed grade 3 immune mediated adverse events. One-year RFS was 73% (95% CI, 56–84%) with median RFS of 21 months (95% CI, 14–40.4 months). Patients with GEJ AC had a trend toward superior 1-year RFS compared to those with esophageal AC (83% vs. 63%, p = 0.1534). There was a numerical trend toward superior 1-year RFS among patients with PD-L1 positive disease compared to those with PD-L1 negative disease, using CPS of ≥10 (100% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.1551) and ≥1 (84.2% vs. 61.1%, p = 0.1510) cutoffs. A higher relative proportion of M2 macrophages and CD4 memory activated T cells was associated with improved RFS (HR = 0.16; 95% CI, 0.05–0.59; p = 0.0053; and HR = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15–0.93, p = 0.0351, respectively).ConclusionsAdjuvant durvalumab in patients with residual disease in the surgical specimen following trimodality therapy for locally advanced esophageal and GEJ AC led to clinically meaningful improvement in 1-year RFS compared to historical control rate. Higher PD-L1 expression may have a correlation with the efficacy of durvalumab in this setting. Higher proportion of M2 macrophages and CD4 memory activated T cells was associated with superior RFS.

Chemotherapy first, followed by chemoradiation (CRT) and then surgery, in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3605-3605
Author(s):  
Andrea Cercek ◽  
Karyn A. Goodman ◽  
Carla Hajj ◽  
Emily Weisberger ◽  
Neil Howard Segal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Response ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Complete Clinical Response ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy ◽  
Non Operative Management

3605 Background: Standard pre-op CRT and post-op chemo for LARC delays the start of optimal systemic therapy by 18-22 weeks. To more promptly address micrometastases that could lead to distant failure, and supported by evidence of excellent primary tumor response to FOLFOX, we began offering FOLFOX as initial treatment for patients (pts) with high-risk LARC. More recently, we have begun offering all planned FOLFOX prior to CRT and surgery. Methods: We obtained an IRB waiver to review records of all clinical stage II/III RC pts treated with initial FOLFOX followed by CRT and total mesorectal excision (TME) at our institution between 2007 and 2012. Of approximately 300 rectal pts treated with CMT, 61 received some or all of their planned FOLFOX as initial therapy. Results: The median age of these 61 pts was 52 years, 54% male. At diagnosis, 84% had T3N1-2 or T4N0-1 tumors and 16% had T3N0 tumors. Of these, 57 received induction FOLFOX (median 7 cycles) then received pre-op CRT, while 4 pts achieved an excellent response to chemotherapy alone, declined CRT, and went directly to TME. Twelve pts did not undergo surgery; 9 had a complete clinical response and elected to be managed non-operatively; 1 refused recommended surgery despite incomplete tumor regression, 1 had surgery deferred due to comorbidities, and 1 developed distant metastatic disease prior to planned surgery. Of the 61 patients, 19 (31%) had either a pathCR (14) or a complete clinical response (5) leading to non-operative management. Of the 49 pts who underwent TME, all had R0 resections and 23 (47%) had tumor response >90%, including 13 (27%) with pathCR. Of the 28 patients who received all 8 cycles of initial FOLFOX, 8 achieved a pathCR (29%) and 3 achieved a complete clinical responses (11%), managed non-operatively. All patients completed therapy as planned. There were no SAEs requiring delay in treatment during either FOLFOX or CMT. Conclusions: FOLFOX before CRT results in substantial tumor regression, a high rate of delivery of all planned therapy, and a substantial rate of pathCRs. Chemo and CMT before planned TME provides a favorable opportunity for consideration of non-operative management.

Phase II trial of preoperative (POP) irinotecan (I) + cisplatin (C) and radiotherapy for esophageal cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4056-4056
Author(s):  
A. L. Visbal ◽  
G. Darling ◽  
R. Wong ◽  
M. Guindi ◽  
J. Hornby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Thoracic Esophagus

4056 Background: Esophagectomy (E) for locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC) yields limited survival; this phase II trial assess feasibility and efficacy of induction chemo-radiotherapy followed by E. Methods: Patients (pts) with LAEC of the thoracic esophagus (TE) or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), ECOG PS ≤ 2 and surgical candidates underwent POP I (65mg/m2) + C (30mg/m2) on weeks 1,2,4,5,7,8 + concurrent conformal radiotherapy (40Gy/20 fractions (F) during wk 4–7) and external beam boost (10Gy/5F on wk 8); E was performed on wk 12–16 after restaging. Pts receiving 75% of POP chemotherapy were eligible for pathologic (p) evaluation; planned sample size 36 nonM1A pts. Results: 52 pts enrolled from 11/02 to 12/05, mean age 60 yr (33–79), male:40, GEJ:TE/15:37; 37 adenocarcinoma, 13 SCC, 2 other; 13 pts were stage IIA, 7 IIB, 22 III, and 10 IVA. Toxicity during POP treatment included ANC (G3/4:36%), febrile neutropenia (9%), diarrhea (G3:9%), nausea (G3:6%), esophagitis (G3:2%) and anorexia (G3/4:15%); 3 pts stopped treatment due to toxicity, 2 withdrew, 2 progressed becoming non-operable, 1 died of a stroke and 1 from central line sepsis. Clinical response by RECIST was CR:2%, PR:30%, SD:62% and PD in 6%. Dysphagia improved or resolved in 34/47 pts (72%) during POP treatment. Of 43 evaluable pts, 41 underwent E, achieving R0 resection in 98% (1 refused E, 1 pending). Perioperative complications included anastomotic leak (23%), Afib (21%), pneumonia (21%), delirium (10%) and aspiration (10%); 1 pt died from aspiration. 7 pts (17%) achieved pCR, 2 of whom were pretreatment clinical stage IIA, 1 IIb and 4 III; downstaging occurred in 3/7 pts; 15 pts (36.6%) achieved minimal residual disease, 15 (36.6%) pPR, and 4 (9.8%) pSD. At a median (med) follow-up of 15.2 months (1.3–34.5m), 16/52 patients died (med & 2yr overall survival (OS) of 29 m & 66%). Of 41 resected pts, 17 recurred (med & 2yr disease free survival (DFS) of 20m & 46%) of whom 10 died of progression (med & 2-yr OS of 29m & 68.4%). 2yr DFS & OS was 83% & 86% in pCR vs 41% & 76% in non-pCR. Conclusion: In LAEC, induction I/C and radiotherapy followed by E is associated with 72% dysphagia improvement, a significant but manageable toxicity profile, and encouraging survival compared to historical controls. [Table: see text]

Phase II study of trastuzumab and cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Grávalos ◽  
Carlos Gómez-Martín ◽  
Fernando Rivera ◽  
Inmaculada Alés ◽  
Bernardo Queralt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
First Line ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer ◽  
Line Therapy

Phase II trial of perioperative chemotherapy + avelumab in locally advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: Preliminary results.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4046-4046
Author(s):  
Thierry Alcindor ◽  
Touhid Opu ◽  
Arielle Elkrief ◽  
Farzin Khosrow-Khavar ◽  
Carmen L. Mueller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Daily Intake ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Type I ◽  
Perioperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Preliminary Results ◽  
Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma

4046 Background: Perioperative chemotherapy improves cure rate in locally advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA), and immune checkpoint inhibitors are active at the metastatic stage. This trial tests the hypothesis that the addition of avelumab to perioperative chemotherapy will increase the major pathologic response (MPR) rate in comparison with historical controls. Methods: Phase II study of avelumab + chemotherapy (docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-FU or mDCF) given every 2 weeks for 4 cycles before and after surgery. Main inclusion criteria: GEA, cT3 and/or cN+, M0, WHO PS 0-1. Main exclusion criteria: use of immunosuppressants, serious autoimmune disease, daily intake >10 mg prednisone. Staging studies: CT, PET-CT, endoscopic ultrasound, diagnostic laparoscopy. Surgical resection: D2 lymphadenectomy, en-bloc esophagectomy for type I/II gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) tumors. Aim of the study: MPR as defined as tumor regression grades 0-1 (modified Ryan scheme); as per hypothesis, this experimental regimen will result in a 20% rate of MPR, compared with 7% with chemotherapy alone. Simon 2-stage design: if less than 2 MPR are seen in the first 16 patients, the study will be closed. The study hypothesis cannot be rejected if at least 6 MPR are seen in the first 50 patients. All adverse effects are prospectively recorded per CTCAE guidelines in patients who have received at least one treatment cycle. Survival rates are calculated with Kaplan-Meier method. Preliminary results are presented since the study has met its primary endpoint. Results: Feb 2018-Feb 2020: 28 patients enrolled (25 M/3 F, age 45-78). Location: GEJ (23), stomach (5). Staging: cT3 (25), cT4 (1), cN+ (20). Biomarkers expression: mismatch repair (MMR) protein loss (3/28); PD-L1(clone 73-10) expression in 1% (TPS) or more of tumor cells seen in 12/28 samples, and >10% in 6 patients. Grade 3 toxicity: stomatitis (2/28); nausea (2/28); vomiting (1/28); diarrhea (1/28); hypothyroidism (1/28); arthralgia (3/28); neutropenia (1/28). Grade 4 toxicity: pneumonia (1/28); neutropenia (2/28). Postoperative 30-day mortality: 0%. One patient was excluded from efficacy analyses for M1 staging; 27 patients underwent surgery, 26 with R0 (96%). Six cases (22%) show MPR: 3 grade 0 (11%) and 3 grade 1 (11%) tumor regressions. No correlation was seen between MMR proteins or PD-L1 expression and tumor regression. With a median follow-up of 1.5 years (range 0.4-2.5), the disease-free survival rate is projected to be 0.92 (95% CI 0.83-1.00) at 12 months and 0.77 (95% CI 0.58-1.00) at 24 months. Conclusions: The combination of mDCF chemotherapy with Avelumab demonstrates a promising safety and activity profile. Ongoing laboratory investigations are underway to correlate our findings with tumor molecular features before exposure to treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT03288350.

scholarly journals Recurrent Sigmoid Volvulus – Early Resection may Obviate Later Emergency Surgery and Reduce Morbidity and Mortality

2009 ◽  
Vol 91 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
JO Larkin ◽  
TB Thekiso ◽  
R Waldron ◽  
K Barry ◽  
PW Eustace
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Surgery ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Mortality ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Sigmoid Volvulus ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Colonoscopic Decompression ◽  
Non Operative Management ◽  
Overall Mortality

INTRODUCTION Acute sigmoid volvulus is a well recognised cause of acute large bowel obstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS We reviewed our unit's experience with non-operative and operative management of this condition. A total of 27 patients were treated for acute sigmoid volvulus between 1996 and 2006. In total, there were 62 separate hospital admissions. RESULTS Eleven patients were managed with colonoscopic decompression alone. The overall mortality rate for non-operative management was 36.4% (4 of 11 patients). Fifteen patients had operative management (five semi-elective following decompression, 10 emergency). There was no mortality in the semi-elective cohort and one in the emergency surgery group. The overall mortality for surgery was 6% (1 of 15). Five of the seven patients managed with colonoscopic decompression alone who survived were subsequently re-admitted with sigmoid volvulus (a 71.4% recurrence rate). The six deaths in our overall series each occurred in patients with established gangrene of the bowel. With early surgical intervention before the onset of gangrene, however, good outcomes may be achieved, even in patients apparently unsuitable for elective surgery. Eight of the 15 operatively managed patients were considered to be ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) grade 4. There was no postoperative mortality in this group. CONCLUSIONS Given the high rate of recurrence of sigmoid volvulus after initial successful non-operative management and the attendant risks of mortality from gangrenous bowel developing with a subsequent volvulus, it is our contention that all patients should be considered for definitive surgery after initial colonoscopic decompression, irrespective of the ASA score.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document