scholarly journals Anti-Viral Pattern Recognition Receptors as Therapeutic Targets

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 2258
Author(s):  
Conor Hennessy ◽  
Declan P. McKernan
Keyword(s):  
Pattern Recognition ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Pattern Recognition Receptors ◽  
Chronic Inflammatory Disease ◽  
Vaccine Adjuvants ◽  
Microbial Infection ◽  
Chronic Infections ◽  
Disease States ◽  
Activation Of Transcription ◽  
Molecular Patterns

Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) play a central role in the inflammation that ensues following microbial infection by their recognition of molecular patterns present in invading microorganisms but also following tissue damage by recognising molecules released during disease states. Such receptors are expressed in a variety of cells and in various compartments of these cells. PRR binding of molecular patterns results in an intracellular signalling cascade and the eventual activation of transcription factors and the release of cytokines, chemokines, and vasoactive molecules. PRRs and their accessory molecules are subject to tight regulation in these cells so as to not overreact or react in unnecessary circumstances. They are also key to reacting to infection and in stimulating the immune system when needed. Therefore, targeting PRRs offers a potential therapeutic approach for chronic inflammatory disease, infections and as vaccine adjuvants. In this review, the current knowledge on anti-viral PRRs and their signalling pathways is reviewed. Finally, compounds that target PRRs and that have been tested in clinical trials for chronic infections and as adjuvants in vaccine trials are discussed.

scholarly journals Pattern Recognition Receptors: From the Cell Surface to Intracellular Dynamics

2007 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 1031-1039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denise Altenbach ◽  
Silke Robatzek
Keyword(s):  
Pattern Recognition ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Plant Immunity ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
Pattern Recognition Receptors ◽  
Surface Receptors ◽  
Receptor Endocytosis ◽  
Molecular Patterns ◽  
Plant Surfaces ◽  
Review Current

Detection of potentially infectious microorganisms is essential for plant immunity. Microbial communities growing on plant surfaces are constantly monitored according to their conserved microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs). In recent years, several pattern-recognition receptors, including receptor-like kinases and receptor-like proteins, and their contribution to disease resistance have been described. MAMP signaling must be carefully controlled and seems to involve receptor endocytosis. As a further surveillance layer, plants are able to specifically recognize microbial effector molecules via nucleotide-binding site leucine-rich repeat receptors (NB-LRR). A number of recent studies show that NB-LRR translocate to the nucleus in order to exert their activity. In this review, current knowledge regarding the recognition of MAMPs by surface receptors, receptor activation, signaling, and subcellular redistribution are discussed.

scholarly journals Broad and direct interaction between TLR and Siglec families of pattern recognition receptors and its regulation by Neu1

eLife ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guo-Yun Chen ◽  
Nicholas K Brown ◽  
Wei Wu ◽  
Zahra Khedri ◽  
Hai Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pattern Recognition ◽  
Direct Interaction ◽  
Pattern Recognition Receptors ◽  
Immunoglobulin Superfamily ◽  
Lectin Receptors ◽  
Sialidase Inhibitor ◽  
Tlr4 Ligand ◽  
Tlr4 Activation ◽  
Molecular Patterns ◽  
Damage Associated Molecular Patterns

Both pathogen- and tissue damage-associated molecular patterns induce inflammation through toll-like receptors (TLRs), while sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin superfamily lectin receptors (Siglecs) provide negative regulation. Here we report extensive and direct interactions between these pattern recognition receptors. The promiscuous TLR binders were human SIGLEC-5/9 and mouse Siglec-3/E/F. Mouse Siglec-G did not show appreciable binding to any TLRs tested. Correspondingly, Siglece deletion enhanced dendritic cell responses to all microbial TLR ligands tested, while Siglecg deletion did not affect the responses to these ligands. TLR4 activation triggers Neu1 translocation to cell surface to disrupt TLR4:Siglec-E interaction. Conversely, sialidase inhibitor Neu5Gc2en prevented TLR4 ligand-induced disruption of TLR4:Siglec E/F interactions. Absence of Neu1 in hematopoietic cells or systematic treatment with sialidase inhibitor Neu5Gc2en protected mice against endotoxemia. Our data raised an intriguing possibility of a broad repression of TLR function by Siglecs and a sialidase-mediated de-repression that allows positive feedback of TLR activation during infection.

scholarly journals Oxidation-Specific Epitopes Are Danger-Associated Molecular Patterns Recognized by Pattern Recognition Receptors of Innate Immunity

2011 ◽  
Vol 108 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yury I. Miller ◽  
Soo-Ho Choi ◽  
Philipp Wiesner ◽  
Longhou Fang ◽  
Richard Harkewicz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pattern Recognition ◽  
Innate Immunity ◽  
Pattern Recognition Receptors ◽  
Molecular Patterns

scholarly journals Expression, purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of full-length human RIG-I

2014 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 248-251
Author(s):  
Jane Kwok ◽  
Kenrie P. Y. Hui ◽  
Julien Lescar ◽  
Masayo Kotaka
Keyword(s):  
Pattern Recognition ◽  
Ebola Virus ◽  
Pattern Recognition Receptors ◽  
Full Length ◽  
Viral Rna ◽  
Microbial Pathogens ◽  
Diffusion Method ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Cell Parameters ◽  
Molecular Patterns

The human innate immune system can detect invasion by microbial pathogens through pattern-recognition receptors that recognize structurally conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns. Retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I)-like helicases (RLHs) are one of the two major families of pattern-recognition receptors that can detect viral RNA. RIG-I, belonging to the RLH family, is capable of recognizing intracellular viral RNA from RNA viruses, including influenza virus and Ebola virus. Here, full-length human RIG-I (hRIG-I) was cloned inEscherichia coliand expressed in a recombinant form with a His-SUMO tag. The protein was purified and crystallized at 291 K using the hanging-drop vapour-diffusion method. X-ray diffraction data were collected to 2.85 Å resolution; the crystal belonged to space groupF23, with unit-cell parametersa = b=c= 216.43 Å, α = β = γ = 90°.

scholarly journals PRRDB 2.0: a comprehensive database of pattern-recognition receptors and their ligands

Database ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dilraj Kaur ◽  
Sumeet Patiyal ◽  
Neelam Sharma ◽  
Salman Sadullah Usmani ◽  
Gajendra P S Raghava
Keyword(s):  
Pattern Recognition ◽  
Data Bank ◽  
Pattern Recognition Receptors ◽  
Research Articles ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Source Type ◽  
Comprehensive Information ◽  
Extensive Information ◽  
Function Relationship ◽  
Molecular Patterns

Abstract PRRDB 2.0 is an updated version of PRRDB that maintains comprehensive information about pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) and their ligands. The current version of the database has ~2700 entries, which are nearly five times of the previous version. It contains extensive information about 467 unique PRRs and 827 pathogens-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), manually extracted from ~600 research articles. It possesses information about PRRs and PAMPs that has been extracted manually from research articles and public databases. Each entry provides comprehensive details about PRRs and PAMPs that includes their name, sequence, origin, source, type, etc. We have provided internal and external links to various databases/resources (like Swiss-Prot, PubChem) to obtain further information about PRRs and their ligands. This database also provides links to ~4500 experimentally determined structures in the protein data bank of various PRRs and their complexes. In addition, 110 PRRs with unknown structures have also been predicted, which are important in order to understand the structure–function relationship between receptors and their ligands. Numerous web-based tools have been integrated into PRRDB 2.0 to facilitate users to perform different tasks like (i) extensive searching of the database; (ii) browsing or categorization of data based on receptors, ligands, source, etc. and (iii) similarity search using BLAST and Smith–Waterman algorithm.

Inhibitory pattern recognition receptors

2021 ◽  
Vol 219 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matevž Rumpret ◽  
Helen J. von Richthofen ◽  
Victor Peperzak ◽  
Linde Meyaard
Keyword(s):  
Pattern Recognition ◽  
Cell Death ◽  
Immune System ◽  
Immune Responses ◽  
Pattern Recognition Receptors ◽  
Inhibitory Receptors ◽  
Danger Signals ◽  
Molecular Pattern ◽  
Molecular Patterns ◽  
Damage Associated Molecular Patterns

Pathogen- and damage-associated molecular patterns are sensed by the immune system’s pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) upon contact with a microbe or damaged tissue. In situations such as contact with commensals or during physiological cell death, the immune system should not respond to these patterns. Hence, immune responses need to be context dependent, but it is not clear how context for molecular pattern recognition is provided. We discuss inhibitory receptors as potential counterparts to activating pattern recognition receptors. We propose a group of inhibitory pattern recognition receptors (iPRRs) that recognize endogenous and microbial patterns associated with danger, homeostasis, or both. We propose that recognition of molecular patterns by iPRRs provides context, helps mediate tolerance to microbes, and helps balance responses to danger signals.

scholarly journals Role of antimicrobial peptides (AMP) and pattern recognition receptors (PRR) in the intestinal mucosa homeostasis

2009 ◽  
Vol 150 (47) ◽  
pp. 2146-2149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Károly Lapis
Keyword(s):  
Pattern Recognition ◽  
Antimicrobial Peptides ◽  
Pattern Recognition Receptors ◽  
Immunomodulatory Effects ◽  
First Line ◽  
Continuous Layer ◽  
Immunological Mechanisms ◽  
Molecular Patterns ◽  
Bowel Mucosa

Homeostasis and integrity of bowel mucosa is assured by well controlled mechanical, biochemical and immunological mechanisms. First line of defense is presented by the antimicrobial peptides (AMP), which form a continuous layer on the bowel surface, produced by intestinal specific (Paneth) and non-specific epithelial cells. AMPs have a significant antimicrobial, antifungal and antiviral, as well as immunomodulatory effects. Next line of defense is the pattern recognition receptors (PRR), which allows identifying conservative molecular patterns of different pathogens, and starts antimicrobial and inflammatory mechanisms through gene-expression induction. We review the most recent knowledge and studies concerning these mechanisms.

scholarly journals Battle Royale: Innate Recognition of Poxviruses and Viral Immune Evasion

Biomedicines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 765
Author(s):  
Huibin Yu ◽  
Ryan C. Bruneau ◽  
Greg Brennan ◽  
Stefan Rothenburg
Keyword(s):  
Immune Responses ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Immune Defense ◽  
Innate Immune ◽  
Host Immune Responses ◽  
Antiviral Responses ◽  
Activation Of Transcription ◽  
Immune Sensing ◽  
Molecular Patterns ◽  
Innate Immune Sensing

Host pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) sense pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), which are molecular signatures shared by different pathogens. Recognition of PAMPs by PRRs initiate innate immune responses via diverse signaling pathways. Over recent decades, advances in our knowledge of innate immune sensing have enhanced our understanding of the host immune response to poxviruses. Multiple PRR families have been implicated in poxvirus detection, mediating the initiation of signaling cascades, activation of transcription factors, and, ultimately, the expression of antiviral effectors. To counteract the host immune defense, poxviruses have evolved a variety of immunomodulators that have diverse strategies to disrupt or circumvent host antiviral responses triggered by PRRs. These interactions influence the outcomes of poxvirus infections. This review focuses on our current knowledge of the roles of PRRs in the recognition of poxviruses, their elicited antiviral effector functions, and how poxviral immunomodulators antagonize PRR-mediated host immune responses.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document