scholarly journals Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Elderly Patients: An Observational Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 3259-3267
Author(s):  
Agnese Paderi ◽  
Sara Fancelli ◽  
Enrico Caliman ◽  
Serena Pillozzi ◽  
Elisabetta Gambale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Discontinuation Rate ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Age Cohorts

Background: Immunotherapy has completely changed the treatment of solid tumors. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) seem to be an appealing alternative to chemotherapy, especially in elderly patients, due to a more tolerable toxicity profile, they can lead to a peculiar variety of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). However, data on tolerability and outcome of ICIs in the elderly are lacking due to poor accrual in clinical trials of these patients. Methods: We performed a retro-prospective analysis on patients treated with single agent anti-PD-L1/PD-1 at the Clinical Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, from March 2016 to March 2020. Data on the treatment responses, type and severity of irAEs, as well as the corticosteroids (CCS) dosage used for irAEs and the discontinuation rate, were described per each patient, according to two different age-based cohorts of patients (< or ≥70 years). Results: We reported a lower incidence of all-grade toxicity in elderly compared to younger patients (64.9% vs. 44.9%, p = 0.018). The two age-cohorts showed a different profile of irAEs. Endocrine irAEs were significantly higher in younger patients (39.7% vs. 21.7%, p = 0.002), while dermatologic toxicities were more common in the older group (35.0% vs. 11.3%, p = 0.047). Use of CCS and treatment discontinuation rate do not differ significantly between the two age groups. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that treatment with ICIs in elderly populations is safe and feasible. Patients over 70 years are more prone to develop skin irAEs, while younger patients are more subject to experience endocrine toxicities.

scholarly journals Combinatorial benefit without synergy in recent clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam C. Palmer ◽  
Benjamin Izar ◽  
Peter K. Sorger
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Combination Therapies ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

ABSTRACTHundreds of clinical trials are testing whether combination therapies can increase the anti-tumor activity of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs). We find that the benefits of recently reported and approved combinations involving ICIs are fully accounted for by increasing the chance of a single-agent response (drug independence), with no requirement for additive or synergistic efficacy. Thus, the degree of success of combinations involving ICIs with other therapies is largely predictable.

scholarly journals Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for in-transit melanoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilia Nan Tie ◽  
Julia Lai-Kwon ◽  
Michael Alexander Rtshiladze ◽  
Lumine Na ◽  
James Bozzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Mek Inhibitor ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
In Transit

BackgroundThe efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in metastatic melanoma is well established. However, there are limited data regarding their efficacy in in-transit melanoma (ITM). This study assessed the efficacy of ICI in patients with ITM.MethodsA retrospective review of patients with ITM commenced on an ICI between March 2013 and February 2018 at three tertiary centers in Australia. Patients were excluded if they had previous or synchronous distant metastases. Overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were based on a composite of radiological and clinical assessments.ResultsFifty-four patients were included: 27 (50%) female; median age 75 (range 26–94); 12 (22%) stage IIIB, 40 (74%) stage IIIC and 2 (4%) stage IIID; 10 (19%) BRAF mutant. Forty (74%) received single-agent anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab or nivolumab), 8 (15%) single agent anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab), 5 (9%) combination anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab and nivolumab or pembrolizumab) and 1 (2%) combination anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab) and MEK inhibitor (cobimetinib). The median follow-up was 15 months (2–46).ORR to ICI was 54%: 14 (26%) complete responses; 15 (28%) partial responses; 9 (17%) stable disease; 16 (30%) progressive disease. Thirteen (46%) responders had only one ITM lesion. ORR was 58% for single-agent anti-PD-1, 38% for single-agent anti-CTLA4 and 40% for anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4. The median PFS was 11.7 months (6.6-not reached). 1-year and 2-year PFS were 48% and 39%, respectively,. Fourteen progressed locoregionally and 11 progressed distantly. The median OS was not reached. 1-year and 2-year OS were 85% and 63%, respectively. No clinicopathological features were associated with ORR.Conclusions and relevanceICI produce objective responses in ITM and should be considered in patients with unresectable ITM or disease recurrence.

A living systematic review of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients: A novel platform for evidence synthesis in oncology.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6596-6596
Author(s):  
Irbaz Bin Riaz ◽  
Rabbia Siddiqi ◽  
Saad Malik ◽  
Elizabeth Jane Cathcart-Rake ◽  
Ognjen Gajic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
New Evidence

6596 Background: Several previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have attempted to summarize toxicity of Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, very soon after each one of these reviews has been published, it became outdated. ICIs are currently used in 14 different cancers and data is rapidly evolving from new clinical trials. A living Systematic review, which is defined as a systematic review that is continually updated to incorporate relevant new evidence as it becomes available, is necessary in this situations. Therefore, we performed an updated systematic review and a meta-analysis which will serve as a foundation of a living Systematic review. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane were searched to identify phase 2 and 3 RCTs of PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs. Included studies compared either immunotherapy alone or combination with existing standard of care treatment and reported data for AE’s of interest. DerSimonian-Laird random effects Meta-Analysis was performed to derive pooled odds Ratio (OR) estimates for AE’s of interest. An infrastructure of a living systematic review is being developed and it includes monthly literature searches, cumulative meta-analysis and an online reporting platform. Results: We screened 6746 studies and 31 phase 3 and 2 phase 2 RCTs (n = 21,421) were included in the analysis. 22 RCTs used PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs as a single agent and 11 as a combination therapy. Selected toxicity estimates are summarized in a table. Conclusions: The meta-analysis updates previously published toxicity estimates and provides additional information about the risk of toxicities in single versus combination regimens. We have initiated the first living systematic review in oncology that will be continuously updated, incorporating relevant new evidence as it becomes available, and will provide accurate and up to date toxicity estimates to support clinical decision making. [Table: see text]

Preliminary safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) results of KN046 (bispecific anti-PD-L1/CTLA4) from a first-in-human study in subjects with advanced solid tumors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2554-2554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jermaine Coward ◽  
Vinod Ganju ◽  
Ramin Behzadigohar ◽  
Kenneth Kwong ◽  
June Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Human Study ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Efficacy Evaluation

2554 Background: KN046 is a novel bispecific antibody that blocks both PD-L1 interaction with PD1 and CTLA-4 interaction with CD80/CD86. KN046 has a wild type IgG1 Fc portion that preserves intact effector functions, such as depletion of Tregs in tumor microenvironments. This first-in-human study evaluated the safety, tolerability, PK and preliminary efficacy of KN046 in subjects with advanced solid tumors. Methods: This traditional “3+3” dose-escalation design study enrolled patients (pts) with advanced unresectable or metastatic solid tumors refractory or intolerant to standard therapies. Previous treatment from PD1 or PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors was allowed. KN046 was administered intravenously Q2W. Dose limit toxicity (DLT) evaluation period is 28 days. The planned dose levels (DL) were 0.3, 1, 3, 5 and 10 mg/kg. Efficacy evaluation was performed by RECIST 1.1 every 8 weeks. Results: As of Dec 13, 2018, 10 pts had been enrolled (0.3 mg/kg, n = 1; 1 mg/kg, n = 3; 3 mg/kg, n = 3; and 5 mg/kg, n = 3). Median duration of treatment was 8 (range: 2-24) weeks. 1 DLT was observed at 5 mg/kg dose (a grade 3 immune-related hepatitis without elevation in total bilirubin; reversible in two weeks). The most common (≥30%) treatment-emergent AEs (TEAE) were Fatigue, Diarrhea, Nausea, Vomiting. Six immune-related TEAEs (Abdominal pain lower, Arthralgia, Hepatic function abnormal, Hyperthyroidism, Nausea and Transaminitis) were observed in 3 pts. One pt with NSCLC from 3 mg/kg cohort had confirmed completed response. Two pts (TNBC and nivolumab refractory RCC) from 1 mg/kg cohort had shown long-term stable disease ( > 12 weeks). Faster clearance of KN046 was observed at lower dose might be due to target-mediated clearance. T1/2 is approximately 7~9 days at doses of 3 mg/kg and above when saturation occurs. Conclusions: Single agent KN046 has an acceptable safety profile and is in line with previously reported safety data from other immune checkpoint inhibitors. Preliminary efficacy results are promising. PK data from initial 4 cohorts support Q2W schedule. The study is currently ongoing at dose level of 5 mg/kg Q2W. Clinical trial information: NCT03529526.

Association of LRP1B pathogenic genomic alterations with favorable outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors across multiple tumor types.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3007-3007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Landon Carter Brown ◽  
Ramy Sedhom ◽  
Eric B Schwartz ◽  
Jason Zhu ◽  
Chester Kao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Missense Mutations ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Tumor Types

3007 Background: Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1b (LRP1b) is a putative tumor suppressor and one of the most frequently altered genes in cancer. Our prior single-center work suggested that LRP1B alterations may enrich for responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in solid tumors including prostate cancer; however, validation of these findings is needed. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients with LRP1B alterations (on tissue-based next-generation sequencing panels) treated with ICI at Duke, Johns Hopkins (JHU), and University of Michigan (UM). The primary objective was to assess the association between objective response rate (ORR) to ICI and pathogenic LRP1B alterations, defined as deletions or truncating alterations, when compared with LRP1B variants of undetermined significance (VUS), defined as missense mutations not predicted to be pathogenic in COSMIC. Missense changes with a COSCMIC FATHMM score of > 0.8 were categorized separately as likely pathogenic. Summary statistics, ORR, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Results: 101 patients (44 Duke, 35 JHU, 22 UM) with LRP1B alterations were treated with ICI. Median age was 61 (range 32-82). The most common tumor types by alteration (pathogenic or likely pathogenic/VUS%) were lung (33/47%), GI (17/13%), prostate (11/7%), sarcoma (2/9%), melanoma (11/0%), and others (26/24%). 93% of patients received single-agent PD-(L)1 inhibition. The ORR for patients with either pathogenic/likely pathogenic alterations, or VUS alterations was 57% and 18%, respectively. After excluding MSI-high or TMB-high ( > 10 mut/Mb) tumors, ORR was 14/25 (56%) and 6/36 (17%), respectively. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic LRP1B alterations were associated with longer PFS (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.24-0.63) and OS (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36-0.95). Conclusions: This multicenter study shows impressive and durable objective response rates to ICI for patients harboring pathogenic LRP1B alterations when compared to those with LRP1B VUS, independent of TMB/MSI status. Further mechanistic insights and prospective validation studies are warranted. [Table: see text]

Re-introducing immunotherapy in patients surviving immune checkpoint inhibitors-mediated myocarditis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15228-e15228
Author(s):  
Shira Peleg Hasson ◽  
Michal laufer-Perl ◽  
Ido Wolf ◽  
Ayelet Sivan
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiac Symptoms ◽  
The One ◽  
Grade Iii

e15228 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have transformed the standard care in cancer treatment. Recent case reports describe ICI-mediated myocarditis with an atypical presentation and fatal potential which lead to permanent interruption of immunotherapy. We aim to characterize ICI-mediated myocarditis and re-introduction to immunotherapy. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the presentation, severity, and prognosis of patients diagnosed with ICI-mediated myocarditis during 2019, and presented the clinical course and outcomes of patients that were chosen for re-introduction. Results: Among seven patients, only one patient had a history of cardiac disease. The majority were diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma and treated with anti-programmed death-1 antibody (57%). All patients were treated with single agent ICI. Most patients presented with cardiac symptoms, elevated troponin and typical magnetic resonance imaging; however only 43% had reduced ejection fraction. Five patients were defined as grade I-II and two as grade III-IV. Overall, three patients were chosen for re-introduction with concomitant low dose steroids and weekly troponin follow-up. Two patients diagnosed with grade I/II renewed therapy successfully with no recurrence of symptoms and improvement in disease burden, while the one patient diagnosed with grade III developed worsening of cardiac symptoms after the 1st cycle and therefore therapy was interrupted permanently. Overall, survival was higher among the re-introduction patients (67% vs. 25%). Conclusions: ICI-mediated myocarditis is potentially fatal and leads to permanent interruption of life saving cancer therapy. We imply that re-introduction may be considered in low grade patients; however, better definition of the diagnosis and grading is needed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document