scholarly journals Do Preoperative Transfusions Impact Prognosis in Moderate to Severe Anaemic Surgical Patients with Colon Cancer?

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 4634-4644
Author(s):  
Nicolò Tamini ◽  
Luca Gianotti ◽  
Shadya Darwish ◽  
Salvatore Petitto ◽  
Davide Bernasconi ◽  
...  

(1) Background: Anaemia is a common finding in patients with colon cancer and is commonly corrected by blood transfusion prior to surgery. However, the prognostic role of perioperative transfusions is still debated. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of preoperative anaemia and preoperative blood transfusion in influencing the prognosis in colon cancer. (2) Patients and Methods: Patients undergoing elective surgery for colon cancer at a tertiary referral university hospital between January 2010 and December 2018 were included in a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database. Univariate and regression analyses were performed to identify the prognostic role of preoperative anaemia and preoperative transfusions in this homogeneous cohort of patients. (3) Results: A total of 780 patients were included in the final analysis. The estimated five-year overall survival rate was significantly worse in the anaemic group (83.8% in non-anaemic patients, 60.6% in mild anaemic patients, 61.3% in moderate anaemic patients and 58.4% in severe anaemic patients; log-rank < 0.001 vs. non-anaemic patients). Anaemic status was found to be an independent adverse prognostic factor (hazard ratio (HR): 1.46; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02–2.07) during multivariate analysis. Among moderate to severe anaemic patients, no significant association was found between preoperative transfusions and the risk of mortality or recurrence. (4) Conclusions: Preoperative anaemia, regardless of its severity, and not preoperative blood transfusion, was independently associated with a worse prognosis after surgery in patients with colonic cancer.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne Bauer ◽  
Christina Strack ◽  
Ekrem Ücer ◽  
Stefan Wallner ◽  
Ute Hubauer ◽  
...  

Aim: We assessed the 10-year prognostic role of 11 biomarkers with different pathophysiological backgrounds. Materials & methods/results: Blood samples from 144 patients with heart failure were analyzed. After 10 years of follow-up (median follow-up was 104 months), data regarding all-cause mortality were acquired. Regarding Kaplan–Meier analysis, all markers, except TIMP-1 and GDF-15, were significant predictors for all-cause mortality. We created a multimarker model with nt-proBNP, hsTnT and IGF-BP7 and found that patients in whom all three markers were elevated had a significantly worse long-time-prognosis than patients without elevated markers. Conclusion: In a 10-year follow-up, a combination of three biomarkers (NT-proBNP, hs-TnT, IGF-BP7) identified patients with a high risk of mortality.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. viii180
Author(s):  
S.-H. Cho ◽  
H.-J. Shim ◽  
J.E. Hwang ◽  
W.-K. Bae ◽  
I.J. Chung

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Zhao ◽  
Xiusheng Qu ◽  
Xin Lv ◽  
Qingdong Wang ◽  
Deqiang Bian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14578-e14578
Author(s):  
Sang-Hee Cho ◽  
Min-Ho Shin ◽  
Sun-Seog Kweon ◽  
Hee-Nam Kim ◽  
Hyung-jung Shim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 110 (4) ◽  
pp. 451-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Chi Lin ◽  
Jen-Kou Lin ◽  
Tzu-Chen Lin ◽  
Wei-Shone Chen ◽  
Shung-Haur Yang ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14509-14509
Author(s):  
S. Grewal ◽  
S. Saha ◽  
M. Patel ◽  
R. Sehgal ◽  
R. Parker ◽  
...  

14509 Background: Lymph Node (LN) status is the most important prognostic factor in colon cancer (Cca). Angiogenesis Index (AI) has been studied as a prognostic marker in various solid tumors with conflicting results. Hence, a retrospective analysis was done to evaluate the role of AI as a prognostic marker in Cca. Methods: Pts with Cca who underwent SLNM to determine LN status were included. A portion of tumor was sent for tumor marker analysis including p53, Thrombospondin-1 and CD31 by IHC. AI was derived for each specimen by summing the biomarker specific score for the three tumor markers. AI of -ve 6 was taken as cut off for significance based on previous studies on solid tumors. Metastatic foci in SLNs and non-SLNs were measured in greatest diameter by ocular micrometer; and were added for each pt to estimate overall tumor burden in SLNs and non-SLNs. Results: A total of 111 consecutive pts with Cca were included in the study. SLNM was successful in 100% pts. Pts with distant metastasis (mets) (n=18), Tis (n=1) and skip mets (n=9) were excluded from final analysis. Out of the remaining 83 pts, an AI of -6 or less was found in 22 pts (26.5%) while 61 pts (73.5%) had AI of more than (>) -6. Of the 61 pts with AI > -6, 37.7% pts were SLN +ve while 62.3% pts were SLN -ve (p=0.05)( Table 1A ). Of the 22 pts with AI less than or -6, 45.5% pts were SLN +ve and 54.5% pts were SLN -ve (p=0.65). Size of the metastatic tumor burden in lymph nodes was available in 69.7% of SLN +ve pts. Total average tumor burden for pts with AI > -6 (n=15) was 2.04cm as compared to 1.48cm in pts with AI of -6 or less (n=8)(p=0.66). Average SLN met size was 0.73cm in pts with AI > -6 and 0.63cm in pts with AI of -6 or less (p=0.66)( Table 1B ). Conclusions: AI did not correlate with nodal positivity or tumor burden in LNs in pts with Cca. LN status remains the most important prognostic marker in Cca. Further larger trials are required to determine the role of AI as a prognostic marker in Cca. [Table: see text] [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15075-e15075
Author(s):  
Jan Novotny ◽  
Ioannis Gkekas ◽  
Ladislav Pecen ◽  
Karin Strigard ◽  
Richard Palmquist ◽  
...  

e15075 Background: The prognostic role of microsatellite instability (MSI) in stage II colon cancer patients remains controversial despite it has been investigated in a number of studies. Hazard ratios differ considerably among these studies. We performed a meta-analysis to define the significance of MSI in this group of patients. Methods: Studies indexed in PubMed presenting separate data on MSI status and survival outcomes for stage II colon cancer patients have been analyzed using fixed-effect meta-analysis of hazard ratio according to the method of Peto. Results: Analysis was performed on 19 studies including 5998 patients. 47.2% patients received postoperative chemotherapy, 52.8% were males and 47.2% females. Eight studies included also rectal cancer patients. MSI was detected in 20.8 % of the patients. Hazard ration (HR) for overall survival (OS): MSI vs MSS for the entire population: 0.73 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.33-1.65); HR for disease free survival (DFS): 0.60 (95% CI: 0.27-1.32). No statistical significant difference was found when comparing studies analyzing MSI with genotyping (MG) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) (MG vs IHC: HR OS 0.45, 95% CI 0.10-2.05 vs. 0.95, 95% CI 0.57–1.58; HR DFS 0.51, 95% CI: 0.14-1.85 vs. 0.67, 95% CI 0.26-1.70). However, numerically MSI determination with genotyping shows remarkably lower hazard ratios (further from HR equal to one) for both OS and DFS. Separate analysis of studies investigating colon cancer patients only showed HR OS 0.72 (95% CI: 0.31-1.71); HR DFS 0.60 (95% CI: 0.27-1.31). Conclusions: This is the first meta-analysis that evaluates the prognostic role of MSI in the well defined population of colon cancer patients with stage II disease. No significant relation was found between MSI status and various survival outcomes. Routine determination of MSI status to guide postoperative management of stage II colon cancer patients cannot be recommended based on the presently included studies. This study was supported from the unrestricted grant of Cancerforskningsfonden i Norrland/Lions Cancerforskningsfond LP 14-2065 and Akademisk Miljö NLL-576531.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 555-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang-Hee Cho ◽  
Jun Eul Hwang ◽  
Woo Kyun Bae ◽  
Ik-Joo Chung

555 Background: Tumors expressing PD-L1 can render immune inactivated via triggering of PD-1 receptor on T cells with various pathways. Based on these mechanism, the blockade PD-1/PD-L1 pathway based been used as a therapeutic target for metastatic CRC. In the present study, we evaluated the prognostic role of PD-L1 expression associated with microsatellite status in surgically resected stage III colon cancer patients. Methods: PD-L1 expression was performed by immunohistochemistry from 182 stage III colon cancer patients after curative resection. Using the immunohistochemical stain, percentages of PD-L1 positive tumor cells and staining intensity were evaluated and categorized as ‘strong’ and ‘weak’ positive group. Clinical and histopathologic parameters including of MSI status and survival outcomes were analyzed with IDO expression which stands for the suppressive immune environment. Results: Strong PD-L1 expression was observed in 29% of all patients. PNI and lymphocyte response response were more frequently shown in strong PD-L1 patients. Among these patients, MSI was shown in 23 patients (12%). Although there was no significant difference between MSI and PD-L1 status, strong PD-L1 tended to better OS in MSS colon cancer (P = 0.056). In contrast, strong PD-L1 expression significantly correlated with significantly worse prognosis in disease free survival (P = 0.001) and overall survival (P < 0.001) than weak PD-L1 expression inMSI patients regardless of adjuvant chemotherapy. In MSI patients, the strong IDO expression was tended to be more frequently shown in strong PD-L1 expression patients (36.4%) than weak PD-L1 expression patients (14.3%). Conclusions: The expression of PD-L1 is differently affected on the survival according to the status of microsatellite. There is no significant relationship between the expression of PD-L1 and prognosis in MSS stage III colon cancer patients. However, in MSI colon cancer which has been well known as a highly immunogenic property, strong PD-L1 expression is significantly associated with poor prognosis on survival outcomes reflecting of immunosuppressive microenvironment in curative resected stage III colon cancer patient.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document