scholarly journals The Healthcare Sector Employer’s Duty of Care: Implications for Worker Well-Being

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
pp. 6015
Author(s):  
Melissa McDiarmid ◽  
Marian Condon ◽  
Joanna Gaitens
Keyword(s):  
Middle East ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Care Program ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Middle East Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
Worker Safety ◽  
Healthcare Sector ◽  
Duty Of Care ◽  
Protective Equipment ◽  
Extreme Risk

Pandemic diseases of this century have differentially targeted healthcare workers globally. These infections include Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome SARS, the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and Ebola. The COVID-19 pandemic has continued this pattern, putting healthcare workers at extreme risk. Just as healthcare workers have historically been committed to the service of their patients, providing needed care, termed their “duty of care”, so too do healthcare employers have a similar ethical duty to provide care toward their employees arising from historical common law requirements. This paper reports on results of a narrative review performed to assess COVID-19 exposure and disease development in healthcare workers as a function of employer duty of care program elements adopted in the workplace. Significant duty of care deficiencies reported early in the pandemic most commonly involved lack of personal protective equipment (PPE) availability. Beyond worker safety, we also provide evidence that an additional benefit of employer duty of care actions is a greater sense of employee well-being, thus aiding in the prevention of healthcare worker burnout.

scholarly journals Exploring the risk of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome- coronavirus among expatriate healthcare workers. A comparative epidemiological study of Saudi Arabian and South Korean healthcare workers

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Owais Qureshi ◽  
Abrar Chughtai ◽  
Holly Seale
Keyword(s):  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Middle East ◽  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
South Korea ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Saudi Arabian ◽  
Middle East Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
World Health ◽  
Healthcare Sector ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Abstract Background In comparison to South Korea, which was able to contain the outbreak of Middle East respiratory syndrome corona virus (MERS-CoV) in 2015, new cases are still emerging in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The Saudi Arabian healthcare sector, which is dependent on the expatriate workforce to cater to its growing local healthcare demands, has been reporting multiple healthcare-associated MERS-CoV outbreaks since 2012. In this paper, we compare the epidemiology of MERS-CoV among healthcare workers (HCWs) in Saudi Arabia and South Korea and to ascertain the risks of MERS-CoV among expatriate HCWs. Methods Data were collected from publicly available resources such as World Health Organization and health department websites. A line list of all reported cases of MERS-CoV among HCWs in Saudi Arabia and South Korea was prepared and analysed. Results Among the total infected HCWs in Saudi Arabia, 84.6% (n=192/227) were expatriates. The mean age of infected HCWs in both settings was similar (Saudi Arabia 38 years, South Korea 39 years). Female HCWs were more likely to be infected, while male HCWs were more likely to die. In Saudi Arabia, 36.5% (n= 68/186) of HCWs with MERS-CoV were asymptomatic, compared to 7% (n=2/28) HCWs in South Korea. Most of the expatriate HCWs in Saudi Arabia were asymptomatic (78%, n=53/68) to MERS-CoV. Unlike South Korea, in Saudi Arabia, a diversity of HCWs other than doctors, and nurses were also infected with MERS-CoV. Conclusions A high proportion of expatriate HCWs were infected with MERS-CoV in Saudi Arabia which highlights the need for adequate training and education in this group about emerging infectious diseases and the appropriate strategies to prevent acquisition. Also, we did not find any policy statements restricting the contact of HCWs, vulnerable to MERS-CoV like pregnant HCW, HCWs over the age 60, HCWs with underlying comorbidity etc, from getting in proximity with a suspected or potential MERS-CoV infected patient. Policy development in this regard should be a priority, to contain healthcare-associated transmission of emerging and remerging infectious diseases like MERS-CoV. Further studies should be conducted to determine social, cultural and other factors contributing to high infection rate among expatriate HCWs.

scholarly journals Critically ill healthcare workers with the middle east respiratory syndrome (MERS): A multicenter study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. e0206831 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Shalhoub ◽  
Fahad Al-Hameed ◽  
Yasser Mandourah ◽  
Hanan H. Balkhy ◽  
Awad Al-Omari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Middle East ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Middle East Respiratory Syndrome

scholarly journals Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Personal Safety Measures Adopted by Medical Practioners during the Covid-19 Pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 883-887
Author(s):  
Hemapriya L ◽  
Maureen Prativa Tigga ◽  
Anil Kumar M.R ◽  
Prathap T ◽  
Neha Wali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Personal Protective Equipment ◽  
Urban Areas ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Well Being ◽  
World Health ◽  
Protective Equipment ◽  
Personal Safety ◽  
Safety Measures

BACKGROUND A novel coronavirus (now termed as SARS-CoV-2) was detected as the causative agent of severe pneumonia in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, in December 2019. Declared by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a global pandemic in March 2020, it has created profound changes in global economy and healthcare systems. This study evaluates the knowledge and practice with regard to various personal safety measures used by the healthcare professionals. METHODS We conducted a questionnaire study after obtaining approval, from the Institutional ethical committee. An online survey was conducted using a preformatted questionnaire consisting of multiple-choice questions which assessed the knowledge and practices adopted by various healthcare professionals. The survey was done between 1st and 30th of June 2020 and a total of 536 responses was analysed. RESULTS 58.4 % of the participants were females, 66 % of the healthcare workers worked at a private hospital / private medical college with 82.1 % being located in urban areas. Of the 536 respondents, 90.1 % practiced bathing immediately after returning home and 86.8 % sanitized their accessories. 86.9 % of the professionals used frequent sanitization with use of mask and gloves whereas only 12.3 % used full personal protective equipment. 58 % of females had used hydroxychloroquine as prophylaxis whereas only 41 % of males used it (statistically significant, P = 0.005). Healthcare workers in younger age group (23 - 40 years) were more likely to maintain distance with family members, and government doctors were significantly more likely to do so (P < 0.001) as compared to private practitioners. CONCLUSIONS With the medical professionals being at high risk for contracting the infection, the need to provide the healthcare professionals with adequate personal protective equipment is of utmost importance. There is also a need to maintain the well-being of the healthcare professionals as they are the weakest link in the chain. KEY WORDS Medical Practitioners, Personal Protective Equipment, Safety Measures

scholarly journals Impact of enhanced personal protective equipment on the physical and mental well-being of healthcare workers during COVID-19

2020 ◽  
pp. postgradmedj-2020-139150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramanathan Swaminathan ◽  
Bimantha Perera Mukundadura ◽  
Shashi Prasad
Keyword(s):  
Personal Protective Equipment ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Protective Equipment ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Mental Well Being

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated the use of enhanced personal protective equipment (PPE) in healthcare workers in patient-facing roles. We describe the impact on the physical and mental well-being of healthcare professionals who use enhanced PPE consistently.MethodsWe conducted a single-centre, cross-sectional study among healthcare professionals who use enhanced PPE. A web-based questionnaire was disseminated to evaluate the effects on individuals’ physical and mental well-being. Physical and mental impact was assessed through a visual analogue scale.ResultsProspective analysis of the views of 72 respondents is reported. 63.9% were women and 36.1% were men. Physical impact included exhaustion, headache, skin changes, breathlessness and a negative impact on vision. Communication difficulties, somnolence, negative impact on overall performance and difficulties in using surgical instrumentation were reported.ConclusionOur study demonstrates the undeniable negative impact on the front-line healthcare workers using enhanced PPE and lays the ground for larger multicentric assessments given for it to potentially be the norm for the foreseeable future.

scholarly journals Perceptions of postoutbreak management by management and healthcare workers of a Middle East respiratory syndrome outbreak in a tertiary care hospital: a qualitative study

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e017476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bandar Abdulmohsen Al Knawy ◽  
Hanan M F Al-Kadri ◽  
Mahmoud Elbarbary ◽  
Yaseen Arabi ◽  
Hanan H Balkhy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Middle East ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
High Stress ◽  
Middle East Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Management Decision ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Outbreak Management ◽  
Outbreak Control

ObjectivesThis study examines perceptions of the operational and organisational management of a major outbreak of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) caused by a novel coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Perspectives were sought from key decision-makers and clinical staff about the factors perceived to promote and inhibit effective and rapid control of the outbreak.SettingA large teaching tertiary healthcare centre in KSA; the outbreak lasted 6 weeks from June 2015.ParticipantsData were collected via individual and focus group interviews with 28 key informant participants (9 management decision-makers and 19 frontline healthcare workers).DesignWe used qualitative methods of process evaluation to examine perceptions of the outbreak and the factors contributing to, or detracting from successful management. Data were analysed using qualitative thematic content analysis.ResultsFive themes and 15 subthemes were found. The themes were related to: (1) the high stress of the outbreak, (2) factors perceived to contribute to outbreak occurrence, (3) factors perceived to contribute to success of outbreak control, (4) factors inhibiting outbreak control and (5) long-term institutional gains in response to the outbreak management.ConclusionManagement of the MERS-CoV outbreak at King Abdulaziz Medical City-Riyadh was widely recognised by staff as a serious outbreak of local and national significance. While the outbreak was controlled successfully in 6 weeks, progress in management was inhibited by a lack of institutional readiness to implement infection control (IC) measures and reduce patient flow, low staff morale and high anxiety. Effective management was promoted by greater involvement of all staff in sharing learning and knowledge of the outbreak, developing trust and teamwork and harnessing collective leadership. Future major IC crises could be improved via measures to strengthen these areas, better coordination of media management and proactive staff counselling and support.

scholarly journals Factors Associated With Viral Load Kinetics of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus During the 2015 Outbreak in South Korea

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong-Sun Yang ◽  
Min-Gyu Yoo ◽  
Hye-Ja Lee ◽  
Han Byul Jang ◽  
Hee-Dong Jung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Middle East ◽  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Middle East Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
Viral Loads ◽  
Hospitalization Period ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Kinetics Of ◽  
Respiratory Specimens

Abstract We conducted a retrospective study of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) viral load kinetics using data from patients hospitalized with MERS-CoV infection between 19 May and 20 August 2015. Viral load trajectories were considered over the hospitalization period using 1714 viral load results measured in serial respiratory specimens of 185 patients. The viral load levels were significantly higher among nonsurvivors than among survivors (P = .003). Healthcare workers (P = .001) and nonspreaders (P &lt; .001) had significantly lower viral loads. Viral RNA was present on the day of symptom onset and peaked 4–10 days after symptom onset.

scholarly journals Differences Between the Psychiatric Symptoms of Healthcare Workers Quarantined at Home and in the Hospital After Contact With a Patient With Middle East Respiratory Syndrome

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su Jeong Seong ◽  
Hyung Joon Kim ◽  
Kyung Mi Yim ◽  
Ji Won Park ◽  
Kyung Hoon Son ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Depressive Symptoms ◽  
Middle East ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Acute Stress ◽  
Psychiatric Symptoms ◽  
Middle East Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Effective Measure ◽  
Psychiatric Problems ◽  
At Home

Objective: Although quarantine is an effective measure for the prevention of the spread of infectious diseases, it may have negative effects on the mental health of the isolated individual. During the 2015 outbreak of the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) in Korea, healthcare workers came in contact with patients with MERS were quarantined either at home or in a hospital ward. In this study, we aimed to compare the psychiatric symptoms of these employees according to the method of quarantine.Methods: All 146 quarantined staff completed self-report questionnaires. Depressive symptoms were measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, anxiety symptoms were assessed using Spielberger's State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and acute stress disorder (ASD) symptoms were evaluated using the Stanford Acute Stress Reaction Questionnaire.Results: The in-hospital quarantine group had a higher rate of symptoms of depression (p &lt; 0.001) and ASD (p = 0.014) than the group quarantined at home. Logistic regression analysis showed that respondents quarantined in the hospital (OR = 6.342; 95% CI 1.853–21.708) and those quarantined for longer periods (OR = 1.153, 95% CI = 1.036–1.285) had a higher risk of depressive symptoms.Conclusions: In-hospital quarantine and quarantine for longer periods increase the risk of depressive symptoms. When quarantine measures are taken, certain measures are needed to minimize the risk of psychiatric problems. Appropriate interventions should be implemented if psychiatric problems occur.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document