scholarly journals Optimisation and Benchmarking of Targeted Amplicon Sequencing for Mycobiome Analysis of Respiratory Specimens

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (20) ◽  
pp. 4991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali ◽  
Mac Aogáin ◽  
Morales ◽  
Tiew ◽  
Chotirmall
Keyword(s):  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Its Region ◽  
Amplicon Sequencing ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Sample Type ◽  
Enzymatic Lysis ◽  
Dna Extraction Methods ◽  
Mechanical Lysis ◽  
Respiratory Specimens

(1) Background: Firm consensus has yet to be established in relation to taxonomic classification and primer choice in targeted amplicon sequencing of the mycobiome. While the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region are recognized as the formal fungal taxonomic barcode, appraisal of different ITS sub-regions and the influence of DNA extraction methods have not been comprehensively undertaken using human respiratory specimens. (2) Methods: We performed ITS analysis of respiratory (sputum) samples by assessing (a) the effect of alternate DNA extraction techniques and (b) an evaluation of four different ITS primer pairs (ITS1F and ITS2; ITS1-30F and ITS1-217R; gITS7ngs and ITS4ng; and Fseq and Rseq) on the mycobiome profiles generated for mock fungal communities and their respective clinical (airway) specimens. (3) Results: Primer pairs varied in their resulting ITS mycobiome profiles, suggesting that particular pairs may be more relevant for analysis of respiratory samples compared to others. Assessment of DNA extraction methods highlighted lower final DNA concentrations achieved by mechanical disruption compared to enzymatic lysis. However, despite lower yields, DNA liberated by mechanical lysis more readily yielded ITS bands with highest success in combination with the Fseq and Rseq primers. (4) Conclusion: Choice of extraction method, primers used, and sequencing approach are all important considerations in sequencing the mycobiome and should be tailored to sample type. A standardization of approach to mycobiome studies using respiratory specimens will permit more reliable comparisons between studies and improve our understanding of the role of fungi in the human airway.

scholarly journals Sensitive diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis by lesion swab sampling coupled to qPCR

Parasitology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 141 (14) ◽  
pp. 1891-1897 ◽  
Author(s):  
EMILY R. ADAMS ◽  
MARIA ADELAIDA GOMEZ ◽  
LAURA SCHESKE ◽  
RUBY RIOS ◽  
RICARDO MARQUEZ ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cutaneous Leishmaniasis ◽  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Diagnostic Methods ◽  
Molecular Diagnostic ◽  
Sample Type ◽  
Recovery Method ◽  
Dna Recovery ◽  
Efficient Recovery ◽  
Dna Extraction Methods

SUMMARYVariation in clinical accuracy of molecular diagnostic methods for cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is commonly observed depending on the sample source, the method of DNA recovery and the molecular test. Few attempts have been made to compare these variables. Two swab and aspirate samples from lesions of patients with suspected CL (n = 105) were evaluated alongside standard diagnosis by microscopic detection of amastigotes or culture of parasites from lesion material. Three DNA extraction methods were compared: Qiagen on swab and aspirate specimens, Isohelix on swabs and Boil/Spin of lesion aspirates. Recovery ofLeishmaniaDNA was evaluated for each sample type by real-time polymerase chain reaction detection of parasitic 18S rDNA, and the diagnostic accuracy of the molecular method determined. Swab sampling combined with Qiagen DNA extraction was the most efficient recovery method forLeishmaniaDNA, and was the most sensitive (98%; 95% CI: 91–100%) and specific (84%; 95% CI: 64–95%) approach. Aspirated material was less sensitive at 80% (95% CI: 70–88%) and 61% (95% CI: 50–72%) when coupled to Qiagen or Boil-Spin DNA extraction, respectively. Swab sampling of lesions was painless, simple to perform and coupled with standardized DNA extraction enhances the feasibility of molecular diagnosis of CL.

scholarly journals Microvolume DNA extraction methods for microscale amplicon and metagenomic studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna R. Bramucci ◽  
Amaranta Focardi ◽  
Christian Rinke ◽  
Philip Hugenholtz ◽  
Gene W. Tyson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Magnetic Beads ◽  
Amplicon Sequencing ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Lytic Enzymes ◽  
Metabolic Capacity ◽  
Standard Operating ◽  
Dna Extraction Methods ◽  
Downstream Analysis ◽  
Functional Profiles

AbstractInvestigating the composition and metabolic capacity of aquatic microbial assemblages usually requires the filtration of multi-litre samples, which are up to 1 million-fold larger than the microenvironments within which microbes are predicted to be spatially organised. To determine if community profiles can be reliably generated from microlitre volumes, we sampled seawater at a coastal and an oceanic site, filtered and homogenised them, and extracted DNA from bulk samples (2 L) and microvolumes (100, 10 and 1 μL) using two new approaches. These microvolume DNA extraction methods involve either physical or chemical lysis (through pH/thermal shock and lytic enzymes/surfactants, respectively), directly followed by the capture of DNA on magnetic beads. Downstream analysis of extracted DNA using both amplicon sequencing and metagenomics, revealed strong correlation with standard large volume approaches, demonstrating the fidelity of taxonomic and functional profiles of microbial communities in as little as 1 μL of seawater. This volume is six orders of magnitude smaller than most standard operating procedures for marine metagenomics, which will allow precise sampling of the heterogenous landscape that microbes inhabit.

OPTIMIZATION OF DNA EXTRACTION METHODS FROM BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS OF HONEY BEES IN A DIFFERENT METAMOTPHOSIS PHASE

2016 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 171-176
Author(s):  
M. Palkina ◽  
O. Metlitska
Keyword(s):  
Ion Exchange ◽  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Honey Bees ◽  
Biological Material ◽  
Exchange Resin ◽  
Ion Exchange Resin ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Chelex 100 ◽  
Drone Brood ◽  
Dna Extraction Methods

The aim of the research – adaptation, optimization and using of existing DNA extraction methods from bees’ biological material with the reagent «Chelex-100" under complex economic conditions of native laboratories, which will optimize labour costs and improve the economic performance of DNA extraction protocol. Materials and methods. In order to conduct the research the samples of honey bees’ biological material: queen pupae exuviae, larvae of drone brood, some adult bees’ bodies (head and thorax) were selected. Bowl and drone brood were obtained from the experimental bee hives of Institute of Apiculture nd. a. P. I. Prokopovich of NAAS. DNA extraction from biosamples of Apis mellifera ssp. was carried out using «Chelex-100®» ion exchange resin in different concentrations and combinations. Before setting tests for determination of quantitative and quality indexes, dilution of DNA samples of the probed object was conducted in ratio 1:40. The degree of contamination with protein and polysaccharide fractions (OD 260/230), quantitative content of DNA (OD 260/280) in the extracted tests were conducted using spectrophotometer of «Biospec – nano» at the terms of sample volume in 2 µl and length of optical way in 0,7 mm [7]. Verification of DNA samples from biological material of bees, isolated by «Chelex-100®», was conducted after cold keeping during 24 hours at 20°C using PСR with primaries to the fragment of gene of quantitative trait locus (QTL) Sting-2 of next structure [8]:  3' – CTC GAC GAG ACG ACC AAC TTG – 5’; 3' – AAC CAG AGT ATC GCG AGT GTT AC – 5’ Program of amplification: 94 °C – 5 minutes – 1 cycle; 94 °C – 1 minute, 57°C – 1 minute, 72 °C – 2 minutes – 30 cycles; elongation after 72°C during 2 minutes – 1 cycle. The division of obtained amplicons was conducted by gel electrophoresis at a low current – 7 µÀ, in 1,5 % agarose gel (Sigma ®) in TAE buffer [7]. The results. At the time of optimization of DNA isolation methods, according to existing methods of foreign experts, it was found optimal volume of ion exchange resin solution was in the proposed concentration: instead of 60 µl of solution used 120 µl of «Chelex-100®», time of incubation was also amended from 30 minutes to 180 minutes [9]. The use of the author's combination of method «Chelex-100®» with lysis enzymes, proteinase K and detergents (1M dithiothreitol), as time of incubation was also amended, which was reduced to 180 minutes instead of the proposed 12 hours [10]. Changes in quality characteristics of obtained DNA in samples after reduction in incubation time were not found. Conclusions. The most economical method of DNA isolation from bees’ biological material is 20% solution of «Chelex-100» ion exchange resin with the duration of the incubation period of 180 minutes. It should also be noted that the best results can be obtained from exuviae, selected immediately after the queen’s exit from bowl, that reduces the likelihood of DNA molecules destruction under the influence of nucleases activation, but not later than 12 hours from release using the technology of isolated obtain of queens.

scholarly journals Impact of Collection Volume and DNA Extraction Method on the Detection of Biomarkers and HPV DNA in First-Void Urine

Molecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 1989
Author(s):  
Laura Téblick ◽  
Severien Van Keer ◽  
Annemie De Smet ◽  
Pierre Van Damme ◽  
Michelle Laeremans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Internal Control ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Urine Collection ◽  
Hpv Dna ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Herpesvirus 1 ◽  
Dna Extraction Methods ◽  
Detection Of Biomarkers ◽  
High Risk Hpv

The potential of first-void (FV) urine as a non-invasive liquid biopsy for detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA and other biomarkers has been increasingly recognized over the past decade. In this study, we investigated whether the volume of this initial urine stream has an impact on the analytical performance of biomarkers. In parallel, we evaluated different DNA extraction protocols and introduced an internal control in the urine preservative. Twenty-five women, diagnosed with high-risk HPV, provided three home-collected FV urine samples using three FV urine collection devices (Colli-Pee) with collector tubes that differ in volume (4, 10, 20 mL). Each collector tube was prefilled with Urine Conservation Medium spiked with phocine herpesvirus 1 (PhHV-1) DNA as internal control. Five different DNA extraction protocols were compared, followed by PCR for GAPDH and PhHV-1 (qPCR), HPV DNA, and HBB (HPV-Risk Assay), and ACTB (methylation-specific qPCR). Results showed limited effects of collection volume on human and HPV DNA endpoints. In contrast, significant variations in yield for human endpoints were observed for different DNA extraction methods (p < 0.05). Additionally, the potential of PhHV-1 as internal control to monitor FV urine collection, storage, and processing was demonstrated.

scholarly journals A Rapid Bacteriophage DNA Extraction Method

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Džiuginta Jakočiūnė ◽  
Arshnee Moodley
Keyword(s):  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Illumina Miseq ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Simple Method ◽  
Antibiotic Resistant ◽  
Phage Dna ◽  
Specialized Equipment ◽  
Miseq Platform ◽  
Dna Extraction Methods

Bacteriophages (phages) are intensely investigated as non-antibiotic alternatives to circumvent antibiotic resistance development as well as last resort therapeutic options against antibiotic resistant bacteria. As part of gaining a better understanding of phages and to determine if phages harbor putative virulence factors, whole genome sequencing is used, for which good quality phage DNA is needed. Traditional phage DNA extraction methods are tedious and time consuming, requiring specialized equipment e.g., an ultra-centrifuge. Here, we describe a quick and simple method (under four hours) to extract DNA from double stranded DNA (dsDNA) phages at titers above 1.0 × 1010 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL. This DNA was suitable for library preparation using the Nextera XT kit and sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform.

131-P: Protein contamination in manual DNA extraction methods

2007 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. S80
Author(s):  
Victoriano J. Leon ◽  
Alberto J. Leon ◽  
Juan Luis Garcia
Keyword(s):  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
P Protein ◽  
Protein Contamination ◽  
Dna Extraction Methods
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document