scholarly journals VEGF-A and ICAM-1 Gene Polymorphisms as Predictors of Clinical Outcome to First-Line Bevacizumab-Based Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (22) ◽  
pp. 5791 ◽  
Author(s):  
Apostolos Papachristos ◽  
Polychronis Kemos ◽  
Theodora Katsila ◽  
Eirini Panoilia ◽  
George P. Patrinos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Signaling Pathways ◽  
Intracellular Signaling ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Nucleotide Polymorphisms ◽  
First Line ◽  
Intracellular Signaling Pathways

Bevacizumab is used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, there are still no available predictors of clinical outcomes. We investigated selected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the genes involved in VEGF-dependent and -independent angiogenesis pathways and other major intracellular signaling pathways involved in the pathogenesis of mCRC as an attempt to find predictors of clinical outcome. Forty-six patients treated with first-line bevacizumab-based chemotherapy were included in this study with a 5 year follow up. Genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood for the analysis of VEGF-A (rs2010963, 1570360, rs699947), ICAM-1 (rs5498, rs1799969) SNPs and from tumor tissue for the detection of genomic variants in KRAS, NRAS, BRAF genes. PCR and next generation sequencing were used for the analysis. The endpoints of the study were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The VEGF-A rs699947 A/A allele was associated with increased PFS (p = 0.006) and OS (p = 0.043). The ICAM-1 rs1799969 G/A allele was associated with prolonged OS (p = 0.036). Finally, BRAF wild type was associated with increased OS (p = 0.027). We identified VEGF-A and ICAM-1 variants in angiogenesis and other major intracellular signaling pathways, such as BRAF, that can predict clinical outcome upon bevacizumab administration. These identified biomarkers could be used to select patients with mCRC who may achieve long-term responses and benefit from bevacizumab-based therapies.

Variations in Y chromosome-related genes and clinical outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 634-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Stremitzer ◽  
Sebastian Stintzing ◽  
Volker Heinemann ◽  
Wu Zhang ◽  
Dongyun Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Y Chromosome ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Nucleotide Polymorphisms ◽  
Tissue Samples ◽  
Exon 2 ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis

634 Background: Males have a higher cancer risk and worse clinical outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer compared to females, which has been related to loss of Y chromosome. In this study, we investigated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in Y chromosome-related genes and their association with clinical outcome in patients from the FIRE-3 study (NCT00433927). Methods: Three SNPs (FOXL2 rs11924939 C>T, DMRT1 rs755383 T>C and DMRT1 rs3739583 A>T) were investigated in genomic DNA isolated from tissue samples of 295 patients (KRAS exon 2 wild-type) from the bevacizumab-arm of the FIRE-3 study. The median age of 195 (66.6%) male and 98 (33.4%) female patients was 65 months (range 27-76). Seventy-four (25.6%) patients had right-sided tumors and 215 (74.4%) had left-sided tumors. Results: The C/C genotype of DMRT1 rs755383 T>C was associated with significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) in univariable (C/C 14.3 months, T/T or T/C 10.0 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.58; P=0.033) and in multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusted for baseline characteristics (HR 0.63; P=0.026). This difference was confirmed in male patients (C/C 15.9 months, T/T or T/C 10.1 months, HR 0.58; P=0.038 and HR 0.53; P=0.023) and patients with left-sided tumors (C/C 14.6 months, T/T or T/C 10.4 months, univariable HR 0.61; P=0.044 and multivariable HR 0.60; P=0.046). The T/T genotype of FOXL2rs11924939 C>T was associated with longer PFS in patients with right-sided tumors (T/T 13.4 months, C/C or C/T 7.8 months, univariable HR 0.47; P=0.043 and multivariable HR 0.30; P=0.031) and shorter PFS in left-sided tumors (T/T 6.9 months, C/C or C/T 11.3 months, univariable HR 1.83; P=0.017 and multivariable HR 1.99; P=0.009). Conclusions: In this study, we demonstrated for the first time that SNPs in Y chromosome-related genes are associated with outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer in a gender- and location-specific way. These results highlight the value of the SNPs as potential biomarkers.

Genetic variants in CCL5 and CCR5 genes and serum VEGF-A levels to predict efficacy of bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer patients receiving first-line chemotherapy.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11564-11564
Author(s):  
Mitsukuni Suenaga ◽  
Shu Cao ◽  
Wu Zhang ◽  
Yan Ning ◽  
Satoshi Okazaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Direct Sequencing ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Nucleotide Polymorphisms ◽  
First Line ◽  
Significant Difference

11564 Background: Early VEGF-A reduction by targeting abundant VEGF-A is a potential predictive marker of bevacizumab (BV). CCL5/CCR5 axis modulates VEGF-A production via endothelial progenitor cells migration. We tested whether genetic polymorphisms in CCL5/CCR5 pathway will predict outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) receiving BV in first-line setting. Methods: Genomic DNA was extracted from 215 samples of three independent cohorts: 61 pts receiving FOLFOX+BV (median age 60 yrs, median follow-up 39.2 mos); 83 pts receiving FOLFOX (median age 61 yrs, median follow-up 57.6 mos); 71 pts receiving FOLFOX/XELOX+BV as exploratory for serum biochemistry assay (median age 60 yrs, median follow-up 28.9 mos). Single nucleotide polymorphisms of genes in CCL5/CCR5 pathway were analyzed by PCR-based direct sequencing. Serum VEGF-A levels at baseline and day 14 were measured using ELISA. Results: In univariate analysis for the FOLFOX cohort, pts with the CCL5 rs2280789 G/G variant or any CCR5 rs1799988 T allele had shorter overall survival (OS) compared to the those with any A allele or the C/C variant (18.7 vs. 29.4 mos, HR 1.93, 95%CI: 1.05−3.53 P= 0.025; 22.0 vs. 31.2 mos, HR 1.74, 95%CI: 0.98-3.90, P= 0.055). The trend remained in multivariable analysis ( P= 0.090 and P= 0.026). The differences were not confirmed in the FOLFOX+BV cohort. Pts with any CCL5 rs2280789 G allele had longer progression-free survival (PFS) and OS when receiving FOLFOX+BV than FOLFOX (PFS: 19.8 vs. 11.0 mos, HR: 0.44, 95%CI: 0.25-0.78, P= 0.002; OS: 41.8 vs. 21.1 mos, HR: 0.43, 95%CI: 0.24-0.77, P= 0.002); pts carrying any CCR5 rs1799988 T allele had longer PFS and OS ( P= 0.025 and P= 0.008, respectively). No significant difference was shown in pts with either A/A or C/C variant. In the exploratory cohort, any CCL5 rs2280789 G allele was associated with higher VEGF-A levels at baseline and greater decrease of VEGF-A levels at day 14 compared with the A/A variant. Conclusions: CCL5 and CCR5 impact the angiogenic environment. Our data suggest the genotypes may identify specific populations who benefit from BV-based chemotherapy in first-line treatment for mCRC.

scholarly journals Genetic Variants of ANGPT1, CD39, FGF2 and MMP9 Linked to Clinical Outcome of Bevacizumab Plus Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 1381
Author(s):  
María Gaibar ◽  
Miguel Galán ◽  
Alicia Romero-Lorca ◽  
Beatriz Antón ◽  
Diego Malón ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Tumour Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Variant Allele ◽  
Nucleotide Polymorphisms ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Formalin Fixed Paraffin ◽  
Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded

Angiogenesis pathway genes show substantial genetic variability causing inter-individual differences in responses to anti-angiogenic drugs. We examined 20 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 13 of these genes to predict tumour response and clinical outcome measured as progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in 57 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) given bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. SNPs were detected (iPLEX® Assay) in genomic DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour specimens. The variant allele CD39 rs11188513 was associated with a good tumour response (p = 0.024). Patients homozygous for the wild-type allele FGF2 rs1960669 showed a median PFS of 10.95 months versus 5.44 months for those with at least one variant allele-A (HR 3.30; 95% CI: 1.52–7.14; p = 0.001). Patients homozygous for wild-type MMP9 rs2236416 and rs2274755 showed a median PFS of 9.48 months versus 6 and 6.62 months, respectively, for those with at least one variant allele (p = 0.022, p = 0.043, respectively). OS was also lengthened to 30.92 months (p = 0.034) in carriers of wild-type ANGPT1 rs2445365 versus 22.07 months for those carrying at least one variant allele-A. These gene variants were able to predict clinical outcome and tumour response in mCRC patients given bevacizumab-based therapy.

scholarly journals Long Term Real-World Outcomes of Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer—A Single UK Centre Experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 2260-2269
Author(s):  
Daniel Tong ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
Jeewaka Mendis ◽  
Sharadah Essapen
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Current Data ◽  
Real World Data

In the UK, Trifluridine-tipiracil (Lonsurf) is used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer in the third-line setting, after prior exposure to fluoropyrimidine-based regimes. Current data on the real-world use of Lonsurf lack long-term follow-up data. A retrospective evaluation of patients receiving Lonsurf at our Cancer Centre in 2016–2017 was performed, all with a minimum of two-year follow-up. Fifty-six patients were included in the review. The median number of cycles of Lonsurf administered was 3. Median follow-up was 6.0 months, with all patients deceased at the time of analysis. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.2 months, and overall survival (OS) was 5.8 months. The median interval from Lonsurf discontinuation to death was two months, but seven patients received further systemic treatment and median OS gained was 12 months. Lonsurf offered a slightly better PFS but inferior OS to that of the RECOURSE trial, with PFS similar to real-world data previously presented. Interestingly, 12.5% had a PFS > 9 months, and this cohort had primarily left-sided and RAS wild-type disease. A subset received further systemic treatment on Lonsurf discontinuation with good additional OS benefit. Lonsurf may alter the course of disease for a subset of patients, and further treatment on progression can be considered in carefully selected patients.

Exploratory biomarker findings from cohort 2 of MODUL: An adaptable, phase 2, signal-seeking trial of fluoropyrimidine + bevacizumab ± atezolizumab maintenance therapy for BRAFwt metastatic colorectal cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3570-3570
Author(s):  
Josep Tabernero ◽  
Axel Grothey ◽  
Dirk Arnold ◽  
Michel Ducreux ◽  
Peter J. O'Dwyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Maintenance Treatment ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Experimental Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
First Line ◽  
Tissue Samples ◽  
First Line Therapy

3570 Background: MODUL is an adaptable, phase 2, signal-seeking trial testing novel agents as first-line therapy for predefined subgroups of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Previously reported findings demonstrated that adding atezolizumab to fluoropyrimidine (FP)/bevacizumab as first-line maintenance treatment after induction with FOLFOX + bevacizumab did not improve efficacy outcomes in BRAFwt mCRC. Given these efficacy results, exploratory assessments on tumour samples were conducted to provide insights into factors that might affect efficacy of maintenance treatment and provide guidance on appropriate therapeutic strategies for BRAFwt mCRC. Methods: In patients with BRAFwt tumours (Cohort 2), experimental treatment was FP/bevacizumab + atezolizumab. Primary efficacy endpoint: progression-free survival (PFS). Overall survival (OS) was a secondary endpoint. Archival tissue samples from 104 patients were analysed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) at HistoGeneX (PD-L1; CD8/GrB/FoxP3). SP142 antibody was used for PD-L1 IHC analysis, which evaluated PD-L1low (IC 0–1) vs PD-L1high (IC > 1) in correlation with PFS and OS in the control and experimental arms. CD8/GrB/FoxP3 triplex staining was also performed to evaluate potential correlations with efficacy. Results: 445 patients with BRAFwt mCRC were randomised (2:1 ratio) to maintenance treatment in Cohort 2. Archival samples from 104 patients were analysed: FP/bevacizumab + atezolizumab (n = 82); FP/bevacizumab (n = 22). The biomarker evaluable population (BEP) for PD-L1 was n = 81 for FP/bevacizumab + atezolizumab [PD-L1low n = 35 (43%); PD-L1high n = 46 (57%)] and n = 22 for FP/bevacizumab [PD-L1low n = 16 (72%); PD-L1high n = 6 (28%)]. The BEP for CD8/GrB was n = 50 for FP/bevacizumab + atezolizumab and n = 16 for FP/bevacizumab. No difference in PFS or OS was observed in the FP/bevacizumab + atezolizumab vs FP/bevacizumab arms for PD-L1high [PFS: HR = 1.5 (95% CI 0.45−4.8), p = 0.51; OS: HR = 1.3 (95% CI 0.38−4.1), p = 0.71] or PD-L1low [PFS: HR = 0.92 (95% CI 0.47−1.8), p = 0.81; OS: HR = 0.78 (95% CI 0.4−1.5), p = 0.48]. Similar results were observed with CD8/GrBhigh [PFS: HR = 0.73 (95% CI 0.27−2.0), p = 0.55; OS: HR = 0.66 (95% CI 0.24−1.8), p = 0.44], CD8/GrBlow [PFS: HR = 1.0 (95% CI 0.42–2.5), p = 0.96; OS: HR = 0.73 (95% CI 0.3–1.8), p = 0.5], FoxP3high [PFS: HR = 0.97 (95% CI 0.37−2.5), p = 0.95; OS: HR = 0.95 (95% CI 0.36−2.5), p = 0.91] and FoxP3low [PFS: HR = 0.73 (95% CI 0.29−1.9), p = 0.53; OS: HR = 0.5 (95% CI 0.19−1.3), p = 0.18]. Conclusions: These findings suggest that PD-L1, CD8/GrB and FoxP3 might not be predictive biomarkers in BRAFwt mCRC. Further analyses are needed to further evaluate potential predictive and prognostic factors of response in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT02291289.

scholarly journals Protocol of the EFFORT study: a prospective study of FOLFIRI plus aflibercept as second-line treatment after progression on FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab or during maintenance treatment in patients with unresectable/metastatic colorectal cancer

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hironaga Satake ◽  
Koji Ando ◽  
Eiji Oki ◽  
Mototsugu Shimokawa ◽  
Akitaka Makiyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Background FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab is used as a first-line therapy for patients with unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer. However, there are no clear recommendations for second-line therapy after FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab combination. Here, we describe our planning for the EFFORT study to investigate whether FOLFIRI plus aflibercept has efficacy following FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab for mCRC. Methods EFFORT is an open-label, multicenter, single arm phase II study to evaluate whether a FOLFIRI plus aflibercept has efficacy following FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab for mCRC. Patients with unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer who received FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as a first-line therapy will receive aflibercept and FOLFIRI (aflibercept 4 mg/kg, irinotecan 150 mg/m2 IV over 90 min, with levofolinate 200 mg/m2 IV over 2 h, followed by fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 bolus and fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 46 h) every 2 weeks on day 1 of each cycle. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). To achieve 80% power to show a significant response benefit with a one-sided alpha level of 0.10, assuming a threshold progression-free survival of 3 months and an expected value of at least 5.4 months, we estimated that 32 patients are necessary. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, overall response rate, safety, and exploratory biomarker analysis for differentiating anti-VEGF drug in 2nd-line chemotherapy for unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer. Discussion This is the first study to investigate whether FOLFIRI plus aflibercept has efficacy following FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab for unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer. Switching to a different type of anti-VEGF drug in second-line therapy after FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab appears to be an attractive treatment strategy when considering survival benefit. It is expected that this phase II study will prove the efficacy of this strategy and that a biomarker for drug selection will be discovered. Trial registration Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs071190003. Registered April 18, 2019.

Pharmacogenetic Assessment of Toxicity and Outcome in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With LV5FU2, FOLFOX, and FOLFIRI: FFCD 2000-05

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (15) ◽  
pp. 2556-2564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valérie Boige ◽  
Jean Mendiboure ◽  
Jean-Pierre Pignon ◽  
Marie-Anne Loriot ◽  
Marine Castaing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Cancérologie Digestive

Purpose The aim was to investigate whether germline polymorphisms within candidate genes known or suspected to be involved in fluorouracil (FU), oxaliplatin, and irinotecan pathways were associated with toxicity and clinical outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients and Methods Blood samples from 349 patients included in the Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive 2000-05 randomized trial, which compared FU plus leucovorin (LV5FU2) followed by FU, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) followed by FU, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI; sequential arm) with FOLFOX followed by FOLFIRI (combination arm) in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival, were collected. Twenty polymorphisms within the DPD, TS, MTHFR, ERCC1, ERCC2, GSTP1, GSTM1, GSTT1, and UGT1A1 genes were genotyped. Results The ERCC2-K751QC allele was independently associated with an increased risk of FOLFOX-induced grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity (P = .01). In the sequential arm, TS-5′UTR3RG and GSTT1 alleles were independently associated with response to LV5FU2 (P = .009) and FOLFOX (P = .01), respectively. The effect of oxaliplatin on tumor response increased with the number of MTHFR-1298C alleles (test for trend, P = .008). The PFS benefit from first-line FOLFOX was restricted to patients with 2R/2R (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.68) or 2R/3R (HR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.82) TS-5′UTR genotypes, respectively. Conversely, patients with the TS-5′UTR 3R/3R genotype did not seem to benefit from the adjunction of oxaliplatin (HR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.40; trend between the three HRs, P = .006). Conclusion A pharmacogenetic approach may be a useful strategy for personalizing and optimizing chemotherapy in mCRC patients and deserves confirmation in additional prospective studies.

Randomized, Controlled Trial of Irinotecan Plus Infusional, Bolus, or Oral Fluoropyrimidines in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results From the BICC-C Study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (30) ◽  
pp. 4779-4786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles S. Fuchs ◽  
John Marshall ◽  
Edith Mitchell ◽  
Rafal Wierzbicki ◽  
Vinod Ganju ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
First Line Treatment

PurposeThis phase III study compared the safety and efficacy of the following three different irinotecan-containing regimens in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: irinotecan plus infusional fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) (FOLFIRI), irinotecan plus bolus FU/LV (mIFL), and irinotecan plus oral capecitabine (CapeIRI).Patients and MethodsA total of 430 previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients were randomly assigned to receive FOLFIRI (n = 144), mIFL (n = 141), or CapeIRI (n = 145). Patients were concurrently randomly assigned to a double-blind treatment with celecoxib or placebo. After a protocol amendment, an additional 117 patients were randomly assigned to either FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab (FOLFIRI+Bev; n = 57) or mILF plus bevacizumab (mIFL+Bev; n = 60), whereas the CapeIRI arm was discontinued. The primary study end point was progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary end points of overall survival (OS), response rate, and toxicity.ResultsMedian PFS was 7.6 months for FOLFIRI, 5.9 months for mIFL (P = .004 for the comparison with FOLFIRI), and 5.8 months for CapeIRI (P = .015). Median OS was 23.1 months for FOLFIRI, 17.6 months for mIFL (P = .09), and 18.9 months for CapeIRI (P = .27). CapeIRI was associated with higher rates of severe vomiting, diarrhea, and dehydration. After the amendment to add bevacizumab, the median survival time has not yet been reached for FOLFIRI+Bev and was 19.2 months for mIFL+Bev (P = .007). FOLFIRI+Bev was associated with a higher rate of ≥ grade 3 hypertension than mIFL+Bev.ConclusionFOLFIRI and FOLFIRI+Bev offered superior activity to their comparators and were comparably safe. An infusional schedule of FU should be the preferred irinotecan-based regimen in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document