scholarly journals Single-Breath Counting Test Predicts Non-Invasive Respiratory Support Requirements in Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 179
Author(s):  
Yaroslava Longhitano ◽  
Christian Zanza ◽  
Tatsiana Romenskaya ◽  
Angela Saviano ◽  
Tonia Persiano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Function ◽  
Respiratory Symptoms ◽  
Oxygen Therapy ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Roc Curves ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Single Breath ◽  
Bedside Test ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Simple Bedside

The use of non-invasive respiratory strategies (NIRS) is crucial to improve oxygenation in COVID-19 patients with hypoxemia refractory to conventional oxygen therapy. However, the absence of respiratory symptoms may delay the start of NIRS. The aim of this study was to determine whether a simple bedside test such as single-breath counting test (SBCT) can predict the need for NIRS in the 24 h following the access to Emergency Department (ED). We performed a prospective observational study on 120 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. ROC curves were used to analyze factors which might predict NIRS requirement. We found that 36% of patients had normal respiratory rate and did not experience dyspnea at rest. 65% of study population required NIRS in the 24 h following the access to ED. NIRS-requiring group presented lower PaO2/FiO2 (235.09 vs. 299.02), SpO2/FiO2 ratio (357.83 vs. 431.07), PaCO2 (35.12 vs. 40.08), and SBCT (24.46 vs. 30.36) and showed higher incidence of dyspnea at rest (57.7% vs. 28.6%). Furthermore, SBCT predicted NIRS requirement even in the subgroup of patients without respiratory symptoms (AUC = 0.882, cut-off = 30). SBCT might be a valuable tool for bedside assessment of respiratory function in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and might be considered as an early clinical sign of impending respiratory deterioration.

scholarly journals Trends in oxygen therapy in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 admitted to the ICU

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 10-14
Author(s):  
Raghunath S S ◽  
Bheema Devanand ◽  
Mohammed Nizamuddeen B ◽  
Bala Bhaskar S ◽  
Pradnya Kothari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oxygen Therapy ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Comfort Level ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Ethical Clearance

The most concerning complication of severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARSCoV-2) pneumonia is acute hypoxemic failure. Though various antivirals, steroids, immunomodulators have been tried, oxygen therapy remains the mainstay of treatment. After obtaining institutional ethical clearance, a prospective observational study was conducted on 102 COVID-19 positive patients aged 20 years and above, admitted in the ICU with moderate to severe disease. COVID-19 infection was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction or rapid antigen test. Data of two demographically comparable groups i.e., patients on HFNO and NIV was analysed outcome was defined as discharge from ICU, shift to other non-invasive modes of oxygen therapy, endotracheal intubation or death, and comfort level for each mode. The data was analysed using SPSS-16.0, Chi-square test and “t” value test were applied.Comparison ofthe mean number of invasive ventilator free days of HFNO and NIV was insignificant(p>0.05). Among the patients on HFNO (high flow nasal oxygen) 49.09% were stepped down to NRB (non-rebreathing mask) whereas 7.27% went for intubation which is significant compared to NIV mask (non-invasive ventilation), where 13.64% were stepped down to HFNO and 34.09% were intubated (p=0.000).Oxygen therapy with HFNO is associated with better outcome and less mortality when compared with NIV.

The Incidence and Immediate Respiratory Consequences of Pulmonary Aspiration of Enteral Feed as Detected Using a Modified Glucose Oxidase Test

2003 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 272-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Hussain ◽  
U. Roy ◽  
P. J. Young
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Glucose Oxidase ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Pulmonary Aspiration ◽  
Tenfold Increase ◽  
Bedside Test ◽  
Oxidase Test ◽  
Simple Bedside

Pulmonary micro-aspiration of enteral feed in intubated critically ill patients has been reported to occur commonly. In this prospective observational study the incidence of micro-aspiration, diagnosed by a modified glucose oxidase test, is reported in 25 enterally fed critically ill and tracheally intubated patients on a general intensive care unit. Episodes of microaspiration were correlated with changes in PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio as an index of changes in degree of lung injury. The modified glucose oxidase test differs from the traditional glucose oxidase test because of the enrichment of the feed with glucose (10g glucose added to 500 ml enteral feed resulting in a tenfold increase in glucose concentration). Pulmonary aspiration of feed was detected by exposing a glucose oxidase strip to tracheal secretions. The feed was enriched with glucose to improve the ability of the reagent strip to detect the feed. The incidence of aspiration of feed was 44% with a prevalence of 6.9% per day of intubation. Only 43% of these episodes of aspiration were detected by the feed being seen in the tracheal secretions. Aspiration was associated with a mean fall in the PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio of 5.6 kPa from 27.1 kPa to 21.5 kPa (P=0.002). Aspiration of enteral feed is common and causes a demonstrable morbidity. Detection using this simple bedside test may alert the clinician to institute measures to minimize further aspiration.

scholarly journals Impulse oscillometry for detection of small airway dysfunction in subjects with chronic respiratory symptoms and preserved pulmonary function

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang-Yuan Li ◽  
Tian-Sheng Yan ◽  
Jing Yang ◽  
Yu-Qi Li ◽  
Lin-Xi Fu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Function ◽  
Respiratory Symptoms ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Roc Curves ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Small Airway ◽  
Impulse Oscillometry ◽  
Additional Method ◽  
Cutoff Values ◽  
Higher Sensitivity

Abstract Background Subjects with chronic respiratory symptoms and preserved pulmonary function (PPF) may have small airway dysfunction (SAD). As the most common means to detect SAD, spirometry needs good cooperation and its reliability is controversial. Impulse oscillometry (IOS) may complete the deficiency of spirometry and have higher sensitivity. We aimed to explore the diagnostic value of IOS to detect SAD in symptomatic subjects with PPF. Methods The evaluation of symptoms, spirometry and IOS results in 209 subjects with chronic respiratory symptoms and PPF were assessed. ROC curves of IOS to detect SAD were analyzed. Results 209 subjects with chronic respiratory symptoms and PPF were included. Subjects who reported sputum had higher R5–R20 and Fres than those who didn’t. Subjects with dyspnea had higher R5, R5–R20 and AX than those without. CAT and mMRC scores correlated better with IOS parameters than with spirometry. R5, R5–R20, AX and Fres in subjects with SAD (n = 42) significantly increased compared to those without. Cutoff values for IOS parameters to detect SAD were 0.30 kPa/L s for R5, 0.015 kPa/L s for R5–R20, 0.30 kPa/L for AX and 11.23 Hz for Fres. Fres has the largest AUC (0.665, P = 0.001) among these parameters. Compared with spirometry, prevalence of SAD was higher when measured with IOS. R5 could detect the most SAD subjects with a prevalence of 60.77% and a sensitivity of 81% (AUC = 0.659, P = 0.002). Conclusion IOS is more sensitive to detect SAD than spirometry in subjects with chronic respiratory symptoms and PPF, and it correlates better with symptoms. IOS could be an additional method for SAD detection in the early stage of diseases.

scholarly journals Safety of switching between rituximab biosimilars in onco-hematology

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvana A. M. Urru ◽  
Stefania Spila Alegiani ◽  
Anna Guella ◽  
Giuseppe Traversa ◽  
Annalisa Campomori
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Safety Signal ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Clinical Safety ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Grade 3

AbstractComparable clinical efficacy and safety of the reference rituximab (MABTHERA) and its biosimilars has been established in randomized trials. However, safety concerns are often raised when switching from reference to biosimilar products and between different biosimilars. In this prospective observational study we aimed at evaluating the safety of switching between reference and biosimilar rituximab (TRUXIMA and RIXATHON) at Trento General Hospital (Italy). All patients (n = 83) with Non Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL, n = 72) and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL, n = 11) who received rituximab between March 2018 and March 2019 were asked to take part in the study. In 2017 and 2018 two tenders were carried out and two different biosimilars became available in the hospital, these were used sequentially. Thus, patients with or without previous treatments with the originator rituximab either received a biosimilar or were switched between different biosimilars. The incidence of adverse events in these groups of patients is described. The study population received 465 rituximab infusions and all received biosimilars. Fifty patients (60%) experienced at least one switch between different biosimilars or between rituximab originator and biosimilar, whereas 33 (40%) received one of the two biosimilars and one patient received reference rituximab. Adverse events (n = 146) were reported in 71 patients (84.5%). Treatment-related grade 3–4 events were reported in 5 patients (5.9%), whereas grade 1 rituximab related infusion events were observed in 6 patients (7.1%). No safety signal emerged in association with the use of a specific biosimilar nor with the practice of switching. Adverse events were similar, in terms of seriousness and frequency, to those described in the literature, providing further support to the clinical safety of rituximab biosimilars.

scholarly journals Comparison of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy and non-invasive ventilation in ICU patients with acute respiratory failure and a do-not-intubate orders: a multicentre prospective study OXYPAL

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e045659
Author(s):  
René Robert ◽  
Denis Frasca ◽  
Julie Badin ◽  
C Girault ◽  
Christophe Guitton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Oxygen Therapy ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Clinical Practices ◽  
Icu Patients ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Registration Number

IntroductionA palliative approach to intensive care unit (ICU) patients with acute respiratory failure and a do-not-intubate order corresponds to a poorly evaluated target for non-invasive oxygenation treatments. Survival alone should not be the only target; it also matters to avoid discomfort and to restore the patient’s quality of life. We aim to conduct a prospective multicentre observational study to analyse clinical practices and their impact on outcomes of palliative high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFOT) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in ICU patients with do-not-intubate orders.Methods and analysisThis is an investigator-initiated, multicentre prospective observational cohort study comparing the three following strategies of oxygenation: HFOT alone, NIV alternating with HFOT and NIV alternating with standard oxygen in patients admitted in the ICU for acute respiratory failure with a do-not-intubate order. The primary outcome is the hospital survival within 14 days after ICU admission in patients weaned from NIV and HFOT. The sample size was estimated at a minimum of 330 patients divided into three groups according to the oxygenation strategy applied. The analysis takes into account confounding factors by modelling a propensity score.Ethics and disseminationThe study has been approved by the ethics committee and patients will be included after informed consent. The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNCT03673631

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document