scholarly journals Effects of a Multicomponent Exercise Program in Physical Function and Muscle Mass in Sarcopenic/Pre-Sarcopenic Adults

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1386
Author(s):  
Hyuma Makizako ◽  
Yuki Nakai ◽  
Kazutoshi Tomioka ◽  
Yoshiaki Taniguchi ◽  
Nana Sato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Muscle Mass ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Exercise Program ◽  
Exercise Group ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Muscle Area

This study aimed to assess the effects of a multicomponent exercise program on physical function and muscle mass in older adults with sarcopenia or pre-sarcopenia. Moreover, we aim to standardize the exercise program for easy incorporation in the daily life of community-dwelling older adults as a secondary outcome. A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted with individuals (≥60 years) who had sarcopenia or pre-sarcopenia (n = 72). Participants were randomly assigned to the exercise and control groups. The exercise program consisted of 12 weekly 60-min sessions that included resistance, balance, flexibility, and aerobic training. Outcome measures were physical function and muscle mass. Assessments were conducted before and immediately after the intervention. Among the 72 participants (mean age: 75.0 ± 6.9 years; 70.8% women), 67 (93.1%) completed the trial. Group-by-time interactions on the chair stand (p = 0.02) and timed “up and go” (p = 0.01) tests increased significantly in the exercise group. Although the exercise group showed a tendency to prevent loss of muscle mass, no significant interaction effects were observed for cross-sectional muscle area and muscle volume. The 12-week exercise program improved physical function in the intervention group. Although it is unclear whether the program is effective in increasing muscle mass, a multicomponent exercise program would be an effective treatment for physical function among older adults with sarcopenia.

scholarly journals Evaluating the effects of an exercise program (Staying UpRight) for older adults in long-term care on rates of falls: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynne Taylor ◽  
John Parsons ◽  
Denise Taylor ◽  
Elizabeth Binns ◽  
Sue Lord ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Exercise Program ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Term Care

Abstract Background Falls are two to four times more frequent amongst long-term care (LTC) than community-dwelling older adults and have deleterious consequences. It is hypothesized that a progressive exercise program targeting balance and strength will reduce falls rates when compared to a seated exercise program and do so cost effectively. Methods/Design This is a single blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial with blinded assessment of outcome and intention-to-treat analysis. LTC residents (age ≥65 years) will be recruited from LTC facilities in New Zealand. Participants (n= 528 total; with a 1:1 allocation ratio) will be randomly assigned to either a novel exercise program (Staying UpRight), comprising strength and balance exercises designed specifically for LTC and acceptable to people with dementia, (intervention group) or a seated exercise program (control group). The intervention and control group classes will be delivered for 1 hour twice weekly over 1 year. The primary outcome is rate of falls (per 1000 person years) within the intervention period. Secondary outcomes will be risk of falling (the proportion of fallers per group), falls rate relative to activity exposure, hospitalisation for fall-related injury, change in gait variability, volume and patterns of ambulatory activity and change in physical performance assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Cost effectiveness will be examined using intervention and health service costs. The trial commenced recruitment on 31 November 2018. Discussion This study evaluates the efficacy and cost effectiveness of a progressive strength and balance exercise program for aged-care residents to reduce falls. The outcomes will aid development of evidenced-based exercise programs for this vulnerable population.

scholarly journals Peer-led exercise program for ageing adults to improve physical functions - a randomized trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D. R. Bouchard ◽  
J. V. Olthuis ◽  
V. Bouffard-Levasseur ◽  
C. Shannon ◽  
T. McDonald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Function ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Exercise Program ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Walk Test ◽  
Blood Draw ◽  
Chair Stand ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Physical Functions

Abstract Background A peer-led exercise program is one way to empower people sharing similar characteristics to encourage others to be active, but there is a lack of evidence that these programs have physical function and other benefits when delivered to ageing adults. Methods This randomized controlled trial lasting 12 weeks proposed an exercise peer-led program offered to 31 adults aged 50 and above, twice a week, by a trained leader of the same age from March to May 2019. The program was offered for free with limited space and equipment. Valid tests of physical function (e.g., 30-s chair stand, 6-min walk test) were used to assess the functional benefits. Psychosocial outcomes were assessed using self-reported questionnaires and metabolic outcomes via a fasted blood draw. Results A significant difference was found between pre-and post-values in most physical function tests in the intervention group (all p < 0.05). When adjusted for potential confounders, the intervention group was significantly associated with a more significant improvement on the chair stand test (ß = .26; p < 0.001; r2 = 0.26), the arm curl (ß = .29; p < 0.001; r2 = 0.49), as well as the 6-min walk test (ß = -.14; p < 0.001; r2 = 0.62) compared with the control group. Using repetitive measures generalized linear model, the interaction between the changes and the group was significant for all three tests. Benefits were also observed for participants’ stress level and perceived health in the intervention group compared to the control. Finally, no significant difference was observed between groups for metabolic health. Conclusions The current work suggests that a 12-week peer-led exercise program can improve physical function for adults age 50 and above. Trial registration NCT03799952(ClinicalTrials.gov) 12/20/2018.

Effects of golf training on cognition in older adults: a randomised controlled trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 72 (10) ◽  
pp. 944-950 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Shimada ◽  
Sangyoon Lee ◽  
Masahiro Akishita ◽  
Koichi Kozaki ◽  
Katsuya Iijima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Training Group ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Logical Memory ◽  
Randomised Controlled

BackgroundAlthough research indicates that a physically active lifestyle has the potential to prevent cognitive decline and dementia, the optimal type of physical activity/exercise remains unclear. The present study aimed to determine the cognitive benefits of a golf-training programme in community-dwelling older adults.MethodsWe conducted a randomised controlled trial between August 2016 and June 2017 at a general golf course. Participants included 106 Japanese adults aged 65 and older. Participants were randomly assigned to either a 24-week (90–120 min sessions/week) golf-training group or a health education control group. Postintervention changes in Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) and National Centre for Geriatrics and Gerontology-Functional Assessment Tool scores were regarded as primary outcome measures. Secondary outcome measures included changes in physical performance and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) scores.ResultsA total of 100 participants (golf training, n=53; control, n=47) completed the assessments after the 24-week intervention period. The adherence to the golf programme was 96.2% (51/53 participants). Analysis using linear mixed models revealed that the golf training group exhibited significantly greater improvements in immediate logical memory (p=0.033), delayed logical memory (p=0.009) and composite logical memory (p=0.013) scores than the control group. However, no significant changes in MMSE, word memory, Trail Making Test or Symbol Digital Substitution Test scores were observed. In addition, no significant changes in grip strength, walking speed or GDS were observed.ConclusionsGolf-based exercise interventions may improve logical memory in older adults, but no significant changes in other cognitive tests. Further follow-up investigations are required to determine whether the observed effects are associated with delayed onset of mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer’s disease in older adults.Trial registration numberUMIN-CTR UMIN000024797; Pre-results.

scholarly journals 86 Developing the Adapted Lifestyle - Integrated Functional Exercise Programme in Thai Context (TLIFE) to Prevent Falls among Older Adults in Thailand: A Mixed Methods Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (Supplement_4) ◽  
pp. iv18-iv27
Author(s):  
Sasiporn Ounjaichon ◽  
Chris Todd ◽  
Emma Stanmore ◽  
Elisabeth Boulton
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Retention Rate ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Exercise Programme ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Functional Exercise ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Abstract Introduction Falls are the leading cause of injuries in older Thai adults. There is a need to develop a fall prevention exercise programme to encourage participation and adherence. The adapted Lifestyle-integrated Functional Exercise (aLiFE) programme may be suitable by integrating exercise into daily routines as opposed to attending an exercise class. This study aimed to explore the acceptability and feasibility of the aLiFE programme in Thai context (TLiFE) among older Thai adults. Methods Based on the findings of a prior qualitative study, a feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) of TLiFE was conducted among community-dwelling older adults, comparing the TLiFE intervention group with a usual care control group. Outcome measures were analysed at baseline, 3 months, and after 6 months of the intervention. Results We recruited a total of 72 older adults into the RCT, randomised to TLiFE (n=36) and control (n=36). The retention rate at 6 months was 91.7%. Attendance in the intervention group (3 home visits and 4 follow-up calls) was 82.9%. There were no differences in fall incidence between the groups. The acceptability survey reveals TLiFE is easy to perform in daily life, safe, and useful. No adverse events were reported. Conclusion The TLiFE programme appears to be acceptable and feasible to deliver to community-dwelling older Thai adults. This feasibility study was not powered to detect a difference between groups. A further fully powered definitive randomised controlled trial of TLiFE is needed to evaluate long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness before it is integrated within the healthcare system in Thailand.

scholarly journals Patients’ Perceptions of an Exercise Program Delivered Following Discharge From Hospital After Critical Illness (the Revive Trial)

2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 978-984 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Ferguson ◽  
Judy M. Bradley ◽  
Daniel F. McAuley ◽  
Bronagh Blackwood ◽  
Brenda O’Neill
Keyword(s):  
Critical Illness ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Exercise Intervention ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Exercise Program ◽  
Exercise Group ◽  
Poor Mental Health ◽  
Discharge From Hospital ◽  
Insight Into

Background: The REVIVE randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigated the effectiveness of an individually tailored (personalized) exercise program for patients discharged from hospital after critical illness. By including qualitative methods, we aimed to explore patients’ perceptions of engaging in the exercise program. Methods: Patients were recruited from general intensive care units in 6 hospitals in Northern Ireland. Patients allocated to the exercise intervention group were invited to participate in this qualitative study. Independent semistructured interviews were conducted at 6 months after randomization. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and content analysis used to explore themes arising from the data. Results: Of 30 patients allocated to the exercise group, 21 completed the interviews. Patients provided insight into the physical and mental sequelae they experienced following critical illness. There was a strong sense of patients’ need for the exercise program and its importance for their recovery following discharge home. Key facilitators of the intervention included supervision, tailoring of the exercises to personal needs, and the exercise manual. Barriers included poor mental health, existing physical limitations, and lack of motivation. Patients’ views of outcome measures in the REVIVE RCT varied. Many patients were unsure about what would be the best way of measuring how the program affected their health. Conclusions: This qualitative study adds an important perspective on patients’ attitude to an exercise intervention following recovery from critical illness, and provides insight into the potential facilitators and barriers to delivery of the program and how programs should be evolved for future trials.

scholarly journals Effect of quadriceps strengthening exercises alone and in combination with Baduanjin qigong on older adults with knee osteoarthritis: a quasi-experimental study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
fenglan wang ◽  
Xiaoli Zhang ◽  
Xiao Tong ◽  
Min Zhang ◽  
Fengmei Xing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Exercise Program ◽  
Exercise Group ◽  
Strengthening Exercises ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Abstract BackgroundExercise is recommended as a core treatment for individuals with KOA. However, the optimal exercise program to promote long-term compliance for KOA patients is not clear. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of the combination exercise program (quadriceps strengthening exercises (QSE) plus Baduanjin qigong) versus QSE alone on older adults with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). MethodsA two-arm, quasi-experimental trial with repeated measurements was used. As a cluster randomized trial, participants from one community center were assigned to combination exercise group while participants from the other center were assigned to QSE group. We assessed pain intensity, physical function, self-efficacy, and HRQoL with standardized instruments at baseline, 3 and 6 months. Results87 participants with KOA who aged above 60 completed the study. Over the 6 months, There were significant time by group interaction effects on pain intensity (F = 44.419, p < 0.001), physical function (F = 46.904, p < 0.001) and self-efficacy (F = 49.754, p < 0.001), as well as in the physical component summary (F = 15.205, p < 0.001) and mental component summary of SF-12 (F = 19.205, p < 0.001), with the combination exercise group exhibiting significantly greater improvements in all outcomes than QSE group. ConclusionsCombination exercise treatment is more effective than QSE for relieving pain, increasing physical functioning, and improving self-efficacy, and quality of life in community-dwelling KOA older adults. Also, it could promote long-term compliance for KOA community patients.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trails Registry number ChiCTR2000033387 (retrospectively registered). Registered 30 May 2020

scholarly journals Evaluating the effects of an exercise program (Staying UpRight) for older adults in long-term care on rates of falls: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynne Taylor ◽  
John Parsons ◽  
Denise Taylor ◽  
Elizabeth Binns ◽  
Sue Lord ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Exercise Program ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Term Care

Abstract BackgroundFalls are two to four times more frequent amongst long-term care (LTC) than community-dwelling older adults and have deleterious consequences. It is hypothesized that a progressive exercise program targeting balance and strength will reduce falls rates when compared to a seated exercise program and do so cost effectively.Methods/DesignThis is a single blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial with blinded assessment of outcome and intention-to-treat analysis. LTC residents (age ≥65 years) will be recruited from LTC facilities in New Zealand. Participants (n= 528 total; with a 1:1 allocation ratio) will be randomly assigned to either a novel exercise program (Staying UpRight), comprising strength and balance exercises designed specifically for LTC and acceptable to people with dementia, (intervention group) or a seated exercise program (control group). The intervention and control group classes will be delivered for 1 hour twice weekly over 1 year. The primary outcome is rate of falls (per 1000 person years) within the intervention period.Secondary outcomes will be risk of falling (the proportion of fallers per group), falls rate relative to activity exposure, hospitalisation for fall-related injury, change in gait variability, volume and patterns of ambulatory activity and change in physical performance assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Cost effectiveness will be examined using intervention and health service costs. The trial commenced recruitment on 31 November 2018.DiscussionThis study evaluates the efficacy and cost effectiveness of a progressive strength and balance exercise program for aged-care residents to reduce falls. The outcomes will aid development of evidenced-based exercise programs for this vulnerable population.Trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12618001827224. Registered on November 9 2018; Universal trial number U1111-1217-7148

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document