scholarly journals Optimal Timing of External Ventricular Drainage after Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1996
Author(s):  
Charlene Y. C. Chau ◽  
Saniya Mediratta ◽  
Mikel A. McKie ◽  
Barbara Gregson ◽  
Selma Tulu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
External Ventricular Drainage ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Intensity Level ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Ventricular Drainage ◽  
Meta Analyses

External ventricular drainage (EVD) may be used for therapeutic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage to control intracranial pressure (ICP) after traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, there is currently uncertainty regarding the optimal timing for EVD insertion. This study aims to compare patient outcomes for patients with early and late EVD insertion. Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, MEDLINE/EMBASE/Scopus/Web of Science/Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for published literature involving at least 10 severe TBI (sTBI) patients from their inception date to December 2019. Outcomes assessed were mortality, functional outcome, ICP control, length of stay, therapy intensity level, and complications. Twenty-one studies comprising 4542 sTBI patients with an EVD were included; 19 of the studies included patients with an early EVD, and two studies had late EVD placements. The limited number of studies, small sample sizes, imbalance in baseline characteristics between the groups and poor methodological quality have limited the scope of our analysis. We present the descriptive statistics highlighting the current conflicting data and the overall lack of reliable research into the optimal timing of EVD. There is a clear need for high quality comparisons of early vs. late EVD insertion on patient outcomes in sTBI.

scholarly journals The Evolution of the Role of External Ventricular Drainage in Traumatic Brain Injury

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 1422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlene Y. C. Chau ◽  
Claudia L. Craven ◽  
Andres M. Rubiano ◽  
Hadie Adams ◽  
Selma Tülü ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Clinical Effectiveness ◽  
External Ventricular Drainage ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Ventricular Drainage ◽  
Contemporary Practice ◽  
Economic Considerations

External ventricular drains (EVDs) are commonly used in neurosurgery in different conditions but frequently in the management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) to monitor and/or control intracranial pressure (ICP) by diverting cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Their clinical effectiveness, when used as a therapeutic ICP-lowering procedure in contemporary practice, remains unclear. No consensus has been reached regarding the drainage strategy and optimal timing of insertion. We review the literature on EVDs in the setting of TBI, discussing its clinical indications, surgical technique, complications, clinical outcomes, and economic considerations.

scholarly journals Intracranial Pressure during External Ventricular Drainage Weaning Is an Outcome Predictor of Traumatic Brain Injury

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Jia-cheng Gu ◽  
Hong Wu ◽  
Xing-zhao Chen ◽  
Jun-feng Feng ◽  
Guo-yi Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Intracranial Pressure ◽  
External Ventricular Drainage ◽  
Unfavorable Outcome ◽  
Ventricular Drainage ◽  
Outcome Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Relationship

External ventricular drainage (EVD) is widely used in patients with a traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, the EVD weaning trial protocol varies and insufficient studies focus on the intracranial pressure (ICP) during the weaning trial. We aimed to establish the relationship between ICP during an EVD weaning trial and the outcomes of TBI. We enrolled 37 patients with a TBI with an EVD from July 2018 to September 2019. Among them, 26 were allocated to the favorable outcome group and 11 to the unfavorable outcome group (death, post-traumatic hydrocephalus, persistent vegetative state, and severe disability). Groups were well matched for sex, pupil reactivity, admission Glasgow Coma Scale score, Marshall computed tomography score, modified Fisher score, intraventricular hemorrhage, EVD days, cerebrospinal fluid output before the weaning trial, and the complications. Before and during the weaning trial, we recorded the ICP at 1-hour intervals to calculate the mean ICP, delta ICP, and ICP burden, which was defined as the area under the ICP curve. There were significant between-group differences in the age, surgery types, and intensive care unit days (p=0.045, p=0.028, and p=0.004, respectively). During the weaning trial, 28 (75.7%) patients had an increased ICP. Although there was no significant difference in the mean ICP before and during the weaning trial, the delta ICP was higher in the unfavorable outcome group (p=0.001). Moreover, patients who experienced death and hydrocephalus had a higher ICP burden, which was above 20 mmHg (p=0.016). Receiver operating characteristic analyses demonstrated the predictive ability of these variables (area under the curve AUC=0.818 [p=0.002] for delta ICP and AUC=0.758 [p=0.038] for ICP burden>20 mmHg). ICP elevation is common during EVD weaning trials in patients with TBI. ICP-related parameters, including delta ICP and ICP burden, are significant outcome predictors. There is a need for larger prospective studies to further explore the relationship between ICP during EVD weaning trials and TBI outcomes.

scholarly journals Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term neurocognitive outcomes in paediatric traumatic brain injury

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. e035513
Author(s):  
Dawn Shu Hui Looi ◽  
Mark Sen Liang Goh ◽  
Sharon Si Min Goh ◽  
Jia Ling Goh ◽  
Rehena Sultana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Neurodevelopmental Outcomes ◽  
Neurocognitive Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analyses

IntroductionChildren who suffer from traumatic brain injury (TBI) are at risk of permanent brain damage and developmental deficits. Reports on neurodevelopmental outcomes in paediatric TBI suffer from small sample size and varying outcome definitions in the neurocognitive domains tested. This protocol describes a systematic review and meta-analysis of paediatric TBI in the following key neurocognitive domains: executive function, perceptual–motor function, language, learning and memory, social cognition and complex attention.MethodsA comprehensive search comprising studies from Medline, Cochrane, Embase and PsycINFO published from 1988 to 2019 will be conducted. We will include studies on children ≤18 years old who suffer from mild, moderate and severe TBI as determined by the Glasgow Coma Scale that report neurocognitive outcomes in domains predetermined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders fifth edition criteria. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials, case–control, cohort and cross-sectional studies will be included. References from systematic reviews and meta-analyses will be hand-searched for relevant articles. A meta-analysis will be performed and effect sizes will be calculated to summarise the magnitude of change in each neurocognitive domain compared at different timepoints and stratified by severity of TBI. Included studies will be pooled using pooled standardised mean differences with a random effects model to determine an overall effect. In the scenario that we are unable to pool the studies, we will perform a narrative analysis.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is not required for this study.The authors of this study will publish and present the findings in a peer-reviewed journal as well as national and international conferences. The results of this study will provide understanding into the association between different severities of paediatric TBI and long-term neurocognitive outcomes.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020152680.

scholarly journals Factors Related To Outcome of Traumatic Brain Injury Patients at M Djamil Padang Hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 811-817
Author(s):  
Nora Fitri ◽  
Syarif Indra ◽  
Hendra Permana
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Significant Relationship ◽  
Traffic Accidents ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
P Value ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Major Threat

Background: Traumatic brain injury is still a major threat because it can cause global morbidity and mortality. Many factors can affect the outcome of a traumatic brain injury. Some conditions that can exacerbate traumatic brain injury include GCS conditions, blood pressure variability, and pupillary reflexes.Methods: The research was conducted in M. Djamil Padang Hospital from October 2020 to March 2021. The study design was a cross-sectional study in traumatic brain injury patients with ≤ 48 hours of onset and the aged between 18-60 years. The subjects in this study consisted of 66 subjects. At 6 weeks after onset, a GOS assessment was performed to assess patient outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed computerized with SPSS 22.0. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Most of the patients were male (71.2%) with an average age of 36.41 ± 14,275 years, and the most common injury mechanism was traffic accidents (95.5%). There was a significant relationship between onset of incidence, hypotension, pupillary reflexes, and Rotterdam score with the outcome of traumatic brain injury patients (p<0.05) and there was no significant relationship between age, gender, and mechanism of injury with the outcome patients with traumatic brain injury. Conclution: The onset of events, hypotension, pupillary reflexes, and Rotterdam scores significantly affect the outcome patients of traumatic brain injury.

External Ventricular Drainage

2018 ◽  
pp. 165-172
Author(s):  
Nitin Agarwal ◽  
Andrew F. Ducruet
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Neurological Disease ◽  
External Ventricular Drain ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
External Ventricular Drainage ◽  
Postoperative Management ◽  
Ventricular Drainage ◽  
Cerebrospinal Fluid Diversion ◽  
Lumbar Drain

External ventricular drainage, or ventriculostomy, refers to surgical placement of a catheter into the ventricle to achieve temporary cerebrospinal fluid diversion and remains one of the most frequently performed neurosurgical interventions. External ventricular drainage is an essential therapeutic strategy for a myriad of neurological disease processes causing hydrocephalus or increased intracranial pressure including traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and intracranial hemorrhage with intraventricular extension. In select cases, lumbar drains may provide a suitable alterative to an external ventricular drain (EVD). Complications related to both EVD and lumbar drain placement include malfunction, infection, and hemorrhage. This chapter reviews the indications, surgical technique, postoperative management strategies, and potential complications associated with external ventricular drainage.

scholarly journals Abnormalities on Perfusion CT and Intervention for Intracranial Hypertension in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 2000
Author(s):  
Shannon Cooper ◽  
Cino Bendinelli ◽  
Andrew Bivard ◽  
Mark Parsons ◽  
Zsolt J. Balogh
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Severe Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Perfusion Computed Tomography ◽  
Group I ◽  
Second Tier

The role of invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (STBI) remain unclear. Perfusion computed tomography (CTP) provides crucial information about the cerebral perfusion status in these patients. We hypothesised that CTP abnormalities would be associated with the severity of intracranial hypertension (ICH). To investigate this hypothesis, twenty-eight patients with STBI and ICP monitors were investigated with CTP within 48 h from admission. Treating teams were blind to these results. Patients were divided into five groups based on increasing intervention required to control ICH and were compared. Group I required no intervention above routine sedation, group II required a single first tier intervention, group III required multiple different first-tier interventions, group IV required second-tier medical therapy and group V required second-tier surgical therapy. Analysis of the results showed demographics and injury severity did not differ among groups. In group I no patients showed CTP abnormality, while patients in all other groups had abnormal CTP (p = 0.003). Severe ischaemia observed on CTP was associated with increasing intervention for ICH. This study, although limited by small sample size, suggests that CTP abnormalities are associated with the need to intervene for ICH. Larger scale assessment of our results is warranted to potentially avoid unnecessary invasive procedures in head injury patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document