scholarly journals The Landscape and Therapeutic Implications of Molecular Profiles in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 2239
Author(s):  
Ludivine Dion ◽  
Isis Carton ◽  
Sylvie Jaillard ◽  
Krystel Nyangoh Timoh ◽  
Sébastien Henno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) affects 43,000 women worldwide every year and has a five-year survival rate of 30%. Mainstay treatment is extensive surgery and chemotherapy. Outcomes could be improved by molecular profiling. We conducted a review of the literature to identify relevant publications on molecular and genetic alterations in EOC. Approximately 15% of all EOCs are due to BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Four histologic subtypes characterized by different mutations have been described: serous, endometrioid, mucinous, and clear-cell. Between 20–30% of high-grade serous EOCs have a BRCA mutation. Tumors with BRCA mutations are unable to repair double-strand DNA breaks, making them more sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy and to PolyAdenosine Diphosphate-Ribose Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Olaparib is a PARP inhibitor with proven efficacy in BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer, but its effectiveness remains to be demonstrated in tumors with a BRCAness (breast cancer) profile (i.e., also including sporadic tumors in patients with deficient DNA repair genes). A universally accepted molecular definition of BRCAness is required to identify optimal theranostic strategies involving PARP inhibitors. Gene expression analyses have led to the identification of four subgroups of high-grade serous EOC: mesenchymal, proliferative, differentiated, and immunoreactive. These subtypes are not mutually exclusive but are correlated with prognosis. They are not yet used in routine clinical practice. A greater understanding of EOC subtypes could improve patient management.

scholarly journals Tumour Versus Germline BRCA Testing in Ovarian Cancer: A Single-Site Institution Experience in the United Kingdom

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 547
Author(s):  
Iolia Akaev ◽  
Siavash Rahimi ◽  
Olubukola Onifade ◽  
Francis John Edward Gardner ◽  
David Castells-Rufas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Unknown Origin ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Serous Carcinoma ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
Epithelial Cancers ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Pathogenic Mutations

The aim of this audit was to evaluate the usefulness and serviceability of testing for pathogenic mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) genes in ovarian cancer (OC) patients. One hundred and thirty-five patients with more common histological sub-types of OC were retrospectively identified between 2011 and 2019. The fail rate of the molecular analysis was 7.4% (10/135). One hundred and twenty-five records were evaluated: 99 (79.2%) patients had wild-type BRCA (both somatic and germline); tumour BRCA1/2 (tBRCA1/2) pathogenic mutations were found in 20 (16%) patients with distribution between BRCA1 and BRCA2 being 40% and 60%, respectively; 13 (10.4%) patients with pathogenic variants had germline mutations; and tBRCA1/2 with variant of unknown significance (VUS), in the absence of pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 variants, was detected in 6 (4.8%) patients. Our data show that expanding the molecular service to the routine first-tumour testing for patients with OC will potentially increase the detection rate of BRCA mutations, thereby providing early benefits of PARP inhibitors therapy. The tumour testing service should continue to be offered to newly diagnosed patients with high-grade epithelial cancers, including high-grade serous carcinoma, but also with carcinosarcomas and poorly-differentiated metastatic adenocarcinomas of unknown origin.

scholarly journals PARP Inhibitor Olaparib Use in a BRCA1-Positive Patient With Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer, Without the Initial Use of Platinum-Based Chemotherapy, Showing Significant Rapid Near Resolution of Large Liver Metastasis While Patient Experienced Gout-Like Symptoms

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 232470961986498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trevanne Matthews Hew ◽  
Lara Zuberi
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Management Options ◽  
Federal Drug Administration ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Metastatic Setting

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 20% of breast cancers diagnosed worldwide. This subtype of breast cancer tends to behave more aggressively, and unlike other breast cancer subtypes, there are no standard targeted treatments for most patients. However, up to 20% of patients with TNBC harbor a breast cancer gene (BRCA) mutation, particularly in BRCA1. For patients who carry this gene mutation, this opens the door for new management options by the use of newer agents such as polyadenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in the metastatic setting. Given that this is uncommon and that PARP inhibitors have only recently received Federal Drug Administration approval, the experience with these drugs is relatively new. In this article, we present a case of a patient treated in this setting with olaparib who developed an unanticipated side effect as a result of the high efficacy of the drug.

scholarly journals Gynecologic Cancers: Emerging Novel Strategies for Targeting DNA Repair Deficiency

2016 ◽  
pp. e259-e268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca S. Kristeleit ◽  
Rowan E. Miller ◽  
Elise C. Kohn
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Inhibitor Therapy ◽  
Molecular Therapy ◽  
Parp Inhibition ◽  
Gynecologic Cancers ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
Individual Gene

The presence of a BRCA mutation, somatic or germline, is now established as a standard of care for selecting patients with ovarian cancer for treatment with a PARP inhibitor. During the clinical development of the PARP inhibitor class of agents, a subset of women without BRCA mutations were shown to respond to these drugs (termed “ BRCAness”). It was hypothesized that other genetic abnormalities causing a homologous recombinant deficiency (HRD) were sensitizing the BRCA wild-type cancers to PARP inhibition. The molecular basis for these other causes of HRD are being defined. They include individual gene defects (e.g., RAD51 mutation, CHEK2 mutation), homozygous somatic loss, and whole genome properties such as genomic scarring. Testing this knowledge is possible when selecting patients to receive molecular therapy targeting DNA repair, not only for patients with ovarian cancer but also endometrial and cervical cancers. The validity of HRD assays and multiple gene sequencing panels to select a broader population of patients for treatment with PARP inhibitor therapy is under evaluation. Other non-HRD targets for exploiting DNA repair defects in gynecologic cancers include mismatch repair (MMR), checkpoint signaling, and nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) DNA repair. This article describes recent evidence supporting strategies in addition to BRCA mutation for selecting patients for treatment with PARP inhibitor therapy. Additionally, the challenges and opportunities of exploiting DNA repair pathways other than homologous recombination for molecular therapy in gynecologic cancers is discussed.

Somatic versus germline BRCA mutations screening in ovarian cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13100-e13100
Author(s):  
Hugo SM Nunes ◽  
Patricia Machado ◽  
Sofia Fragoso ◽  
Sidonia Santos ◽  
Fernanda Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Somatic Mutations ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
Alu Element ◽  
Brca1 Carriers ◽  
Large Rearrangements ◽  
Clinic Medical

e13100 Background: ovarian cancer (OC) with germinal or somatic BRCA mutations responds better to platinum and to PARP-inhibitors. There is great enthusiasm about BRCA somatic screening. Our aim was to analyse the correlation between BRCA somatic and germline mutational profile. Methods: a cohort of 23 pts was obtained by cross-linking OC pts from the South Portuguese Cancer Registry, between 2009-2014 and BRCA mutation carriers identified in our Clinic. Medical records were reviewed: demographic and clinico-pathologic data obtained. Germinal screening: pts were pre-screened for the BRCA2 Portuguese founder mutation (PFM), analysed for BRCA point mutations (different screening methodologies were used in diagnostic timeline: initially CSGE, then CSCE and finally NGS) and for large rearrangements by MLPA. Somatic screening: DNA was extracted from 5 sections of 10µm of FFPE tissue and analysed for BRCA1/2 genes by NGS. Results: clinico-pathological features of the 23 pts revealed mainly high-grade serous histology (96%). Mean age at diagnosis was 54 years old (33-76); BRCA2 were older than BRCA1 carriers (62 vs 51). Most pts presented at advanced stage (70% stages III-IV; 30% stage I-II). Seventeen were BRCA1 carriers and 6 were BRCA2 (5 of those PFM, a large insertion of an Alu element). Somatic correlation: 8 pts (5 BRCA1, 3PFM) were already analysed and 100% correlation was observed for all point mutations. One additional BRCA2 somatic mutation was detected (with a variant allele frequency of 53% whereas 2 others were < 7%); interestingly exclusive somatic mutations were only observed in PFM carriers (known not to be NGS detectable). The remaining 15 pts are under analysis. Conclusions: it was expected that the PFM and other large rearrangements would not be detected with NGS. A specific somatic screening for the PFM may be possible but other rearrangements are found by MLPA in our population (10% of all BRCA mutations). Preliminary data adds to the evidence that NGS OC somatic screening will identify all germinal point mutations and an indeterminate number of additional pts with exclusive somatic mutations. An ideal correlation needs integration of differenttechniques that may increase complexity, time and cost.

Real-world treatment patterns of maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: Are some patients missing out?

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18042-e18042
Author(s):  
Haley Moss ◽  
Angeles Alvarez Secord ◽  
Jessica Perhanidis ◽  
Carol Hawkes
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Real World ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
World Population ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

e18042 Background: The clinical utility of maintenance therapy (MT) for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC) has been validated in several clinical trials. We assessed real world treatment patterns using a US nationwide electronic health record database. Methods: A retrospective study of patients with PSROC between March 2017 and July 2019 was conducted using the Flatiron Health database. This longitudinal, demographically and geographically diverse de-identified database covers > 2.2 million oncology patients in > 280 cancer clinics. Patients were excluded if second or third line (2L or 3L) platinum-based chemotherapy (PBT) regimens included less than four or more than eight cycles of platinum. Information regarding somatic or germline BRCA mutations and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) were obtained. Results: 2292 patients with PSROC were identified (had 2L or 3L treatment); 1214 of these received PBT at recurrence; 610 completed the PBT for recurrence on or after March 2017; 351 received 4–8 cycles of PBT; 225 patients had ≥2 months of active surveillance or were receiving MT of PARPi or bevacizumab (B) and were included in this analysis. 183 patients (80%) had BRCA testing and 14 patients (6%) had HRD testing. 46 (20%) had a germline or somatic BRCA mutations (t BRCA), 134 (59%) had a wildtype wt BRCA gene, and 48 (21%) were unknown. Of patients with tBRCA, 63% received a PARP inhibitor (PARPi), 17% received B, 20% received active surveillance. Of patients with wt BRCA, 40% received a PARPi, 24% received B, and 37% received active surveillance. Olaparib was the most commonly used PARPi among tBRCA patients (26%), while niraparib was most commonly used among wt BRCA patients (21%). MT was more common in younger patients, those with a better performance status and with a BRCA mutation. MT use trend increased by 21% during the study period. As PARPi use increased, the use of active surveillance as a post-platinum regimen decreased during the later time periods (Table). Conclusions: In this real world population, the majority of patients with PSROC are receiving maintenance therapy. While genetic testing is improving, universal testing of all patients with ovarian cancer remains the goal. The results provide insight into the shifting treatment patterns for patients with ovarian cancer. [Table: see text]

Maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab (bev) after platinum-based chemotherapy plus bev in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed advanced high-grade ovarian cancer (HGOC): Efficacy by BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation in the phase III PAOLA-1 trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6039-6039
Author(s):  
Domenica Lorusso ◽  
Jean-Pierre Lotz ◽  
Philipp Harter ◽  
Claire Cropet ◽  
Maria Jesus Rubio Pérez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Brca1 Mutation ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Brca2 Mutation ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
First Line ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

6039 Background: In PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 (NCT02477644), adding the PARP inhibitor olaparib to maintenance bev after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy plus bev led to a statistically significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in pts with advanced HGOC (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.49–0.72) (Ray-Coquard et al. 2019). Retrospective subgroup analysis in GOG-0218 (Norquist et al. 2018) suggested BRCA mutation (BRCAm) status did not significantly impact the PFS benefit provided by bev. We explored the efficacy of olaparib plus bev by BRCA1 mutation ( BRCA1m) or BRCA2 mutation ( BRCA2m) in PAOLA-1. Methods: PAOLA-1 is a randomized, double-blind, Phase III trial in pts with newly diagnosed, FIGO stage III–IV, high-grade serous or endometrioid OC, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer receiving platinum-based chemotherapy plus bev then maintenance bev. Pts unrestricted by surgical outcome or BRCAm status and in response to first-line therapy were randomized to maintenance olaparib tablets (300 mg bid for up to 24 months) plus bev (15 mg/kg q3w for up to 15 months in total) or placebo plus bev, stratified by first-line treatment outcome and tumor BRCAm status. Investigator-assessed PFS (modified RECIST v1.1) by BRCAm was a predefined analysis. Results: Of 806 randomized pts, 160 (20%) had tumor BRCA1m, 76 (9%) had tumor BRCA2m and 1 (<1%) had both. Median PFS follow-up was 24.1 and 27.4 months in BRCA1m and BRCA2m pts, respectively. At primary data cutoff, PFS was prolonged with olaparib plus bev versus placebo plus bev in BRCA1m pts and BRCA2m pts (Table). The percentage of BRCA1m pts who received olaparib plus bev and were progression-free at 1 and 2 years was 95% and 73% (vs. 70% and 29% for placebo plus bev) and for BRCA2m pts was 89% and 84% (vs. 84% and 53%) (Kaplan-Meier estimates). Conclusions: In PAOLA-1, maintenance olaparib plus bev provided a significant PFS benefit versus placebo plus bev in all pts analysed, regardless of whether they had BRCA1m or BRCA2m. The median PFS in the control arm suggests a role for bev in this subgroup and the hazard ratio versus an active control arm shows the value of adding maintenance olaparib to bev. Clinical trial information: NCT02477644. [Table: see text]

DUETTE: A randomized phase II study to assess a second maintenance treatment with olaparib (ola) or ola+ceralasertib (cer), in patients (pts) with platinum-sensitive relapsed (PSR) epithelial ovarian cancer who have previously received PARP inhibitor maintenance treatment (NCT04239014).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS6104-TPS6104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit M. Oza ◽  
Andrew Pierce ◽  
Alan Lau ◽  
Nisha Kurian ◽  
Graeme Parr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Maintenance Treatment ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Resistance Mechanisms ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

TPS6104 Background: Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecological cancers in the USA, and the fifth most common cause of cancer death in women. Ola is a PARPi approved for first-line maintenance treatment of BRCA-mutated advanced ovarian cancer in women who achieve a complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Ola is also efficacious in combination with bevacizumab in the same population, independent of BRCA mutation status. Cer is a potent, oral, selective inhibitor of ATR. ATR is a critical DDR kinase that is activated in response to replication stress and stalled replication forks. There is no second maintenance standard of care for patients with PSR ovarian cancer who have previously received a PARPi in the maintenance setting. Pre-clinical models have shown that several mechanisms of PARPi resistance may be overcome by ATR inhibition, such as BRCA reversion, replication fork protection and DDR rewiring. DUETTE will select pts with tumor response or stable disease after second or third-line platinum-based treatment, with the expectation to enrich for non-BRCA reversion PARPi resistance mechanisms. The study will address the role of a second maintenance treatment following prior 1L or 2L maintenance, an emerging population of unmet need, and includes translational studies that aim to further our knowledge of clinical PARPi resistance mechanisms and predictors of treatment response. Methods: DUETTE is a global, multi-center, phase II study. 192 pts with PSR epithelial ovarian cancer who have previously received PARPi maintenance treatment, will be retreated with platinum and those who have not progressed after ≥ 4 cycles will be randomized (1:1:1) to 3 treatment arms: Arm 1, open-label: cer 160 mg once daily (qd) days 1 to 7 plus ola 300 mg twice daily (bd); Arm 2, blinded: ola monotherapy 300 mg bd and Arm 3, blinded: ola-placebo. Treatment is administered in 28-day cycles. All pts will be stratified by BRCA status (mutation or wildtype) and response to most recent line of platinum-based chemotherapy (CR/PR or SD). The primary endpoint is to assess the efficacy of maintenance ola monotherapy and cer+ola combination therapy compared with placebo by PFS using blinded, independent central review. Secondary endpoints are overall survival, PFS2, ORR, DoR, safety and tolerability. Enrolment is planned to start in April 2020.

scholarly journals Niraparib in ovarian cancer: results to date and clinical potential

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 579-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Caruso ◽  
Anselmo Papa ◽  
Silverio Tomao ◽  
Patrizia Vici ◽  
Pierluigi Benedetti Panici ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Synthetic Lethality ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Repair System ◽  
Gynaecological Malignancy ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Base Excision

Ovarian cancer is the first cause of death from gynaecological malignancy. Germline mutation in BRCA1 and 2, two genes involved in the mechanisms of reparation of DNA damage, are showed to be related with the incidence of breast and ovarian cancer, both sporadic and familiar. PARP is a family of enzymes involved in the base excision repair (BER) system. The introduction of inhibitors of PARP in patients with BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer is correlated with the concept of synthetic lethality. Among the PARP inhibitors introduced in clinical practice, niraparib showed interesting results in a phase III trial in the setting of maintenance treatment in ovarian cancer, after platinum-based chemotherapy. Interestingly, was niraparib showed to be efficacious not only in BRCA-mutated patients, but also in patients with other alterations of the homologous recombination (HR) system and in patients with unknown alterations. These results position niraparib as the first PARP-inhibitor with clinically and statistically significant results also in patients with no alterations in BRCA 1/2 and other genes involved in the DNA repair system. Even if the results are potentially practice-changing, the action of niraparib must be further studied and deepened.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of PARP Inhibitor Combination Therapy in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ning Ren ◽  
Leyin Zhang ◽  
Jieru Yu ◽  
Siqi Guan ◽  
Xinyang Dai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Efficacy And Safety

ObjectivesThough it is known to all that PARP inhibitors (PARPis) are effective when used as maintenance alone for women with recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC), little is known about whether using them in combination with other drugs would contribute to a better efficacy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the efficacy and safety of PARPi combination therapy compared with monotherapy.Materials and MethodsWe searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that offered the date we needed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and major conference. Data extraction and processing were completed by three investigators to compare OS, PFS, and ORR both in intervention and in control subset. Then, we calculated the pooled RR and 95% CI of all-grade and high-grade adverse effects to study its safety. And we evaluated the within-study heterogeneity by using subgroup and sensitivity analysis.Results and ConclusionA total of three eligible RCTs covering 343 women were included. In PFS analysis, PARP inhibitor (PARPi) combination therapy can significantly improve PFS for women with ROC when compared with the controls (HR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.59), especially for those with mutated BRCA (HR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.45). And in OS analysis, combination therapy is not inferior to monotherapy (HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.50 to 1.61). As for ORR, the effectiveness of combination therapy and monotherapy was almost the same (RR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.31). Additionally, combination therapy seldom causes more adverse events, both in all-grade and in high grade.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (identifier, CRD42018109933).

scholarly journals PARP Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer: The Route to “Ithaca”

Diagnostics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boussios ◽  
Karathanasi ◽  
Cooke ◽  
Neille ◽  
Sadauskaite ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Parp Inhibition ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Significant Efficacy

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are a novel class of therapeutic agents that target tumors with deficiencies in the homologous recombination DNA repair pathway. Genomic instability characterizes high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), with one half of all tumors displaying defects in the important DNA repair pathway of homologous recombination. Early studies have shown significant efficacy for PARP inhibitors in patients with germline breast related cancer antigens 1 and 2 (BRCA1/2) mutations. It has also become evident that BRCA wild-type patients with other defects in the homologous recombination repair pathway benefit from this treatment. Companion homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) scores are being developed to guide the selection of patients that are most likely to benefit from PARP inhibition. The choice of which PARP inhibitor is mainly based upon the number of prior therapies and the presence of a BRCA mutation or HRD. The identification of patients most likely to benefit from PARP inhibitor therapy in view of HRD and other biomarker assessments is still challenging. The aim of this review is to describe the current evidence for PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer, their mechanism of action, and the outstanding issues, including the rate of long-term toxicities and the evolution of resistance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document