Caffeine Stabilises Fission Yeast Wee1 in a Rad24-Dependent Manner but Attenuates Its Expression in Response to DNA Damage

The widely consumed neuroactive compound caffeine has generated much interest due to its ability to override the DNA damage and replication checkpoints. Previously Rad3 and its homologues was thought to be the target of caffeine’s inhibitory activity. Later findings indicate that the Target of Rapamycin Complex 1 (TORC1) is the preferred target of caffeine. Effective Cdc2 inhibition requires both the activation of the Wee1 kinase and inhibition of the Cdc25 phosphatase. The TORC1, DNA damage, and environmental stress response pathways all converge on Cdc25 and Wee1. We previously demonstrated that caffeine overrides DNA damage checkpoints by modulating Cdc25 stability. The effect of caffeine on cell cycle progression resembles that of TORC1 inhibition. Furthermore, caffeine activates the Sty1 regulated environmental stress response. Caffeine may thus modulate multiple signalling pathways that regulate Cdc25 and Wee1 levels, localisation and activity. Here we show that the activity of caffeine stabilises both Cdc25 and Wee1. The stabilising effect of caffeine and genotoxic agents on Wee1 was dependent on the Rad24 chaperone. Interestingly, caffeine inhibited the accumulation of Wee1 in response to DNA damage. Caffeine may modulate cell cycle progression through increased Cdc25 activity and Wee1 repression following DNA damage via TORC1 inhibition, as TORC1 inhibition increased DNA damage sensitivity.

Download Full-text

Caffeine stabilises fission yeast Wee1 in a Rad24-dependent manner but attenuates its expression in response to DNA damage identifying a putative role for TORC1 in mediating its effects on cell cycle progression

10.1101/2020.01.22.915231 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

John P. Alao ◽

Johanna Johansson-Sjölander ◽

Charalampos Rallis ◽

Per Sunnerhagen

Keyword(s):

Cell Cycle ◽

Dna Damage ◽

Stress Response ◽

Environmental Stress ◽

Cell Cycle Progression ◽

Dependent Manner ◽

Environmental Stress Response ◽

Cycle Progression ◽

Dna Damage Checkpoints ◽

Wee1 Kinase

AbstractThe widely consumed neuroactive compound caffeine has generated much interest due to its ability to override the DNA damage and replication checkpoints. Previously Rad3 and its homologues was thought to be the target of caffeine’s inhibitory activity. Later findings indicate that the Target of Rapamycin Complex 1 (TORC1) is the preferred target of caffeine. Effective Cdc2 inhibition requires both the activation of the Wee1 kinase and inhibition of the Cdc25 phosphatase. The TORC1, DNA damage, and environmental stress response pathways all converge on Cdc25 and Wee1. We previously demonstrated that caffeine overrides DNA damage checkpoints by modulating Cdc25 stability. The effect of caffeine on cell cycle progression resembles that of TORC1 inhibition. Furthermore, caffeine activates the Sty1 regulated environmental stress response. Caffeine may thus modulate multiple signalling pathways that regulate Cdc25 and Wee1 levels, localisation and activity. Here we show that the activity of caffeine stabilises both Cdc25 and Wee1. The stabilising effect of caffeine and genotoxic agents on Wee1 was dependent on the Rad24 chaperone. Interestingly, caffeine inhibited the accumulation of Wee1 in response to DNA damage. Caffeine therefore modulates cell cycle progression contextually through increased Cdc25 activity and Wee1 repression following DNA damage via TORC1 inhibition.

Download Full-text

DNA damage checkpoint dynamics drive cell cycle phase transitions

10.1101/137307 ◽

2017 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Hui Xiao Chao ◽

Cere E. Poovey ◽

Ashley A. Privette ◽

Gavin D. Grant ◽

Hui Yan Chao ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cell Cycle ◽

Dna Damage ◽

Phase Transitions ◽

Cell Cycle Progression ◽

S Phase ◽

Cell Cycle Phase ◽

Cycle Phase ◽

Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽

Cycle Progression ◽

Dna Damage Checkpoints

ABSTRACTDNA damage checkpoints are cellular mechanisms that protect the integrity of the genome during cell cycle progression. In response to genotoxic stress, these checkpoints halt cell cycle progression until the damage is repaired, allowing cells enough time to recover from damage before resuming normal proliferation. Here, we investigate the temporal dynamics of DNA damage checkpoints in individual proliferating cells by observing cell cycle phase transitions following acute DNA damage. We find that in gap phases (G1 and G2), DNA damage triggers an abrupt halt to cell cycle progression in which the duration of arrest correlates with the severity of damage. However, cells that have already progressed beyond a proposed “commitment point” within a given cell cycle phase readily transition to the next phase, revealing a relaxation of checkpoint stringency during later stages of certain cell cycle phases. In contrast to G1 and G2, cell cycle progression in S phase is significantly less sensitive to DNA damage. Instead of exhibiting a complete halt, we find that increasing DNA damage doses leads to decreased rates of S-phase progression followed by arrest in the subsequent G2. Moreover, these phase-specific differences in DNA damage checkpoint dynamics are associated with corresponding differences in the proportions of irreversibly arrested cells. Thus, the precise timing of DNA damage determines the sensitivity, rate of cell cycle progression, and functional outcomes for damaged cells. These findings should inform our understanding of cell fate decisions after treatment with common cancer therapeutics such as genotoxins or spindle poisons, which often target cells in a specific cell cycle phase.

Download Full-text

5-AED enhances survival of irradiated mice in a G-CSF-dependent manner, stimulates innate immune cell function, reduces radiation-induced DNA damage and induces genes that modulate cell cycle progression and apoptosis

Journal of Radiation Research ◽

10.1093/jrr/rrs060 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 53 (6) ◽

pp. 840-853 ◽

Cited By ~ 32

Author(s):

Marcy B. Grace ◽

Vijay K. Singh ◽

Juong G. Rhee ◽

William E. Jackson ◽

Tzu-Cheg Kao ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cell Cycle ◽

Dna Damage ◽

Cell Cycle Progression ◽

Cell Function ◽

Immune Cell ◽

Innate Immune ◽

Dependent Manner ◽

Immune Cell Function ◽

Cycle Progression ◽

Radiation Induced

Download Full-text

The environmental stress response regulates ribosome content in cell cycle-arrested S. cerevisiae

10.1101/2021.05.14.444167 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Allegra Terhorst ◽

Arzu Sandikci ◽

Gabriel E. Neurohr ◽

Charles A. Whittaker ◽

Tamás Szórádi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cell Cycle ◽

Stress Response ◽

Environmental Stress ◽

Cell Cycle Progression ◽

Transcriptional Response ◽

Biomass Accumulation ◽

Temperature Sensitive ◽

Restrictive Temperature ◽

Environmental Stress Response ◽

Pka Pathway

Temperature sensitive cell division cycle (cdc-ts) cells are unable to progress through the cell cycle at the restrictive temperature due to mutations in genes essential to cell cycle progress. Cells harboring cdc-ts mutations increase in cell volume upon arrest but eventually stop growing. We found that this attenuation in growth was due to selective downregulation of ribosome concentration. We saw similar ribosome downregulation in cells arrested in the cell cycle through alpha factor addition, rapamycin addition, and entrance into stationary phase. In all cell cycle arrests studied, cells activated the Environmental Stress Response (ESR), a key transcriptional response to many stressors in S. cerevisiae. When we combined cell cycle arrest with hyperactivation of the Ras/PKA pathway, ESR activation was prevented, cells were unable to downregulate their ribosomes, and cell viability was decreased. Our work uncovers a key role for the environmental stress response in coupling cell cycle progression to biomass accumulation.

Download Full-text

DNA Damage Checkpoints Inhibit Mitotic Exit by Two Different Mechanisms

Molecular and Cellular Biology ◽

10.1128/mcb.00095-07 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 27 (14) ◽

pp. 5067-5078 ◽

Cited By ~ 27

Author(s):

Fengshan Liang ◽

Yanchang Wang

Keyword(s):

Cell Cycle ◽

Dna Damage ◽

Cell Cycle Progression ◽

Budding Yeast ◽

Mitotic Exit ◽

Yeast Cells ◽

Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽

Cycle Progression ◽

Dna Damage Checkpoints ◽

Early Anaphase

ABSTRACT Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) governs cell cycle progression, and its kinase activity fluctuates during the cell cycle. Mitotic exit pathways are responsible for the inactivation of CDK after chromosome segregation by promoting the release of a nucleolus-sequestered phosphatase, Cdc14, which antagonizes CDK. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, mitotic exit is controlled by the FEAR (for “Cdc-fourteen early anaphase release”) and mitotic exit network (MEN) pathways. In response to DNA damage, two branches of the DNA damage checkpoint, Chk1 and Rad53, are activated in budding yeast to prevent anaphase entry and mitotic exit, allowing cells more time to repair damaged DNA. Here we present evidence indicating that yeast cells negatively regulate mitotic exit through two distinct pathways in response to DNA damage. Rad53 prevents mitotic exit by inhibiting the MEN pathway, whereas the Chk1 pathway prevents FEAR pathway-dependent Cdc14 release in the presence of DNA damage. In contrast to previous data, the Rad53 pathway negatively regulates MEN independently of Cdc5, a Polo-like kinase essential for mitotic exit. Instead, a defective Rad53 pathway alleviates the inhibition of MEN by Bfa1.

Download Full-text

Regulation of Cell Division in Bacteria by Monitoring Genome Integrity and DNA Replication Status

Journal of Bacteriology ◽

10.1128/jb.00408-19 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 202 (2) ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Peter E. Burby ◽

Lyle A. Simmons

Keyword(s):

Cell Cycle ◽

Dna Damage ◽

Cell Division ◽

Dna Replication ◽

Cell Cycle Progression ◽

Genome Instability ◽

Sos Response ◽

Bacterial Cells ◽

Cycle Progression ◽

Content Type

ABSTRACT All organisms regulate cell cycle progression by coordinating cell division with DNA replication status. In eukaryotes, DNA damage or problems with replication fork progression induce the DNA damage response (DDR), causing cyclin-dependent kinases to remain active, preventing further cell cycle progression until replication and repair are complete. In bacteria, cell division is coordinated with chromosome segregation, preventing cell division ring formation over the nucleoid in a process termed nucleoid occlusion. In addition to nucleoid occlusion, bacteria induce the SOS response after replication forks encounter DNA damage or impediments that slow or block their progression. During SOS induction, Escherichia coli expresses a cytoplasmic protein, SulA, that inhibits cell division by directly binding FtsZ. After the SOS response is turned off, SulA is degraded by Lon protease, allowing for cell division to resume. Recently, it has become clear that SulA is restricted to bacteria closely related to E. coli and that most bacteria enforce the DNA damage checkpoint by expressing a small integral membrane protein. Resumption of cell division is then mediated by membrane-bound proteases that cleave the cell division inhibitor. Further, many bacterial cells have mechanisms to inhibit cell division that are regulated independently from the canonical LexA-mediated SOS response. In this review, we discuss several pathways used by bacteria to prevent cell division from occurring when genome instability is detected or before the chromosome has been fully replicated and segregated.

Download Full-text

STAU2 protein level is controlled by caspases and the CHK1 pathway and regulates cell cycle progression in the non-transformed hTERT-RPE1 cells

BMC Molecular and Cell Biology ◽

10.1186/s12860-021-00352-y ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 22 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Lionel Condé ◽

Yulemi Gonzalez Quesada ◽

Florence Bonnet-Magnaval ◽

Rémy Beaujois ◽

Luc DesGroseillers

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

Cell Cycle ◽

Cell Proliferation ◽

Dna Damage ◽

Steady State ◽

Posttranscriptional Regulation ◽

Cell Cycle Progression ◽

Rna Binding ◽

Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽

Cycle Progression

AbstractBackgroundStaufen2 (STAU2) is an RNA binding protein involved in the posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression. In neurons, STAU2 is required to maintain the balance between differentiation and proliferation of neural stem cells through asymmetric cell division. However, the importance of controlling STAU2 expression for cell cycle progression is not clear in non-neuronal dividing cells. We recently showed that STAU2 transcription is inhibited in response to DNA-damage due to E2F1 displacement from theSTAU2gene promoter. We now study the regulation of STAU2 steady-state levels in unstressed cells and its consequence for cell proliferation.ResultsCRISPR/Cas9-mediated and RNAi-dependent STAU2 depletion in the non-transformed hTERT-RPE1 cells both facilitate cell proliferation suggesting that STAU2 expression influences pathway(s) linked to cell cycle controls. Such effects are not observed in the CRISPR STAU2-KO cancer HCT116 cells nor in the STAU2-RNAi-depleted HeLa cells. Interestingly, a physiological decrease in the steady-state level of STAU2 is controlled by caspases. This effect of peptidases is counterbalanced by the activity of the CHK1 pathway suggesting that STAU2 partial degradation/stabilization fines tune cell cycle progression in unstressed cells. A large-scale proteomic analysis using STAU2/biotinylase fusion protein identifies known STAU2 interactors involved in RNA translation, localization, splicing, or decay confirming the role of STAU2 in the posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression. In addition, several proteins found in the nucleolus, including proteins of the ribosome biogenesis pathway and of the DNA damage response, are found in close proximity to STAU2. Strikingly, many of these proteins are linked to the kinase CHK1 pathway, reinforcing the link between STAU2 functions and the CHK1 pathway. Indeed, inhibition of the CHK1 pathway for 4 h dissociates STAU2 from proteins involved in translation and RNA metabolism.ConclusionsThese results indicate that STAU2 is involved in pathway(s) that control(s) cell proliferation, likely via mechanisms of posttranscriptional regulation, ribonucleoprotein complex assembly, genome integrity and/or checkpoint controls. The mechanism by which STAU2 regulates cell growth likely involves caspases and the kinase CHK1 pathway.

Download Full-text