scholarly journals GPCR Activation States Induced by Nanobodies and Mini-G Proteins Compared by NMR Spectroscopy

Molecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (24) ◽  
pp. 5984
Author(s):  
Philip Rößler ◽  
Daniel Mayer ◽  
Ching-Ju Tsai ◽  
Dmitry B. Veprintsev ◽  
Gebhard F. X. Schertler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Adrenergic Receptor ◽  
Conformational Ensemble ◽  
Gpcr Activation ◽  
Relevant Situation ◽  
Gs Protein ◽  
The Individual ◽  
G Protein Coupled ◽  
Activation Cycle

In this work, we examine methyl nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra of the methionine ε-[13CH3] labelled thermostabilized β1 adrenergic receptor from turkey in association with a variety of different effectors, including mini-Gs and nanobody 60 (Nb60), which have not been previously studied in complex with β1 adrenergic receptor (β1AR) by NMR. Complexes with pindolol and Nb60 induce highly similar inactive states of the receptor, closely resembling the resting state conformational ensemble. We show that, upon binding of mini-Gs or nanobody 80 (Nb80), large allosteric changes throughout the receptor take place. The conformation of tβ1AR stabilized by the native-like mini-Gs protein is highly similar to the conformation induced by the currently used surrogate Nb80. Interestingly, in both cases residual dynamics are present, which were not observed in the resting states. Finally, we reproduce a pharmaceutically relevant situation, where an antagonist abolishes the interaction of the receptor with the mini-G protein in a competitive manner, validating the functional integrity of our preparation. The presented system is therefore well suited for reproducing the individual steps of the activation cycle of a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) in vitro and serves as a basis for functional and pharmacological characterizations of more native-like systems in the future.

scholarly journals G Protein-coupled Receptor Kinase 2–mediated Phosphorylation of Ezrin Is Required for G Protein-coupled Receptor–dependent Reorganization of the Actin Cytoskeleton

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 3088-3099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah H. Cant ◽  
Julie A. Pitcher
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Phosphorylation Site ◽  
Rho Kinase ◽  
Receptor Kinase ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptor ◽  
Glutathione S Transferase ◽  
Membrane Ruffling ◽  
Gpcr Activation ◽  
G Protein Coupled

G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) phosphorylates and desensitizes activated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Here, we identify ezrin as a novel non-GPCR substrate of GRK2. GRK2 phosphorylates glutathione S-transferase (GST)-ezrin, but not an ezrin fusion protein lacking threonine 567 (T567), in vitro. These results suggest that T567, the regulatory phosphorylation site responsible for maintaining ezrin in its active conformation, represents the principle site of GRK2-mediated phosphorylation. Two lines of evidence indicate that GRK2-mediated ezrin-radixinmoesin (ERM) phosphorylation serves to link GPCR activation to cytoskeletal reorganization. First, in Hep2 cells muscarinic M1 receptor (M1MR) activation causes membrane ruffling. This ruffling response is ERM dependent and is accompanied by ERM phosphorylation. Inhibition of GRK2, but not rho kinase or protein kinase C, prevents ERM phosphorylation and membrane ruffling. Second, agonist-induced internalization of the β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR) and M1MR is accompanied by ERM phosphorylation and localization of phosphorylated ERM to receptor-containing endocytic vesicles. The colocalization of internalized β2AR and phosphorylated ERM is not dependent on Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factor binding to the β2AR. Inhibition of ezrin function impedes β2AR internalization, further linking GPCR activation, GRK activity, and ezrin function. Overall, our results suggest that GRK2 serves not only to attenuate but also to transduce GPCR-mediated signals.

scholarly journals Activation of the G-protein coupled receptor GPR35 by human milk oligosaccharides through different pathways

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis Foata ◽  
Norbert Sprenger ◽  
Florence Rochat ◽  
Sami Damak
Keyword(s):  
Human Milk ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Bovine Milk ◽  
Human Milk Oligosaccharides ◽  
Milk Oligosaccharides ◽  
Gpcr Activation ◽  
Host Microbe Interactions ◽  
Receptor Assays ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Abstract Numerous benefits of breastfeeding over infant formula are fully established. The superiority of human milk over bovine milk-based formula is partly due to human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs), a family of over 100 molecules present specifically and substantially in human milk that resemble mucosal glycans. To uncover novel physiological functions and pathways of HMOs, we screened a panel of 165 G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) using a blend of 6 HMOs (3′-O-sialyllactose (3′SL), 6′-O-sialyllactose (6′SL), lacto-N-tetraose (LNT), lacto-N-neo-tetraose (LNnT), 2-O-fucosyllactose (2′FL), and difucosyllactose (diFL)), and followed up positive hits with standard receptor assays. The HMO blend specifically activated GPR35. LNT and 6′SL individually activated GPR35, and they showed synergy when used together. In addition, in vitro fermentation of infant stool samples showed that 2′FL upregulates the production of the GPR35 agonist kynurenic acid (KYNA) by the microbiota. LNT + 6′SL and KYNA showed additive activation of GPR35. Activation by 6′SL and LNT of GPR35, a receptor mediating attenuation of pain and colitis, is to our knowledge the first demonstration of GPCR activation by any HMO. In addition, we demonstrated a remarkable cooperation between nutrition and microbiota towards activation of a host receptor highlighting the close interplay between environment and host-microbe interactions.

scholarly journals Paroxetine Attenuates Cardiac Hypertrophy Via Blocking GRK2 and ADRB1 Interaction in Hypertension

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuejing Sun ◽  
Mengli Zhou ◽  
Gaiyan Wen ◽  
Yun Huang ◽  
Junru Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Cardiac Hypertrophy ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Adrenergic Receptor ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear ◽  
G Protein Coupled ◽  
Paroxetine Treatment

Background ADRB1 (adrenergic receptor beta 1) responds to neuroendocrine stimulations, which have great implications in hypertension. GRK2 (G protein‐coupled receptor kinase 2) is an essential regulator for many G protein‐coupled receptors and subsequent cell signaling cascades, but its role as a regulator of ADRB1 and associated cardiac hypertrophy in hypertension remains to be elucidated. Methods and Results In this study, we found the expressions of GRK2 and ADRB1 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were positively associated with blood pressure levels in hypertensive patients and with their expression in heart. In vitro evidence showed a direct interaction in ADRB1 and GRK2 and genetic depletion of GRK2 blocks epinephrine‐induced upregulation of hypertrophic and fibrotic genes in cardiomyocytes. Meanwhile, we discovered a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine specifically blockades GRK2 and ADRB1 interaction. In vivo, paroxetine treatment ameliorates hypertension‐induced cardiac hypertrophy, dysfunction, and fibrosis in animal models. We found that paroxetine suppressed sympathetic overdrive and increased the adrenergic receptor sensitivity to catecholamines. Paroxetine treatment also blocks epinephrine‐induced upregulation of hypertrophic and fibrotic genes as well as ADRB1 internalization in cardiomyocytes. Coadministration of paroxetine further potentiates metoprolol‐induced reductions in blood pressure and heart rate, further attenuating cardiac hypertrophy in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Furthermore, in patients with hypertension accompanied with depression, we observed that cardiac remodeling was less severe in those with paroxetine treatment compared with those with other types of anti‐depressive agents. Conclusions Paroxetine promotes ADRB1 sensitivity and attenuates cardiac hypertrophy partially via blocking GRK2‐mediated ADRB1 activation and internalization in the context of hypertension.

Development of a Novel SNAP-Epitope Tag/Near-Infrared Imaging Assay to Quantify G Protein-Coupled Receptor Degradation in Human Cells

2021 ◽  
pp. 247255522097979
Author(s):  
Kyung-Soon Lee ◽  
Edelmar Navaluna ◽  
Nicole M. Marsh ◽  
Eric M. Janezic ◽  
Chris Hague
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Adrenergic Receptor ◽  
Near Infrared ◽  
Human Cells ◽  
Receptor Subtypes ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptor ◽  
Functional Responses ◽  
Epitope Tag ◽  
Nir Imaging ◽  
G Protein Coupled

We have developed a novel reporter assay that leverages SNAP-epitope tag/near-infrared (NIR) imaging technology to monitor G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) degradation in human cell lines. N-terminal SNAP-tagged GPCRs were subcloned and expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells and then subjected to 24 h of cycloheximide (CHX)-chase degradation assays to quantify receptor degradation half-lives ( t1/2) using LICOR NIR imaging–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) analysis. Thus far, we have used this method to quantify t1/2 for all nine adrenergic (ADRA1A, ADRA1B, ADRA1D, ADRA2A, ADRA2B, ADRA2C, ADRB1, ADRB2, ADRB3), five somatostatin (SSTR1, SSTR2, SSTR3, SSTR4, SSTR5), four chemokine (CXCR1, CXCR2, CXCR3, CXCR5), and three 5-HT2 (5HT2A, 5HT2B, 5HT2C) receptor subtypes. SNAP-GPCR-CHX degradation t1/2 values ranged from 0.52 h (ADRA1D) to 5.5 h (SSTR3). On the contrary, both the SNAP-tag alone and SNAP-tagged and endogenous β-actin were resistant to degradation with CHX treatment. Treatment with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib produced significant but variable increases in SNAP-GPCR protein expression levels, indicating that SNAP-GPCR degradation primarily occurs through the proteasome. Remarkably, endogenous β2-adrenergic receptor/ADRB2 dynamic mass redistribution functional responses to norepinephrine were significantly decreased following CHX treatment, with a time course equivalent to that observed with the SNAP-ADRB2 degradation assay. We subsequently adapted this assay into a 96-well glass-bottom plate format to facilitate high-throughput GPCR degradation screening. t1/2 values quantified for the α1-adrenergic receptor subtypes (ADRA1A, ADRA1B, ADR1D) using the 96-well-plate format correlated with t1/2 values quantified using NIR-PAGE imaging analysis. In summary, this novel assay permits precise quantitative analysis of GPCR degradation in human cells and can be readily adapted to quantify degradation for any membrane protein of interest.

scholarly journals Structural Characterization of Receptor–Receptor Interactions in the Allosteric Modulation of G Protein-Coupled Receptor (GPCR) Dimers

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 3241
Author(s):  
Raudah Lazim ◽  
Donghyuk Suh ◽  
Jai Woo Lee ◽  
Thi Ngoc Lan Vu ◽  
Sanghee Yoon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Allosteric Modulation ◽  
Experimental Investigations ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptor ◽  
Metabotropic Glutamate ◽  
Gpcr Activation ◽  
G Protein Coupled

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) oligomerization, while contentious, continues to attract the attention of researchers. Numerous experimental investigations have validated the presence of GPCR dimers, and the relevance of dimerization in the effectuation of physiological functions intensifies the attractiveness of this concept as a potential therapeutic target. GPCRs, as a single entity, have been the main source of scrutiny for drug design objectives for multiple diseases such as cancer, inflammation, cardiac, and respiratory diseases. The existence of dimers broadens the research scope of GPCR functions, revealing new signaling pathways that can be targeted for disease pathogenesis that have not previously been reported when GPCRs were only viewed in their monomeric form. This review will highlight several aspects of GPCR dimerization, which include a summary of the structural elucidation of the allosteric modulation of class C GPCR activation offered through recent solutions to the three-dimensional, full-length structures of metabotropic glutamate receptor and γ-aminobutyric acid B receptor as well as the role of dimerization in the modification of GPCR function and allostery. With the growing influence of computational methods in the study of GPCRs, we will also be reviewing recent computational tools that have been utilized to map protein–protein interactions (PPI).

scholarly journals Impact of Aldosterone on the Failing Myocardium: Insights from Mitochondria and Adrenergic Receptors Signaling and Function

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 1552
Author(s):  
Mariona Guitart-Mampel ◽  
Pedro Urquiza ◽  
Jordana I. Borges ◽  
Anastasios Lymperopoulos ◽  
Maria E. Solesio
Keyword(s):  
Mitochondrial Dysfunction ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Adrenergic Receptor ◽  
Cellular Level ◽  
Cardiac Physiology ◽  
Failing Heart ◽  
Receptor Kinases ◽  
And Function ◽  
The Impact ◽  
G Protein Coupled

The mineralocorticoid aldosterone regulates electrolyte and blood volume homeostasis, but it also adversely modulates the structure and function of the chronically failing heart, through its elevated production in chronic human post-myocardial infarction (MI) heart failure (HF). By activating the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), a ligand-regulated transcription factor, aldosterone promotes inflammation and fibrosis of the heart, while increasing oxidative stress, ultimately induding mitochondrial dysfunction in the failing myocardium. To reduce morbidity and mortality in advanced stage HF, MR antagonist drugs, such as spironolactone and eplerenone, are used. In addition to the MR, aldosterone can bind and stimulate other receptors, such as the plasma membrane-residing G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER), further complicating it signaling properties in the myocardium. Given the salient role that adrenergic receptor (ARs)—particularly βARs—play in cardiac physiology and pathology, unsurprisingly, that part of the impact of aldosterone on the failing heart is mediated by its effects on the signaling and function of these receptors. Aldosterone can significantly precipitate the well-documented derangement of cardiac AR signaling and impairment of AR function, critically underlying chronic human HF. One of the main consequences of HF in mammalian models at the cellular level is the presence of mitochondrial dysfunction. As such, preventing mitochondrial dysfunction could be a valid pharmacological target in this condition. This review summarizes the current experimental evidence for this aldosterone/AR crosstalk in both the healthy and failing heart, and the impact of mitochondrial dysfunction in HF. Recent findings from signaling studies focusing on MR and AR crosstalk via non-conventional signaling of molecules that normally terminate the signaling of ARs in the heart, i.e., the G protein-coupled receptor-kinases (GRKs), are also highlighted.

scholarly journals Every Detail Matters. That Is, How the Interaction between Gα Proteins and Membrane Affects Their Function

Membranes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 222
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Polit ◽  
Paweł Mystek ◽  
Ewa Błasiak
Keyword(s):  
Signal Transduction ◽  
G Protein ◽  
G Proteins ◽  
Lipid Membranes ◽  
Signaling Proteins ◽  
Heterotrimeric G Proteins ◽  
Membrane Attachment ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Multicellular Organisms ◽  
G Protein Coupled

In highly organized multicellular organisms such as humans, the functions of an individual cell are dependent on signal transduction through G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and subsequently heterotrimeric G proteins. As most of the elements belonging to the signal transduction system are bound to lipid membranes, researchers are showing increasing interest in studying the accompanying protein–lipid interactions, which have been demonstrated to not only provide the environment but also regulate proper and efficient signal transduction. The mode of interaction between the cell membrane and G proteins is well known. Despite this, the recognition mechanisms at the molecular level and how the individual G protein-membrane attachment signals are interrelated in the process of the complex control of membrane targeting of G proteins remain unelucidated. This review focuses on the mechanisms by which mammalian Gα subunits of G proteins interact with lipids and the factors responsible for the specificity of membrane association. We summarize recent data on how these signaling proteins are precisely targeted to a specific site in the membrane region by introducing well-defined modifications as well as through the presence of polybasic regions within these proteins and interactions with other components of the heterocomplex.

scholarly journals Adhesion G Protein–Coupled Receptors: From In Vitro Pharmacology to In Vivo Mechanisms

2015 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 617-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly R. Monk ◽  
Jörg Hamann ◽  
Tobias Langenhan ◽  
Saskia Nijmeijer ◽  
Torsten Schöneberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptors ◽  
In Vitro Pharmacology ◽  
G Protein Coupled

scholarly journals Applications of molecular replacement to G protein-coupled receptors

2013 ◽  
Vol 69 (11) ◽  
pp. 2287-2292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew C. Kruse ◽  
Aashish Manglik ◽  
Brian K. Kobilka ◽  
William I. Weis
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Structural Biology ◽  
Structural Information ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptors ◽  
Integral Membrane Proteins ◽  
Molecular Replacement ◽  
Gpcr Activation ◽  
Health And Disease ◽  
Almost All ◽  
G Protein Coupled

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a large class of integral membrane proteins involved in regulating virtually every aspect of human physiology. Despite their profound importance in human health and disease, structural information regarding GPCRs has been extremely limited until recently. With the advent of a variety of new biochemical and crystallographic techniques, the structural biology of GPCRs has advanced rapidly, offering key molecular insights into GPCR activation and signal transduction. To date, almost all GPCR structures have been solved using molecular-replacement techniques. Here, the unique aspects of molecular replacement as applied to individual GPCRs and to signaling complexes of these important proteins are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document