scholarly journals Smarty Pants: Exploring Textile Pressure Sensors in Trousers for Posture and Behaviour Classification

Proceedings ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Skach ◽  
Stewart ◽  
Healey
Keyword(s):  
Random Forest ◽  
Social Behaviour ◽  
Pressure Sensors ◽  
Application Area ◽  
Body Postures ◽  
Textile Sensors ◽  
Forest Models ◽  
Random Forest Models ◽  
Potential Use

In this paper, we introduce a new modality for capturing body postures and social behaviour. Vice versa, we propose a new application area for on-body textile sensors. We have developed “smart trousers” with embedded textile pressure sensors that allow for classification of a large variety of postural movements as well as interactional states. Random Forest models are used to investigate those. Here, we give an overview of the research conducted and discuss potential use cases of the presented design.

scholarly journals Limitations of using surrogates for behaviour classification of accelerometer data: refining methods using random forest models in Caprids

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleanor R. Dickinson ◽  
Joshua P. Twining ◽  
Rory Wilson ◽  
Philip A. Stephens ◽  
Jennie Westander ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Random Forest ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Similar Species ◽  
Accelerometer Data ◽  
Alpine Ibex ◽  
Forest Models ◽  
Random Forest Models ◽  
In The Wild ◽  
Elusive Species

Abstract Background Animal-attached devices can be used on cryptic species to measure their movement and behaviour, enabling unprecedented insights into fundamental aspects of animal ecology and behaviour. However, direct observations of subjects are often still necessary to translate biologging data accurately into meaningful behaviours. As many elusive species cannot easily be observed in the wild, captive or domestic surrogates are typically used to calibrate data from devices. However, the utility of this approach remains equivocal. Methods Here, we assess the validity of using captive conspecifics, and phylogenetically-similar domesticated counterparts (surrogate species) for calibrating behaviour classification. Tri-axial accelerometers and tri-axial magnetometers were used with behavioural observations to build random forest models to predict the behaviours. We applied these methods using captive Alpine ibex (Capra ibex) and a domestic counterpart, pygmy goats (Capra aegagrus hircus), to predict the behaviour including terrain slope for locomotion behaviours of captive Alpine ibex. Results Behavioural classification of captive Alpine ibex and domestic pygmy goats was highly accurate (> 98%). Model performance was reduced when using data split per individual, i.e., classifying behaviour of individuals not used to train models (mean ± sd = 56.1 ± 11%). Behavioural classifications using domestic counterparts, i.e., pygmy goat observations to predict ibex behaviour, however, were not sufficient to predict all behaviours of a phylogenetically similar species accurately (> 55%). Conclusions We demonstrate methods to refine the use of random forest models to classify behaviours of both captive and free-living animal species. We suggest there are two main reasons for reduced accuracy when using a domestic counterpart to predict the behaviour of a wild species in captivity; domestication leading to morphological differences and the terrain of the environment in which the animals were observed. We also identify limitations when behaviour is predicted in individuals that are not used to train models. Our results demonstrate that biologging device calibration needs to be conducted using: (i) with similar conspecifics, and (ii) in an area where they can perform behaviours on terrain that reflects that of species in the wild.

scholarly journals Non-invasive classification of non-small cell lung cancer: a comparison between random forest models utilising radiomic and semantic features

2019 ◽  
Vol 92 (1099) ◽  
pp. 20190159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Usman Bashir ◽  
Bhavin Kawa ◽  
Muhammad Siddique ◽  
Sze Mun Mak ◽  
Arjun Nair ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Random Forest ◽  
Test Data ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Semantic Features ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Forest Models ◽  
Random Forest Models

Objective: Non-invasive distinction between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma subtypes of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may be beneficial to patients unfit for invasive diagnostic procedures or when tissue is insufficient for diagnosis. The purpose of our study was to compare the performance of random forest algorithms utilizing CT radiomics and/or semantic features in classifying NSCLC. Methods: Two thoracic radiologists scored 11 semantic features on CT scans of 106 patients with NSCLC. A set of 115 radiomics features was extracted from the CT scans. Random forest models were developed from semantic (RM-sem), radiomics (RM-rad), and all features combined (RM-all). External validation of models was performed using an independent test data set (n = 100) of CT scans. Model performance was measured with out-of-bag error and area under curve (AUC), and compared using receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis on the test data set. Results: The median (interquartile-range) error rates of the models were: RF-sem 24.5 % (22.6 – 37.5 %), RF-rad 35.8 % (34.9 – 38.7 %), and RM-all 37.7 % (37.7 – 37.7). On training data, both RF-rad and RF-all gave perfect discrimination (AUC = 1), which was significantly higher than that achieved by RF-sem (AUC = 0.78; p < 0.0001). On test data, however, RM-sem model (AUC = 0.82) out-performed RM-rad and RM-all (AUC = 0.5 and AUC = 0.56; p < 0.0001), neither of which was significantly different from random guess ( p = 0.9 and 0.6 respectively). Conclusion: Non-invasive classification of NSCLC can be done accurately using random forest classification models based on well-known CT-derived descriptive features. However, radiomics-based classification models performed poorly in this scenario when tested on independent data and should be used with caution, due to their possible lack of generalizability to new data. Advances in knowledge: Our study describes novel CT-derived random forest models based on radiologist-interpretation of CT scans (semantic features) that can assist NSCLC classification when histopathology is equivocal or when histopathological sampling is not possible. It also shows that random forest models based on semantic features may be more useful than those built from computational radiomic features.

scholarly journals Data-Driven Wildfire Risk Prediction in Northern California

Atmosphere ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 109
Author(s):  
Ashima Malik ◽  
Megha Rajam Rao ◽  
Nandini Puppala ◽  
Prathusha Koouri ◽  
Venkata Anil Kumar Thota ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Random Forest ◽  
Learning Curves ◽  
Data Driven ◽  
Northern California ◽  
Combined Model ◽  
Wildfire Risk ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Forest Models ◽  
Random Forest Models

Over the years, rampant wildfires have plagued the state of California, creating economic and environmental loss. In 2018, wildfires cost nearly 800 million dollars in economic loss and claimed more than 100 lives in California. Over 1.6 million acres of land has burned and caused large sums of environmental damage. Although, recently, researchers have introduced machine learning models and algorithms in predicting the wildfire risks, these results focused on special perspectives and were restricted to a limited number of data parameters. In this paper, we have proposed two data-driven machine learning approaches based on random forest models to predict the wildfire risk at areas near Monticello and Winters, California. This study demonstrated how the models were developed and applied with comprehensive data parameters such as powerlines, terrain, and vegetation in different perspectives that improved the spatial and temporal accuracy in predicting the risk of wildfire including fire ignition. The combined model uses the spatial and the temporal parameters as a single combined dataset to train and predict the fire risk, whereas the ensemble model was fed separate parameters that were later stacked to work as a single model. Our experiment shows that the combined model produced better results compared to the ensemble of random forest models on separate spatial data in terms of accuracy. The models were validated with Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, learning curves, and evaluation metrics such as: accuracy, confusion matrices, and classification report. The study results showed and achieved cutting-edge accuracy of 92% in predicting the wildfire risks, including ignition by utilizing the regional spatial and temporal data along with standard data parameters in Northern California.

Classifying Very High-Dimensional Data with Random Forests Built from Small Subspaces

2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 44-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baoxun Xu ◽  
Joshua Zhexue Huang ◽  
Graham Williams ◽  
Qiang Wang ◽  
Yunming Ye
Keyword(s):  
Random Forest ◽  
High Dimensional Data ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Classification Performance ◽  
Feature Weighting ◽  
Random Forest Model ◽  
High Dimensional ◽  
Forest Model ◽  
Forest Models ◽  
Random Forest Models

The selection of feature subspaces for growing decision trees is a key step in building random forest models. However, the common approach using randomly sampling a few features in the subspace is not suitable for high dimensional data consisting of thousands of features, because such data often contains many features which are uninformative to classification, and the random sampling often doesn’t include informative features in the selected subspaces. Consequently, classification performance of the random forest model is significantly affected. In this paper, the authors propose an improved random forest method which uses a novel feature weighting method for subspace selection and therefore enhances classification performance over high-dimensional data. A series of experiments on 9 real life high dimensional datasets demonstrated that using a subspace size of features where M is the total number of features in the dataset, our random forest model significantly outperforms existing random forest models.

scholarly journals Data Mining Crystallization Kinetics

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cameron Brown ◽  
Diego Maldonado ◽  
Antony Vassileiou ◽  
Blair Johnston ◽  
Alastair Florence
Keyword(s):  
Random Forest ◽  
Kinetic Parameters ◽  
Crystallization Kinetics ◽  
Balance Model ◽  
Forest Models ◽  
Vast Literature ◽  
Random Forest Models ◽  
Kinetic Expression ◽  
Population Balances ◽  
Different Sources

<p>Population balance model is a valuable modelling tool which facilitates the optimization and understanding of crystallization processes. However, in order to use this tool, it is necessary to have previous knowledge of the crystallization kinetics, specifically crystal growth and nucleation. The majority of approaches to achieve proper estimations of kinetic parameters required experimental data. Across time, a vast literature about the estimation of kinetic parameters and population balances have been published. Considering the availability of data, this work built a database with information on solute, solvent, kinetic expression, parameters, crystallization method and seeding. Correlations were assessed and clusters structures identified by hierarchical clustering analysis. The final database contains 336 data of kinetic parameters from 185 different sources. The data were analysed using kinetic parameters of the most common expressions. Subsequently, clusters were identified for each kinetic model. With these clusters, classification random forest models were made using solute descriptors, seeding, solvent, and crystallization methods as classifiers. Random forest models had an overall classification accuracy higher than 70% whereby they were useful to provide rough estimates of kinetic parameters, although these methods have some limitations.</p>

For Honor, for Toxicity

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (CHI PLAY) ◽  
pp. 1-29
Author(s):  
Alessandro Canossa ◽  
Dmitry Salimov ◽  
Ahmad Azadvar ◽  
Casper Harteveld ◽  
Georgios Yannakakis
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Random Forest ◽  
Random Forests ◽  
Initial Study ◽  
Unfair Advantage ◽  
Offensive Behavior ◽  
Forest Models ◽  
Random Forest Models ◽  
Action Type ◽  
Degree Of Severity

Is it possible to detect toxicity in games just by observing in-game behavior? If so, what are the behavioral factors that will help machine learning to discover the unknown relationship between gameplay and toxic behavior? In this initial study, we examine whether it is possible to predict toxicity in the MOBA gameFor Honor by observing in-game behavior for players that have been labeled as toxic (i.e. players that have been sanctioned by Ubisoft community managers). We test our hypothesis of detecting toxicity through gameplay with a dataset of almost 1,800 sanctioned players, and comparing these sanctioned players with unsanctioned players. Sanctioned players are defined by their toxic action type (offensive behavior vs. unfair advantage) and degree of severity (warned vs. banned). Our findings, based on supervised learning with random forests, suggest that it is not only possible to behaviorally distinguish sanctioned from unsanctioned players based on selected features of gameplay; it is also possible to predict both the sanction severity (warned vs. banned) and the sanction type (offensive behavior vs. unfair advantage). In particular, all random forest models predict toxicity, its severity, and type, with an accuracy of at least 82%, on average, on unseen players. This research shows that observing in-game behavior can support the work of community managers in moderating and possibly containing the burden of toxic behavior.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document