scholarly journals Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure (CSRD) and Financial Distressed Risk (FDR): Does Institutional Ownership Matter?

2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 742
Author(s):  
Hossein Tarighi ◽  
Andrea Appolloni ◽  
Ali Shirzad ◽  
Abdullah Azad
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Financial Distress ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Z Score ◽  
Score Model ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Institutional Owners

This study aims to investigate the effect of corporate social responsibility disclosure (CSRD) on financial distressed risk (FDR) among firms listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). This paper also examines whether there is a negative linkage between institutional ownership as a corporate governance mechanism and corporate bankruptcy. The final research purpose is to analyze if there is a moderating effect of institutional owners on the relationship between CSRD and FDR too. The study sample consists of 200 firms listed on the TSE between 2013 and 2018, and the statistical model is logistic regression. When FDR is assessed under both Article 141 of Iran’s business law and the Altman Z-score model, our results on the main research hypotheses are quite similar. Considering the social and cultural conditions and economic situation of the Iranian market, the results show that firms with a high level of CSR disclosure are not able to make themselves more creditworthy and do not have better access to financing, resulting in more financial insolvency. Our findings confirm institutional shareholders play a vital role in facilitating a firm’s emergence from bankruptcy. The results also demonstrate financial distress risk is less seen among companies with more institutional owners that disclose more CSR information. In other words, since the goals related to CSR are long-term and Iranian institutional investors have a long-term horizon towards the company, the presence of more institutional owners within a firm push managers to provide additional voluntary CSR disclosure so firms can maintain the trust of their shareholders at the highest possible level and prevent financial distress. Our additional analysis indicates there is a positive association between financial leverage and firm failure, whereas the current ratio and ROA are negatively connected with corporate bankruptcy. Finally, when FDR is assessed on the Altman Z-score model, our evidence supports a negative relation between purchase and sale-related party transactions and bankruptcy risk, which is consistent with the efficient transaction hypothesis.

scholarly journals Determinant of The Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure

ETIKONOMI ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-172
Author(s):  
Uun Sunarsih ◽  
N. Nurhikmah
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Multiple Regression Analysis ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has a very important role for the company and now become an obligation for every company. The purpose of this study examined the effect of institutional ownership, board of commissioners, profitability and size on CSR disclosure. This research conducted at mining manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2013-2014 and obtained 76 sample companies. The method used is multiple regression analysis. The result showed only institutional ownership affecting CSR disclosure. This suggests institutional ownership structure can act in monitoring the company. Independent board has not effected on CSR, it failed to monitor the actions of top management. Profitability has not effected on the disclosure of CSR, it enabled the company to have two perspectives on CSR. The most companies view CSR as a deduction from earnings. CSR disclosure has not affect the size of the CSR disclosure area.DOI: 10.15408/etk.v16i2.5236

scholarly journals Pengaruh Dimensi Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility Terhadap Future Institutional Ownership

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
Rizky Eriandani
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Institutional Investors ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Measurement Instrument ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

<em>Corporate social responsibility practice becomes important subject in company`s activity, because it will affect the company's reputation. Besides, institutional investors likely prefer to invest in companies that have a social responsibility as it is considered to increase the legitimacy and future performance. This study aims to investigate the effect of CSR disclosure on institutional ownership. We use percentages ownership to measure institutional ownership. CSR measurement instrument used in this study adopted a previous research. The instrument comes from research Hackston and Milne, which was adjusted with Bapepam regulation in Indonesia. We also divided CSR disclosures in four sub-dimensions. The samples used in this research were 115 listed agriculture, mining, and manufacturing companies in indonesian Stock Exchange which studied during the years of 2010. Using SPSS 20, The analysis methods of this research used multiple regression analysis. Studies shows that not all dimensions of CSR disclosure effect on institutional ownership. Only product dimensions of CSR disclosures has a significant positive impact on institutional ownership. However, this paper fail to find any significant impact of another CSR dimensions. Thus, our study suggests that the dimensions of the product can affect investment decisions. In contrast, institutional investors have not focused on environment, employee relation, and community activities in investment decisions.</em>

The effect of managerial and institutional ownership on corporate social responsibility disclosure

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 979-987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurleni Nurleni ◽  
Agus Bandang ◽  
Darmawati Darmawati ◽  
Amiruddin Amiruddin
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

PurposeThis study aims to analyze the effect of ownership structure that consists of managerial ownership and institutional ownership of the extensive of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure.Design/methodology/approachThe population in this study is manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI), as the manufacturing companies are considered to have great potential on environmental damage (Mathews, 2000). The selected sample were the companies which meet certain criteria (purposive sampling) which published the complete annual financial statements from 2011 to 2015. This study used an analysis method using partial least square (WarpPLS) to assess the effect of the structure of ownership consists of managerial ownership and institutional ownership on the extent of the CSR disclosure.FindingsThe results showed that there is a direct effect of a negative and significant correlation between managerial ownership on CSR disclosure, and there is a direct effect of a positive and significant correlation between institutional ownership on CSR disclosure.Originality/valueOriginality of this paper shows PLS (WarpPLS) that applied to determine the effect between variables managerial and institutional ownership on CSR disclosure. This research is collected data financial statements and annual reports of manufacturing companies obtained from the Indonesia Capital Market Reference Center (PRPM), which is located in the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX), which there has not been research by the methods and the same location.

scholarly journals Do Political Connection and Corporate Governance Mechanism Increase Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure?

2021 ◽  
pp. 28-46
Author(s):  
Yeterina Widi Nugrahanti
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Political Connection ◽  
Governance Mechanism ◽  
Corporate Governance Mechanism ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Impact

The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of political connection and corporate governance mechanisms (independent board of commissioner, institutional ownership, and board of commissioner size) toward Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) disclosures using Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Guidelines. Purposive sampling technique was conducted and 272 non-financial companies listed in the Indonesian Stock Exchange during 2015-2017 were acquired as the samples (816 firm-years). For testing the hypotheses, unbalanced Generalized Least Square panel data regression was employed. The finding shows that political connection and board of commissioner size have a positive impact on CSR disclosures while independent board of commissioner and institutional ownership do not. This study contributes to political connection, corporate governance mechanism, and CSR disclosure literature by identifying CSR disclosure based on GRI guidelines up to the most detailed level, which are 77 disclosure items indicators and 254 sub-indicators. Meanwhile, previous research only identify CSR disclosure up to 77 GRI indicators without paying attention to the sub-indicators in detail.

scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF FIRM SIZE, GROSS PROFIT MARGIN AND INSTITUTIONAL OWNERSHIP ON DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR)

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-308
Author(s):  
Pipit Rosita Andarsari
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Profit Margin ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Positive Effect

The objective of this research is to analyze influence of Size, Gross Profit Margin (GPM) and Institusional Ownership to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure. Sample of this research are annual report for manufacture companies that listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) in 2014-2016. Sample were selected using purposive sampling method and 11 sample were able to fullfill the criteria used as sample. This research uses multiple regression data analysis techniques . The result of the research showns that size and gross profit margin has positive effect on the corporate social responsibility , meanwhile Institutional ownership has negative effect on the corporate social responsibility. Keywords: Size, Gross Profit Margin, Institutional Ownership, Corporate Social Responsibility

scholarly journals PENGARUH ELEMEN-ELEMEN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DAN KUALITAS AUDIT TERHADAP LUAS PENGUNGKAPAN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ester Ayu Febriana ◽  
Abdul Halim ◽  
Ati Retna Sari
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Audit Quality ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of elements of Corporate Governance (CG) on the extent of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) disclosure in banking companies listed on the IDX and identify the factors that influence companies to conduct disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). The elements of Corporate Governance in this study consist of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, audit committee, board of commissioners size, independent board of commissioners and audit quality. The results of the hypothesis test indicate that the Corporate Governance (GCG) variable significantly influences the disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) on banking companies listed on the IDX. These results can be proven by the results of hypothesis testing which results in Corporate Governance criteria consisting of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, audit committee, board of commissioners, independent board of commissioners and audit quality simultaneously having a significant effect on the disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in the company banking registered on the IDX. While partially only institutional ownership and audit quality do not significantly influence the disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in pharmaceutical sub-sector companies listed on the IDX.

The impact of corporate social responsibility on financial distress: empirical evidence

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Farooq ◽  
Amna Noor ◽  
Shahzadah Fahad Qureshi
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Financial Distress ◽  
Generalized Method Of Moments ◽  
Z Score ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Financial Firms ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Impact

Purpose The present study aims to explore the role of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on the likelihood of financial distress for a sample of 139 Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) listed firms throughout 2008–2019. Design/methodology/approach Panel logistic regression (PLR) and the dynamic generalized method of moments (GMM) estimator are used to examine the impact of CSR on financial distress. The investment in CSR measures through a multidimensional financial approach which comprises the sum of the contribution made by the company in the form of charitable donation, employees’ welfare and research and development, whereas the Altman Z-score and ZM-Score are used as an indicator of financial distress. The higher the Z-score lower will be the probability of financial distress, whereas the higher ZM score shows a greater probability of financial distress risk. Findings The authors find a significant negative impact of CSR on financial distress in both PLR and GMM models. This finding is consistent with the stakeholder view of CSR, as an investment in CSR not only aligns the interest between shareholders and stakeholders but also mitigates the risk of financial distress as well. Research limitations/implications Like other studies, the present study is not free from limitations. First, financial firms skipped from the sample, although literature witnesses a lot of studies highlight the financial firms' commitment to achieving CSR goals. Second, financial distress occurs in different stages, the authors fail to establish linkage CSR engagements at different stages of CSR. In the future, researchers can make a valuable addition by covering these missing links in present studies. Practical implications The findings of this study provide more insight to corporate managers and investors about the association between the quality of investment in CSR and the degree of financial distress, concerning Pakistani firms. Furthermore, this study contributes to the existing literature by adding new evidence from developing countries such as Pakistan which are helpful for regulatory bodies and policymakers in the formulation of long-term CSR strategies to manage financial distress. Originality/value The study extends the body of existing literature on CSR and the likelihood of financial distress in Pakistan. The results suggest that policymakers may pay special attention to the quality of CSR while predicting corporate financial distress.

scholarly journals The Effect of Firm Size and Corporate Governance Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Reghita Nabilla Shafira ◽  
Siti Nur Azizah ◽  
Sri Wahyuni ◽  
Hadi Pramono
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Firm Size ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Governance Structure ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Corporate Governance Structure ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

The purpose of this study is to empirically prove the effect of firm size and corporate governance structure (such as board of commissioner size, institutional ownership and managerial ownership) on corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure. The samples in this study were the mining companies listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2019 using the purposive sampling method. Based on the criteria, there were 58 samples of research data. The data analysis technique used in this study is multiple linear regression analysis. The results of this study indicated that company size, institutional ownership, and managerial ownership have no effect on CSR disclosure. Meanwhile, the size of the board of commissioners has a positive effect on CSR disclosure.

scholarly journals ANALYSIS OF EFFECT OF FIRM SIZE, INSTITUTIONAL OWNERSHIP, PROFITABILITY, AND LEVERAGE ON FIRM VALUE WITH CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) DISCLOSURE AS INTERVENING VARIABLES (Study on Banking Companies Listed on BEI Period 2012-2016)

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 95
Author(s):  
Fitria Yuni Astuti ◽  
Sugeng Wahyudi ◽  
Wisnu Mawardi
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Firm Size ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Shareholder Wealth ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

The main objective of the company survives in the stringent competitive by maximizing the value of the company to shareholder wealth. Firm value is experiencing a downward trend is a problem that must be resolved. The banking company also undertakes a social responsibility that is perceived to have a positive impact on the company's image. This study aimed to analyze the effect of the firm size, institutional ownership, profitability, and leverage with corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure as a variable intervening.Populations are banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange Period 2012-2016. Sampling technique used is purposive sampling with 29 companies selected according to predetermined criteria. This research is done by using multiple linear regression analysis methods and path analysis also Sobel test to examine the effect of intervening. Test results with CSRD as the dependent variable indicate that institutional ownership and Leverage have no effect on CSRD While firm size and profitability (ROA) have a positive significant effect on CSRD. The result of testing with Firm Value (Tobins'Q) as the dependent variable indicates that Firm Size, Institutional Ownership, and Profitability (ROA) have no effect on Firm Value (Tobins'Q). Leverage (DAR) has a negative and significant influence on Firm  Value (Tobins'Q) while CSRD has a significant positive effect on Firm Value (Tobins'Q). CSRD does not mediate the effect of Institutional Ownership, Profitability (ROA) and Leverage (DAR) on Firm Value (Tobins'Q). CSRD mediates the effect of Firm Size on Firm Value (Tobins'Q).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document