scholarly journals A Pharmacokinetic Study Comparing the Clearance of Vancomycin during Haemodialysis Using Medium Cut-Off Membrane (Theranova) and High-Flux Membranes (Revaclear)

Toxins ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 317
Author(s):  
Hussain Allawati ◽  
Linda Dallas ◽  
Sreejith Nair ◽  
Janine Palmer ◽  
Shaiju Thaikandy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
High Flux ◽  
Serum Concentrations ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Median Percentage ◽  
Middle Molecules ◽  
Dialysis Membranes ◽  
Trough Concentrations ◽  
To Receive

Medium cut-off membrane (MCO) dialysers have been shown to remove a range of middle molecules, which are associated with adverse outcomes in haemodialysis (HD) patients, more effectively than high-flux HD. Vancomycin is widely used in HD patients for treating a variety of infections. To avoid subtherapeutic trough concentrations, it is important to understand vancomycin clearance in patients undergoing HD with the MCO membrane. This open label single centre, cross-over clinical study compared the vancomycin pharmacokinetics in chronic HD patients using MCO membrane (Theranova) and high-flux membrane (Revaclear). Five patients established on chronic HD who were due to receive vancomycin were enrolled. The study used alternating Theranova and Revaclear dialysis membranes over six consecutive sessions. Vancomycin was administered over the last one to two hours of each HD session. The maintenance dose was adjusted based on pre-HD serum concentrations. Over the 210 study samples, vancomycin clearance was higher with MCO-HD compared to high-flux HD but not statistically significant. Median percentage of vancomycin removal at 120 min by MCO membrane was 39% (20.6–51.5%) compared with 34.1% (21.3–48.4%) with high-flux HD. MCO-HD removes a slightly higher percentage of vancomycin at 120 min into dialysis compared to high-flux membrane dialysis in HD patients with infections. Application of vancomycin during the last one to two hours of each dialysis is required to maintain therapeutic concentrations to minimise loss through the dialyser and maintain therapeutic levels.

High-Flux versus High-Retention-Onset Membranes: In vivo Small and Middle Molecules Kinetics in Convective Dialysis Modalities

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 8-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isis S.F. Cordeiro ◽  
Lilian Cordeiro ◽  
Carolina S. Wagner ◽  
Luiza Karla R.P. Araújo ◽  
Benedito J. Pereira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Mass ◽  
Crossover Trial ◽  
Maintenance Hemodialysis ◽  
High Flux ◽  
Serum Concentrations ◽  
Middle Molecules ◽  
Dialysis Membranes ◽  
Poor Outcomes ◽  
Beta 2 Microglobulin

Background: Patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (HD) exhibit increased levels of uremic toxins, which are associated with poor outcomes. Recently, new dialysis membranes have allowed clearance of solutes with higher molecular weight, without significant albumin losses high-retention-onset-HD (HRO-HD). Methods: Prospective crossover trial, in which 16 prevalent patients switched from high-flux HD (HF-HD) to online hemodiafiltration (olHDF) and HRO-HD for 4 weeks. The following variables were evaluated: pre- and post-dialysis serum concentrations of albumin, urea, phosphate (P), beta-2 microglobulin (β2M), and total mass (TM) extraction and dialyzer clearance of urea, P, and β2M. Results: Comparing HF-HD, olHDF, and HRO-HD, respectively, there were no differences regarding pre-dialysis serum concentrations of albumin (3.94 ± 0.36, 4.06 ± 0.22, and 3.93 ± 0.41 g/dL, p = 0.495), urea (166 ± 29, 167 ± 30, and 164 ± 27 mg/dL, p = 0.971), P (4.9 ± 2.1, 5.2 ± 1.6, and 4.9 ± 2.1 mg/dL, p = 0.879), and β2M (31.3 ± 7.1, 32.6 ± 8.6, and 33.7 ± 5.9 µg/mL, p = 0.646). β2M clearance was significantly lower in HF-HD in comparison to both olHDF and HRO-HD: 43 (37–53) versus 64 (48–85) mL/min, p = 0.013, and 69 (58–86) mL/min, p = 0.015, respectively. Post-dialysis β2M serum concentration was higher in HF-HD in comparison to olHDF and HRO-HD: 11.6 (9.6–12.4) vs. 5.7 (4.5–7.0) µg/mL, p = 0.001, and 5.6 (5.3–7.6) µg/mL, p = 0.001, respectively. TM extraction of urea, P, and β2M were similar across the 3 dialysis modalities. Conclusions: olHDF and HRO-HD were superior to HF-HD regarding β2M clearance, leading to lower post-dialysis β2M levels.

scholarly journals Comparison of the removal of uraemic toxins with medium cut-off and high-flux dialysers: a randomized clinical trial

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Belmouaz ◽  
Marc Bauwens ◽  
Thierry Hauet ◽  
Valentin Bossard ◽  
Pierre Jamet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 ◽  
High Flux ◽  
Catabolic Rate ◽  
Middle Molecules ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Potential Benefits ◽  
To Receive ◽  
And Oxidative Stress ◽  
Protein Catabolic Rate

Abstract Background Accumulation of middle-weight uraemic toxins in haemodialysis (HD) patients results in increased morbidity and mortality. Whether medium cut-off HD (MCO-HD) improves removal of middle-weight uraemic toxins remains to be demonstrated. Methods This cross-over prospective study included 40 patients randomly assigned to receive either 3 months of MCO-HD followed by 3 months of high-flux HD (HF-HD), or vice versa. The primary endpoint was myoglobin reduction ratio (RR) after 3 months of MCO-HD. Secondary endpoints were the effect of MCO-HD on other middle-weight toxins and protein-bound toxins, and on parameters of nutrition, inflammation, anaemia and oxidative stress. Results Compared with HF-HD, MCO-HD provided higher mean RR of myoglobin (36 ± 8 versus 57 ± 13%, P < 0.0001), beta2-microglobulin (68 ± 6 versus 73 ± 15%, P = 0.04), prolactin (32 ± 13 versus 59 ± 11%, P < 0.0001), fibroblast growth factor 23 (20 ± 21 versus 41 ± 22%, P = 0.0002), homocysteine (43 ± 7 versus 46 ± 9%, P = 0.03) and higher median RR of kappa [54 (48–58) versus 70 (63–74)%, P < 0.0001] and lambda free light chain (FLC) [15 (9–22) versus 44 (38–49)%, P < 0.0001]. Mean ± SD pre-dialysis levels of beta2-microglobulin (28.4 ± 5.6 versus 26.9 ± 5.1 mg/L, P = 0.01) and oxidized low-density lipoprote (6.9 ± 4.4 versus 5.5 ± 2.5 pg/mL, P = 0.04), and median (interquartile range) kappa FLC [145 (104–203) versus 129 (109–190) mg/L, P < 0.03] and lambda FLC [106 (77–132) versus 89 (62–125) mg/L, P = 0.002] were significantly lower. Mean albumin levels decreased significantly (38.2 ± 4.1 versus 36.9 ± 4.3 g/L, P = 0.004), without an effect on nutritional status as suggested by unchanged normalized protein catabolic rate and transthyretin level. Conclusions Compared with HF-HD, MCO-HD provides higher myoglobin and other middle molecules RR and is associated with moderate hypoalbuminemia. The potential benefits of this strategy on long-term clinical outcomes deserve further evaluation.

Influence of Dialysis Membranes on the Convective Transport of Middle Molecules

1986 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 421-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.L. M. de Francisco ◽  
J. Gordillo ◽  
J.G. Cotorruelo ◽  
L. Ruiz ◽  
M. Gonzalez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Performance ◽  
Convective Transport ◽  
Maintenance Hemodialysis ◽  
Gel Chromatography ◽  
High Flux ◽  
Solute Transfer ◽  
Effective Form ◽  
Middle Molecules ◽  
Dialysis Membranes ◽  
Chromatographic Profiles

Ultrafiltrates from 10 patients in chronic maintenance hemodialysis (7 males and 3 females) were obtained simultaneously using three different membranes: cuprophan, polyacrilonitrile and polysulfone. Middle molecules (MM) chromatographic profiles and total MM amount were determined by gel chromatography and high performance liquid chromatography. The convective transport of MM was similar and not membrane related. Hemofiltration, a predominantly convective solute transfer procedure using high flux membranes such as polyacrilonitrile and polysulfone, in which large amounts of fluids have to be ultrafiltered, is an effective form of MM removal.

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of Tocilizumab 4 or 8 mg/kg in Hospitalized Patients With Moderate to Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Princy N Kumar ◽  
Jules Hernández-Sánchez ◽  
Sandra Nagel ◽  
Yuning Feng ◽  
Fang Cai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Status ◽  
Optimal Dose ◽  
Serum Concentrations ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
End Points ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Interleukin 6 Receptor ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Dose Dependent

Abstract Background Tocilizumab, an interleukin 6 receptor (IL-6R) antagonist monoclonal antibody, has shown efficacy in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, but the optimal dose is unknown. Methods Patients hospitalized for moderate-to-severe COVID-19 pneumonia were randomized 1:1 to receive standard care treatment and 1 to 2 doses of intravenous tocilizumab 4 or 8 mg/kg (open-label). Primary pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic end points were serum concentrations of tocilizumab and soluble IL-6R (sIL-6R), IL-6, ferritin, and C-reactive protein (CRP), from baseline to day 60. The secondary end point was safety. Key exploratory efficacy end points included clinical status, time to discharge, mortality rate, and incidence of mechanical ventilation. Results Of 100 patients randomized, 49 received tocilizumab 4 mg/kg and 48 received 8 mg/kg. In pharmacokinetic and sIL-6R assessments, dose-dependent differences were seen in patients who received 1 or 2 doses of 4 or 8 mg/kg. Serum concentrations of IL-6, ferritin, and CRP and safety outcomes were comparable between groups. Through day 60, serious adverse events were reported in 30.6% and 25.0% of patients in the 4- and 8-mg/kg group, respectively. Eight patients (16.3%) in the 4-mg/kg group and 6 (12.5%) in the 8-mg/kg group died. Exploratory time-to-event outcomes favored 8-mg/kg within the first 2 weeks. Conclusions In patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 pneumonia who received tocilizumab 4 or 8 mg/kg, pharmacokinetic and sIL-6R assessments showed expected dose-dependent effects; pharmacodynamic assessments and safety were comparable, with no new safety signals. Further study is required before a lower dose of tocilizumab can be recommended in patients with COVID pneumonia.

scholarly journals P1102EVALUATION THE EFFICACY OF MEDIUM CUT- OFF MEMBRANE DIALYZERS AND COMPARISON WITH HIGH FLUX DIALYZERS IN CONVENTIONAL HEMODIALYSIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Irena Rambabova Bushljetikj ◽  
Lada Trajcheska ◽  
Vladimir Pushevski ◽  
Sefedin Biljali ◽  
Trajan Balkanov
Keyword(s):  
Removal Rate ◽  
Uremic Toxins ◽  
High Flux ◽  
Removal Rates ◽  
Innovative Therapy ◽  
New Class ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Middle Molecules ◽  
Dialysis Membranes

Abstract Background and Aims Hemodialysis (HD) is the most widely used modality of renal replacement therapy. The high-flux dialyzers in standard hemodialysis offer numerous benefits for ESRD patients, such as, increasing the uremic toxins removal and improving patients survival, reduced patients admission and morbidity. A new class of membranes, medium cut-off (MCO) membranes, has been designed to achieve better removal capacities for middle and large middle molecules, as well as to ensure the retention of albumin in hemodialysis (HD) treatments. We evaluated the removal efficacy of Theranova® in standard HD in comparison with standard high- flux HD. Method Four stable HD patients (M/F 1/4) were included in 12-weeks small observational pilot study in HD with Theranova® 400 (sup. 1.7 m2) and Theranova® 500 (sup. 2.0 m2) dialyzers. Each patient was assessed four times, T0 with standard high flux dialyzers, T1 at 1 month, T2 at second month and T3 at third month, by measuring pre and post-HD samples of: urea, creatinine, beta2-microglobilin (B2M), myoglobin, albumin and FLC-k, FLC-λ . Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The removal rates of uremic toxins are expressed as percentages. Results The average removal rates for the uremic toxins with standard high-flux membranes were 18.4% for B2M, 14.3% for Myoglobin, 19.8 % for FLC-k and 17.4 % for FLC-λ. The data showed a higher average removal rate for all the uremic toxins with Theranova® dialyzers for B2M, Myoglobin, FLC-k and FLC-λ (62.7%, 56.9%, 63.5%, 54.6%, respectively) during the 3 months of follow up. The using of Theranova® dialyzers in standard HD was enough to significantly decrease the pre-dialysis value of Urea (17.72 ± 2.26 vs 13.75 ± 3.75, p=0.001), Creatinine (700.50 ± 315.07 vs 570.00 ± 206.64, p=0.021), B2M (40.90 ± 11.00 vs 29.00 ± 4.64, p=0.005), FLC-k (267.25 ± 113.28 vs 225.25 ± 100.62, p=0.018), FLC-λ (324.25 ± 116.12 vs 215.23 ± 64.44, p=0.011), Myoglobin ( 199.96 ± 124.41 vs 137.00 ± 83.14, p= 0.049). Finally, albumin retention was observed with Theranova® dialyzers, between T0 and T3 it increased significantly (40.50 ± 4.79 vs 42.25 ± 4.50, p=0.0001). Conclusion Compared to high-flux dialysis membranes, novel medium cut-off (MCO) membranes show greater permeability for larger middle molecules in mid -term report. But the long term analysis and larger number of patients is necessary to evaluate a clinical significance of this innovative therapy.

Impact of Temperature on Injection-Related Pain Caused by Subcutaneous Administration of Ustekinumab: A Three-arm Crossover Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 117-127
Author(s):  
Yasaman Mansouri ◽  
Yasmin Amir ◽  
Michelle Min ◽  
Raveena Khanna ◽  
Ruiqi Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Subcutaneous Administration ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Post Dose ◽  
Subcutaneous Injections ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Observational Cohort ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
To Receive

Background: Adherence to subcutaneous biologic agents for the treatment of psoriasis can be negatively influenced by injection pain.Objective: To explore the differences in injection site pain when patients are pre-treated with heat or cold, versus no pre-treatment prior to administration of a subcutaneous biologic agent.Methods: In an observational cohort study, patients receiving subcutaneous injections of ustekinumab were randomly assigned to receive pretreatment with ice, heat, or no intervention over three visits. Post-dose, patients rated pain on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS).Results: There was an increase in the VAS score for both heat (2.51, P=0.30) and ice (3.33, P=0.16), compared to no intervention. No differences were found between the two intervention groups (-0.83, P=0.73). On average, females had the same VAS scores with ice compared to that of no intervention (-0.12, P=0.97) and a non–significant decrease of 3.29 points (P=0.38) with heat. Males had increased pain scores by 5.65 points (P=0.07) with ice and by 6.39 points (P=0.04) with heat.Limitations: Pain is a subjective measurement and objective quantification is difficult.Conclusions: On average, neither heat nor cold application reliably reduced pain. Our results do not support the application of heat or cold prior to ustekinumab injection.

scholarly journals Further improvement in glycemic control after switching from exenatide two times per day to exenatide once-weekly autoinjected suspension in patients with type 2 diabetes: 52-week results from the DURATION-NEO-1 study

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000773
Author(s):  
Carol H Wysham ◽  
Julio Rosenstock ◽  
Marion L Vetter ◽  
Hui Wang ◽  
Elise Hardy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Body Weight ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Study ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Efficacy Measures ◽  
Design And Methods ◽  
To Receive

IntroductionInvestigate the effects of switching from two times per day exenatide to once-weekly exenatide administered by autoinjector (exenatide once-weekly suspension by autoinjector (QWS-AI)) or treatment with exenatide QWS-AI for 1 year.Research design and methodsIn this phase III open-label study, adults with type 2 diabetes were randomized to receive exenatide QWS-AI (2 mg) or exenatide two times per day (5 mcg for 4 weeks, followed by 10 mcg) for 28 weeks. During a subsequent non-randomized 24-week extension, patients who received exenatide two times per day were switched to exenatide QWS-AI and those randomized to exenatide QWS-AI continued this treatment. Efficacy measures included changes from baseline in glycated hemoglobin (A1C), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and body weight.ResultsIn total, 315 patients (mean baseline A1C of 8.5%) completed the initial 28 weeks of randomized treatment with exenatide QWS-AI (n=197) or exenatide two times per day (n=118) and were included in the 24-week extension (mean A1C of 7.0% and 7.3%, respectively, at week 28). From weeks 28–52, patients who switched from exenatide two times per day to exenatide QWS-AI had additional A1C reductions of approximately 0.5% (mean A1C change from baseline of –1.4% at week 52) and further reductions from baseline in FPG. Patients who continued exenatide QWS-AI treatment for 52 weeks showed clinically relevant A1C reductions (mean A1C change from baseline of –1.3% at week 52). Body-weight reductions achieved through week 28 were sustained at week 52 in both groups. There were no unexpected safety concerns or changes in the safety profile among patients who switched from exenatide two times per day to exenatide QWS-AI or those who continued exenatide QWS-AI treatment for 52 weeks.ConclusionsSwitching from exenatide two times per day to exenatide QWS-AI resulted in further A1C reductions and maintenance of earlier decreases in body weight, while continued therapy with exenatide QWS-AI for 52 weeks maintained A1C and body-weight reductions, without additional safety or tolerability concerns.Trial registration numberNCT01652716.

scholarly journals Platform study of genotyping-guided precision medicine for rare solid tumours: a study protocol for a phase II, non-randomised, 18-month, open-label, multiarm, single-centre clinical trial testing the safety and efficacy of multiple Chinese-approved targeted drugs and PD-1 inhibitors in the treatment of metastatic rare tumours

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e044543
Author(s):  
Shuhang Wang ◽  
Hui-Yao Huang ◽  
Dawei Wu ◽  
Hong Fang ◽  
Jianming Ying ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Solid Tumours ◽  
Targeted Drugs ◽  
Gene Fusions ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Rare Tumours

IntroductionLimited clinical studies have been conducted on rare solid tumours, and there are few guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment, including experiences with targeted therapy and immunotherapy, of rare solid tumours in China, resulting in limited treatment options and poor outcomes. This study first proposes a definition of rare tumours and is designed to test the preliminary efficacy of targeted and immunotherapy drugs for the treatment of rare tumours.Methods and analysisThis is a phase II, open-label, non-randomised, multiarm, single-centre clinical trial in patients with advanced rare solid tumours who failed standard treatment; the study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of targeted drugs in patients with advanced rare solid tumours with corresponding actionable alterations, as well as the safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint (programmed death receptor inhibitor 1, PD-1) inhibitors in patients with advanced rare solid tumours without actionable alterations. Patients with advanced rare tumours who fail standardised treatment and carry actionable alterations (Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, ALK gene fusions, ROS-1 gene fusions, C-MET gene amplifications/mutations, BRAF mutations, CDKN2A mutations, BRCA1/2 mutations, HER-2 mutations/overexpressions/amplifications or C-KIT mutations) will be enrolled in the targeted therapy arm and be given the corresponding targeted drugs. Patients without actionable alterations will be enrolled in the PD-1 inhibitor arm and be treated with sintilimab. After the patients treated with vemurafenib, niraparib and palbociclib acquire resistance, they will receive combination treatment with sintilimab or atezolizumab. With the use of Simon’s two-stage Minimax design, and the sample size was estimated to be 770. The primary endpoint of this study is the objective response rate. The secondary endpoints are progression-free survival in the targeted treatment group and single-agent immunotherapy group; the duration of response in the targeted therapy and single-agent immunotherapy groups; durable clinical benefit in the single-agent immunotherapy group; and the incidence of adverse events.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval was obtained from the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (ID: 20/132-2328). The results from this study will be actively disseminated through manuscript publications and conference presentations.Trial registration numbersNCT04423185; ChiCTR2000039310.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document