scholarly journals Medical and psychosocial factors associated with antibiotic prescribing in primary care: survey questionnaire and factor analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 67 (656) ◽  
pp. e168-e177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tau-Hong Lee ◽  
Joshua GX Wong ◽  
David CB Lye ◽  
Mark IC Chen ◽  
Victor WK Loh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Latent Factors ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Attitudes And Practices ◽  
Kap Survey

BackgroundAcute upper respiratory infections (AURI) are the leading causes of antibiotic prescribing in primary care although antibiotics are often not indicated.AimTo gain an understanding of the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of GPs in Singapore and the associated latent factors to guide the implementation of an effective programme to reduce antibiotic use in primary care.Design and setting:An anonymous survey on the KAP of antibiotic use in AURI of GPs in Singapore.MethodKAP survey questionnaires were posted to all GPs from a database. To ascertain the latent factors affecting prescribing patterns, exploratory factor analysis was performed.ResultsAmong 427 responses, 351 (82.2%) were from GPs working in private practice. It was found that 58.4% of GPs in the private versus 72.4% of those in the public sector recognised that >80% of AURIs were caused by viruses (P = 0.02). The majority of GPs (353/427; 82.7%) felt that antibiotics were overprescribed in primary care. Significant factors associated with low antibiotic prescribing were good medical knowledge and clinical competency (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.4 to 4.3), good clinical practice (aOR 2.7 [95% CI = 2.0 to 3.6]), availability of diagnostic tests (aOR 1.4 [95% CI = 1.1 to 1.8]), and desire to improve clinical practice (aOR 1.5 [95% CI = 1.2 to 1.9]). The conservative practice of giving antibiotics ‘to be on the safe side’ is significantly less likely to be associated with low antibiotic prescribing (aOR 0.7 [95% CI = 0.5 to 0.9]).ConclusionThis is the first KAP survey on antibiotic prescribing for AURI among GPs in Singapore. With the latent factors identified, future interventions should be directed at addressing these factors to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing.

scholarly journals Knowledge, Attitudes and Intentions to Prescribe Antibiotics: A Structural Equation Modeling Study of Primary Care Institutions in Hubei, China

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (13) ◽  
pp. 2385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chenxi Liu ◽  
Chaojie Liu ◽  
Dan Wang ◽  
Xinping Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Antibiotic Resistance ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Motivation To Change ◽  
Attitudes And Practices

The aim of this paper is to measure the knowledge and attitudes of primary care physicians toward antibiotic prescriptions and their impacts on antibiotic prescribing. A questionnaire survey was conducted on 625 physicians from 67 primary care facilities in Hubei, China. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was applied to test the theoretical framework derived from the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP) theory. Physicians’ knowledge, five sub-types of attitudes, and three sub-types of behavioral intentions towards antibiotic use were measured. Physicians had limited knowledge about antibiotic prescriptions (average 54.55% correct answers to 11 questions). Although they were generally concerned about antibiotic resistance (mean = 1.28, SD = 0.43), and were reluctant to be submissive to pressures from consumer demands for antibiotics (mean = 1.29, SD = 0.65) and the requirements of defensive practice (mean = 1.11, SD = 0.63), there was a lack of motivation to change prescribing practices (mean = −0.29, SD = 0.70) and strong agreement that other stakeholders should take the responsibility (mean = −1.15, SD = 0.45). The SEM results showed that poor knowledge, unawareness of antibiotic resistance, and limited motivation to change contributed to physicians’ high antibiotics prescriptions (p < 0.001). To curb antibiotic over-prescriptions, improving knowledge itself is not enough. The lack of motivation of physicians to change needs to be addressed through a systematic approach.

scholarly journals Antibiotic Prescribing for Adults Hospitalized in the Etiology of Pneumonia in the Community Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Tomczyk ◽  
Seema Jain ◽  
Anna M Bramley ◽  
Wesley H Self ◽  
Evan J Anderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Community Study ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Beta Lactam ◽  
First Line ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Admission Ward ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Background Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) 2007 guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)/American Thoracic Society (ATS) recommend a respiratory fluoroquinolone or beta-lactam plus macrolide as first-line antibiotics for adults hospitalized with CAP. Few studies have assessed guideline-concordant antibiotic use for patients hospitalized with CAP after the 2007 IDSA/ATS guidelines. We examine antibiotics prescribed and associated factors in adults hospitalized with CAP. Methods From January 2010 to June 2012, adults hospitalized with clinical and radiographic CAP were enrolled in a prospective Etiology of Pneumonia in the Community study across 5 US hospitals. Patients were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire, and medical charts were reviewed. Antibiotics prescribed were classified according to defined nonrecommended CAP antibiotics. We assessed factors associated with nonrecommended CAP antibiotics using logistic regression. Results Among enrollees, 1843 of 1874 (98%) ward and 440 of 446 (99%) ICU patients received ≥1 antibiotic ≤24 hours after admission. Ward patients were prescribed a respiratory fluoroquinolone alone (n = 613; 33%), or beta-lactam plus macrolide (n = 365; 19%), beta-lactam alone (n = 240; 13%), among other antibiotics, including vancomycin (n = 235; 13%) or piperacillin/tazobactam (n = 157; 8%) ≤24 hours after admission. Ward patients with known risk for healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP), recent outpatient antibiotic use, and in-hospital antibiotic use &lt;6 hours after admission were significantly more likely to receive nonrecommended CAP antibiotics. Conclusions Although more than half of ward patients received antibiotics concordant with IDSA/ATS guidelines, a number received nonrecommended CAP antibiotics, including vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam; risk factors for HCAP, recent outpatient antibiotic, and rapid inpatient antibiotic use contributed to this. This hypothesis-generating descriptive epidemiology analysis could help inform antibiotic stewardship efforts, reinforces the need to harmonize guidelines for CAP and HCAP, and highlights the need for improved diagnostics to better equip clinicians.

scholarly journals Informing the development of a standardised approach to measure antibiotic use in secondary care: a systematic review protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e026792
Author(s):  
Selina Patel ◽  
Arnoupe Jhass ◽  
Susan Hopkins ◽  
Laura Shallcross
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Care ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Consumption ◽  
Antibiotic Usage ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Antibiotic Consumption Surveillance

IntroductionEcological and individual-level evidence indicates that there is an association between level of antibiotic exposure and the emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance. The Global Point Prevalence Survey in 2015 estimated that 34.4% of hospital inpatients globally received at least one antimicrobial. Antimicrobial stewardship to optimise antibiotic use in secondary care can reduce the high risk of patients acquiring and transmitting drug-resistant infections in this setting. However, differences in the availability of data on antibiotic use in this context make it difficult to develop a consensus of how to comparably monitor antibiotic prescribing patterns across secondary care. This review will aim to document and critically evaluate methods and measures to monitor antibiotic use in secondary care.Methods and analysisWe will search Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and websites of key organisations for published reports where an attempt to measure antibiotic usage among adult inpatients in high-income hospital settings has been made. Two independent reviewers will screen the studies for eligibility, extract data and assess the study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. A description of the methods and measures used in antibiotic consumption surveillance will be presented. An adaptation of the Affordability, Practicability, Effectiveness, Acceptability, Side-effects Equity framework will be used to consider the practicality of implementing different approaches to measuring antibiotic usage in secondary care settings. A descriptive comparison of definitions and estimates of (in)appropriate antibiotic usage will also be carried out.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required for this study as no primary data will be collected. The results will be published in relevant peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences or meetings where possible. This review will inform future approaches to scale up antibiotic consumption surveillance strategies to attempt to maximise impact through standardisation.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018103375

scholarly journals Trends and patterns of antibiotic prescribing at orthopedic inpatient departments of two private-sector hospitals in Central India: A 10-year observational study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. e0245902
Author(s):  
Kristina Skender ◽  
Vivek Singh ◽  
Cecilia Stalsby-Lundborg ◽  
Megha Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Design Patterns ◽  
Central India ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Essential Medicines ◽  
World Health ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Defined Daily Doses

Background Frequent antibiotic prescribing in departments with high infection risk like orthopedics prominently contributes to the global increase of antibiotic resistance. However, few studies present antibiotic prescribing patterns and trends among orthopedic inpatients. Aim To compare and present the patterns and trends of antibiotic prescription over 10 years for orthopedic inpatients in a teaching (TH) and a non-teaching hospital (NTH) in Central India. Methods Data from orthopedic inpatients (TH-6446; NTH-4397) were collected using a prospective cross-sectional study design. Patterns were compared based on the indications and corresponding antibiotic treatments, mean Defined Daily Doses (DDD)/1000 patient-days, adherence to the National List of Essential Medicines India (NLEMI) and the World Health Organization Model List of Essential Medicines (WHOMLEM). Antibiotic prescriptions were analyzed separately for the operated and the non-operated inpatients. Linear regression was used to analyze the time trends of antibiotic prescribing; in total through DDD/1000 patient-days and by antibiotic groups. Results Third generation cephalosporins were the most prescribed antibiotic class (TH-39%; NTH-65%) and fractures were the most common indications (TH-48%; NTH-48%). Majority of the operated inpatients (TH-99%; NTH-97%) were prescribed pre-operative prophylactic antibiotics. The non-operated inpatients were also prescribed antibiotics (TH-40%; NTH-75%), although few of them had infectious diagnoses (TH-8%; NTH-14%). Adherence to the NLEMI was lower (TH-31%; NTH-34%) than adherence to the WHOMLEM (TH-65%; NTH-62%) in both hospitals. Mean DDD/1000 patient-days was 16 times higher in the TH (2658) compared to the NTH (162). Total antibiotic prescribing increased over 10 years (TH-β = 3.23; NTH-β = 1.02). Conclusion Substantial number of inpatients were prescribed antibiotics without clear infectious indications. Adherence to the NLEMI and the WHOMLEM was low in both hospitals. Antibiotic use increased in both hospitals over 10 years and was higher in the TH than in the NTH. The need for developing and implementing local antibiotic prescribing guidelines is emphasized.

scholarly journals Time Trends and Factors Associated with Antibiotic Prescribing in Swiss Primary Care (2008 to 2020)

Antibiotics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 837
Author(s):  
Nahara Anani Martínez-González ◽  
Stefania Di Gangi ◽  
Giuseppe Pichierri ◽  
Stefan Neuner-Jehle ◽  
Oliver Senn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Time Trends ◽  
Antibiotic Consumption ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Employment Level ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Swiss Primary Care

Antibiotic resistance (ABR) is a major threat to public health, and the majority of antibiotics are prescribed in the outpatient setting, especially in primary care. Monitoring antibiotic consumption is one key measure in containing ABR, but Swiss national surveillance data are limited. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study to characterise the patterns of antibiotic prescriptions, assess the time trends, and identify the factors associated with antibiotic prescribing in Swiss primary care. Using electronic medical records data, we analysed 206,599 antibiotic prescriptions from 112,378 patients. Based on 27,829 patient records, respiratory (52.1%), urinary (27.9%), and skin (4.8%) infections were the commonest clinical indications for antibiotic prescribing. The most frequently prescribed antibiotics were broad-spectrum penicillins (BSP) (36.5%), fluoroquinolones (16.4%), and macrolides/lincosamides (13.8%). Based on the WHO AWaRe classification, antibiotics were 57.9% Core-Access and 41.7% Watch, 69% of which were fluoroquinolones and macrolides. Between 2008 and 2020, fluoroquinolones and macrolides/lincosamides prescriptions significantly declined by 53% and 51%; BSP prescriptions significantly increased by 54%. Increasing patients’ age, volume, and employment level were significantly associated with antibiotic prescribing. Our results may inform future antibiotic stewardship interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing.

scholarly journals 2193. Factors Impacting the Duration of Antimicrobial Therapy for Community-Acquired Pneumonia

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S746-S747
Author(s):  
Avnish Sandhu ◽  
Erin Goldman ◽  
Jordan Polistico ◽  
Sarah Polistico ◽  
Ahmed Oudeif ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Specific Risk

Abstract Background Pneumonia is a common cause of infection associated with hospitalization. Treatment durations for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) often exceed guideline recommended durations of 5–7 days without a clear explanation. The objective of this study was to determine factors that may lead to durations exceeding this recommendation. Methods A retrospective chart review of 89 patients admitted to the Detroit Medical Center (DMC) for the treatment of pneumonia was conducted. Demographics, clinical signs and symptoms, antibiotic data, pneumonia severity score (CURB 65), risk factors for resistance, microbiology results, and outcomes were recorded and analyzed for factors associated with increased durations of antibiotics. Average durations of antibiotics and durations of antibiotics greater that 7 days were assessed for each risk factor. Results Average durations of antibiotics was 9 days (SD 3.8) for the cohort, and 55 (61%) received durations of > 7 days. Average durations of antibiotics for risk factors are shown in Table 1. Factors associated with durations of antibiotics longer than 7 days are shown in Table 2. There was a trend toward longer average durations of antibiotics for persons with risk factors for resistance [Drug Resistance in Pneumonia (DRIP) score ≥ 4 (increased duration of antibiotics by 1.7 days, P = 0.07] and those with a positive legionella antigen [increased durations of antibiotics by 6.6 days, P = 0.07]. Conclusion Specific risk factors could not be associated with increased durations of antibiotics, although there was a trend toward longer durations for persons with markers for resistance and positive legionella testing. Efforts to reduce durations of antibiotics must target global clinician antibiotic prescribing patterns and not specific risk factors. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals 966. A Closer Look at Antibiotic Prescribing for Upper Respiratory Illnesses (URI) in People with HIV Compared with People Without HIV

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S31-S31
Author(s):  
Anum Abbas ◽  
Mackenzie R Keintz ◽  
Elizabeth Lyden ◽  
Jihyun Ma ◽  
Sara H Bares ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Private Insurance ◽  
Primary Care Clinic ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Care Clinic ◽  
Antibiotic Overuse ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Icd 10

Abstract Background Antibiotic overuse is widespread, increasing healthcare cost and promoting antimicrobial resistance. People with HIV (PWH) who develop URIs may be assumed “higher risk,” compared with non-PWH, but comparative antibiotic use evaluations have not been performed. We evaluated antibiotic prescribing patterns for URI diagnoses (cough, sinusitis, bronchitis, and cold) in PWH and non-PWH. Methods This was an observational, single-center study comparing PWH and non-PWH diagnosed with URI (using ICD 10 codes for URI syndromes: cough, sinusitis, bronchitis, and cold) between January 1, 2014 and April 30, 2018. Patients were empaneled in an outpatient primary care clinic or specialty care clinic in one healthcare system. Appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing was defined based on published guidelines. Fisher’s exact test compared categorical variables with antibiotic prescribing patterns. Each encounter was considered an independent event. Results The two groups (PWH and non-PWH) were similar, with 34% of subjects in both groups being female. PWH had median CD4+ count of 610 cells/mm3 with 91% on antiretrovirals and 77% with HIV RNA < 20 copies/mL. Overall, 37% of visits resulted in antibiotic prescriptions, 92% of which were inappropriate (discordant with guidelines). Antibiotics were prescribed slightly more frequently in non-PWH (40% vs. 33%, P = 0.056; Figure 1) and inappropriate more often in non-PWH (37% vs. 30%, P = 0.029). Over 20% of PWH antibiotic prescriptions were too long, and 22% of non-PWH received the wrong drug (Figure 2; P = 0.011). 47% of the non-PWH receiving antibiotics for URI had private insurance (compared with other payers; P < 0.0001) vs. 33% in PWH (P = 0.32) (Figure 3). Conclusion Outpatient antibiotic overuse remains prevalent among patients evaluated for URIs. This is the first study, to our knowledge, comparing antibiotic use for URIs in PWH compared with non-PWH. Counterintuitively, we found less-frequent inappropriate antibiotic use in PWH. We speculate that PWH are more likely to be evaluated by infectious disease/HIV specialists, possibly explaining the lower rate of antibiotic prescriptions for URIs in this population. Future analyses will evaluate the association between provider specialty and inappropriate antibiotic use. Disclosures All Authors: No reported Disclosures.

scholarly journals Knowledge, Attitudes, and Reported Practices Among Obstetrician-Gynecologists in the USA Regarding Antibiotic Prescribing for Upper Respiratory Tract Infections

2005 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shadi Chamany ◽  
Jay Schulkin ◽  
Charles E. Rose ◽  
Laura E. Riley ◽  
Richard E. Besser
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Respiratory Tract Infections ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Upper Respiratory Tract Infections ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Upper Respiratory Tract ◽  
Office Visits ◽  
The Common ◽  
Upper Respiratory ◽  
Tract Infections

Background:Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding antibiotic prescribing for upper respiratory tract infections (URIs) have not been well described among obstetrician-gynecologists (OB/GYNs). This information is useful for determining whether an OB/GYN-specific program promoting appropriate antibiotic use would significantly contribute to the efforts to decrease inappropriate antibiotic use among primary care providers.Methods:An anonymous questionnaire asking about the treatment of URIs was sent to 1031 obstetrician-gynecologists.Results:The overall response rate was 46%. The majority of respondents (92%) were aware of the relationship between antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance, and respondents estimated that 5% of their patients had URI symptoms at their office visits. Overall, 56% of respondents reported that they would prescribe an antibiotic for uncomplicated bronchitis and 43% for the common cold. OB/GYNs with the fewest years of experience were less likely than those with the most years of experience to report prescribing for uncomplicated bronchitis (Odds ratio (OR) 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.23 to 0.91) or the common cold (OR 0.44, CI 0.22 to 0.89). The majority of respondents (60%) believed that most patients wanted an antibiotic for URI symptoms, with male OB/GYNs being more likely than female OB/GYNs (OR 2.1, CI 1.2 to 3.8) to hold this belief. Both male OB/GYNs (OR 1.9, CI 1.1 to 3.4) and rural practitioners (OR 2.1, CI 1.1 to 4.0) were more likely to believe that it was hard to withhold antibiotics for URI symptoms because other physicians prescribe antibiotics for these symptoms. OB/GYNs who believed that postgraduate training prepared them well for primary care management were more likely than those who did not (OR 2.1, CI 1.1 to 4.2) to believe that they could reduce antibiotic prescribing without reducing patient satisfaction.Conclusion:Multiple demographic factors affect attitudes and reported practices regarding antibiotic prescribing. However, in view of the low proportion of office visits for URIs, an OB/GYN-specific program is not warranted.

scholarly journals Diarrhoea and preadmission antibiotic exposure in COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study of 1153 hospitalised patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000593
Author(s):  
Bilal Akhter Mateen ◽  
Sandip Samanta ◽  
Sebastian Tullie ◽  
Sarah O’Neill ◽  
Zillah Cargill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Risk ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Antibiotic Exposure ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Hospitalised Patients ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Residual Confounding

ObjectiveThe aims of this study were to describe community antibiotic prescribing patterns in individuals hospitalised with COVID-19, and to determine the association between experiencing diarrhoea, stratified by preadmission exposure to antibiotics, and mortality risk in this cohort.Design/methodsRetrospective study of the index presentations of 1153 adult patients with COVID-19, admitted between 1 March 2020 and 29 June 2020 in a South London NHS Trust. Data on patients’ medical history (presence of diarrhoea, antibiotic use in the previous 14 days, comorbidities); demographics (age, ethnicity, and body mass index); and blood test results were extracted. Time to event modelling was used to determine the risk of mortality for patients with diarrhoea and/or exposure to antibiotics.Results19.2% of the cohort reported diarrhoea on presentation; these patients tended to be younger, and were less likely to have recent exposure to antibiotics (unadjusted OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.97). 19.1% of the cohort had a course of antibiotics in the 2 weeks preceding admission; this was associated with dementia (unadjusted OR 2.92, 95% CI 1.14 to 7.49). After adjusting for confounders, neither diarrhoea nor recent antibiotic exposure was associated with increased mortality risk. However, the absence of diarrhoea in the presence of recent antibiotic exposure was associated with a 30% increased risk of mortality.ConclusionCommunity antibiotic use in patients with COVID-19, prior to hospitalisation, is relatively common, and absence of diarrhoea in antibiotic-exposed patients may be associated with increased risk of mortality. However, it is unclear whether this represents a causal physiological relationship or residual confounding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document