scholarly journals Patients’ and physicians’ experiences with remote consultations in primary care, during the covid-19 pandemic: a multi-method rapid review of the literature.

BJGP Open ◽  
2022 ◽  
pp. BJGPO.2021.0192
Author(s):  
Pradipti Verma ◽  
Robert Kerrison
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
The United States ◽  
Verbal Communication ◽  
Rapid Review ◽  
Full Paper ◽  
Qualitative And Quantitative ◽  
Key Issues ◽  
Remote Consultations

BackgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries implemented remote consultations in primary care to protect patients and staff from infection.AimThe aim of this review was to synthesise the literature exploring patients’ and physicians’ experiences with remote consultations in primary care, during the pandemic, with the further aim of informing their future delivery.Design & settingRapid literature review.MethodWe searched PubMed and PsychInfo for studies that explored patients’ and physicians’ experiences with remote consultations in primary care. To determine the eligibility of studies, we reviewed their titles and abstracts, prior to the full paper. We then extracted qualitative and quantitative data from those that were eligible, and synthesised the data using thematic and descriptive synthesis.ResultsA total of twenty-four studies were eligible for inclusion in the review. Most were performed in the United States of America (n=7, 29%) or Europe (n=7, 29%). Patient and physician experiences were categorised into perceived ‘advantages’ and ‘issues’. Key advantages experienced by patients and physicians included: ‘Reduced risk of COVID-19’ and ‘Increased convenience’, while key issues included: ‘a lack of confidence in / access to required technology’ and a ‘loss of non-verbal communication’, which exacerbated clinical decision making.ConclusionThis review identified a number of advantages and issues experienced by patients and physicians using remote consultations in primary care. The results suggest that, while remote consultations are more convenient, and protect patients and staff against COVID-19, they result in the loss of valuable non-verbal communication, and are not accessible to all.

scholarly journals Consensus for a primary care clinical decision-making tool for assessing, diagnosing, and managing shoulder pain in Alberta, Canada

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Breda H. F. Eubank ◽  
Sebastian W. Lackey ◽  
Mel Slomp ◽  
Jason R. Werle ◽  
Colleen Kuntze ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Shoulder Pain ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Rapid Review ◽  
Diagnosis And Management ◽  
Joint Health ◽  
Decision Making Tool

Abstract Background Shoulder pain is a highly prevalent condition and a significant cause of morbidity and functional disability. Current data suggests that many patients presenting with shoulder pain at the primary care level are not receiving high quality care. Primary care decision-making is complex and has the potential to influence the quality of care provided and patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to develop a clinical decision-making tool that standardizes care and minimizes uncertainty in assessment, diagnosis, and management. Methods First a rapid review was conducted to identify existing tools and evidence that could support a comprehensive clinical decision-making tool for shoulder pain. Secondly, provincial consensus was established for the assessment, diagnosis, and management of patients presenting to primary care with shoulder pain in Alberta, Canada using a three-step modified Delphi approach. This project was a highly collaborative effort between Alberta Health Services’ Bone and Joint Health Strategic Clinical Network (BJH SCN) and the Alberta Bone and Joint Health Institute (ABJHI). Results A clinical decision-making tool for shoulder pain was developed and reached consensus by a province-wide expert panel representing various health disciplines and geographical regions. This tool consists of a clinical examination algorithm for assessing, diagnosis, and managing shoulder pain; recommendations for history-taking and identification of red flags or additional concerns; recommendations for physical examination and neurological screening; recommendations for the differential diagnosis; and care pathways for managing patients presenting with rotator cuff disease, biceps pathology, superior labral tear, adhesive capsulitis, osteoarthritis, and instability. Conclusions This clinical decision-making tool will help to standardize care, provide guidance on the diagnosis and management of shoulder pain, and assist in clinical decision-making for primary care providers in both public and private sectors.

scholarly journals Clinician checklist for assessing suitability of machine learning applications in healthcare

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. e100251
Author(s):  
Ian Scott ◽  
Stacey Carter ◽  
Enrico Coiera
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Improve Patient Care ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Routine Care ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Clinical Settings ◽  
Machine Learning Applications ◽  
Key Issues

Machine learning algorithms are being used to screen and diagnose disease, prognosticate and predict therapeutic responses. Hundreds of new algorithms are being developed, but whether they improve clinical decision making and patient outcomes remains uncertain. If clinicians are to use algorithms, they need to be reassured that key issues relating to their validity, utility, feasibility, safety and ethical use have been addressed. We propose a checklist of 10 questions that clinicians can ask of those advocating for the use of a particular algorithm, but which do not expect clinicians, as non-experts, to demonstrate mastery over what can be highly complex statistical and computational concepts. The questions are: (1) What is the purpose and context of the algorithm? (2) How good were the data used to train the algorithm? (3) Were there sufficient data to train the algorithm? (4) How well does the algorithm perform? (5) Is the algorithm transferable to new clinical settings? (6) Are the outputs of the algorithm clinically intelligible? (7) How will this algorithm fit into and complement current workflows? (8) Has use of the algorithm been shown to improve patient care and outcomes? (9) Could the algorithm cause patient harm? and (10) Does use of the algorithm raise ethical, legal or social concerns? We provide examples where an algorithm may raise concerns and apply the checklist to a recent review of diagnostic imaging applications. This checklist aims to assist clinicians in assessing algorithm readiness for routine care and identify situations where further refinement and evaluation is required prior to large-scale use.

scholarly journals ACADEMIA’S ROLE TO DRIVE CHANGE IN THE ORTHOTICS AND PROSTHETICS PROFESSION

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Géza Kogler ◽  
Christopher Hovorka
Keyword(s):  
Technology Use ◽  
Clinical Training ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
The United States ◽  
Academic Program ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Curricular Emphasis

This position paper outlines the important role of academia in shaping the orthotics and prosthetics (O&P) profession and preparing for its future. In the United States, most healthcare professions including O&P are under intense pressure to provide cost effective treatments and quantifiable health outcomes. Pivotal changes are needed in the way O&P services are provided to remain competitive. This will require the integration of new technologies and data driven processes that have the potential to streamline workflows, reduce errors and inform new methods of clinical care and device manufacturing. Academia can lead this change, starting with a restructuring in academic program curricula that will enable the next generation of professionals to cope with multiple demands such as the provision of services for an increasing number of patients by a relatively small workforce of certified practitioners delivering these services at a reduced cost, with the expectation of significant, meaningful, and measurable value. Key curricular changes will require replacing traditional labor-intensive and inefficient fabrication methods with the integration of newer technologies (i.e., digital shape capture, digital modeling/rectification and additive manufacturing). Improving manufacturing efficiencies will allow greater curricular emphasis on clinical training and education – an area that has traditionally been underemphasized. Providing more curricular emphasis on holistic patient care approaches that utilize systematic and evidence-based methods in patient assessment, treatment planning, dosage of O&P technology use, and measurement of patient outcomes is imminent. Strengthening O&P professionals’ clinical decision-making skills and decreasing labor-intensive technical fabrication aspects of the curriculum will be critical in moving toward a digital and technology-centric practice model that will enable future practitioners to adapt and survive. Article PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/36673/28349 How To Cite: Kogler GF, Hovorka CF. Academia’s role to drive change in the orthotics and prosthetics profession. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2021; Volume 4, Issue 2, No.21. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v4i2.36673 Corresponding Author: Géza F. KoglerOrthotics and Prosthetics Unit, Kennesaw State University.E-Mail: [email protected] ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0212-5520

The value of a consultant physiotherapist within a primary care musculoskeletal interface service: part of the spinal multidisciplinary team

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Michelle L Angus ◽  
Victoria Dickens ◽  
Naveed Yasin ◽  
James Greenwood ◽  
Irfan Siddique
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Tertiary Referral Centre ◽  
Allied Health Professionals ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Surgical Services ◽  
Pain Pathway ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Case Based

Background/aims The national low back pain pathway in the UK suggests practitioners managing patients with spinal pathology should be specifically trained to do so and have the ability to link with tertiary spinal services when required. The aim of this study was to ensure referrals through to a tertiary spinal surgical centre are appropriate and patients get the correct advice early in their management pathway. Methods A retrospective review of 700 cases were discussed at a spinal case-based discussion meeting in a primary care interface service, compared to services without this model. A convenience sample of cases were analysed with the consultant physiotherapist and those referred from other allied health professionals into the tertiary spinal surgical centre. Case-based team discussion took place before every referral into the tertiary spinal service, with spinal surgical discussion where required. Results Patients referred from other interface services were more likely to require further work-up such as investigations, or be discharged from clinic on their first attendance than those who had been through the case-based discussion. Conclusions A consultant physiotherapist working as part of the spinal team of a tertiary referral centre can help advanced practitioners with their clinical decision making to help prevent unnecessary referrals to spinal surgical services.

Implementation of Semantic Search to Support Clinical Decision-Making

2015 ◽  
pp. 270-286
Author(s):  
Andrew Tawfik ◽  
Karl Kochendorfer
Keyword(s):  
Human Performance ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Information Overload ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Human Performance Technology ◽  
The United States ◽  
Semantic Search ◽  
Current Case ◽  
Performance Technology

The current case study is situated within a large, land grant hospital located in the Midwestern region of the United States. Although the physicians had seen an increase in medical related human performance technology (HPTs) within the organization (e.g. computer physician ordered entry) some challenges remained as the hospital sought to improve the productivity of the electronic health record (EHRs). Specifically, physicians had difficulty finding information embedded within the chart due to usability problems and information overload. To overcome the challenges, a semantic search within the chart was implemented as a solution for physicians to retrieve relevant results given the conceptual semantic pattern. The case study will discuss many elements of the implementation based on our experience and feedback from clinicians. The case will specifically highlight the importance of training and change agents within an organization.

scholarly journals Direct oral anticoagulant monitoring: what laboratory tests are available to guide us?

Hematology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (1) ◽  
pp. 194-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi Sarode
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Rapid Assessment ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
The United States ◽  
Thrombin Inhibitor ◽  
Thrombin Time ◽  
Clinical Scenarios

Abstract Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used in the treatment and prophylaxis of thromboembolism because of several advantages over vitamin K antagonists, including no need for laboratory monitoring. However, it has become increasingly important in certain clinical scenarios to know either actual DOAC concentration (quantitative) or presence of DOAC (qualitative). These clinical conditions include patients presenting with major bleeding or requiring urgent surgery who may need a reversal or hemostatic agent, extremes of body weight, failed therapy, etc. Prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time are variably affected by factor Xa inhibitors (FXaIs) and direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI), respectively, depending on reagents’ sensitivity, and hence, they cannot be relied on confidently. Thrombin time is highly sensitive to very low amounts of DTI; thus, normal value rules out a clinically significant amount. Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry accurately measures DOAC levels but is clinically impractical. Dilute thrombin time and ecarin-based assays using appropriate calibrators/controls provide an accurate DTI level. Anti-Xa assay using corresponding FXaI calibrators/controls provides accurate drug levels. However, these assays are not readily available in the United States compared with some other parts of the world. Heparin assays using anti-Xa activity often have a linear relationship with calibrated FXaI assays, especially at the lower end of on-therapy levels, and they may provide rapid assessment of drug activity for clinical decision making. Currently, there is very limited knowledge of DOAC effect on viscoelastic measurements. Although there is uniformity in expression of DOAC concentrations in nanograms per milliliter, a universal FXaI DOAC assay is urgently needed.

scholarly journals Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the core functions of primary care: will the cure be worse than the disease? A qualitative interview study in Flemish GPs

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. e039674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronique Verhoeven ◽  
Giannoula Tsakitzidis ◽  
Hilde Philips ◽  
Paul Van Royen
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Core Competencies ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Framework Analysis ◽  
Profound Impact ◽  
The Core ◽  
Qualitative Interview Study

ObjectivesThe current COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the measures taken to control it, have a profound impact on healthcare. This study was set up to gain insights into the consequences of the COVID-19 outbreak on the core competencies of general practice, as they are experienced by general practitioners (GPs) on the frontline.Design, setting, participantsWe performed a descriptive study using semistructured interviews with 132 GPs in Flanders, using a topic list based on the WONCA definition of core competencies in general practice. Data were analysed qualitatively using framework analysis.ResultsChanges in practice management and in consultation strategies were quickly adopted. There was a major switch towards telephone triage and consults, for covid-related as well as for non-covid related problems. Patient-centred care is still a major objective. Clinical decision-making is largely focused on respiratory assessment and triage, and GPs feel that acute care is compromised, both by their own changed focus and by the fact that patients consult less frequently for non-covid problems. Chronic care is mostly postponed, and this will have consequences that will extend and become visible after the corona crisis. Through the holistic eyes of primary care, the current outbreak—as well as the measures taken to control it—will have a profound impact on psychological and socioeconomic well-being. This impact is already visible in vulnerable people and will continue to become clear in the medium and long terms. GPs think that they are at high risk of getting infected. Dropping out and being unable to contribute their part or becoming virus transmitters are reported to be greater concerns than getting ill themselves.ConclusionsThe current times have a profound impact on the core competences of primary care. Although the vast increase in patients soliciting medical help and the necessary separate covid and non-covid flows have been dealt with, GPs are worried about the continuity of regular care and the consequences of the anticovid measures. These may become a threat for the general health of the population and for the provision of primary healthcare in the near and distant future.

scholarly journals Public views regarding the responsibility of patients, clinicians, and institutions to participate in research in the United States

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 574-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin P Weinfurt ◽  
Li Lin ◽  
Jeremy Sugarman
Keyword(s):  
Health System ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
The United States ◽  
Robust Learning ◽  
Learning Health System ◽  
English Speaking ◽  
Nationally Representative ◽  
Public Views

Background The need for more and better evidence to inform clinical decision making among all stakeholders has fueled calls for creating learning healthcare systems. The successful realization of a learning healthcare system seems to assume that various parties have a responsibility to participate in learning activities, including research. The objective of this study was to determine whether members of the general public perceive an ethical responsibility to participate in pragmatic clinical research that would be inherent to a learning health system. Methods A total of 2994 English-speaking adults completed a nationally representative online survey. Results About two-thirds of respondents were relatively neutral regarding a responsibility for themselves and others to participate in research; the remainder felt that they and others did not have a responsibility to participate in research. Conclusions Efforts to justify and develop a robust learning health system in an ethically acceptable fashion need to take these findings into account.

scholarly journals OVERVIEW: THE VA GERIATRIC SCHOLARS PROGRAM FOR PRIMARY CARE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S765-S766
Author(s):  
Josea Kramer ◽  
Joe Douglas ◽  
Shawn Clarke ◽  
Luis Melendez
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Workforce Development ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Potentially Inappropriate Medications ◽  
Primary Care Workforce ◽  
Core Components ◽  
Intensive Course ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Inappropriate Medications

Abstract The VA has invested in developing the skills of its primary care workforce through the longitudinal Geriatric Scholars Program. The program consists of core components --- intensive course in geriatrics, intensive workshop in quality improvement (QI) and initiation of a micro QI projects in the Scholar’s clinic; electives allow learners to tailor the program to self-identified gaps in knowledge, skills and competencies. The program has demonstrated direct impacts of continuing education through a workforce development process that enhances skills and competencies at a pace and selection that meets clinicians’ self-identified gaps in training. Now in its 11th year, the program has been shown to increase career satisfaction and job retention, standardize provider behaviors, improve clinical decision-making and reduce dispensing of potentially inappropriate medications. This symposium further explores the impact of the program on individual clinicians and on clinical teams.

scholarly journals Predictive Glucose Trends From Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Friend or Foe in Clinical Decision Making?

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 963-966 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Fantasia ◽  
Katherine Modzelewski ◽  
Devin Steenkamp
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
The United States ◽  
Rate Of Change ◽  
Inherent Difficulty ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitor ◽  
Freestyle Libre ◽  
Practical Recommendations

In this commentary, we briefly review the currently recommended approaches to interpretation and management of continuous glucose monitor (CGM) rate of change (ROC) trend arrows and discuss the inherent difficulty in incorporating practical recommendations for their application into routine clinical care. We have limited our review and discussion to the currently available Dexcom G5 and G6 CGM systems and Abbott’s Freestyle Libre flash glucose monitor (FGM) system, as they are the most widely used and currently approved for nonadjunctive use in the United States.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document