scholarly journals Survival Analysis of Hungarian Large White, Duroc and Pietrain Sows

2016 ◽  
pp. 31-36
Author(s):  
Ágnes Baginé Hunyadi ◽  
Szilvia Kusza ◽  
Péter Balogh
Keyword(s):  
Survival Analysis ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Large White ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Survival Percentage ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Single Factor Analysis ◽  
The Individual

The aim of the present study was to perform lifetime performance analysis in three pig breeds; Hungarian Large White (n=295), Duroc (n=76) and Pietrain (n=91) on a commercial farm using analysis of survival sows. We took into consideration the age of sows at the time of their inclusion into breeding, their age at the time of culling, time spent in production, number of mating and parities, parity percentage, intervals between litters, number and mean of piglets born alive and born dead, number of raised piglet litters, number and mean of 21 days old piglets, the weight and mean of raised litter and raise percentage. We carried out the analysis by SPSS 22.0. Single factor analysis of variants, Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox PH model were used. The determination of the significance of risk rates differences was done by Wald chi square test. Our results showed that the average culling age were 1056 (±33.52) days for the Hungarian Large White, 735 (±73.56) days for Duroc and 818 (±71.98) days for the Pietrain. The log rank test of the survival analysis indicated a significant difference between the three tested genotypes (χ2=16.981, P<0.001), which means that the survival percentage of the individual breeds varied significantly from one another. In comparison with the Hungarian Large White genotype the Duroc genotype has a 1.6 times higher (P<0.001) culling risk while that of the genotype Pietrain was 1.36 times higher (P<0.001). Our results can be used to compare the breeds kept under the same conditions and to compare the life span of one genotype under different farming conditions. Factors that increase survival and improve the profitability of pig farming can be determined by this method.

scholarly journals LED vs Halogen Light-Curing of Adhesive-Precoated Brackets

2008 ◽  
Vol 78 (5) ◽  
pp. 935-940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Mirabella ◽  
Raffaele Spena ◽  
Giovanni Scognamiglio ◽  
Lombardo Luca ◽  
Antonio Gracco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Failure Rate ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Fisher Exact Test ◽  
Halogen Lamp ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Halogen Light ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Light Curing ◽  
Bracket Failure

Abstract Objective: To test the hypothesis that bonding with a blue light-emitting diode (LED) curing unit produces no more failures in adhesive-precoated (APC) orthodontic brackets than bonding carried out by a conventional halogen lamp. Materials and Methods: Sixty-five patients were selected for this randomized clinical trial, in which a total of 1152 stainless steel APC brackets were employed. In order to carry out a valid comparison of the bracket failure rate following use of each type of curing unit, each patient's mouth was divided into four quadrants. In 34 of the randomly selected patients, designated group A, the APC brackets of the right maxillary and left mandibular quadrants were bonded using a halogen light, while the remaining quadrants were treated with an LED curing unit. In the other 31 patients, designated group B, halogen light was used to cure the left maxillary and right mandibular quadrants, whereas the APC brackets in the remaining quadrants were bonded using an LED dental curing light. The bonding date, the type of light used for curing, and the date of any bracket failures over a mean period of 8.9 months were recorded for each bracket and, subsequently, the chi-square test, the Yates-corrected chi-square test, the Fisher exact test, Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, and the log-rank test were employed in statistical analyses of the results. Results: No statistically significant difference in bond failure rate was found between APC brackets bonded with the halogen light-curing unit and those cured with LED light. However, significantly fewer bonding failures were noted in the maxillary arch (1.67%) than in the mandibular arch (4.35%) after each light-curing technique. Conclusions: The hypothesis cannot be rejected since use of an LED curing unit produces similar APC bracket failure rates to use of conventional halogen light, with the advantage of a far shorter curing time (10 seconds).

scholarly journals Microsurgical rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia in MS patients: technique, patient satisfaction, and clinical outcomes

2019 ◽  
Vol 130 (6) ◽  
pp. 1877-1888
Author(s):  
Mark G. Bigder ◽  
Sandeep Krishnan ◽  
E. Francis Cook ◽  
Anthony M. Kaufmann
Keyword(s):  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Time To Treatment ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Time To Treatment Failure ◽  
Chi Square Test

OBJECTIVEPatients with multiple sclerosis (MS)–associated trigeminal neuralgia (TN) have higher recurrence and retreatment rates than non-MS patients. The optimal management strategy and role for microsurgical rhizotomy (MSR) for MS-TN remains to be determined. The aim of this study was to report time to treatment failure (TTF) and pain scores following MSR compared to percutaneous and Gamma Knife procedures.METHODSTime to treatment failure was analyzed after MSR (n = 14) versus prior procedures (n = 53) among MS-TN patients. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test were utilized to compare TTF after MSR versus prior procedures using the same cohort of patients as their own control group. Subsequent analysis compared TTF after MSR to TTF after 93 other procedures among a second cohort of 18 MS-TN patients not undergoing MSR. BNI pain scores were compared between MSR and other procedures among the MS-TN cohort using a chi-square test.RESULTSTTF was significantly longer after MSR than after other procedures in the MSR cohort (median TTF 79 vs 10 months, respectively, p < 0.0001). Similarly, TTF was longer after MSR than after prior procedures in the non-MSR cohort (median TTF 79 vs 13 months, respectively, p < 0.001). MSR resulted in a higher proportion of excellent pain scores when compared to other procedures in the non-MSR cohort (77% vs 29%, p < 0.001). Probability of treatment survival was higher after MSR than after other procedures at all time points (3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months). There were no deaths or major complications after MSR.CONCLUSIONSTTF was significantly longer following MSR compared to prior procedures in MS-TN patients. Additionally, a higher proportion of patients achieved excellent BNI pain scores after MSR.

Is there a correlation between clinic-pathological features, MSI, PD-L1 and survival outcomes in resected gastric cancer? Looking for optimal biomarkers.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15566-e15566
Author(s):  
Margherita Ratti ◽  
Nicola Valeri ◽  
Jens Claus Hahne ◽  
Andrea Lampis ◽  
Michele Ghidini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Pathological Features ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Tissue Samples ◽  
Prognostic Effect ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Msi Analysis

e15566 Background: Identification of prognostic biomarkers for gastric cancer (GC) patient selection is compelling to improve survival outcomes. Microsatellite instability (MSI) is related with a positive prognostic effect in GC, whereas perioperative chemotherapy resulted detrimental in this subgroup. In metastatic GC, immunotherapy with anti-PD1/PD-L1 drugs has shown promising results. Nevertheless, in early stages, data on the relation between MSI, clinic-pathological features, PD-L1 expression and overall survival (OS) remains sparse, especially in Western population. In our study, the prognostic role of MSI, clinic-pathological features and PD-L1 expression in a cohort of Italian GC patients was examined. Methods: CP data of 148 consecutive stage I-III GC pts resected in Cremona Institute between 2010 and 2014 (mostly chemo and/or radio-naive) were collected. MSI analysis was performed on tissue samples for all cases by polymerase chain reaction. PDL-1 expression, evaluated by immunohistochemistry, was assessed in MSI group. Differences between subgroups were evaluated with Chi-square test; Kaplan-Meier method and Long Rank test were used to calculate OS. Results: Female sex (p=0.012), earlier TNM stages (p=0.011) and limited nodal involvement (p=0.29) significantly correlated with MSI status. MSI is significantly associated with better prognosis, exhibiting an advantage of 28.6 months in OS compared with microsatellite stable subgroup (p<0.001). Most MSI patients expressed PD-L1. MSI patients without PD-L1 expression showed higher percentage of clinical features correlated with better prognosis compared with PD-L1 expressing MSI patients and MSS subgroup. Conclusions: MSI is an independent prognostic biomarker in GC and identifies a subset of patients with better OS and specific clinic-pathological features, including high percentage of PD-L1 expression. MSI could represent a promising biomarker to select patients for chemotherapy versus immunotherapy in non-metastatic disease.

scholarly journals MicroRNA-124 alone might represent an indicator signifying cholangiocarcinoma prognosis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ning Wang ◽  
Yanni Li ◽  
Yanfang Zheng ◽  
Huoming Chen ◽  
Xiaolong Wen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Prognostic Biomarker ◽  
Prognostic Indicator ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Abstract Background: Previous studies have demonstrated that microRNAs (miRNAs) played a crucial role in various diseases, including cancers. The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical significance of miR-124 in patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA).Methods: The expression pattern of miR-124 was detected in CCA tissues using quantitative reserve transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The correlation of miR-124 expression with clinicopathological features and overall survival of patients were explored using chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression analyses.Results: The miR-124 expression level was strong down-regulated in CCA tissues compared with normal para-cancerous tissues (P<0.001). Moreover, aberrant miR-124 expression was significantly associated with differentiation (P=0.045) and lymph node metastasis (P=0.040). In addition, Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test revealed that patients with low miR-124 expression has a poorer overall survival compared with those with high miR-124 expression (P=0.002). Furthermore, multivariate analysis confirmed that miR-124 expression (P=0.006; HR=2.006; 95%CI: 1.224-3.289) was an independent prognostic indicator in CCA.Conclusions: Collectively, our results defined miR-124 expression plays important roles in CCA patients. MiR-124 expression might used as a valuable prognostic biomarker for patients with CCA.

RADT-31. TREATMENT TRENDS AND SURVIVAL OUTCOMES IN ATYPICAL MENINGIOMA

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi48-vi48
Author(s):  
Yusef Syed ◽  
Manali Rupji ◽  
Jeffrey Switchenko ◽  
Bree Eaton ◽  
Jeffrey Olson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Data ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Atypical Meningioma ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Treatment Type ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Atypical Meningiomas

Abstract BACKGROUND WHO grade II (atypical) meningiomas are treated with surgical resection, often followed by adjuvant fractionated radiation therapy (FRT). The increased availability of frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) presents an opportunity to offer patients a high biological effective dose over fewer fractions. Here we study the patterns of care and outcomes of these two forms of adjuvant RT. METHODS Patients with atypical meningioma were abstracted from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Descriptive statistics were reported, and differences between treatment groups were assessed using either a chi-square test or ANOVA. Patients were grouped by treatment type and Kaplan Meier (KM) analysis was performed to compare overall survival (OS) using a log rank test. Univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) cox regression analyses were completed. RESULTS Of 10,015 cases diagnosed from 2004-2016, 7,153 received surgery alone, 2,059 received surgery and adjuvant FRT (S+RT), and 362 received adjuvant SRS (S+SRS). The use of adjuvant RT increased by 71.8% for S+RT and 97.8% for S+SRS. In 2004, 15.1% of 443 registered patients received S+RT and 2.26% received S+SRS, while in 2016 these figures were 26.0% and 4.47%, respectively, for the 1051 registered patients (p&lt; 0.001 and 0.022, respectively). For the 8,636 patients with survival data there was no significant difference in median OS between S+RT and S+SRS (130 months vs. 125 months, log rank p=0.935). On UVA, S+RT conferred better survival compared to surgery alone (HR 0.81 [0.72-0.91], p&lt; 0.001) while S+SRS trended towards better survival (HR 0.82 [0.64-1.06], p=0.124). On MVA, no significant OS benefit was seen with S+RT (HR 0.96 [0.85-1.08], p=0.491) or S+SRS (HR 0.90 [0.69-1.16], p=0.413) versus surgery alone. CONCLUSIONS While the use of adjuvant RT for atypical meningioma has increased substantially since 2004, OS is comparable between FRT and SRS. The data presented here support further prospective investigation of adjuvant SRS.

Ifosfamide (IFO) and doxorubicin (DOX) dose-intensities seem related to overall survival in adult soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) patients

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9581-9581
Author(s):  
G. F. Almeida ◽  
G. Castro ◽  
I. M. Snitcovsky ◽  
A. C. Bassani ◽  
M. E. Diz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Lower Grade ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Outpatient Unit ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Palliative Setting

9581 Background: IFO/DOX dose intensities (DI) seem to impact on the outcome of STS. We explored retrospectively the relationship between DI and overall survival (OS) in STS. Methods: From Jan/00 to Jun/05, 70 untreated STS pts received IFO/DOX, 32 as neo/adjuvant and 38 in the palliative setting at our outpatient unit. Filgrastin was not mandatory. Median age 47 y (17–74 y), 44 male; mean tumor size 13.6 cm in the neo/adjuvant and 16.5 cm in the palliative group (p=0.202, t-test). Most frequent histologies: leiomyo (16 pts), synovial (13), malignant fibrous histiocytoma (8) and liposarcoma (8). 28 pts had lower/ 9 upper limb tumors, 9 retroperitoneal, 9 trunk, 6 mediastinal, 5 visceral and 4 head and neck. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were considered from diagnosis and compared by log-rank test. Results: For the 70 pts, the mean DI for IFO and DOX were 2.5±0.9 mg/m2/wk and 18.8±6.0 mg/m2/wk, respectively. There was no difference between neo/adjuvant and palliative IFO/DOX DI (p=0.314/p=0.247, respectively). With 19-mo median f-up, the median OS (mOS) was 43 mo in the neo/adjuvant group with an advantage for pts submitted to conservative surgeries (46.5 mo vs. 16.8 mo; HR 0.185, 95%CI 0.003–0.399, p=0.007) as well as in those diagnosed with tumors with less than 3 mitoses/10 HPF (48.3 mo vs. 18.8 mo; HR 0.272, 95%CI 0.058–0.871, p=0.031). No differences in mOS related to tumor size, margin status or primary sites were found. According to IFO DI, the mOS were 46.5 mo, not reached (NR), 14.5 mo and 43 mo for pts in the 1st and subsequent DI quartiles (chi-square test for trend, p=0.004). In the median f-up of 9.8 mo, pts in the palliative setting presented mOS 21.8 mo, superior in the lower grade subgroup (NR vs. 11.1 mo; HR 0.130, 95%CI 0.076–0.746, p=0.014) and in the STS not from extremities (40.9 mo vs. 10.8 mo; HR 2.152, 95%CI 0.959–5.137, p=0.063). According to IFO DI quartiles, we also found a direct correlation between mOS (11.3 mo, 19 mo, 45.1 mo, and NR) and DI (p=0.052), and similar trend was shown for DOX DI, with 11.3 mo, 10.3 mo, NR, and 40.9 mo mOS for the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th quartiles (p=0.018). Conclusions: In these STS adult pts, we have found a relationship between IFO and DOX DI and OS. Further evaluations of more intensive chemotherapy schedules are warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Characteristics and outcomes of patients admitted to the acute palliative care unit (APUC) from the emergency center (EC) versus inpatient transfers (IP).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20581-e20581
Author(s):  
SeongHoon Shin ◽  
Eduardo Bruera ◽  
David Hui ◽  
Jung Hye Kwon ◽  
Gary B. Chisholm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Hematologic Cancer ◽  
C Statistic ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Symptom Assessment Scale

e20581 Background: Most patients admitted to APCU are transferred from inpatient oncology units. We hypothesized that EC admissions have different symptom burden and outcomes compared to IP patients. In this retrospective cohort study, we compared the symptom burden and survival between the EC and IP groups. Methods: Among all 2,568 patients admitted to our APCU between September 1, 2003 and August 31, 2008, 312 (12%) were EC patients. We randomly selected 298 IP patients as controls. We retrieved the patient demographics, cancer diagnosis, Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS), discharge outcomes, and overall survival from time of admission. Results: EC patients were more like to be black (22% v 11%, p=0.0006) and less likely to have hematologic cancer (5% v 14%, p=0.0003). EC patients had higher pain (5.4 v 4.6, p=0.0004), fatigue (6.7 v 6.1, p=0.0049), nausea (2.7 v 1.6, p<0.0001), insomnia (4.8 v 4.2, p=0.03) and were less likely to be delirious (41% v 55%, p=0.001). EC patients had more public insurance (44% v 38%, p=0.0142), more home discharge (29% v 11%, p=0.0001), longer admission (8 v 7 days, p=0.0002), and were 2.3x as likely to be discharged alive as compared to IP patients (p<0.0001, Wald Chi-square test). Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank test for survival from admission of APCU for EC and IP groups were not statistically significant (Median survival after admission were 34 v 31 days, p=0.08). In multivariate analysis, EC admission (OR= 1.9, 1.2-3.0), wellbeing (OR=1.12, 1.02-1.23), dyspnea (OR=0.85, 0.79-0.92) and delirium (OR=0.39, 0.24-0.64) were independently significant for being discharge alive. The c-statistic value was 0.71. Conclusions: EC patients have higher acute symptom burden, but more likely to be discharged alive as compared to IP transfer patients. The APCU is successful at managing symptoms and facilitating discharge to the community for EC patients. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals 358. Early Cardiac Marker of Mortality in COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S282-S283
Author(s):  
Douglas Salguero ◽  
Juliana Ferri-Guerra ◽  
Angel Porras ◽  
Marissa Donatelle ◽  
Everett Rogers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adipose Tissue ◽  
Survival Analysis ◽  
Epicardial Adipose Tissue ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Vasa Vasorum ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Survival Percentage ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is a highly inflammatory depot of fat, with high concentrations of IL-6 and macrophages, which can directly reach the myo-pericardium via the vasa vasorum or paracrine pathways. TNF-α and IL-6 diminish cardiac inotropic function, making EAT inflammation a potential cause of cardiac dysfunction. Methods A retrospective cohort study assessing EAT Thickness and Density from CT scans, without contrast, from adult patients during index admission for COVID-19 infection at Mount Sinai Medical Center from March 2020 to January 2021. A total of 1,644 patients were screened, of which 148 patients were included. Follow-up completed until death or discharge. The descriptive analysis was applied to the general population, parametric test of normality for comparisons between groups. Kaplan survival analysis was conducted after survival distribution was confirmed significant. It was followed by the assumption of normality by Q-Q Plot, prior to performing a multiple regression analysis in the vulnerable group using a K-Matrix input for cofounders. A log-rank test was conducted to determine differences in the survival distributions for the different ranges of EAT thickness. Results A total of 148 Participants were assigned to two groups based on epicardial adipose tissue in order to classify them as increased or decreased risk of cardiovascular risk: &gt;5mm (n = 99), &lt; 5mm (n = 49). The survival percentage was higher in the group with no EAT inflammation compared to the group with EAT inflammation (95.0% and 65%, respectively). Participants with EAT &gt;5mm had a median day of hospital stay of 18 (95% CI, 16.86 to 29.92). The survival distributions for the two categories were statistically significantly different, χ2(2) = 6.9, p &lt; 0.01. A Bonferroni correction was made with statistical significance accepted at the p &lt; 0.025 level. There was a statistically significant difference in survival distributions for the EAT &gt;5 mm vs EAT &lt; 5 mm, χ2(1) =6.953, p = 0.008. EAT Thickness Survival Analysis 2020-2021 COVID-19 MSMC Scatter Plot Length of Stay by EAT Thickness Conclusion There was an association with increased EAT thickness and increased mortality. These findings suggest that EAT thickness can be used as a prognostic factor and as a risk factor for increased mortality in patients with COVID-19 Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Development of predictive prognostic nomogram for NECs of rectum on population-based exploration

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 1178-1185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Lv ◽  
Ning Pu ◽  
Wei-lin Mao ◽  
Wen-qi Chen ◽  
Huan-yu Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cox Regression ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Prognostic Indicators ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Chi Square Test

Aim We aim to investigate the clinical characteristics of the rectal NECs and the prognosis-related factors and construct a nomogram for prognosis prediction. Methods The data of 41 patients and 1028 patients with rectal NEC were retrieved respectively from our institution and SEER database. OS or PFS was defined as the major study outcome. Variables were compared by chi-square test and t-test when appropriate. Kaplan–Meier analysis with log-rank test was used for survival analysis and the Cox regression analysis was applied. The nomogram integrating risk factors for predicting OS was constructed by R to achieve superior discriminatory ability. Predictive utility of the nomogram was determined by concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve. Results In the univariate and multivariate analyses, tumor differentiation, N stage, M stage and resection of primary site were identified as independent prognostic indicators. The linear regression relationship was found between the value of Ki-67 index and the duration of OS (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the independent prognostic factors were added to formulate prognostic nomogram. The constructed nomogram showed good performance according to the C-index. Conclusions Contrary to WHO classification guideline, we found that the rectal NEC diseases are heterogeneous and should be divided as different categories according to the pathological differentiation. Besides, the nomogram formulated in this study showed excellent discriminative capability to predict OS for those patients. More advanced predictive model for this disease is required to assist risk stratification via the formulated nomogram.

scholarly journals Investigation of the effect of flooring on the living performance of sows using survival analysis

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 99-102
Author(s):  
Angéla Soltész
Keyword(s):  
Survival Analysis ◽  
Great Plain ◽  
Breeding Programme ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Logrank Test ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Pig Farming ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Mean Differences

Pig-farming has a long tradition in Hungary, most significantly within the Alföld region. In my analysis I studied the lifespan of sows in two nucleus pig herds on the Great Plain, also examining the probability of the occurrence of different reasons for culling. During my research I collected data (from 2001 to 2010) relating to more than 10,000 sows from the farms conducting a breeding programme and I searched for the answer to the question of whether can I find a significant difference in the lifespan of sows with the same feeding and the same genotype if the floor type of farms is different (Herd A has a solid floor with straw and Herd B has a slatted floor). Regarding the reasons for culling ANOVA was used to investigate mean differences in logarithms of the lifespan of sows in each herd. Between the herds the seven most common culling reasons were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and the significant difference was demonstrated with the logrank test. The results of the log-rank test showed that there was a significant difference in leg problems as a cause of culling and deaths (p < 0.05) between the two farms, which is the consequence of different floor types.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document