scholarly journals ТРУДОВИЙ ДОГОВІР ЯК СУЧАСНА ФОРМА РЕАЛІЗАЦІЇ ПРАВА НА ПРАЦЮ: ПЕРСПЕКТИВИ ПРАВОВОГО ВРЕГУЛЮВАННЯ

Author(s):  
Г. О. Вайленко

The purpose of the paper is to characterize the employment contract as a form of realization of the right to work and outline the prospects for resolving it as a legal fact of the emergence of labor relations in the form of proposals in the future Labor Code of Ukraine. The author analyzes contemporary scientific thoughts on understanding the right to work, an employment contract as a form of realization of the right to work, which become the basis for their own conclusions. The author substantiates the scientific position on the dynamic context of understanding the right to work, which simultaneously takes into account a very powerful sphere of existence and the development of the right to work in realization: to choose the sphere of the future and activities and to specify the right to work through this choice. There is a direct link between the chosen activity and the content of the right to work. it is concluded that the Constitution of Ukraine, based on international normative legal acts, establishes a formula for the right to work with certain unknowns, and the type of professional activity determines these unknowns. Proposals on improvement of labor legislation are given.

2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-64
Author(s):  
A. Kasymova ◽  
◽  
M. Zhandeldinova ◽  

In this article, the authors consider the features of the scope of application of labor legislation. The authors note that the extent to which the norms of labor legislation apply to different types of labor relations varies. In this connection, the question of the scope of labor legislation, as well as the limits of its use in the settlement of labor relations of various categories of citizens, becomes relevant. The purpose of this article is to address issues related to the scope of application of labor legislation. In this study, the methods generally accepted in the legal science and the science of labor law is used. Thus, such general scientific methods as dialectical, system-structural, historical methods, as well as the method of comparative analysis were used. Among the special legal methods used, it is necessary to distinguish the formal legal method of scientific knowledge. The scope of the labor legislation is, first of all, the circle of public relations, a certain territory, as well as the circle of subjects to which its norms apply. The Labor Code cannot regulate all relations concerning the exercise of the right to work. This is the sphere of regulation of the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Labor legislation can regulate only those relations concerning the exercise of the right to work that arise on the basis of an employment contract. The authors come to the conclusion that labor legislation regulates not only labor relations, which are the subject of labor law. It also regulates certain other types of employment relations in cases where this is expressly provided for by law. At the same time, it should be noted that the labor legislation applies to other types of labor relations only within the limits defined by a special law. Labor legislation does not apply in cases where the work is performed by an individual – a business entity independently or the work is performed by members of a personal peasant farm in this farm, as well as in cases where an individual performs the duties of a member of the supervisory board of a joint-stock company, the executive body of a business company, or other relevant management bodies of legal entities; if these duties are performed on other grounds than an employment contract, and if an individual performs the duties under a civil contract providing for the performance of certain work in favor of the other party to the contract.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 191-196
Author(s):  
I Р Chikireva

In article it is noted that freedom of work defined by the Constitution, had direct impact on development of variety of forms of application of work. The greatest volume of privileges and guarantees is provided for the citizens which activity is issued by the service contract and the employment contract, minimum - for the persons working on the contract of civil character. Problems of legal regulation of the atypical labor relations, work of loan and remote workers, psychological prosecution at («mobbing») work are considered. If the atypical labor relations are actually issued by the civil contract, possibility of recognition their labor on the basis of article 11 of the Labour code is minimum. The constitutional freedom of work affected that the labor relations became more flexible, having changed and quantitatively (by types), and is qualitative (on signs, subjects, object and the contents), but changes have to take place in the certain limits caused by socially directed purposes and tasks of the Constitution and the labor legislation.


Author(s):  
Hang Thi Trinh

Article 35 of the Vietnamese Constitution 2013 stipulates that "Citizens have the right to work, choose a career and workplace." This is one of the basic rights of citizens and is concretized by an array of different regulations to regulate the labor relations between employees and employers. Of the regulations, provisions on the employee's right to unilaterally terminate the employment contract are emphasized. Within the scope of this article, the author points out a number of issues which are associated with the employee's rights to unilaterally terminate the employment contract stipulated in the Labor Code 2019, specifically the provisions in Section 3, Chapter III. In order to clarify and deepen the issues, the author uses the comparison method between the provisions of the Labor Code 2019 and the provision of the Labor Code 2012, reviewing and analyzing the issues of grounds and procedures for exercising the right to unilaterally terminate the employment contract of the employee; rights and obligations of employees when unilaterally terminating the employment contract legally; rights and obligations of employees when unilaterally terminating the employment contract illegally. In particular, the issues of grounds for the termination of the employment contract, a notice period before the unilateral termination of the employment contract, severance allowances and unemployment benefits are analyzed thoroughly to highlight the positive points as well as the gaps that currently exist and affect employees and employers. Finally, the author gives a number of recommendations to improve the legal regulations, creating balance and stability in labor relations as well as sustainable development for the economy and society.


Author(s):  
Yuliya Chernenilova

This article describes the periods of development of the legal institution of employment contract in Russia. The characteristic features for each of them are defined. The first period was the longest and was marked by develogment of the contract of personal employment as the origin of the modern institution of employment contract. In the second period, the contract of personal employment represented the institution of civil law, and later became the subject of study of the civil law science. At that time the industrial law of the country was forming. A distinctive feature of the third period was the adoption of codified acts, as well as differentiation in the legal regulation of labor relations of temporary and seasonal workers. The fourth period is characterized by changes in state-legal methods of economic management. With the adoption of the Constitution of the Russian Federation labor legislation was assigned to the joint jurisdiction of the Russian Federation and its subjects. It is concluded that the adoption of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation necessitates a more accurate study of the problems arising in the application of specific rules of law governing the peculiarities of labor of certain categories of workers (for example, labor relations with persons with disabilities are not yet perfect because of the youth of the labor law), conflict of laws issues arising in practice, contradictions that occur in a huge array of legal documents not only in labor law, but also in other branches of law.


Author(s):  
V.A. Lebedev ◽  
E.I. Lebedeva

A comparative analysis of the latest changes in labor legislation concerning the implementation of the right to leave by remote workers is carried out. The article considers the legal differentiation of the norms on vacation of remote workers who perform remote work in accordance with the employment contract on a permanent basis, and remote workers who perform remote work temporarily. The complex issues of the application of labor legislation to remote relations and the applied models of vacation regulation are considered; restrictions that cannot worsen the situation of a remote worker, deprive him of constitutional guarantees, or restrict his right to rest.


2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-156
Author(s):  
T. Pisоchenkо ◽  
◽  
S. Agafonova ◽  

Annotation. Introduction. The author investigates in his article the main drawbacks of the Ukrainian legislative base that may cause difficulties for employers and employees during the COVID-19 pandemic. While reading this article you will find several solutions on how to limit salary expenses of you company or firm, lead in remote or part-time working schedule on the enterprise and grant employees unpaid leave. The article also deals with the procedure of the paper work that should be done while processing sick leaves of the people who suffered from the COVID-19 disease or contacted with the COVID-19 patients. Purpоse. The purpose of this article is to identify the shortcomings of labor legislation during quarantine and restrictive measures related to the spread of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Consider and analyze new approaches in building labor relations between employees and employers in the face of rising unemployment and the introduction of telework. Results. The pandemic covered 210 countries and territories. Studies have shown that tens of millions of people have lost their jobs. According to various social survey centers, every third company surveyed optimized the payroll, sent employees to remote work with a reduction in wages, reduced staff and transferred some workers to contracts. Today it is possible to exercise the right to receive partial unemployment benefits for insured workers who have lost part of their wages due to forced downtime or reduction of working hours due to quarantine. Cоnclusiоns. Today, much responsibility lies with the subjects of labor relations, much depends on the employees and employers, on their responsibility and charity. State aid to those categories that were more vulnerable during the crisis remains important. Financial assistance can take the form of grants and grace periods on outstanding loans – in order to support and overcome the profitability crisis. Keywоrds: labor relations; pandemic; wages; COVID-19.


2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. 48-51
Author(s):  
Е.М. Коничева

The article is devoted to the analysis of the labor legislation of the Russian Federation in the context of the development of various forms of social partnership. The study concluded that social partnership is one of the forms of coordination of the interests of the parties to the employment contract between the employee and the employer. The development of labor relations in Russia is promoted by various commissions for the regulation of social and labor relations - social partnership bodies that have competence in the field of organizing collective negotiations and drafting collective agreements and contracts in accordance with the legislation


Author(s):  
Alexandra Borimecicova

The article considers the peculiarities of foreign citizens stay on the Russian Federation territory. The rights and freedoms of foreigners guaranteed by the Constitution of the Russian Federation and other laws are reviewed and examined. The article provides a comparative legal analysis of the status and rights of both the Russian Federation citizen and a foreign citizen residing in the territory of this state. Common and distinctive features of these two categories are specified. The matters of employment of foreign citizens and restrictions on the rights to participate in labor relations, which is due to the fact that non-citizens have the right to work only if they have a work permit, are also considered. In its turn, the component of migration policy is revealed, that is, the problem of expulsion and deportation of a foreign citizen from the Russian Federation is touched upon. Administrative expulsion and deportation of foreign citizens from the Russian Federation is a form of state activity that regulates relations with foreign citizens and is aimed to protect the State border.


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (11) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Николай Демидов ◽  
Nikolay Demidov

The article analyzes system-related contradictions inherent to the development of the Russian labor law branch in XIX—XX. By means of historical-legal, comparative, dialectic methods the author investigates the roots of modern problems in law-making and law enforcement in legal regulation of hired labor relations. The author reveals negative factors in the development of the labor legislation, that are common for Russia and world leading countries. Among main evolutional problems in labor law, the author considers excessive centralization, a high degree of the right enforcement formalization, susceptibility of the branch to political environment, an important role of non-legal regulators of labor relations, low development level of security arrangements for labor rights, inadequate government supervision, a division of employees and employers’ interests, that is not always correct. The author draws the conclusion about the implicit, objective nature of the described defects and notes an essential impossibility to overcome them.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document