scholarly journals Problems of adherence to treatment with oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation in the Kyrgyz Republic

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 50-54
Author(s):  
Kanat Kyzy Bazira
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Kyrgyz Republic ◽  
Adherence To Treatment ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Effective Prevention ◽  
New Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
One Year

Objectives assessment of adherence to treatment in elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were prescribed anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonist, warfarin, and a new oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban. Material and methods. During the study, 322 patients with atrial fibrillation of nonvalvular etiology were observed. Depending on the type of anticoagulant taken, the patients were divided into 2 groups: the first group included 253 (78.6%) people who took warfarin, the second group 69 (21.4%) people, who were prescribed a new oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban. Results. By the end of the one-year follow-up from the start of anticoagulant treatment, only 8.7% of patients in the first group followed the doctor's prescription; the second group had 59.4% of adherent patients. The vast majority of patients refused warfarin therapy due to the inability to control INR. In the case of the appointment of rivaroxaban, the reason for the refusal to take was the high cost of the drugs. Conclusion. Effective prevention of thromboembolic complications in atrial fibrillation requires the development of appropriate measures to improve adherence to treatment.

scholarly journals Switching to Another Oral Anticoagulant and Drug Discontinuation Among Elderly Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Treated With Different Direct Oral Anticoagulants

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 107602961987024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine L. Baker ◽  
Amol D. Dhamane ◽  
Jigar Rajpura ◽  
Jack Mardekian ◽  
Oluwaseyi Dina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Drug Discontinuation ◽  
Research Database ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Study Population

We compared the risks of switching to another oral anticoagulant (OAC) and discontinuation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) among elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who were prescribed rivaroxaban or dabigatran versus apixaban. Patients (≥65 years of age) with NVAF prescribed DOACs (January 1, 2013 to September 30, 2017) were identified from the Humana research database and grouped into DOAC cohorts. Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate whether the risk for switching to another OAC or discontinuing index DOACs differed among cohorts. Of the study population (N = 38 250), 55.9% were prescribed apixaban (mean age: 78.6 years; 49.8% female), 37.3% rivaroxaban (mean age: 77.4 years; 46.7% female), and 6.8% dabigatran (mean age: 77.0 years; 44.0% female). Compared to patients prescribed apixaban, patients prescribed rivaroxaban (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.92-2.25; P < .001) or dabigatran (HR: 3.74; 95% CI, 3.35-4.18, P < .001) had a significantly higher risk of switching to another OAC during the follow-up; compared to patients prescribed apixaban, the risks of discontinuation were also higher for patients treated with rivaroxaban (HR: 1.10; 95% CI, 1.07-1.13, P < .001) or dabigatran (HR: 1.29; 95% CI, 1.23-1.35, P < .001).

scholarly journals Anticoagulant Utilization and Direct Oral Anticoagulant Prescribing in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

2019 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Priscilla Shum ◽  
Gordon Klammer ◽  
Dale Toews ◽  
Arden Barry
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Renal Dialysis ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Patients Âgés ◽  
Fibrillation Auriculaire

ABSTRACTBackground: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are indicated for prevention of stroke and embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). These agents have been shown to be non-inferior to warfarin in terms of efficacy and safety. However, their uptake in practice has been variable, and prescribed dosages may be inconsistent with manufacturer recommendations.Objectives: To evaluate patterns of oral anticoagulant use in patients with NVAF, including determination of patient characteristics associated with the prescribing of warfarin or DOACs and whether prescribed dosages of DOACs were concordant with manufacturer recommendations.Methods: This retrospective chart review was conducted from April to September 2017 at Abbotsford Regional Hospital, Abbotsford, British Columbia. Patients at least 18 years of age with NVAF and CHADS-65 score of 1 or higher were included. Patients with contraindications to oral anticoagulants, those with reversible atrial fibrillation, and those undergoing renal dialysis were excluded. The dosage of DOACs was categorized as too low, too high, or correct in relation to manufacturer recommendations for the Canadian product. Results: A total of 120 patients were included. At discharge, 83 (69%) of the patients had a prescription for DOAC, 25 (21%) had a prescription for warfarin, and 12 (10%) had no prescription for an oral anticoagulant. There were no statistically significant differences between the warfarin and DOAC groups with respect to patient characteristics. Among the 56 patients for whom a full DOAC dose was indicated, 7 (13%) received a dose that was too low. Among the 23 patients for whom a full DOAC dose was not indicated, 4 (17%) received a dose that was too high. Conclusions: At the study hospital, most patients with NVAF and CHADS-65 score of at least 1 had a discharge prescription for DOAC. Patient characteristics appeared to be similar between the warfarin and DOAC groups. For a notable proportion of patients who received a DOAC, the dosage was incorrect. Appropriate prescribing of oral anticoagulants could be further improved by education for prescribers and involvement of hospital pharmacists.RÉSUMÉContexte : Les anticoagulants oraux directs (AOD) sont indiqués pour prévenir les AVC et les embolies parmi les patients atteints de fibrillation auriculaire non valvulaire (FANV). Il a été démontré que l’efficacité et l’innocuité de ces agents n’étaient pas inférieures à la warfarine. Cependant, leur adoption dans la pratique est inégale, et les doses prescrites peuvent être contraires aux recommandations des fabricants.Objectifs : Évaluation des habitudes d’utilisation des anticoagulants oraux pour les patients atteints de FANV, y compris la définition des caractéristiques des patients associées à la prescription de la warfarine ou des AOD, ainsi que de la conformité des doses prescrites de ces derniers aux recommandations des fabricants.Méthodes : Cet examen rétrospectif des dossiers a été mené d’avril à septembre 2017 à l’Hôpital régional d’Abbotsford à Abbotsford, en Colombie-Britannique. Des patients âgés d’au moins 18 ans, atteints de FANV et ayant un score CHADS-65 d’au moins 1, ont été inclus dans l’étude. Les patients présentant une contre-indication aux anticoagulants oraux, ceux atteints de fibrillation auriculaire réversible et ceux soumis à une dialyse rénale en ont été exclus. La dose d’AOD destinés au marché canadien a été catégorisée comme trop faible, trop élevée ou correcte par rapport aux recommandations du fabricant.Résultats : Cent-vingt patients au total ont participé à l’étude. Au moment du congé, 83 (69 %) d’entre eux avaient une prescription d’AOD, 25 (21 %) avaient une prescription de warfarine et 12 (10 %) n’avaient pas de prescription d’anticoagulant oral. En ce qui concerne les caractéristiques des patients, il n’y avait aucune différence statistique notable entre les groupes ayant reçu une prescription de warfarine et ceux ayant reçu une prescription d’AOD. Des 56 patients qui avaient reçu une indication de dose complète d’AOD, sept (13 %) ont reçu une dose trop faible. Des 23 patients qui n’avaient pas reçu d’indication de dose complète d’AOD, quatre (17 %) ont reçu une dose trop élevée.Conclusions : À l’hôpital où s’est déroulée l’étude, la plupart des patients atteints de FANV et ceux ayant un score CHADS-65 d’au moins 1 recevaient une prescription d’AOD au moment du congé. Les caractéris-tiques des patients semblaient similaires entre les groupes ayant reçu une prescription de warfarine et ceux ayant reçu une prescription d’AOD. La dose d’AOD reçue par une proportion notable de patients était incorrecte. La prescription appropriée d’anticoagulants oraux pourrait encore être améliorée si on sensibilisait les prescripteurs avec la collaboration des pharmaciens d’hôpitaux.   

Which Patients Would Be Willing to Change Anticoagulation From Vitamin-K Antagonists to a New Oral Anticoagulant?

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4318-4318
Author(s):  
Job Harenberg ◽  
Svetlana Marx ◽  
Nadja Abou-Ayash ◽  
Christophe Kremer ◽  
Vera Hoeing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
New Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Willingness To Change

Abstract Abstract 4318 New oral anticoagulants have generated promising data on the prophylaxis of systemic and non-systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation and treatment of acute venous thromboembolism and prolonged prophylaxis of recurrent events. For patients on chronic treatment with vitamin-K antagonists (VKA) we analysed the motivation and willingness to change the anticoagulation from VKA to new oral anticoagulants. Patients (n=110) on stable treatment with VKA for at least 3 months (indication for anticoagulation: atrial fibrillation or VTE) completed a validated personality inventory (Freiburger Persönlichkeitsinventar FPI-R), and a self-developed questionnaire on general attitudes regarding anticoagulant therapy (Q1). Patients were divided in two groups according to the reply to the question weather they were willing to switch to a new oral anticoagulant. Out of these sets of questions 7 questions were identified by means of a logistic regression analysis for the willingness to change anticoagulation with VKA to a new oral anticoagulant. The same patients completed this shortened questionnaire (Q2) (n=85) thereafter. Logistic regression analysis defined the 7 items of the FPI and Q1 questionaires as relevant for willingness of patients to change the medication. The probability to change medication was 98% using the 7 questions (Q2) compared to the 2 comlete questionnaires. The items were: extraversion – introversion scale on the FPI-R consisting of 14 questions, and from Q1: hope for a better quality of life with a new anticoagulant, no scepticism for new drugs, wish of a lack of routine monitoring for dose adjustment, relevance of the practitioners opinion, thoughts in the past of alternatives for anticoagulation, and difficulty to adjust the prothrombin time. Using Q2 85% of patients confirmed to be willing to change the anticoagulant drug compared to Q1 (chi square test p<0.0001). Seven questions were identified and confirmed to identify patients for their willingness to change anticoagulation from VKA to a new oral anticoagulant. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Oral Anticoagulants in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (7) ◽  
pp. 2066-2075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Van Ganse ◽  
Nicolas Danchin ◽  
Isabelle Mahé ◽  
Olivier Hanon ◽  
Flore Jacoud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Large Population ◽  
National Health System ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Safety Effectiveness

Background and Purpose: The effects of direct oral anticoagulants in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation should be assessed in actual conditions of use. France has near-universal healthcare coverage with a unified healthcare information system, allowing large population-based analyses. NAXOS (Evaluation of Apixaban in Stroke and Systemic Embolism Prevention in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation) aimed to compare the safety, effectiveness, and mortality of apixaban with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), rivaroxaban, and dabigatran, in oral anticoagulant-naive patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Methods: This was an observational study using French National Health System claims data and including all adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who initiated oral anticoagulant between 2014 and 2016. Outcomes of interest were major bleeding events leading to hospitalization (safety), stroke and systemic thromboembolic events (effectiveness), and all-cause mortality. Four approaches were used for comparative analyses: matching on propensity score (PS; 1:n); as a sensitivity analysis, matching on high-dimensional PS; adjustment on PS; and adjustment on known confounders. For each outcome, cumulative incidence rates accounting for competing risks of death were estimated. Results: Overall, 321 501 patients were analyzed, of whom 35.0%, 27.2%, 31.1%, and 6.6% initiated VKAs, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran, respectively. Apixaban was associated with a lower PS–matched risk of major bleeding compared with VKAs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43 [95% CI, 0.40–0.46]) and rivaroxaban (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.63–0.72]), but not dabigatran (HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.81–1.08]). Apixaban was associated with a lower risk of stroke and systemic thromboembolic event compared with VKAs (HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.56–0.65]), but not rivaroxaban (HR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.97–1.15]) or dabigatran (HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.78–1.11]). All-cause mortality was lower with apixaban than with VKAs, but not lower than with rivaroxaban or dabigatran. Conclusions: Apixaban was associated with superior safety, effectiveness, and lower mortality than VKAs; with superior safety than rivaroxaban and similar safety to dabigatran; and with similar effectiveness when compared with rivaroxaban or dabigatran. These observational data suggest potentially important differences in outcomes between direct oral anticoagulants, which should be explored in randomized trials.

scholarly journals Oral anticoagulants for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in frail elderly patients: insights from the ARISTOPHANES study

2020 ◽  
Vol 289 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Y. H. Lip ◽  
A. V. Keshishian ◽  
A. L. Kang ◽  
A. D. Dhamane ◽  
X. Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Frail Elderly ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Oral anticoagulation improves survival in very elderly Chinese patients with atrial fibrillation: A report from the Optimal Thromboprophylaxis in Elderly Chinese Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (ChiOTEAF) registry

2021 ◽  
pp. 174749302110467
Author(s):  
Yutao Guo ◽  
Agnieszka Kotalczyk ◽  
Jacopo F Imberti ◽  
Yutang Wang ◽  
Gregory YH Lip ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Very Elderly ◽  
Elderly Chinese ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
The Impact ◽  
New Onset

Background Advancing age is a major risk factor for ischemic stroke in atrial fibrillation. We aimed to evaluate the predictors of all-cause death/any thromboembolism and the impact of oral anticoagulant on clinical outcomes in very elderly (≥85 years) Chinese atrial fibrillation patients. Methods The ChiOTEAF is a prospective registry proceeded in 44 sites from 20 provinces in China between October 2014 and December 2018. Outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality, any thromboembolism, major bleeding, and new onset/worsening heart failure. Results The eligible cohort for this analysis included 6416 patients and 1215 (18.9%) patients were aged ≥85 years. Only 320 (26.4%) very elderly patients were treated with oral anticoagulant, of whom 205 (64.1%) received non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, while antiplatelet therapy was used among 642 (53.1%) very elderly patients. On multivariate analysis, the use of oral anticoagulant was an independent predictor of a lower risk of the composite outcome (OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.32–0.66) and all-cause death (OR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.32–0.69) among these very elderly atrial fibrillation patients. Conclusions Advanced age should not be a reason to withhold oral anticoagulant, since the use of oral anticoagulants is safe and improves survival.

Comparing Warfarin and 4 Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Risk of Dementia in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
So-Ryoung Lee ◽  
Eue-Keun Choi ◽  
Sang-Hyun Park ◽  
Jin-Hyung Jung ◽  
Kyung-Do Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vascular Dementia ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Weighting Method ◽  
Alzheimer Dementia

Background and Purpose: Atrial fibrillation is a risk factor for dementia, and oral anticoagulant use is associated with a decreased risk of dementia in patients with atrial fibrillation. We aimed to investigate whether the risk of dementia would be different between patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with those with warfarin. Methods: Using the Korean nationwide claims database from January 2014 to December 2017, we identified oral anticoagulant–naive nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients aged ≥40 years. For the comparisons, warfarin and DOAC groups were balanced using the inverse probability of treatment weighting method. The primary outcome was incident dementia. Results: Among 72 846 of total study patients, 25 948 were treated with warfarin, and 46 898 were treated with DOAC (17 193 with rivaroxaban, 9882 with dabigatran, 11 992 with apixaban, and 7831 with edoxaban). During mean 1.3±1.1 years of follow-up, crude incidence of dementia was 4.87 per 100 person-years (1.20 per 100 person-years for vascular dementia and 3.30 per 100 person-years for Alzheimer dementia). Compared with warfarin, DOAC showed a comparable risks of dementia, vascular dementia, and Alzheimer dementia. In subgroup analyses, DOAC was associated with a lower risk of dementia than warfarin, particularly in patients aged 65 to 74 years (hazard ratio, 0.815 [95% CI, 0.709–0.936]) and in patients with prior stroke (hazard ratio, 0.891 [95% CI, 0.820–0.968]). When comparing individual DOACs with warfarin, edoxaban was associated with a lower risk of dementia (hazard ratio, 0.830 [95% CI, 0.740–0.931]). Conclusions: In this large Asian population with atrial fibrillation, DOAC showed a comparable risk of dementia with warfarin overall. DOACs appeared more beneficial than warfarin, in those aged 65 to 74 years or with a history of stroke. For specific DOACs, only edoxaban was associated with a lower risk of dementia than warfarin.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document