scholarly journals The Relationship Between Learning Styles with Learning Outcome and Scientific Literacy of Islamic Junior High School (MTs) Students in Mataram

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Siti Syifa’un Nufus ◽  
Gito Hadiprayitno ◽  
A Wahab Jufri
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Scientific Literacy ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Outcome ◽  
Effect Analysis ◽  
The Relationship

Learning style is one of the important elements in the learning process of students. Information about student learning styles will help teachers design appropriate learning so that students can more easily absorb, organize, and process information during the learning process. Learning in accordance with the character of students in the class will create joyful learning and influences student learning outcomes and abilities, including scientific literacy. This study aims to investigate the relationship between learning styles with student learning outcomes and scientific literacy. This research is descriptive-experimental research. The population of this study was MTs students in Mataram and the subjects of this study were 55 students. In order to determine the tendency of student learning styles, the VARK learning style questionnaire (Visual, Auditory, Read/Write, and Kinesthetic) was developed. In order to assess the scientific literacy that consisted of scientific literacy multiple-choice test and to assess the learning outcome, the final score was employed. Analysis of the relationship between learning styles and the scientific literacy using bivariate correlation, while the effect analysis of learning styles on learning outcomes and scientific literacy using MANOVA and effect analysis of students' scientific literacy on learning outcomes using ANACOVA. The results of the study indicated that the trend of auditory and kinesthetic learning styles correlated significantly with students' scientific literacy (p <0.05), whereas visual and reading/writing learning styles did not significantly correlate (p> 0.05). The type of learning styles does not have a different effect on student learning outcomes and scientific literacy, but scientific literacy has a significant influence on learning outcomes (p <0.05).

scholarly journals ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS DAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA PADA PEMBELAJARAN BIOLOGI DI KELAS X MADRASAH ALIYAH NEGERI 1 MEDAN

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nova Yunita Manik ◽  
Zulkifli Simatupang
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Learning Outcome ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Range Limit ◽  
Student Learning Outcome ◽  
The Relationship

                This research aims to determine how critical thinking skills and student learning outcome in biology subject (Ecosystem Chapter) and how the relationship between both of them in 1st Grade Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 1 Medan Learning Year 2015/2016. The population in this study is all of 1st grade student in Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 1 Medan Learning Year 2015/2016 totaling 390 student. The sampel method is purposive sampling with a sample 40 student. This research is a descriptive study, with a instrument (questionnaire) totaling 31 item about critical thinking skills and 36 item about student learning outcome with data collecting tools. From the analysis of student critical thinking data are categorized enough with 61-76 range limit by 22 student (55%) and student learning outcomes are also categorized enough with (62-77) range limit by 19 students (47,5%). Base on data requirement test known that there is a siqnificant positive relationship between critical thinking with student learning outcomes, but it have low correlation shown by the correlation coefficient percentage where the contribution percentage of 0,014% for critical thinking with student learning outcomes.Keywords:  Critical Thinking, Learning Outcomes, Ecosystem

scholarly journals Pengaruh strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, sarana praktik, dan media terhadap hasil belajar patiseri SMK se-Gerbangkertasusila

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 88
Author(s):  
Siti Nurul Aini ◽  
Putu Sudira
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Instructional Media

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan pengaruh strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar peserta didik, sarana praktik, dan media pembelajaran terhadap hasil belajar Patiseri di SMK SeGerbangkertasusila. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian expostfacto yang bertujuan untuk menjelaskan pengaruh strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar peserta didik, sarana praktik, dan media pembelajaran terhadap hasil belajar Patiseri di SMK Se- Gerbangkertasusila.. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di SMK Se-Gerbangkertasusila yang mempunyai program studi patiseri. Sampel penelitian ini sebanyak 337 siswa. Pengumpulan data melalui angket. Analisa data yang digunakan adalah analisi regresi dan korelasi dengan taraf kesalahan 0,05. Hasil penelitian ini adalah sebagai berikut. 1) Sebanyak 51,04% siswa berpendapat bahwa strategi pembelajaran di SMK Se-Gerbangkertasusila berkategori sedang; 65,58% siswa memiliki gaya belajar berkategori sedang; 53,71% siswa berpendapat bahwa sarana praktik berkategori sedang, 47,18% siswa berpendapat bahwa media pembelajaran berkategori sedang; dan 62,31% siswa memiliki nilai di rapor berkategori sangat tinggi. 2)Ada pengaruh positif dan signifikan antara strategi pembelajaran terhadap hasil belajar mereka (rx1y = 0,735; p< 0,005); ada pengaruh positif dan signifikan antara gaya belajar siswa terhadap hasil belajar(rx2y = 0,567; p< 0,005); terdapat pengaruh positif dan signifikan antara sarana praktik terhadap hasil belajar rx3y = 0,222; p< 0,005); terdapat pengaruh positif dan signifikan antara media pembelajaran terhadap hasil belajar (rx4y = 0,735; p< 0,005); terdapat pengaruh positif dan signifikan secara bersama-sama antara strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, sarana praktik, dan media pembelajaran terhadap hasil belajar (rx1,x2,x3,x4,y = 0,749; p< 0,005). THE EFFECT OF STUDENT’S LEARNING STRATEGIES, LEARNING STYLES, PRACTICE FACILITIES, AND MEDIA ON LEARNING OUTCOMES OF VOCATIONAL PASTRY AND BAKERY IN GERBANGKERTASUSILAAbstractThis study aimed to describe the effect of student’s learning strategies, learning styles , practice facilities, and instructional media on learning outcomes in vocational pastry and bakery in Gerbangkertasusila.This research is expostfacto research to describe effect of student’s learning strategies, learning styles , practice facilities, and instructional media on learning outcomes in vocational pastry and bakery in Gerbangkertasusila.. This research was conducted at SMK Gerbangkertasusila having patiseridepartment. The sample was 337 students establised using a questionnairetechnique. The data were collected through questionnaires. Data analyze using correlation and regretation with correction 0,05. The results of the study are as follows :1) As many as 51.04 % of students found learning strategies in SMK Gerbangkertasusila being in a fair category; 65.58 % students have a moderate learning style category, 53.71 % of students found the practicum facilitiesbeing in afaircategory; 47.18 % of students found the instructional media being in afaircategory and 62.31 % of students have veryhigh grades in their report books.2) There is a positive and significant correlation between the learning strategies on student learning outcomes in patiseriCatering Skills Program SMK Gerbangkertasusila (rx1y = 0.735, p < 0.005); there a positive and significant correlation between students’ learning styles on learning their outcomes (rx2y = 0.567, p < 0.005), there is a positive and significant correlation between the practicum facilities on students learning outcomes (rx3y = 0.222 , p < 0.005), there is a positive and significant correlation between instructional media on the students’ learning outcomes (rx4y = 0.735, p < 0.005), there is a positive and significant effect oflearning strategies, learning styles, practicum facilities, and instructional media in aggregate on the students’ learning outcomes (rx1,x2,x3,x4,y = 0.749, p < 0.005).

scholarly journals Relationship Between Learning Style With Student Learning Outcomes on Structure and Function of Plants

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-105
Author(s):  
Elma Nur Hidayati ◽  
Ara Hidayat ◽  
Ukit Ukit
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Structure And Function ◽  
Correlation Test ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
And Function

Learning styles can make students learn easily, fun, meaningfully that will improve their learning outcomes. This study aimed to determine the correlation between learning styles and student’s learning outcomes in online learning about structure and function of plant. The correlation test method was used and samples were chosen using simple random sampling, consisting of 68 students in class VIII SMPN 2 Pangkalpinang. The data were collected using interview, questionnaire, documentation methods, and analyzed by Pearson product moment correlation test. The results showed that about 72% students in class VIII SMPN 2 Pangkalpinang tended to have a visual learning style and 75% with completed learning-outcomes. The correlation test indicated that there was no significant relationship between learning styles and their learning outcomes, by evidence and determination value of 0.111 more than 0.05 and 3.8% simultaneously. There is no correlation between learning styles and learning outcomes, presumably because learning styles only contribute 3.8% in which other 96.2% were determined by other factors such as teacher motivation and teaching strategies. However, although there is no correlation, learning styles still contribute to student’s learning success. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct further research related to other factors that may affect student learning outcomes.

scholarly journals Konsep Dasar Belajar di SDIT Cendikia

AS-SABIQUN ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Nurhaeniah Nurhaeniah ◽  
Nurul Maspupah
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Student Evaluations ◽  
Qualitative Approach ◽  
Learning Activities

The purpose of this study is to find out the meaning of learrning, this study uses a qualitative approach, tjhen the instruments used are observation and documention of learning activities in class.the results of the analysis of student learning are obtained i the cognitive shutter which is the value of student evaluations when working on evaluation questions given by the teacher when the learning process takes place. The results of this study can be used SDIT CENDIKIA to find out learning styles of student learning outcomes and can be used for consideration of schools and parents of students, especially those in grades V and VI.

PENGARUH PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAMDI MADRASAH TSANAWIYAH MESRAKOTA PEMATANGSIANTAR

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Mul Iadi
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Scientific Approach

<p>The purpose of this study was to find out: (1) differences in Akidah<br />Akhlak learning outcomes of students taught with scientific approaches<br />with students taught with contextual approaches, (2) differences in<br />learning outcomes Akidah Akhlak students who have visual, auditory and<br />kinesthetic learning styles, and (3) the influence of the scientific approach<br />and student learning styles on the learning outcomes of Akidah Akhlak.<br />This research method is quasi-experimental with the population of this<br />study are students of class VII (Seven). The sample was chosen into two<br />classes with cluster random sampling technique, in this case selected for<br />the experimental class with a scientific approach is class VIIa with the<br />number of students 31, while for the control class that is the contextual<br />approach is class VIId with the number of students 34. Instruments of data<br />collection is a questionnaire and test of learning outcomes. The technique<br />by analysis of variance (Anava) at "α" = 0.05. The results of this study are:<br />(1) student learning outcomes taught with scientific approach (= 33.5)<br />higher than student learning outcomes taught with contextual approaches<br />(= 28,7), with Fcount = 68,10&gt; Ftable = 3.988 , (2) student learning<br />outcomes with visual learning style (= 34.21) higher than student learning <br />outcomes with kinesthetic learning styles (= 28.38) and auditory learning <br />styles (= 27.69), with Fcount = 79,32 &gt; Ftable = 3.988. And (3) there is an<br />interaction between learning strategies and learning styles towards<br />learning outcomes with statistical calculations known F count = 30,16&gt;<br />Ftable = 3.988. Further test calculations using the Scheffe test also showed<br />a significant difference between student learning outcomes taught by the<br />scientific approach and the contextual approach (CTL) as well as student<br />learning outcomes with visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles.</p>

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF DAN GAYA BELAJAR MAHASISWA TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PENGANTAR BISNIS

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 146
Author(s):  
Mendarissan Aritonang ◽  
Abdul Hamid K ◽  
Julaga Situmorang
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui: (1) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TST lebih tinggi daripada kooperatif tipe NHT. (2) hasil belajar  pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis dan pragmatis. (3) interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  terhadap hasil belajar pengantar bisnis. Penelitian dilaksanakan di Universitas Methodist Indonesia. Populasi 180 orang, dengan cluster random sampling berjumlah 80 orang yang terdiri dari 40 orang kelas A dan B. Metode penelitian kuasi eksperimen, desain faktorial 2 x 2. Uji statistik dengan statistik deskriptif, dilanjutkan dengan statistik inferensial ANAVA dua jalur dengan taraf signifikan α = 0,05 dilanjutkan uji Scheffe. Sebelumnya dilakukan uji persyaratan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TSTS lebih tinggi dari pada kooperatif tipe NHT; (2) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis lebih tinggi dari pada gaya belajar pragmatis; (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar mahasiswa. Hipotesis ini menunjukkan bahwa model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TSTS lebih tepat dari pada model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa, dan mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis akan memperoleh hasil yang lebih baik dari pada mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis pembelajaran yang tepat digunakan adalah strategi pembelajaran Direct Instructional.            Kata Kunci: pengantar bisnis, kooperatif tipe TST, NHT, gaya belajar Abstract: The purpose of this study is to find out: (1) the results of introductory business learning of students taught with the cooperative learning model of the TST type are higher than that of the NHT cooperative type. (2) introductory student learning outcomes that have theoretical and pragmatic learning styles. (3) the interaction between cooperative learning models and learning styles on introductory business learning outcomes. The research was conducted at Methodist University in Indonesia. A population of 180 people, with a cluster random sampling of 80 people consisting of 40 people class A and B. Quasi-experimental research methods, factorial design 2 x 2. Statistical tests with descriptive statistics, followed by inferential statistics two-way ANOVA with a significant level α = 0.05 continued with the Scheffe test. Previously performed requirements testing. The results showed: (1) the results of introductory business learning of students taught with the cooperative learning model of the TSTS type were higher than that of the NHT type of cooperative; (2) the introductory learning outcomes of business students who have higher theoretical learning styles than pragmatic learning styles; (3) there is an interaction between cooperative learning models and learning styles in influencing student learning outcomes. This hypothesis shows that the TSTS type of cooperative learning model is more appropriate than the NHT type of cooperative learning model in improving student business introductory learning outcomes, and students who have a theoretical learning style will get better results than students who have appropriate pragmatic learning styles of learning used is the Direct Instructional learning strategy. Keywords: business introduction, cooperative TST type, NHT, learning style

scholarly journals Implementasi Problem Based Learning (PBL) menggunakan Virtual Dan Real Lab Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 58
Author(s):  
JUBELLI SIANTURI ◽  
FREEDY TUA MUSA PANGGABEAN
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Significant Interaction ◽  
Interaction Analysis ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Factor B ◽  
Virtual Lab ◽  
Student Learning Style

This study aims: (1) To find out the differences in learning outcomes of students who are taught using virtual and real lab; (2) To find out the correlation between learning styles with student learning outcomes by applying PBL models using virtual and real lab; (3) To find out the interaction between class and student learning style on student learning outcomes. Analysis results: (1) differences in student learning outcomes by applying PBL using a virtual lab (78.269 ± 9,994) and real lab (70.96 ± 8.834) where t-test (2.794) and sig 0.007 <0.05 are obtained; (2) There is a very significant relationship between the two variables in the experimental class-I and II, which obtained a correlation value of 1 (sig. 0,000 <0.05); (3) There are interactions between classes using virtual and real labs and student learning styles on student learning outcomes. Interaction analysis obtained results between columns (A) Fhit 58,480> F table 3.20 (sig 0,000 <0.05) means that factor A is real; inter-row results (B) Fhit of 0.070 <F table 4.05 (sig 0.932> 0.05) means that the factor B is not significant; interaction results (AB) Fhit of 86.41> F table 3.20 (sig 0.000 <0.05) means that the real AB factor

scholarly journals The Effect of Learning Method Schoology Applications and Learning Style on Student Learning Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 113-119
Author(s):  
Anna Angela Sitinjak
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Study Program ◽  
Student Learning Styles

This type of research is a quasi-experimental research. The purpose of this study is to determine whether student learning outcomes with the LMS method (using Schoology) are higher than conventional and whether there is an interaction between learning methods with student learning styles. The population of this study were all students of the mechanical engineering study program at the PTKI campus Medan. The sampling technique used was cluster random sampling. The control class and experimental class selected each consisted of 20 people. The instrument used to measure students' mathematical achievement is the essay-test. The instrument used to measure student learning styles is a questionnaire. The normality test used is the Lilliefor test and homogeneity test using the Fisher test. Then the ANOVA test was performed with a significance level of 0.05. The results showed that students who were taught using Schoology had high learning outcomes compared to conventional learning and visual learning styles were highest in learning outcomes than other learning styles. But learning styles and learning methods don't have interactions. For further research, it can be done with different learning models and adding other variables to see the readiness of our human resources in facing the industrial world.

scholarly journals PENGARUH PENGGUNAAN MEDIA PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS ICT DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR IPA DAN KETERAMPILAN BERTANYA SISWA SD NEGERI 060798 MEDAN AREA

JURNAL CURERE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Siti Zahara Harahap ◽  
Ulfah Sari Rezeki
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Science Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Quasi Experimental

This research aims to find out: (1) Differences in student learning outcomes taught using Camtasia media with conventional media; (2) Differences in student learning outcomes that have visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles taught by Camtasia media; and (3) Differences in student learning outcomes that have visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles that are learned with conventional media. The population in this study was grade V students of SD Negeri 060798 Medan Area, amounting to 82 students consisting of 3 classes. While the study sample is all 3 classes. The research instrument was in the form of a science learning outcomes test, and a learning style questionnaire. This research method is quasi-experimental hypothesis analysis technique t test; and analysis of variance. The results showed that: (1) Student learning outcomes taught with Media Camtasia 85.26 ± 5.45 (± SD) were higher than learning with conventional media 75.52 ± 5.86 (tcount = 8.147; p = 0.000); (2) There are differences in student learning outcomes that have visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles that are learned with Media Camtasia (Fcount = 24,964; p = 0,000); (5) there are differences in student learning outcomes that have visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles that are learned with Conventional media (Fcount = 6.770; p = 0.002).

scholarly journals Penerapan pembelajaran matematika realistik pada mata kuliah matematika II ditinjau dari gaya belajar mahasiswa Teknik Sipil

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
Bq. Malikah Hr ◽  
Sukandi Sukandi ◽  
Ni Putu Ety Lismaya Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Realistic Mathematics

The research aims to know the effect of realistic mathematics learning in mathematics-II courses seen from the learning styles of Civil Engineering students. This type of research uses a quasi-experimental with a 2 x 3 factorial design. The sample consists of 30 second-semester students of Civil Engineering of Mandalika university of Education. The instruments in the research were a learning style questionnaire and an essay test that contained questions for mathematics II courses. The test of data analysis using two-way analysis of variance. The results showed that the learning method and learning style had a significant effect on student learning outcomes in mathematics II courses. The influence of learning methods was 26.8% and the influence of student learning styles was 37.8%. Based on the marginal average, the average of students with realistic mathematics learning methods was 70.73 and the average of students with conventional methods was 65.93. In a class that was treated with realistic mathematics learning, the average of students with visual learning styles was 75.80, the average of students with auditory learning styles was 70.80 and the average of students with kinesthetic learning styles was 65.60. It was concluded that in mathematics II courses, the application of realistic mathematics learning was effective in improving student learning outcomes and students with visual learning styles had better learning outcomes than students with auditory and kinesthetic learning styles and students auditory learning styles had better learning outcomes than students with kinesthetic learning styles.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document