scholarly journals Analisis Penerapan Corporate Governance, Kualitas Audit dan Pengungkapan CSR Serta Ukuran Perusahaan terhadap Integritas Laporan Keuangan

Syntax Idea ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (9) ◽  
pp. 2179
Author(s):  
Ranti Nugraheni

The information presented in the financial statements (LK) is expected to have a high integrity value. To present financial statements with integrity, it is influenced by many factors, both external and internal to the company. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of internal control (audit committee) and external supervision (institutional ownership and external audit quality), disclosure of corporate social responsibility (CRS), firm size on the integrity of financial statements. The sample of this research is companies listed on the Stock Exchange for the manufacturing sector for 3 years from 2016 to 2018 with a purpose-based sampling method in data collection. This type of research is quantitative using secondary data and data analysis is carried out by multiple regression with SPSS 25 in data processing. The results of this study provide empirical evidence that institutional ownership, audit quality, and CSR disclosure have a positive and significant effect on the integrity of financial statements. While the size of the company and the audit committee have no significant effect on the integrity of the financial statements.

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. Press
Author(s):  
Jessyka Tridewi Purba ◽  
Husnah Nur Laela Ermaya ◽  
Ayunita Ajengtiyas

This study aims to examine the effect of Audit Committee, Independent Commissioner, Institutional Ownership, Managerial Ownership, Earnings Management to Related Party Transaction Disclosure. This type of research is quantitative reseacrh using secondary data of financial statements from manufacturing sector companies during 2016 to 2018 obtained from Indonesia Stock Exchange. The sampling technique that used is purposive sampling. The results showed that the Audit Committee, Independent Commissioners, Institutional Ownership, Managerial Ownership and Profit Management were able to influence the disclosure of related party transactions by 13%, while the remaining 87% were influenced by other variables outside this study. Partially, institutional ownership and managerial ownership significantly influence the disclosure of related party transactions. While the audit committee, independent commissioners and earnings management do not affect the disclosure of related party transactions.


Author(s):  
Mr Jombrik ◽  
Vika Alifta Tamami

This study aims to analyze the effect of institutional ownership and audit committee on audit quality with financial difficulties as a moderation. This research was conducted on Manufacturing Companies in the Consumer and Industrial Goods Sector Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for 2016-2020. The quantitative research method uses secondary data, namely the company's annual report that is the object of research. Analysis of the data used is logistic regression analysis. The results show that the direction of the influence of the institutional ownership variable on audit quality is positive, where institutional ownership has a significant effect on audit quality. Likewise, the direction of the impact of the audit committee on audit quality is positive but does not significantly affect audit quality. The results of the moderation show that Financial Distress can moderate institutional ownership in influencing audit quality. In contrast, after being moderated with the financial distress variable, the audit committee has a negative and significant direction, which means it can moderate the audit committee in influencing audit quality but in the opposite direction.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Erlinda Yulianata

This study examine the effect of institutional ownership, audit committee size, audit quality, and remuneration committee on disclosure of key management compensation. The population used in this study is the financial statements of all companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the period 2013-2017. The type of data used in this study is secondary data. The data analysis technique in this study is the logistic regression analyst. The results of this study show that audit committee size, audit quality, and remuneration committee have positive effects on disclosure of key management compensation. On the contrary, institutional ownership has no effect on the disclosure of key management compensation in the financial statements, Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh kepemilikan institusional, ukuran komite audit, kualitas audit, dan komite remunerasi terhadap pengungkapan kompensasi manajemen kunci. Populasi yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah laporan keuangan dari semua perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) periode tahun 2013-2017. Jenis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah data sekunder. Teknik analisis data pada penelitian ini adalah analis regresi logistik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan kepemilikan institusional tidak berpengaruh terhadap pengungkapan kompensasi manajemen kunci di laporan keuangan, ukuran komite audit berpengaruh positif terhadap pengungkapan kompensasi manajemen kunci di laporan keuangan, kualitas audit berpengaruh positif terhadap pengungkapan kompensasi manajemen kunci di laporan keuangan, dan komite remunerasi berpengaruh positif terhadap pengungkapan kompensasi manajemen kunci di laporan keuangan


2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 979-987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurleni Nurleni ◽  
Agus Bandang ◽  
Darmawati Darmawati ◽  
Amiruddin Amiruddin

PurposeThis study aims to analyze the effect of ownership structure that consists of managerial ownership and institutional ownership of the extensive of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure.Design/methodology/approachThe population in this study is manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI), as the manufacturing companies are considered to have great potential on environmental damage (Mathews, 2000). The selected sample were the companies which meet certain criteria (purposive sampling) which published the complete annual financial statements from 2011 to 2015. This study used an analysis method using partial least square (WarpPLS) to assess the effect of the structure of ownership consists of managerial ownership and institutional ownership on the extent of the CSR disclosure.FindingsThe results showed that there is a direct effect of a negative and significant correlation between managerial ownership on CSR disclosure, and there is a direct effect of a positive and significant correlation between institutional ownership on CSR disclosure.Originality/valueOriginality of this paper shows PLS (WarpPLS) that applied to determine the effect between variables managerial and institutional ownership on CSR disclosure. This research is collected data financial statements and annual reports of manufacturing companies obtained from the Indonesia Capital Market Reference Center (PRPM), which is located in the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX), which there has not been research by the methods and the same location.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ester Ayu Febriana ◽  
Abdul Halim ◽  
Ati Retna Sari

The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of elements of Corporate Governance (CG) on the extent of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) disclosure in banking companies listed on the IDX and identify the factors that influence companies to conduct disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). The elements of Corporate Governance in this study consist of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, audit committee, board of commissioners size, independent board of commissioners and audit quality. The results of the hypothesis test indicate that the Corporate Governance (GCG) variable significantly influences the disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) on banking companies listed on the IDX. These results can be proven by the results of hypothesis testing which results in Corporate Governance criteria consisting of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, audit committee, board of commissioners, independent board of commissioners and audit quality simultaneously having a significant effect on the disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in the company banking registered on the IDX. While partially only institutional ownership and audit quality do not significantly influence the disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in pharmaceutical sub-sector companies listed on the IDX.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 579-593
Author(s):  
Muhammad Fazil ◽  
Nadirsyah Nadirsyah

This study aims to investigate the effect of institutional ownership, managerial ownership, audit committee effectiveness, and audit quality both simultaneously and partially on the disclosures of key management compensation in financial statements. The test employed in this research is hypotheses while the data applied is secondary in the form of company financial and annual reports obtained from the official website of the Indonesia Stock Exchange and the official pages of each company that is analyzed using multiple linear regression analysis. The sampling method used is purposive sampling method with population of 61 companies listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange for the period 2015 until 2017 and sample of 41 companies. The results of this study indicate that institutional ownership, managerial ownership, audit committee effectiveness, and audit quality simultaneously have a significant and positive effect on the disclosures of key management compensation in financial statements. Furthermore, institutional ownership, audit committee effectiveness, and audit quality partially have a significant and positive effect for the  disclosure of key management compensation, while managerial ownership partially does not have a significant effect on the disclosures of key management compensation in financial statements


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 3720-3736
Author(s):  
Nada Pertiwi ◽  
Erinos NR

This study aims to determine the effect of audit committee quality, workload, audit rotation on audit quality in financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (idx) for the period 2016-2018. This research is a causative research. The population in this study are financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) for the period 2016-2018. By using purposive sampling method, obtained 107 companies as research samples. The type of data used is secondary data and multiple regression analysis is used. The results of this study indicate that the quality of the audit committee and audit rotation do not have a significant effect on financial quality, only workload has a significant effect on the financial statements


ETIKONOMI ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-96
Author(s):  
Uun Sunarsih ◽  
Kartika Oktaviani

This study aimed to examine the effect of good corporate Governance against tax avoidance peroxided by the book tax gap and corporate governance is peroxided by institutional ownership, managerial ownership, independent board, audit committee and audit quality. This study was performed on companies listed on the Stock Exchange on the observation period 2011-2014. The method used is purposive sampling and obtained a sample of 10 companies. The data used is secondary data that can be downloaded through www.idx.co.id and www.sahamok.com.  The results showed that the variables of the board of managerial ownership, independent directors, audit committee, and audit quality effect on tax avoidance while institutional ownership variable has no effect on tax avoidance. It is suspected that institutional ownership as a monitoring tool in any decision taken by the manager does not support an optimal oversight of management performance related to tax evasion.DOI: 10.15408/etk.v15i2.3541


Author(s):  
Fransisca Listyaningsih ◽  
Putri Renalita Sutra Tanjung

The purpose of this study is to analyze how much influence the board of commissioners, audit committee, institutional ownership, company size and leverage on tax avoidance on food and beverage sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The factors tested in this study are tax avoidance as the dependent variable while the size of the board of commissioners, audit committee, institutional ownership, firm size and leverage as independent variables. The sample of this study consisted of 15 food and beverage sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) and submitted financial statements consistently in the period 2012-2015. The data used in this study is secondary data and the selection of samples using purposive sampling method. The analytical tool used is multiple regression analysis to examine the effect of the size of the board of commissioners, audit committee, institutional ownership, company size and leverage on tax avoidance. KEYWORDS: Good Corporate Governance, Company Size, Leverage, Tax Avoidance.


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uun Sunarsih ◽  
Puput Handayani

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of corporate governance on tax avoidance in manufacturing companies listed on the Stock Exchange in 2012-2015. The method used was purposive sampling and obtained eleven companies. Secondary data is obtained through www.idx.co.id and www.sahamok.com. The results of this study indicate that institutional ownership has no effect, meaning that the small size of institutional ownership has not been able to become an effective monitoring tool in reducing tax avoidance. Managerial ownership has influence. This means that managerial ownership has effectively monitored the company. The independent board of directors is influential. This means that the proportion of independent commissioners has a good performance, which can reduce tax avoidance. The audit committee has no effect. This is possible because it is not able to increase supervision of management due to limited authority. Influential audit quality. This means that the company audited by KAP The Big Four will be more trusted by the tax authorities because it has high work integrity. Executive compensation has no effect. This is possible because of the high compensation received by the executive has not been able to bridge the difference of interests between shareholders and managers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document