scholarly journals Defects in the implementation of legal notification

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (4) ◽  
pp. 173-177
Author(s):  
Olesya Eremich
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Level I ◽  
Static Level

In the article, the concept of «defects in the implementation of legal notification» covers the negative aspects of being the subject of research. Among them are various kinds of defects, errors, etc., the process gaps and the result of the implementation of the legal notification of activities. An attempt was made to detect defects in legal notice both at the static level, i. e. within the limits of legal regulation, and in dynamics, at the stage of legal implementation, including law enforcement.

scholarly journals Use of intelligence tools of operational and search activities in pre-trial investigation

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (45) ◽  
pp. 105-112
Author(s):  
Oleh Tarasenko ◽  
Artem Shevchishen ◽  
Yurii Yermakov ◽  
Dmytro Mirkovets ◽  
Yaroslav Diakin
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Theoretical Method ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Search Activity ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Operational Activities ◽  
Legal Grounds

The purpose of the article is to determine the features and legal grounds for the use of tools of operational and search activities in the pre-trial investigation. Subject of research: The subject of research is covert investigative (search) actions and operational and search measures. Methodology: dialectical method, formal logic methods, logical and semantic method, system analysis method, theoretical method, normative and dogmatic method, legal modeling method. The results of the study: Distinguishing between investigation and search measures, we apply the following principle: if the object of operational activities is already known to law enforcement officers we are talking about search measures, if not – about investigation measures. Practical consequences: The possibility of legal regulation of the use of tools of operational and search activity at the stages of criminal proceedings is determined. Value / originality: It is concluded that the list of operational and search measures also includes those that have no analogues with the CISAs and therefore operational and search measures do not duplicate the CISAs, but perform the task of ensuring the possibility of fulfilling the investigator’s instructions to conduct the CISAs.

scholarly journals Jurisdiction over claims made against public-legal institutions

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Nikolay Basmanov ◽  
Andrei Vladimirovich Ilin
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Practical Importance ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Institutions ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Arbitration Procedure ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

This article discusses the question of territorial jurisdiction over claims made against public-legal institutions (Russian Federation, constituent entities of the Russian Federation, municipal formations). The subject of this research is the current procedural norms regulating the questions of jurisdiction, and the established law enforcement practice. Attention is turned to the existence of gaps in legal regulation of the question of jurisdiction over claims made against public-legal institutions in the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. The authors analyze the established approaches in law enforcement practice towards solution of the aforementioned problem. Methodological framework includes the comparative-legal method and such formal-logical methods, as analysis, synthesis and induction. The relevance and practical importance are substantiated by the subject of research – the law enforcement practice formed by the Russian judicial authorities over the recent years. The conclusion is made on the need for elimination of the existing gap in the normative-legal regulation by amending the current procedural legislation.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS ON THE DEFINITION OF THE SUBJECT OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL LAW

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Оlena Shtefan ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Judicial Reform ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Relationship

The subject of this article was one of the fundamental and debatable provisions of the doctrine of civil procedural law - its subject. The author on the basis of the analysis of scientific sources, the legislation carried out the retrospective analysis of formation and development of scientific thought concerning definition of a subject of civil procedural law. The paper identifies two main approaches to understanding the subject of the industry and elements of its structure. Analyzing the "narrow" approach to defining the subject of civil procedural law and certain areas of its coverage in the works of scholars, the author substantiates the position on the relationship between procedural activities and social relations that arise between the court and the parties. Particular attention is paid to the history of inclusion in the subject of civil procedural law enforcement proceedings. The author's position on the subject and system of civil procedural law is substantiated. The essence of the "broad" approach to the definition of the subject of the industry by including in its structure of non-jurisdictional forms of legal protection is revealed. The essence of two opposite tendencies in scientific researches concerning structure of a subject of civil procedural law is revealed: the first tendency is reduced to expansion of a subject at the expense of inclusion in it of economic procedural law, at ignoring independent character of this branch of law; the second - the narrowing of the subject of civil procedural law by removing from its structure of enforcement proceedings, the relations arising in the consideration of labor cases. The connection between the definition of the subject of civil procedural law and the jurisdiction of the court defined in the legislation is substantiated. It is proved that the tendency to narrow the subject of civil procedural law was embodied in the legislation of the country as a result of judicial reform in 2016, which led to conflicts in legislation and problems in law enforcement. Based on the theoretical model of determining the subject of legal regulation and using the analogy of determining its structure, the elements of the structure of the subject of civil procedural law are distinguished and its definition is formulated.

scholarly journals Mechanism of legal regulation and criminal legal impact: the ratio of doctrinal and practicaland implementation principles

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-14
Author(s):  
Vadim Avdeevich Avdeev ◽  
Olga Anatolievna Avdeeva
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Structural Elements ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Legislative Processes ◽  
Fundamental Direction ◽  
Scientific Rationale ◽  
Law Regulation

The subject of the research is the mechanism of criminal law regulation, taking into account international life implemented in the context of globalization and increasing the efficiency of the criminal law policy of the Russian Federation. The purpose of the study is to disclose the content, structural elements and stages of the mechanism of criminal law regulation. Attention focuses on the effectiveness of the mechanism of criminal law regulation, the methodological basis of which is formed by a combination of legal regulation on the basis of the doctrinal principles of law and practice and implementation activities. The main results of the research reflect the problems of implementation of the mechanism of criminal law regulation at the legislative and law enforcement levels. Conclusions are formulated regarding the structural elements and key stages of the implementation of the mechanism of criminal law regulation, including the scientific rationale for criminalization (decriminalization) and penalization (depenalization). Scientific and practical substantiation of criminal law policy and legislative processes, optimization of the implementation of criminal law are noted as a fundamental direction.

On Legal Nature and Classificatory Identity Standards of Law Enforcement Ethics

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Рафаиль Валиев ◽  
Rafail Valiev
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Problem Situation ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Forms ◽  
Enforcement Activity

Based on the problem situation conditioned by indeterminacy of institutional position of the standards of law enforcement ethics within the mechanism of contemporary law enforcement regulation, the author attempts to analyze the legal nature of the above standards. The study reveals that the legal nature of standards of law enforcement ethics is conditioned by the necessity to protect the identity of citizens and the law enforcement system itself from the negative impact produced by various forms of irregular conduct by subjects of law enforcement. As a result of comparing the standards of law enforcement ethics and the rules of law the author establishes that according to the technical-legal forms of their external expression and other attributes, as well as their regulatory potential, the standards of law enforcement ethics are comparable to the status of the rules of law. The study permits us to conclude that the standards of law enforcement ethics possess the classificatory identity typical of the protective rules of law represented by relations in the field of law enforcement activity. This identity is conditioned by the specificity of the subject of their regulation. The standards of law enforcement ethics are of subsidiary significance as they supplement and develop standards of status laws in matters of legal regulation of the moral aspect of the law enforcement activity.

scholarly journals Deprivation of the right to hold certain positions or engage in certain activities: regulatory issues and law enforcement practice

2021 ◽  
Vol 234 (11) ◽  
pp. 16-24
Author(s):  
SERGEY A. PICHUGIN ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Domestic Legislation ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right

The article is devoted to various aspects of the regulation and execution of punishment in the form of deprivation of the right to hold certain positions or engage in certain activities. The subject of the article is the norms of the current domestic legislation, data from official statistics of the Judicial Department at the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, as well as law enforcement practice on the topic under consideration. The purpose of the article is to analyze the normative regulation and practice of applying punishment in the form of deprivation of the right to hold certain positions or engage in certain activities. The methodological basis of the research is represented by a set of general and specific scientific methods. The work used methods such as analysis, synthesis, formal legal, statistical. As a result of the study, proposals were formulated to amend the current legislation in terms of improving preventive work with persons sentenced to punishment in the form of deprivation of the right to hold certain positions or engage in certain activities. Conclusions are made about the essence, features of legal regulation and law enforcement practice of the considered type of punishment in modern conditions, about the need to increase the effectiveness of preventive activities in relation to persons sentenced to punishment in the form of deprivation of the right to engage in activities related to driving a vehicle. Key words: deprivation of the right to hold certain positions or engage in certain activities, punishment, penal inspectorates, the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, convict, deprivation of the right to engage in activities related to driving.

scholarly journals Administrative prevention measures and issues of their administrative procedural application

2021 ◽  
pp. 116-124
Author(s):  
P. E. Spiridonov
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Preventive Measures ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Prevention Measures ◽  
Administrative Procedure ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

The subject of the study in this paper is administrative prevention measures and their variety, such as preventive measures. The purpose of the study is to analyze the nature of administrative prevention measures and their administrative procedure. The paper concludes that it is premature to talk about the existence of proceedings on the application of administrative prevention (preventive) measures, since the Russian Federation has not fully developed a system of administrative procedural rules governing this type of proceedings from the stage of initiating an administrative case to the stage of appeal. At the same time, taking into account the introduction of a risk- oriented approach in public administration, the need for the formation of this type of administrative proceedings increases. It is also suggested that the peculiarities of the legal regulation of the procedural procedure for the application of administrative prevention measures depend on two important conditions: (1) the effectiveness of the application of the relevant measure by law enforcement officials and their officials; (2) the ability to ensure respect for the rights and freedoms of a person and citizen in the existing procedure of application.

scholarly journals Claiming for recovery of funds and (or) property of others: search for legislative compromise and review of law enforcement practice

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. I. Uhrynovska
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Burden Of Proof ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Discretionary Power ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Court Of Appeal ◽  
Recovery Procedure

In the light of extremely low level of enforcement of court decisions in Ukraine, the formation of effective legal instruments of coercive judgment enforcement measures is getting particularly important. One of the most effective ways to protect the interests of the claimant, which increases the effectiveness of execution of a court decision of a property nature and expands the possibilities of enforcement proceedings, is to claim for recovery of money and (or) property of others. This legal institution allows the enforcement of money and (or) property of another person who is not a party to the enforcement proceedings, but either holds the property or has a debt to the debtor. The article describes the issue of legislative uncertainty of the procedural status of another person whose property and (or) funds are being recovered and formulates ways to resolve it. A number of collisions between the Civil and Commercial Procedural Codes and the Law of Ukraine “On Enforcement Proceedings” were revealed in terms of legal regulation of the institution of claim for recovery of property of others, in particular in terms of seizure of funds of a person in debt to the debtor. It is proposed to resolve the identified collisions in favor of procedural codes. The legal nature of the arrest, which is imposed on the money of another person in the recovery procedure, is determined. On the example of case law, the discretionary power of the court in considering claims for recovery of funds of a person who owes money to the debtor are analyzed, and the incompleteness of the legislative list of grounds for refusal to satisfy the application for recovery is stated. Attention is drawn to the imperfection of the procedural codes in terms of regulating the possibility to appeal to Court of Appeal and Court of Cassation judgements issued as a result of consideration of claims for recovery of funds of a person who has debts to the debtor. Through the prism of law enforcement practice, the subject of proof in the consideration of applications for recovery of funds of persons who have debts to the debtor and clarifies the distribution of the burden of proof in this category of cases.

scholarly journals On the development of the concept of neighborliness in the Russian housing Law

2021 ◽  
pp. 45-57
Author(s):  
Susana Arsenovna Kirakosyan ◽  
Pavel Sergeevich Odnachev
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Housing Policy ◽  
Common Property ◽  
Residential Building ◽  
Social Institution ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Housing Sector ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Law And Legislation

The subject of this research is the relevant although poorly studied issued of neighborly relations in the Russian housing law. The authors set the goal to analyze the current legal regulation of neighborly relations in the housing sector, and substantiate the need for the development of the concept of neighborliness in the Russian housing law and legislation. Such concept aims to form the culture of living in a multifamily residential building, overcome excessive individualism that cultivates complete disunity of interests and indifference of neighbors to each other and to the fate of common property.  The authors explore the problem of neighborly relations in the housing sector, viewing neighborship from two perspectives: as a social institution of the neighborhood community and as a behavioral standard of particular subjects – neighbors. The need for the development of the concept of neighborliness is substantiated. This fully corresponds to the historical path of development of neighborly relations in the housing sector and the objective pursued by the legislator –increase the responsibility and awareness of the housing owners. The concept of neighborliness is a product of the development of the doctrine and law enforcement practice in the sphere of neighborly relations, and should become a part of the new housing policy of the Russian Federation. The concept of neighborliness includes such elements, as objective, principles, functions, and boundaries of neighborliness.

INVALIDITY OF DECISIONS OF GENERAL MEETINGS OF SOCIETIES: ANALYSIS OF JUDICIAL PRACTICE

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oleg Pecheniy ◽  
◽  
Oksana Vartovnik ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
General Meeting ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Practical Application ◽  
Corporate Rights ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Subject

The article examines the activities of companies, their bodies, disputes, delves in connection with the exercise of corporate rights, holding a general meeting, making decisions, appealing to the courts, as well as compliance with rules relevant to the founders and participants of companies. Disputed situations on observance of the procedure of convening and holding a general meeting, their influence on decision-making, their legitimacy are studied. Violated corporate rights of the participant are protected by invalidating the decision of the general meeting as the highest body of society. The article identifies the problematic aspects of disputes over the invalidation of decisions of the general meeting of companies. Some grounds for invalidating the decisions of the general meeting of companies are analyzed, the shortcomings of their legislative regulation and the peculiarities of practical application by economic courts of various instances, especially the court of cassation, are revealed. The study conducted in the article contains an analysis and generalization of judicial practice in resolving corporate disputes, which revealed inconsistencies in the approaches of courts to law enforcement, taking into account the position of the Supreme Court, which allowed to develop recommendations for improving judicial practice. Ukrainian corporate law leaves room for finding new solutions and ideas for protection in corporate relations, despite the latest legislative novelties. The article outlines the ways of development of judicial practice using, in particular, comparative law, dialectical and applied methods. Thus, the basis for improving the legal regulation of this category of corporate disputes should be the experience of the existing case law of the Supreme Court. Emphasis is placed on such problematic issues as to who can be the subject when applying to the court for invalidation of the decision, respectively, what is the range of plaintiffs and defendants, cases are presented and analyzed in which the plaintiffs are not only members but also their successors (heirs) . Peculiarities of application of special statute of limitations to claims in case of invalidity of decisions of the general meeting, especially in the context of application of special statute of limitations to the relations which have arisen earlier are investigated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document