scholarly journals Sequence of therapy and survival in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
E. S. Tsang ◽  
J.M. Loree ◽  
C. Speers ◽  
H.F. Kennecke
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumours ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Somatostatin Analogues ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Primary Role ◽  
First Line ◽  
Optimal Sequence ◽  
Systemic Treatments ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours ◽  
Line Of Therapy

Background Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pnets) often present as advanced disease. The optimal sequence of therapy is unknown. Methods Sequential patients with advanced pnets referred to BC Cancer between 2000 and 2013 who received 1 or more treatment modalities were reviewed, and treatment patterns, progression-free survival (pfs), and overall survival (os) were characterized. Systemic treatments included chemotherapy, small-molecule therapy, and peptide receptor radiotherapy. Results In 66 cases of advanced pnets, median patient age was 61.2 years (25%–75% interquartile range: 50.8–66.2 years), and men constituted 47% of the group. First-line therapies were surgery (36%), chemotherapy (33%), and somatostatin analogues (32%). Compared with first-line systemic therapy, surgery in the first line was associated with increased pfs and os (20.6 months vs. 6.3 months and 100.3 months vs. 30.5 months respectively, p < 0.05). In 42 patients (64%) who received more than 1 line of therapy, no difference in os or pfs between second-line therapies was observed. Conclusions Our results confirm the primary role of surgery for advanced pnets. New systemic treatments will further increase options.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 126-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahad Alsadik ◽  
Siraj Yusuf ◽  
Adil AL-Nahhas
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Effective Treatment ◽  
Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumours ◽  
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Effective Treatment Option ◽  
Peptide Receptor ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours

Background: The incidence of pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours (pNETs) has increased considerably in the last few decades. The characteristic features of this tumour and the development of new investigative and therapeutic methods had a great impact on its management. Objective: The aim of this review is to investigate the outcome of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) in the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Methods: A comprehensive literature search strategy was used based on two databases (SCOPUS, and PubMed). We considered all studies published in English, evaluating the use of PRRT (177Luteciuim- DOTA-conjugated peptides and 90Yetrium- DOTA- conjugated peptides) in the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours as a standalone entity or as a subgroup within the wider category of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours (GEP NETs). Results: PRRT was found to be an effective treatment modality as a monotherapy or in combination with other therapies in the treatment of non-operable and metastatic pNETs where other options are limited. Complete response was reported to be between 2-6% while partial response was achieved in up to 60% of cases. Survival analysis was also impressive. Progression Free Survival (PFS) reached a mean of 34 months and Overall Survival (OS) of 53 months. PRRT also proved to improve patients’ Quality of Life (QoL). Acute and sub-acute side effects like nephrotoxicity and haematotoxicity are usually mild and reversible. Conclusion: PRRT is well tolerated and effective treatment option for non-operable and/or metastatic pNETs. Side effects are usually mild and reversible. Larger randomized controlled trails need to be done to compare PRRT with other treatment modalities and to provide more detailed guidelines regarding patient selections, the choice of PRRT, follow up and response assessment to maximum potential benefit.

Alkylating agent rechallenge in metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ophelie De Rycke ◽  
Thomas Walter ◽  
Marine Perrier ◽  
Olivia Hentic ◽  
Catherine Lombard-Bohas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumours ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Mgmt Expression ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours

A rechallenge is common after initial efficacy of alkylating-based chemotherapy (ALK) in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNET). High MGMT expression seems associated with lower response to ALK. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of ALK rechallenge in PanNET. Secondly, to assess the evolution of MGMT expression under ALK. All consecutive patients with advanced PanNETs who received initial ALK (achieving tumor control) followed by a pause > 3 months, then an ALK rechallenge (ALK2) upon progression were retrospectively studied (Cohort A). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival under ALK2 (PFS2). The MGMT expression was retrospectively assessed by immunohistochemistry (H-score) in consecutive PanNET surgically resected following ALK (Cohort B). We foud that cohort A included 62 patients (median Ki67 8%), for which ALK1 followed by pause achieved an objective response rate of 55%, and a PFS1 of 23.7 months (95% IC, 19.8-27.6). ALK2 achieved no objective response, and stability in 62% of patients. The median PFS2 was 9.2 months (IC 95% 7.1-11.3). At multivariable analysis, a hormonal syndrome (p=0.032) and a pause longer than 12 months (p=0.041) were associated with a longer PFS2. In the cohort B (17 patients), the median MGMT H-score increased from 45 (IQR 18-105) before ALK, to 100 (IQR 56-180) after ALK (p=0.003). We conclude that after initial efficacy of ALK treatment, a pause followed by ALK rechallenge might be appropriate to prolong tumor control, improve quality of life and limit long-term adverse events. Increased MGMT expression under ALK might explain low efficacy of ALK rechallenge.

[177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE Versus Standard of Care in Adult Patients With Gastro-Enteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours (GEP-NETS): A Cost-Consequence Analysis From an Italian Hospital Perspective

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Spada ◽  
Davide Campana ◽  
Giuseppe Lamberti ◽  
Riccardo Laudicella ◽  
Renato Dellamano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumours ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Somatostatin Analogues ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Hospital Perspective ◽  
Cost Consequence

Abstract Purpose To assess and compare clinical outcomes and costs, to the Italian healthcare system, of three therapeutic options approved in the management of adult patients with gastro-enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs). Methods We compared the efficacy, safety and costs of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE, everolimus (both originator and generic products) and sunitinib in patients with advanced GEP-NETs (NET G1 and G2) that had progressed following treatment with somatostatin analogues (SSAs). A cost-consequence model was developed and validated by a panel of clinical experts from three NET reference centres in Italy. The clinical outcomes included in the model were median progression-free survival and the incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs), as reported in pivotal clinical trials. The costs for acquisition and administration of each treatment, and of managing AEs, were calculated from the perspective of the Italian national health service. Treatment costs per progression-free month were calculated separately for patients with NETs of pancreatic (PanNETs; all three treatments) and gastrointestinal (GI-NETs; [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE and everolimus only) origin. Results In patients with PanNETs, total costs per progression-free month were €2989 for [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE, €4975 for originator everolimus, €3472 for generic everolimus, and €5337 for sunitinib. In patients with GI-NETs, total costs per progression-free month were €3189 for [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE, €4990 for originator everolimus, and €3483 for generic everolimus. Conclusions [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE was associated with lower costs per progression-free month versus relevant treatment options in patients with GI-NETs or PanNETs (NET G1–G2; progressed following SSA treatment), although acquisition and administration costs are higher. These findings provide further economic arguments in the overall context of treatment decision making.

Pancreatic endocrine disorders and multiple endocrine neoplasia

2020 ◽  
pp. 2449-2463
Author(s):  
B. Khoo ◽  
T.M. Tan ◽  
S.R. Bloom
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumours ◽  
Mammalian Target Of Rapamycin ◽  
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy ◽  
Mtor Inhibitors ◽  
Somatostatin Analogues ◽  
Endocrine Disorders ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours ◽  
Islet Cell Tumours ◽  
Cancer Syndromes

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (islet-cell tumours) are rare and usually sporadic, but they may be associated with complex familial endocrine cancer syndromes. Recognized types of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours are those that are non-functioning (often advanced at diagnosis and presenting with mass effects due to the absence of symptoms attributable to hormone hypersecretion), insulinoma (the most frequent type), and others including gastrinoma, VIPoma, and glucagonoma. The following should be considered in addition to the symptomatic treatments: surgical resection—the only curative treatment, but not possible in many cases; tyrosine kinase inhibitors which inhibit specific kinases involved in tumour cell proliferation, growth, and angiogenesis; mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors; peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy (radiolabelled somatostatin analogues).

Metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors treated with somatostatin analogues: Ten years experience in a third level hospital in Mexico City.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 514-514
Author(s):  
Alberto Pimentel ◽  
Abdel Karim Dip Borunda ◽  
Luis Jonathan Bueno Rosario ◽  
Gloria Martinez Martinez ◽  
Miguel Angel Pluma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Symptom Control ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Somatostatin Analogues ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Common Symptom ◽  
First Line ◽  
Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Long Acting

514 Background: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP NET´s) are infrequent tumors, with a variety of symptoms depending of the kind of peptide they secrete as well as the affected organs. Long acting somatostatin analogues have shown an adequate rate of symptom control in functional tumors, they also have demonstrated antiproliferative effect, which is translated in a significant improvement of progression free and overall survival Methods: In this retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic GEP NET treated with long acting somatostatin analogues as first line, treated between 2005 and 2015, we evaluated clinical and pathological features, symptoms, disease control and survival adjusted with OMS classification Results: Our cohort included 95 patients with a mean age of 53 years. Primary affected sites were midgut (29.4%), followed by pNET (17.%), stomach (14.7%), and primary unknown in 14%. 20% of cases were functional tumors with diarrhea as the most common symptom in 70% and flushing in 50%. Considering the whole cohort the most prevalent symptom was abdominal pain in the 50% of cases. The OMS classification showed low grade tumors in 65% and 35% intermediate grade. Most common metastatic organ sites were; liver only 35%, liver and other 30%, peritoneum 10% and lymph nodes in 6%, non-specified sites in 19%. Somatostatine analogues used in first line were octreotide in 80% and lanreotide in 20%. Survival results demonstrated a progression free survival for the whole cohort of 84months. No differences between lanreotide and octreotide were observed. Conclusions: This study represents the first Mexican cohort of patients with GEP NET’s treated with somatostatin analogues with a long follow up.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a critical review of the literature

2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 943-953 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Gadducci ◽  
P. F. Conte
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Response Rate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Small Subset ◽  
First Line ◽  
Initial Surgery ◽  
Systemic Treatments

The use of intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy has been advocated in different settings of patients with ovarian cancer. Cisplatin is the drug of choice because of its high response rate and minimal local toxicity. This treatment can be given to women with small residual disease after second look, with surgically assessed complete response rates of approximately 30%, and with a prolonged survival in small subset of patients. However, the use of IP chemotherapy as consolidation treatment of pathologically complete responders after first-line systemic chemotherapy has not been definitively evaluated in a phase III trial. There is much debate in the literature both for and against the use of IP chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of optimally debulked ovarian cancer patients. The recent Cochrane meta-analyses of eight randomized trials enrolling 1819 patients has shown that first-line IP chemotherapy improves progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with minimal residual disease after initial surgery. However, the potential for catheter-related complications, abdominal pain with infusion, and toxicities needs to be taken into consideration for decision making in each individual woman. Rectosigmoidal surgery can be associated with gross contamination of the operative field, and in this case, the catheter placement should not be performed during primary surgery but should be delayed to 3 weeks later. Patients should be provided with information on the survival and toxicity for both IP and systemic treatments, as well as practical information about the administration of each regimen, so that they may be involved in the decision-making process

scholarly journals Metastatic Pheochromocytomas and Abdominal Paragangliomas

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Granberg ◽  
Carl Christofer Juhlin ◽  
Henrik Falhammar
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Potential ◽  
Somatostatin Analogues ◽  
Primary Treatment ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Biochemical Tests ◽  
Pubmed Database ◽  
Tumor Boards ◽  
131I Mibg

Abstract Context Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) are believed to harbor malignant potential; about 10% to 15% of pheochromocytomas and up to 50% of abdominal paragangliomas will exhibit metastatic behavior. Evidence Acquisition Extensive searches in the PubMed database with various combinations of the key words pheochromocytoma, paraganglioma, metastatic, malignant, diagnosis, pathology, genetic, and treatment were the basis for the present review. Data Synthesis To pinpoint metastatic potential in PPGLs is difficult, but nevertheless crucial for the individual patient to receive tailor-made follow-up and adjuvant treatment following primary surgery. A combination of histological workup and molecular predictive markers can possibly aid the clinicians in this aspect. Most patients with PPGLs have localized disease and may be cured by surgery. Plasma metanephrines are the main biochemical tests. Genetic testing is important, both for counseling and prognostic estimation. Apart from computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, molecular imaging using 68Ga-DOTATOC/DOTATATE should be performed. 123I-MIBG scintigraphy may be performed to determine whether 131I-MIBG therapy is a possible option. As first-line treatment in patients with metastatic disease, 177Lu-DOTATATE or 131I-MIBG is recommended, depending on which shows best expression. In patients with very low proliferative activity, watch-and-wait or primary treatment with long-acting somatostatin analogues may be considered. As second-line treatment, or first-line in patients with high proliferative rate, chemotherapy with temozolomide or cyclophosphamide + vincristine + dacarbazine is the therapy of choice. Other therapies, including sunitinib, cabozantinib, everolimus, and PD-1/PDL-1 inhibitors, have shown modest effect. Conclusions Metastatic PPGLs need individualized management and should always be discussed in specialized and interdisciplinary tumor boards. Further studies and newer treatment modalities are urgently needed.

scholarly journals Efficacy of somatostatin analogues in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumours based on the results of recent clinical trials

2014 ◽  
Vol 155 (48) ◽  
pp. 1908-1912 ◽  
Author(s):  
Péter Igaz
Keyword(s):  
Tumour Growth ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumours ◽  
Hormone Secretion ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Symptomatic Treatment ◽  
Somatostatin Analogues ◽  
Inhibitory Effect ◽  
Inhibitory Effects ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Observations

Due to their inhibitory effects on hormone secretion, somatostatin analogues are of pivotal importance in the symptomatic treatment of hormone-secreting neuroendocrine tumours. Although several earlier clinical observations supported the view that these biological agents are capable of inhibiting the growth of neuroendocrine tumours, the PROMID study published in 2009 was the first to confirm the inhibitory effect of octreotide on tumour growth and demonstrated the prolongation of progression free survival. These findings have been confirmed and extended by the most recent CLARINET trial with lanreotide published in 2014. Somatostatin analogues are capable of inhibiting tumour growth and stabilizing disease irrespective of the hormonal activity of the tumour and, therefore, their applicability is expected to be extended to the treatment of hormonally inactive neuroendocrine tumours, as well. Orv. Hetil., 2014, 155(48), 1908–1912.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document